IMPEACHMENT of Federal Judges... Should we proceed?

[bodecea]

reminds me of Putin, and the way he removes all of his political opponents and those who differ with him... Americans should be proud of this....?

Making America Great Again.....arrest all your political opponents.......

 

[JimBowie1958]

. President Trump took the big step in firing every Obama appointed federal attorney but it's too much work and distraction from real issues to impeach every incompetent federal judge. With a conservative majority in the Supreme court, unconstitutional decisions by incompetent liberal federal judges will be reversed anyway.

But we cannot afford the delays in crucial times with idiot activist judges willing to issue brain dead rulings that could prevent timely actions that save lives and possibly even victory in a war.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Upholding the constitution is not a crime .

But that did not happen, genius, unless you can show where in the Constitution the judiciary is given the authority to review diplomatic relations.

 

[Timmy]

Upholding the constitution is not a crime .

Who says they are upholding the Constitution?

Everyone with a brain . Shit like his Trump ban is easy . They wouldn't bother using that as an example in a first year law school test .

Anyone want to give a specific example of what's so impeachment worthy ?

 

[JimBowie1958]

Upholding the constitution is not a crime .

Who says they are upholding the Constitution?

Everyone with a brain . Shit like his Trump ban is easy . They wouldn't bother using that as an example in a first year law school test .

Anyone want to give a specific example of what's so impeachment worthy ?

Lol, no, anyone with a brain and knowledge of the Constitution knows that the Executive has complete authority over matter of diplomacy, not the judiciary.

You are being a stupid partisan hack again, Timmy.

 

[Billy_Bob]

reminds me of Putin, and the way he removes all of his political opponents and those who differ with him... Americans should be proud of this....?

Making America Great Again.....arrest all your political opponents.......

And if you had a judge who usurped your presidential (constitutional) authority you would just let them go.. too... I call bull shit!

 

[OKTexas]

IMPEACHMENT of Federal Judges... Should we proceed?

Yes that is the question..

Article II of the United States Constitution states in Section 4 that "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Usurping the powers of the president as the Federal District Court of Hawaii and the Federal District Court of Washington State have done can be seen as Judges overreaching the clear constitutional powers of the president. Usurping the powers of the president is considered a high crime against the United States.

It seems that the left likes to judge shop in an effort to get one who "feels" rather than one who follows the law. The Hawaii judge made a statement that the words Trump stated during the campaign make any executive order on security involving Muslims a religious test, but failed to look into the written order or the laws giving the president unfettered control in this area. These immigrating individuals ARE NOT US CITIZENS AND THUS HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS.

The judges made assumptions they have no legal authority to make. They gave non-US citizens constitutional protections, in violation of the US Constitution. Both of these federal judges need to have articles of impeachment for breach of the separations of powers and they need to be removed.

Its time to take off the gloves with the the Ninth Circus Court and take them to task on their judicial activism. Time to take out the trash..

Go right ahead and try.

Exactly what I told my congressman today.

Oh, I'm sure you did...did you happen to also tell your congressman what charges?

Abuse of power. No judge has the authority to confer constitutional rights on foreigners that have never set foot on US soil. The law gives the president sole authority to decide if a class of aliens would be detrimental to the interest of the US.

 

[busybee01]

The trouble is that it takes a 2/3rds majority in the Senate. Never going to happen.

There are 14 senators who are in reelection trouble in states Trump won.. I wouldn't be so sure.

That would still leave you one short and there are not 14 senators in reelection trouble. Many of these senators are far more skilled at winning their states than Clinton was. Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are likely out of reach. How many people vote on impeachment votes. A recent Fox poll shows that only 9% of Americans consider the Gorsuch nomination as the most important issue.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The trouble is that it takes a 2/3rds majority in the Senate. Never going to happen.

There are 14 senators who are in reelection trouble in states Trump won.. I wouldn't be so sure.

That would still leave you one short and there are not 14 senators in reelection trouble. Many of these senators are far more skilled at winning their states than Clinton was. Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin are likely out of reach. How many people vote on impeachment votes. A recent Fox poll shows that only 9% of Americans consider the Gorsuch nomination as the most important issue.

