Impeachment Parody Rewind - Having Run Out Of New Material, Nadler Returns To Failed Ploys

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,081
2,645
The article hilariously starts out by reminding people of Obama's arrogant past quote of how 'Elections Have Consequences' when attempting to justify the Socialist Democrat Party's continued House of Representatives 'Impeachment' Agenda they have engaged in since winning the House in 2018.

The 'Consequences' of losing an election / the House, Democrats and snowflakes say, are the non-stop hate-driven Witch Hunt investigations of the President in their continued attempt to reject the results of the 2016 Presidential election during which America's 'Deplorables' rejected Hillary and elected Donald Trump.

They quickly RUN past the fact that, despite a massive conspiracy and effort to control / alter the outcome of the 2016 election, President Trump won the election. Rather than accept the words issued by their 'messiah' after his own Presidential election win, Democrats and snowflakes refused to accept the election results, rejected the consequences of backing a criminal loser, and instead doubled-down on Obama's effort to 'un-do' the choice the American people had made.

As with all 'rules', whether they be actual laws they may break or just a sayings - like 'Elections have Consequences', they don't apply to Democrats if they say so. Now that they control the House, though, they have dusted off Obama's old saying to justify their continued seditious / treasonous crusade of undermining and attempting to 'take down' the sitting President.

The problem is they have all but exhausted every false narrative, every crime-supported attempted coup, every lie, they have to try to remove Trump from office. They have finally, after going on 4 years, run out of 'New Material' and are having to do a rewind, to break out their old failed stuff to see if they can 'squeeze any more juice out of that lemon'.


It's like a horrible Saturday Night Live Skit that just won't end.....

:p



"Their agenda, kinda sorta, is the impeachment of President Trump — which is to say, the quixotic quest to build political support for it. According to the Washington Post, that effort is about to sink deeper into farce: Hearings on Stormy Daniels and the hush-money payments to conceal trysts that Donald Trump had — allegedly, of course — a decade before he ran for president.


If this is how the
Democrats choose to spend the public’s time and money, they must be accountable for it. They must be pressured to demonstrate the courage of their anti-Trump convictions. So far, for all the bluster, they’ve gotten away with cowardice.

Most of the impeachment quasi-action is in the Judiciary Committee, chaired by Representative Jerrold Nadler, D., N.Y. We have to qualify the word “action” because, while Nadler claims to be conducting an impeachment inquiry, his committee has never actually voted to have one."


:lmao:



Andrew McCarthy: Impeachment parody storms back to the House (but there's a catch for Dems)
 
The article hilariously starts out by reminding people of Obama's arrogant past quote of how 'Elections Have Consequences' when attempting to justify the Socialist Democrat Party's continued House of Representatives 'Impeachment' Agenda they have engaged in since winning the House in 2018.

The 'Consequences' of losing an election / the House, Democrats and snowflakes say, are the non-stop hate-driven Witch Hunt investigations of the President in their continued attempt to reject the results of the 2016 Presidential election during which America's 'Deplorables' rejected Hillary and elected Donald Trump.

They quickly RUN past the fact that, despite a massive conspiracy and effort to control / alter the outcome of the 2016 election, President Trump won the election. Rather than accept the words issued by their 'messiah' after his own Presidential election win, Democrats and snowflakes refused to accept the election results, rejected the consequences of backing a criminal loser, and instead doubled-down on Obama's effort to 'un-do' the choice the American people had made.

As with all 'rules', whether they be actual laws they may break or just a sayings - like 'Elections have Consequences', they don't apply to Democrats if they say so. Now that they control the House, though, they have dusted off Obama's old saying to justify their continued seditious / treasonous crusade of undermining and attempting to 'take down' the sitting President.

The problem is they have all but exhausted every false narrative, every crime-supported attempted coup, every lie, they have to try to remove Trump from office. They have finally, after going on 4 years, run out of 'New Material' and are having to do a rewind, to break out their old failed stuff to see if they can 'squeeze any more juice out of that lemon'.


It's like a horrible Saturday Night Live Skit that just won't end.....

:p



"Their agenda, kinda sorta, is the impeachment of President Trump — which is to say, the quixotic quest to build political support for it. According to the Washington Post, that effort is about to sink deeper into farce: Hearings on Stormy Daniels and the hush-money payments to conceal trysts that Donald Trump had — allegedly, of course — a decade before he ran for president.


If this is how the
Democrats choose to spend the public’s time and money, they must be accountable for it. They must be pressured to demonstrate the courage of their anti-Trump convictions. So far, for all the bluster, they’ve gotten away with cowardice.

Most of the impeachment quasi-action is in the Judiciary Committee, chaired by Representative Jerrold Nadler, D., N.Y. We have to qualify the word “action” because, while Nadler claims to be conducting an impeachment inquiry, his committee has never actually voted to have one."


:lmao:



Andrew McCarthy: Impeachment parody storms back to the House (but there's a catch for Dems)



I'm telling you, we need to bring back dueling.
 
The prog House coxuckers want to vote for impeachment, but all they have is about 1/2 of the democrats, or about 118 votes, that leaves about 197 Republicans plus the other half of the dems, or 118, so about 315 votes against Impeachment to 118 for Impeachment, but the MSM keeps whining about it?! WTF??
Impeachment is not going anywhere in the House, let alone in the GOP controlled Senate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top