In the US today the one political party represents "CRAZY" and one party represents "NORMAL" (Poll)

[protectionist]

You retard, post #529 demonstrates exactly what Bobob said. You're the one who can't type in coherent English and who knows not of what he speaks.

You suffering an epileptic fit while you posted that?

Had surgery today. Try it sometime.

 

[protectionist]

You suffering an epileptic fit while you posted that?

I had just returned from surgery when i posted it. Try it sometime.

And I informed you of that in Post # 1433, in the thread below, an hour before you posted this

post. So don't ask questions you should already know the answer to.

BREAKING: Trump To Be Arrested Next Week

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-16/trump-s-small-dollar-donors-fuel-19-million-first-quarter-haul#xj4y7vzkg Keep pulling the infiltrator weeds. Follow the money and pull. :)...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[protectionist]

Kaboooom!!!!

There are so many wholes in your swiss cheese argument that you can't tell enough lies to cover them all.
So now the Federal judge is lying !!!!!!!!!!!!

That's your big rebuttal !!!! That's all you have, a Trump appointed Fed judge is lying !!!!
KAAAAABBBBBOOOOOOMMMMM !!!!

That is the sound of you blowing up and going down in flames.

First you said the judges didn't see the evidence.
That's a lie. The judges said they saw the evidence and it is not credible. You lose right there.

Then you said the judges are "biased against Trump" or "In on the steal", yet they are Trump appointed judges...

You have posted a bunch of QANON bullshit that has absolutely no merit and has been fully debunked and shot down. Shot down by all the US courts in the entire country.

When every single court in the entire country has seen the evidence and has ruled it has no merit at all, with Trump appointed judges saying as much. Its over. That is the end.

Here is the nuclear bomb that you still can;t answer.

Why did AG Barr say no fraud?
Why did the people at fox news say no fraud?
Why did Dept of homeland security and Dept of justice say no fraud?
Why did GOP Election officials like the one from GA say no fraud? With Trump's highly incriminating phone call begging for votes??
Why did every court in all of America say no fraud, with judges looking at the evidence and specifically writing that it was not credible at all?
Why did Jenna Ellis admit she lied about fraud and accept censure for that lying?? If there was fraud she would not be censured and admitting she lied.
Why did Trump's own daughter say no fraud??

We have every credible entity in the entire US including the courts, dept of justice, heads of political parties, election officials, even Trump's own attorneys. etc.
You have absolutely nobody credible at all on your side claiming fraud, all you have is disgravced Sydney Powell, Giuliani, and the My Pillow Guy.


You have been completely debunked and shot down. I have destroyed the Surrenderists

You're a pile of mincemeat. You're posts are sawdust. Hey! Where's the broom ?

 

[sartre play]

There is no NORMAL in AMERICA any more.

 

[Faun]

Well, I stated that these "courts" who ruled against Trump, were biased against him and were >>
1. Anti-Trump Democrats
2. Anti-Trump RINOs.
3. Judges who just were not comfortable with allowing politics to come into the courtroom.
So, you're not presenting anything new here that I havent responded to. How does anything you've said establish that these 7 judges were not part & parcel of these 3 characteristics I noted ? Where's you evidence of that ? Insufficient evidence. You act like all a court has to do is say something, and we should take it as true fact. That is ludicrous.

Thousands of U.S. judges who broke laws or oaths remained on the bench

In the past dozen years, judges have repeatedly escaped public accountability for misdeeds that have victimized thousands. Nine of 10 kept their jobs, Reuters found

www.reuters.com

In the meantime not a word of what these judges said (or you showing they said) speaks to the the evidences I posted. When you, or your 7 judges, specifically comment on what I've posted, THEN we could have something to talk about. Until then, my evidence remains solid.

Nevada
A lawyer for the Trump campaign alleges that 40,000 people voted twice in Nevada.

Voting machines were not secure or password protected, according to a Trump campaign attorney at a Dec. 3 court hearing, and votes disappeared on machines between logging off and logging in. However, they point out they cannot get access to the machines to examine and figure out why.

Watch the court hearing

There was an inexplicable jump in voter registrations with unusual addresses and incomplete information. That's according to an affidavit filed by a data scientist who said there was a “historically strange” spike of 13,000 voters who registered with missing information, such as gender and age. There were also registrations that used casinos and RV parks as their address.

The Trump campaign claims gift cards and other incentives given away in a a get-out-the-vote effort aimed at Native Americans was illegal. The organizing group says it is not.

Read More

Read More

Republicans say they identified several thousand voters who appear to have cast ballots after they moved from Nevada.

The Voter Integrity Project says 8,443 people who voted in Nevada did not meet the legal residency requirements.

At a hearing, the Trump campaign said over 1,500 ballots were cast by dead voters, 42,248 people voted more than once, of those who are on record as not voting: 1% actually did, and 2% of those who supposedly voted by mail, say they never got a ballot.

You're making claims with absolutely no proof....

A lawyer for the Trump campaign alleges that 40,000 people voted twice in Nevada.​

You post a lawyer claimed that but you present nothing to show that actually occurred.