We need 66 votes.. We have 53.... We need just 13

hmmm liberal counting problems?

 

[Clementine]

The judicial activism is creating a Constitutional crisis of massive proportions.

IF this behavior is allowed to stand, then if a President makes a statement the left doesn't like, they could stop deployment of troops in defense of the nation because they file a law suit for some perceived slight that has no basis in reality.

This is a dangerously slippery slope which would hand the power of the presidency to the Judiciary. A clear violation of the separations of powers.

That is why libs put these judges in place. They planned to use them to ignore the constitution, which is necessary to get their agenda through.

 

[cnelsen]

The trouble is that it takes a 2/3rds majority in the Senate. Never going to happen.

There is a way other than impeachment. If a judge rules outside the scope of their constitutional role, their ruling is individual rather than judicial. They are then open to civil suits.

For example, this judge in Hawaii included in his disgraceful ruling the justification that Trump's ban would harm Hawaii's tourist industry. Managing the economy is outside the scope of a judge's office. Therefore his ruling included his individual preferences and was not made on the basis of his membership in the judiciary as an officer of the court. He therefore forfeits his judicial immunity. If a refugee from Yemen commits an attack, the victims would have legal standing to sue him for damages.

THANK YOU!

I hadn't yet gotten to this point... If a ruling is outside the scope of judicial authority, the judge can be held civilly or criminal liable. There are several remedies for this activism. And the moment a case is filed, with him as a defendant, his position as a judge is in peril of a finding of liability. He would then be removed by Judicial ethics process.

It wouldn't be that hard to raise a little money, incorporate and file for a 501 c 3, hell, just raise a little money, then place ads in each of these rogue judges' districts advertising for VOICEs victims of immigrant criminal elements. The ads alone would be enough to throw a little cold water on their celebratory bonfires.

 

[cnelsen]

It wouldn't be that hard to raise a little money, incorporate and file for a 501 c 3, hell, just raise a little money, then place ads in each of these rogue judges' districts advertising for VOICEs victims of immigrant criminal elements. The ads alone would be enough to throw a little cold water on their celebratory bonfires.

As the effort gained in notoriety, it could in fact galvanize an impeachment effort in the Congress. It wouldn't be that hard to find a couple of sponsors.

 

[Picaro]

IMPEACHMENT of Federal Judges... Should we proceed?

Yes that is the question..

Article II of the United States Constitution states in Section 4 that "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Usurping the powers of the president as the Federal District Court of Hawaii and the Federal District Court of Washington State have done can be seen as Judges overreaching the clear constitutional powers of the president. Usurping the powers of the president is considered a high crime against the United States.

It seems that the left likes to judge shop in an effort to get one who "feels" rather than one who follows the law. The Hawaii judge made a statement that the words Trump stated during the campaign make any executive order on security involving Muslims a religious test, but failed to look into the written order or the laws giving the president unfettered control in this area. These immigrating individuals ARE NOT US CITIZENS AND THUS HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS.

The judges made assumptions they have no legal authority to make. They gave non-US citizens constitutional protections, in violation of the US Constitution. Both of these federal judges need to have articles of impeachment for breach of the separations of powers and they need to be removed.

Its time to take off the gloves with the the Ninth Circus Court and take them to task on their judicial activism. Time to take out the trash..

Go right ahead and try.

Exactly what I told my congressman today.

Oh, I'm sure you did...did you happen to also tell your congressman what charges?

Aiding and abetting labor racketeering for starters, which all support for criminal illegal aliens crossing over is. they have to commit at least two felonies in order to work here, in many cases multiple times as they move from job to job, so now it's aiding and abetting fraud against the Federal govt. as well.

 

[Marion Morrison]

I think them smarmy bastards ought to be strung up. Hung by the neck until dead for treason.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

I think them smarmy bastards ought to be strung up. Hung by the neck until dead for treason.

lets also impeach all democrats with an IQ under 65

 

[Reasonable]

IMPEACHMENT of Federal Judges... Should we proceed?

Yes that is the question..

