In re January 6, 2021

Yes, I could, but reducing my insults to a child would directly relate to a level that Trump and his cult could understand. BIGLY.
More childish insults. Progs are all the same. They are like children throwing a tantrum.
 
Being against welfare means you want to "**** people?" You're such a dumbass prog.
WTF, retard.
'Dim social programs'?

Trumptards and teabaggers have always been against the government helping their country's citizens.
 
WTF, retard.
'Dim social programs'?

Trumptards and teabaggers have always been against the government helping their country's citizens.
You are free to help people all you want, just don't do it with my money.

You are nothing but a bunch of looters.
 
Hilarious you Leftards really think a few dozen unarmed protesters can topple the US government.

They were not trying to topple the government, that would be a rebellion, not an insurrection.

Are you people really this uneducated or do you just pretend for the internet?
 
If they support Trump?
YES.
Grifters too, just like Trump

Sure, we aren't the idiots supporting Trump the fascist, traitor.


Well, thanks for admitting that. I though you would try to walk it back, but you instead doubled down.


Very brave of you.


Of course, now you are revealed to be a ******* retard, but I guess that is better than you living a lie.
 
An incumbent president would always be able to condemn the actions of a former president from a rival party and permit confidentiality to be broken to further political ends,” they wrote."

Is this a valid argument?

Doing so on a blanket basis, would expose the current president allowing it, to be subject to that same disclosure standard. If he O.K.s disclosure of conversations between a former president and his advisors, he would have to do the same.

However in this case we're talking about the criminal exception that the USSC gave in US vs Nixon 418 U.S. 683 (1974), and in US v Zolin 491 U.S. 554, 562-63 (1989)
 
You have your world, the rest of us have ours. I'm surely not trying to convince you of anything.

You're very defensive, very emotional. Relax.

Your world consists of nothing other than
1639783132580.webp
 
15th post
Translate the English into something you can understand.
Wikipedia

An armed but limited rebellion is an insurrection, and if the established government does not recognize the rebels as belligerents then they are insurgents and the revolt is an insurgency. ... There are a number of terms that are associated with rebel and rebellion.

It shows that golfing gator was right in defining it as an insurrection instead of a rebellion.
 
If they support Trump?
YES.
Grifters too, just like Trump

Sure, we aren't the idiots supporting Trump the fascist, traitor.

Trump...

Trump...Trump...Trump...Trump...Trump...

TRUMP

TRUMP

TRUMP


You ******* Nazis are insane.

Orwell described your mania as the "two minute hate"

But with you filthy vermin it's the 24/7 hate.
 
{When Reagan left office, real federal revenue was more than 19% higher than it was the day of his first inauguration. A major recession had been overcome, inflation had been broken, the tax code had been indexed to eliminate bracket creep, and the largest tax cut of the postwar era had been implemented
What you omitted was that Reagan did it by first driving up unemployment to levels levels not seen since the great depression for it's deflationary impact. Followed by Reagans tripling the national debt with huge government spending to increase government revenue.
 
Wikipedia

An armed but limited rebellion is an insurrection, and if the established government does not recognize the rebels as belligerents then they are insurgents and the revolt is an insurgency. ... There are a number of terms that are associated with rebel and rebellion.

It shows that golfing gator was right in defining it as an insurrection instead of a rebellion.

So the unarmed protest at the Reichstag Fire was not an insurrection. but the Kristalnacht by you Nazi ***** was.

1639783790408.webp


1639783809687.webp


Thanks for clarifying, Herr Goering.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom