The great global warming fraud

Robert W

Don't tread on me. Be kind to our president.
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2022
Messages
36,202
Reaction score
18,984
Points
1,788
Location
Redmond Oregon, USA
More data rolls in. Consider climate. Is weather the same everywhere? You know it is not the same. Is earth small or large? Compared to countries and states and humans on the planet? It is very very large. Climate at the South pole is different than the climate at the North pole. States climates are different. So, for all those who are in a panic, calm down.

1774484304505.webp
 
More data rolls in. Consider climate. Is weather the same everywhere? You know it is not the same. Is earth small or large? Compared to countries and states and humans on the planet? It is very very large. Climate at the South pole is different than the climate at the North pole. States climates are different. So, for all those who are in a panic, calm down.

View attachment 1235233
The "warmies" are trying their best to resurrect the old time TV show called "Fantasy Island!"
 
More idiotic comments. Yes, the whole surface of the planet is warming. It is being measured in the oceans, and on land with both ground based observations and satellite data. Again, since you numb skulls think that you know more than all the scientists in the world;

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have people here that probably never even had a high school level science class. Oh who to believe. LOL
 
More idiotic comments. Yes, the whole surface of the planet is warming. It is being measured in the oceans, and on land with both ground based observations and satellite data. Again, since you numb skulls think that you know more than all the scientists in the world;

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have people here that probably never even had a high school level science class. Oh who to believe. LOL
Numbskulls do not believe the eminent climate scientists like Dr Judith Curry and Dr. Richard Lindzen plus dozens of others.
 

Highlights​

Temperature

Alaska as a whole was considerably warmer than the 1991–2020 normal, with an annual deviation of +1.5°F. All NCEI climate divisions were at or above average, with the largest positive departures observed on the North Slope. Among the selected First Order stations, Utqiaġvik again recorded the highest relative warmth, with an annual temperature deviation of nearly +2.7°F, highlighting persistent regional warming in northern Alaska. These above-average temperatures contributed to reduced spring snowpack, early snowmelt, and enhanced wildfire potential, particularly in Interior Alaska during the peak summer season.

 
More idiotic comments. Yes, the whole surface of the planet is warming. It is being measured in the oceans, and on land with both ground based observations and satellite data. Again, since you numb skulls think that you know more than all the scientists in the world;

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have people here that probably never even had a high school level science class. Oh who to believe. LOL
No, not all scientists agree with the outrageous claims made by the alarmists, but those depending on government money for salaries or research will unlikely say anything to jeopardize their money.

1774754055617.webp
 
More idiotic comments. Yes, the whole surface of the planet is warming. It is being measured in the oceans, and on land with both ground based observations and satellite data. Again, since you numb skulls think that you know more than all the scientists in the world;

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have people here that probably never even had a high school level science class. Oh who to believe. LOL
The Earth is in a natural warming cycle that has nothing to do with humans.
 
No, not all scientists agree with the outrageous claims made by the alarmists, but those depending on government money for salaries or research will unlikely say anything to jeopardize their money.

View attachment 1236554
Who gives a flying s**t about scientists.

Check with the engineers. They are the practical ones. They know how things work in the real world.

Look at that scientist....lab coat, bottles and a scope. They try to scale up lab tests to a global system.

Hysterical.

Most engineers are conservative.

Most engineers are not on board with the great global warming retard show.
 
Numbskulls do not believe the eminent climate scientists like Dr Judith Curry and Dr. Richard Lindzen plus dozens of others.
LOL Lindzen also said tobacco was not harmful. In fact. show some major dollars, and Lindzen will say anything you want him to. Dr. Curry is a contrarian that will not say that there is no warming, just uses the doubt factor, the same dodge the tobacco companies used for years to defend their poisonous product. Oh, so there are a few scientists willing to prostitute their credentials. But this still remains;

Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University on this planet has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. Against that we have a few outliers and purchased scientists denying reality.

1774754442135.webp
 
Every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University on this planet has policy statements that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
Academics who somehow think they know what's going on.

Useless idiots.
 
15th post
Who gives a flying s**t about scientists.

Check with the engineers. They are the practical ones. They know how things work in the real world.

Look at that scientist....lab coat, bottles and a scope. They try to scale up lab tests to a global system.

Hysterical.

Most engineers are conservative.

Most engineers are not on board with the great global warming retard show.
LOL Another retard that flaps yap without checking on reality;
"The National Academy of Engineering will hold its annual meeting Oct. 2-4, with the theme of Engineering Responses to Climate Change. NAE President John Anderson sat down to talk about the contributions engineers — and NAE in particular — can make to mitigating and adapting to climate change.

Q: As you watch the types of extremes that are likely to increase as the climate changes — intense heat waves, for example, and electricity outages from hurricanes — how do you think about that? How worried are you?

Anderson: I’m a parent of two and have five grandchildren, and I’m worried about the future. As a scientist and as an engineer, I’m convinced — and have been for a number of years — that emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases have caused problems; the correlation between the CO2 composition of the atmosphere and what we’re seeing is just too strong, and there are compelling scientific explanations for why CO2 increases the mean temperature of the Earth.

We’ve all enjoyed improvement of quality of life and other benefits from burning fossil fuels, though. The question is what do we do about it? I think from an engineering point of view, we have to both mitigate climate change — reduce the rate of global temperature rise — and adapt to it.

Adaptation is going to be just as important, if not more important, than mitigation. Even if we put no more CO2 in the atmosphere now, we are still going to have problems. Human beings have been adapting over millennia, and we can do it better than our ancestors. I think the real issue is political will. There are engineering changes that can be made — for example, building houses that are more resilient to wind and rain — but the issue is political will."

 
Who gives a flying s**t about scientists.

Check with the engineers. They are the practical ones. They know how things work in the real world.

Look at that scientist....lab coat, bottles and a scope. They try to scale up lab tests to a global system.

Hysterical.

Most engineers are conservative.

Most engineers are not on board with the great global warming retard show.
What do leftists need with scientists or engineers to promote global warming alarmism nonsense? They have their own hand-picked experts to make the case for them.

1774754955424.webp

1774754981570.webp


1774755009537.webp



1774755029039.webp
 
LOL Another retard that flaps yap without checking on reality;
"The National Academy of Engineering will hold its annual meeting Oct. 2-4, with the theme of Engineering Responses to Climate Change. NAE President John Anderson sat down to talk about the contributions engineers — and NAE in particular — can make to mitigating and adapting to climate change.

Q: As you watch the types of extremes that are likely to increase as the climate changes — intense heat waves, for example, and electricity outages from hurricanes — how do you think about that? How worried are you?

Anderson: I’m a parent of two and have five grandchildren, and I’m worried about the future. As a scientist and as an engineer, I’m convinced — and have been for a number of years — that emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases have caused problems; the correlation between the CO2 composition of the atmosphere and what we’re seeing is just too strong, and there are compelling scientific explanations for why CO2 increases the mean temperature of the Earth.

We’ve all enjoyed improvement of quality of life and other benefits from burning fossil fuels, though. The question is what do we do about it? I think from an engineering point of view, we have to both mitigate climate change — reduce the rate of global temperature rise — and adapt to it.

Adaptation is going to be just as important, if not more important, than mitigation. Even if we put no more CO2 in the atmosphere now, we are still going to have problems. Human beings have been adapting over millennia, and we can do it better than our ancestors. I think the real issue is political will. There are engineering changes that can be made — for example, building houses that are more resilient to wind and rain — but the issue is political will."

An academic.

:laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
 
Back
Top Bottom