Article II of the United States Constitution states in Section 4 that "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Usurping the powers of the president as the Federal District Court of Hawaii and the Federal District Court of Washington State have done can be seen as Judges overreaching the clear constitutional powers of the president. Usurping the powers of the president is considered a high crime against the United States.

It seems that the left likes to judge shop in an effort to get one who "feels" rather than one who follows the law. The Hawaii judge made a statement that the words Trump stated during the campaign make any executive order on security involving Muslims a religious test, but failed to look into the written order or the laws giving the president unfettered control in this area. These immigrating individuals ARE NOT US CITIZENS AND THUS HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS.

The judges made assumptions they have no legal authority to make. They gave non-US citizens constitutional protections, in violation of the US Constitution. Both of these federal judges need to have articles of impeachment for breach of the separations of powers and they need to be removed.

Its time to take off the gloves with the the Ninth Circus Court and take them to task on their judicial activism. Time to take out the trash..

They're following the Constitution and sticking it to the racist unconstitutional prez. Impeach the pathological liar..
He's an international disgrace.

 

[Rob37]

These judges are ignoring longstanding precedent that gives the president plenary power over immigration. When judges misapply the law so blatantly they need to be held accountable.

 

[Coyote]

IMPEACHMENT of Federal Judges... Should we proceed?

Yes that is the question..

Article II of the United States Constitution states in Section 4 that "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Usurping the powers of the president as the Federal District Court of Hawaii and the Federal District Court of Washington State have done can be seen as Judges overreaching the clear constitutional powers of the president. Usurping the powers of the president is considered a high crime against the United States.

It seems that the left likes to judge shop in an effort to get one who "feels" rather than one who follows the law. The Hawaii judge made a statement that the words Trump stated during the campaign make any executive order on security involving Muslims a religious test, but failed to look into the written order or the laws giving the president unfettered control in this area. These immigrating individuals ARE NOT US CITIZENS AND THUS HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS.

The judges made assumptions they have no legal authority to make. They gave non-US citizens constitutional protections, in violation of the US Constitution. Both of these federal judges need to have articles of impeachment for breach of the separations of powers and they need to be removed.

Its time to take off the gloves with the the Ninth Circus Court and take them to task on their judicial activism. Time to take out the trash..

Sounds like you're saying it's time to remove all the checks and balances on the Executive branch.



I think not.

 

[Care4all]

Why not just let our most wonderful system handle it for us, without this radical, Kremlin like action? It goes to the 9th circuit court and then to the Supreme court if appealed again.... that's how it is SUPPOSE to work in the USA. No single judge has control over this?

 

[LuckyDuck]

IMPEACHMENT of Federal Judges... Should we proceed?

Yes that is the question..

Article II of the United States Constitution states in Section 4 that "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors."

Usurping the powers of the president as the Federal District Court of Hawaii and the Federal District Court of Washington State have done can be seen as Judges overreaching the clear constitutional powers of the president. Usurping the powers of the president is considered a high crime against the United States.

It seems that the left likes to judge shop in an effort to get one who "feels" rather than one who follows the law. The Hawaii judge made a statement that the words Trump stated during the campaign make any executive order on security involving Muslims a religious test, but failed to look into the written order or the laws giving the president unfettered control in this area. These immigrating individuals ARE NOT US CITIZENS AND THUS HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS.

The judges made assumptions they have no legal authority to make. They gave non-US citizens constitutional protections, in violation of the US Constitution. Both of these federal judges need to have articles of impeachment for breach of the separations of powers and they need to be removed.

Its time to take off the gloves with the the Ninth Circus Court and take them to task on their judicial activism. Time to take out the trash..

The federal law is very clear in that the president has the authority to restrict any person or "class of people" from entry into the nation if he determines that they may be a detriment to the country. Islam is a class of people and he, by virtue of that federal law, is entitled to deny their entry into the country. My only gripe is that all of Islam should be permanently restricted, with the exception of those who helped the U.S. forces by being interpreters. The federal judges are clearly violating the president's right to restrict people from entering the country and thus should be removed and replaced.