Voting machines were not secure or password protected, according to a Trump campaign attorney at a Dec. 3 court hearing, and votes disappeared on machines between logging off and logging in.​

You post a lawyer claimed that but you present nothing to show that actually occurred.

There was an inexplicable jump in voter registrations with unusual addresses and incomplete information.​

You post someone claimed that but you present nothing to show even one of those registrations were approved, no less approved and the recipient voted.

Republicans say they identified several thousand voters who appear to have cast ballots after they moved from Nevada.​

You post Republicans claimed that but you present nothing to show that actually occurred.

At a hearing, the Trump campaign said over 1,500 ballots were cast by dead voters, 42,248 people voted more than once, of those who are on record as not voting: 1% actually did, and 2% of those who supposedly voted by mail, say they never got a ballot.​

That was the lawsuit I posted about. All you did there was to repeat the claims the plaintiff couldn't demonstrate in court had merit.

Your post is a complete failure of just repeating debunked claims of fraud with zero evidence to support those claims.

 

[Faun]

Your post 529 is in splinters after being shredded by my post 539.
Ho hum. yawn****

The reason I wasnt typing in coherent English, is because I had just returned for having surgery on my lung, and was still feeling the after effects of the anesthetic. I got a few hours sleep after that. and am more clear-headed now.

Retard, your post #539 is a failure like you.

It's just more claims of fraud with no evidence to show the claims are accurate.

Just so you know, your bullshit isn't real just because you say it is.

 

[Faun]

Had surgery today. Try it sometime.

Why would I try surgery? I'm healthy.

 

[Faun]

I had just returned from surgery when i posted it. Try it sometime.

And I informed you of that in Post # 1433, in the thread below, an hour before you posted this

post. So don't ask questions you should already know the answer to.

BREAKING: Trump To Be Arrested Next Week

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-04-16/trump-s-small-dollar-donors-fuel-19-million-first-quarter-haul#xj4y7vzkg Keep pulling the infiltrator weeds. Follow the money and pull. :)...

www.usmessageboard.com

You idiot, you posted that earlier but on a different thread while I was reading this thread first; and responded on this thread before reading your other post on the other thread.

Why do you work so hard to show the forum how senile you are?

 

[protectionist]

You're making claims with absolutely no proof....

A lawyer for the Trump campaign alleges that 40,000 people voted twice in Nevada.​

You post a lawyer claimed that but you present nothing to show that actually occurred.

Voting machines were not secure or password protected, according to a Trump campaign attorney at a Dec. 3 court hearing, and votes disappeared on machines between logging off and logging in.​

You post a lawyer claimed that but you present nothing to show that actually occurred.

There was an inexplicable jump in voter registrations with unusual addresses and incomplete information.​

You post someone claimed that but you present nothing to show even one of those registrations were approved, no less approved and the recipient voted.

Republicans say they identified several thousand voters who appear to have cast ballots after they moved from Nevada.​

You post Republicans claimed that but you present nothing to show that actually occurred.

At a hearing, the Trump campaign said over 1,500 ballots were cast by dead voters, 42,248 people voted more than once, of those who are on record as not voting: 1% actually did, and 2% of those who supposedly voted by mail, say they never got a ballot.​

That was the lawsuit I posted about. All you did there was to repeat the claims the plaintiff couldn't demonstrate in court had merit.

Your post is a complete failure of just repeating debunked claims of fraud with zero evidence to support those claims.

You have no more evidence to your contentions, than I have to mine. That's why courts arent sufficient to disprove voter fraud, or other things. They work on only clear provable evidences, IF they look at that evidence, and are often biased.

Courts are sometimes for real. Other times are a joke. In any case, they dont represent a good platform to base arguments on, and nobody in this forum has demonstrated enough knowledge of my evidence to be able to discount it. Wanna take a QUIZ ? The others have all flunked.

 

[protectionist]

You idiot, you posted that earlier but on a different thread while I was reading this thread first; and responded on this thread before reading your other post on the other thread.

Why do you work so hard to show the forum how senile you are?

I responded on this thread before reading my other post on the other thread. You do realize that makes no sense whatsoever right ?

Maybe you'll get this if I post it for you a second time >>

I informed you of that in Post # 1433, (5:28 PM) in the thread below, an hour before you posted this post, at 6:06 PM.
So don't ask questions you should already know the answer to.

 

[Faun]

You have no more evidence to your contentions, than I have to mine. That's why courts arent sufficient to disprove voter fraud, or other things. They work on only clear provable evidences, IF they look at that evidence, and are often biased.

Courts are sometimes for real. Other times are a joke. In any case, they dont represent a good platform to base arguments on, and nobody in this forum has demonstrated enough knowledge of my evidence to be able to discount it. Wanna take a QUIZ ? The others have all flunked.

You're the one claiming fraud. The onus to prove that is yours. No one has to prove you wrong just because you can't prove yourself right.

You failed.

Yet again.

 

[Faun]

I responded on this thread before reading my other post on the other thread. You do realize that makes no sense whatsoever right ?

