Illegal Ballots Thrown Out in PA as Trump Lawsuit Triumphs

If Trump ends up losing Dems are still butthurt because correcting the fraud will show how razer thin their win is and it eliminates their claims of a mandate from the people. Coupled with losing seats in the peoples House and failing to gain control of the Senate Dem are on thin ice. Their policies and positions don't have nearly the support they were claiming.

Trump has already lost. Since there's no fraud (falsely being thrown around), the voting numbers will stand, (forever and with Trump the loser). Every election has some anomalies, and they should be corrected. However, one thing is for certain; Trump lost both the EC and PV and will be out of the White House in January.

There's no "If Trump ends up losing.... " Facts should matter; anything else is just lying, whining and crying.

It will (and should be) challenging to get one's agenda through - maybe the word 'compromise" will be renewed. A balanced government is a good thing in my view. A great deal requires both sides to give something in return.

LOL keep clinging to your Biden fantasy. :auiqs.jpg:

The fantasy here is you believing Trump will win an already decided election. That resides on delusional and insane.


You should take your own advice and just STFU and quit showing your ignorance. NOTHING has "already been decided" except by idiot trolls like you and leftwing media hoping to install Biden.

Such anger; shows the enormous hatred you have within - find a professional and hop on some medication. The election is over and Biden is the winner. The only idiot here is yourself (and that inferior anger within). LOL
 
Dominion Voting Systems no show for hearing in Pennsylvania after stating they would
That's really strange. One would think if The Election was Legit, such a company like "Dominion" would want to come to defend their integrity of the election and the reliability of their software.
 
It wasn't a Trump lawsuit.

And it's going to the PA Supreme Court anyways.

And it's all irrelevant, given Biden's lead is around 100k.

And Trump's lawyers say that you're lying, because they're saying in court that there's no evidence of any fraud.
the Election is invalid so biden has no lead---------
 
Trump wins a lawsuit, bunch of illegal ballots are thrown out as it's becoming clearer to everyone that the election has been a fraud.
The ballots didn't have the date written in on them. To equate not having a date written on a ballot to fraud is stupid.
There's this new thing called legislation. It specifically defines what makes a ballot eligible or not. If a ballot doesn't meet the requirements it doesn't count. It's not rocket science.
 
There's this new thing called legislation. It specifically defines what makes a ballot eligible or not. If a ballot doesn't meet the requirements it doesn't count. It's not rocket science.
Yeah. We get it. You didn’t find any fraud so you want to start throwing out ballots for whatever reason you can find.

Pretty pathetic.
 
There's this new thing called legislation. It specifically defines what makes a ballot eligible or not. If a ballot doesn't meet the requirements it doesn't count. It's not rocket science.
Yeah. We get it. You didn’t find any fraud so you want to start throwing out ballots for whatever reason you can find.

Pretty pathetic.
That is evidence of fraud. Ineligible votes don't count, yet here we are. What about this don't you get?
 
if you want to be thrust in to office illegitimately like Adolph Hitler in 1933

Hitler was appointed not elected. The Nazi Fascists never got a majority of German votes, either.
Joe is being appointed, illegitimately, not elected in the midst of the most fraudulent election in History, same as what occurred in 1933.

Your ignorance of history shows again.

Good old Joe won the election in what has been describe as a historic landslide!
 
That is evidence of fraud. Ineligible votes don't count, yet here we are. What about this don't you get?
It’s not. It’s evidence someone didn’t fill out every little line on a ballot. Leaving the date blank is about as inconsequential as one could possibly get but apparently that’s good enough reason to deprive them of their vote.
 
That is evidence of fraud. Ineligible votes don't count, yet here we are. What about this don't you get?
It’s not. It’s evidence someone didn’t fill out every little line on a ballot. Leaving the date blank is about as inconsequential as one could possibly get but apparently that’s good enough reason to deprive them of their vote.
It's fraud perpetrated by whoever allowed it to be counted. The date is actually important or do you think you can go vote after the election and still be counted?
 
That is evidence of fraud. Ineligible votes don't count, yet here we are. What about this don't you get?
It’s not. It’s evidence someone didn’t fill out every little line on a ballot. Leaving the date blank is about as inconsequential as one could possibly get but apparently that’s good enough reason to deprive them of their vote.
It's fraud perpetrated by whoever allowed it to be counted. The date is actually important or do you think you can go vote after the election and still be counted?
It's not that important. The office goes by postmark, not the date printed on the ballot.
 
That is evidence of fraud. Ineligible votes don't count, yet here we are. What about this don't you get?
It’s not. It’s evidence someone didn’t fill out every little line on a ballot. Leaving the date blank is about as inconsequential as one could possibly get but apparently that’s good enough reason to deprive them of their vote.
It's fraud perpetrated by whoever allowed it to be counted. The date is actually important or do you think you can go vote after the election and still be counted?
It's not that important. The office goes by postmark, not the date printed on the ballot.
It is important and excessively simple. Tell it to the legislature, but unless they change it, that's the rules. What other rules do you support people ignoring?
 
There's this new thing called legislation. It specifically defines what makes a ballot eligible or not. If a ballot doesn't meet the requirements it doesn't count. It's not rocket science.
Yeah. We get it. You didn’t find any fraud so you want to start throwing out ballots for whatever reason you can find.

Pretty pathetic.

What is your definition of fraud? Is it the intentionality question you are having a problem with? Clearly, votes were counted that should not have been. Are you saying it was just an honest mistake? If so, how are there so many honest mistakes that seem to have helped Biden only?
 
There's this new thing called legislation. It specifically defines what makes a ballot eligible or not. If a ballot doesn't meet the requirements it doesn't count. It's not rocket science.
Yeah. We get it. You didn’t find any fraud so you want to start throwing out ballots for whatever reason you can find.

Pretty pathetic.

What is your definition of fraud? Is it the intentionality question you are having a problem with? Clearly, votes were counted that should not have been. Are you saying it was just an honest mistake? If so, how are there so many honest mistakes that seem to have helped Biden only?


They were not counted. They are not enough to change the outcome. Game. Over.
 
There's this new thing called legislation. It specifically defines what makes a ballot eligible or not. If a ballot doesn't meet the requirements it doesn't count. It's not rocket science.
Yeah. We get it. You didn’t find any fraud so you want to start throwing out ballots for whatever reason you can find.

Pretty pathetic.

What is your definition of fraud? Is it the intentionality question you are having a problem with? Clearly, votes were counted that should not have been. Are you saying it was just an honest mistake? If so, how are there so many honest mistakes that seem to have helped Biden only?


They were not counted. They are not enough to change the outcome. Game. Over.

I think you are confused. Trump doesn't have to account for every single vote to make up the difference. He merely has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that fraud was committed on a large scale. When you have sworn testimony from poll workers saying they(and their colleagues) were told do to fraudulent things, the assumption has to be made than those things were done to an untold number of ballots. That is how it works.
 

Forum List

Back
Top