Maybe you'll get this if I post it for you a second time >>

I informed you of that in Post # 1433, (5:28 PM) in the thread below, an hour before you posted this post, at 6:06 PM.
So don't ask questions you should already know the answer to.

Retard, it doesn't matter where YOU posted. I still read this thread first, before the other thread.

 

[protectionist]

Retard, it doesn't matter where YOU posted. I still read this thread first, before the other thread.

And does anybody believe the forum's #1 FABRICATOR, CONCOCTER, LIAR, PHONY ?
No, Mr Powerpoint, in this forum, at this point, you have the credibility of a wart hog.

 

[protectionist]

You're the one claiming fraud. The onus to prove that is yours. No one has to prove you wrong just because you can't prove yourself right.

You failed.

Yet again.

NO, BOTH sides of any argument have as much onus as the other.
You dont have anything to stand on about election fraud. Nothing. And you dont know squat about the long posts I posted about fraud. The courts you hide behind are a joke, and if that is all you have, you are on rocky ground.

You wanna conclude the "courts" should always be backed, and assumed to be legit ? Yeah ?
How about the Arizona Supreme Court that just invalidated 300,000 ballots with mismatched signatures, that a Democrat supervisor ordered to sent through to be counted, handing the election to Katie Hobbs ?

Wanna back up THAT court ?

 

[Faun]

And does anybody believe the forum's #1 FABRICATOR, CONCOCTER, LIAR, PHONY ?

Dude, in this forum, at this point, you have the credibility of a wart hog.

You're brain-dead, gramps, to think I should know what others write in other threads before I read them.

It's not your lungs that needed surgery; it's your brain.

 

[Faun]

NO, BOTH sides of any argument have as much onus as the other. You dont have anything to stand on about election fraud. Nothing. And you dont know squat about the long posts I posted about fraud. The courts you hide behind are a joke, and if that us all you have, you are on rocky ground.

You wanna conclude the "courts"should always be backed ? Yeah ?
How about the Arizona Supreme Court that just invalidated 300,000 ballots with mismatched signatures, that a Democrat supervisor ordered to sent through to be counted, handing the election to Katie Hobbs ?

Wanna back up THAT court ?

LOL

Wrong, moron. Election results which are counted, recounted, canvassed and certified, serve as prima facie evidence. That's how elections are decided. If you claim fraud, you have to prove fraud. You can't because 60+ cases couldn't.

You're also wrong about 300K ballots in Arizona being invalidated. They did no such thing. You'd know that if you weren't senile.

 

[protectionist]

You're brain-dead, gramps, to think I should know what others write in other threads before I read them.

It's not your lungs that needed surgery; it's your brain.

But it is only YOU who says you had not read the other thread yet.
HA HA HA HA. Forgetting something FAUX Boy ? You're the forum's poster boy. Whatever you say, one will assume, or at least strongly consider THE OPPOSITE.

But don't blame me FAUX. You did it to yourself. And you'll never get past it. Your scarlett letter > F.

 

[protectionist]

LOL

Wrong, moron. Election results which are counted, recounted, canvassed and certified, serve as prima facie evidence. That's how elections are decided. If you claim fraud, you have to prove fraud. You can't because 60+ cases couldn't.

You're also wrong about 300K ballots in Arizona being invalidated. They did no such thing. You'd know that if you weren't senile.

They were invalidated.

HUGE BREAKING NEWS: Arizona Supreme Court Sends Essential Part of Kari Lake Election Lawsuit Back To Trial Court! - ORDER INCLUDED | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

The Arizona Supreme Court issued a new order on Wednesday, sending an essential piece of Kari Lake’s election lawsuit back to the trial court for further review.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Breaking: Kari Lake's Election Claim Going Back To Arizona's Supreme Court

Arizona Supreme Court sends Kari Lake's appeal back to trial court for review Kari Lake, a former journalist and Republican candidate for the Arizona governor's race in 2022, had her legal challenge of her defeat sent back to trial court for review by the Arizona Supreme Court on Wednesday. The...

americanactionnews.com

 

[protectionist]

LOL

Wrong, moron. Election results which are counted, recounted, canvassed and certified, serve as prima facie evidence. That's how elections are decided. If you claim fraud, you have to prove fraud. You can't because 60+ cases couldn't.

You're also wrong about 300K ballots in Arizona being invalidated. They did no such thing. You'd know that if you weren't senile.

AHA ! "because 60+ cases couldn't". See that ? Just like I just said, You're basing all your marbles on the "courts", and that's why you have no argument.

Thousands of U.S. judges who broke laws or oaths remained on the bench

In the past dozen years, judges have repeatedly escaped public accountability for misdeeds that have victimized thousands. Nine of 10 kept their jobs, Reuters found

www.reuters.com

 

[protectionist]

Of 83 members polled here >>

It's concluded that >>

• 60% say Democrats are crazy.
• 20% say Democrats are normal.

I'm guessing Faun had something to do with those results, judging by all the people who have him on ignore.