Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,449
- 2,290
A crime was committedIt's not made upAll of which are made up by the left. There is no evidence that Trump had anything to do with Russia other than mentioning them during the debates. Wikileaks confessed that they did not get their information from the Russians. Now it's suspected that it may be Seth Rich who gave Wiki that information. So no, there is no proof that Russians were the ones who hacked the DNC server, and furthermore, nothing to do with Trump.
Trump had no inside information on the DNC nor their server. He couldn't have helped if he wanted to. He didn't know anybody at the DNC, he didn't have any access to their computers, and more than likely, he didn't even know where they were. So how could Trump have anything to do with it?
Those are undisputed facts.
Russians hacked DNC servers and leaked information. At the time of the leaks, Trump representatives were meeting with the Russians
Trump had no inside information on the DNC or the server.....but did he offer something in return for help in winning an election?
If he did, it is treason
That is why we need an investigation
There is no evidence that anything that took place had an impact on the election. What had an impact on the election was Hillary's drunkenness that prohibited her from campaigning and making stops, the border, and her Deplorable remark. Bet you can't find one person who voted that knew what was in those emails, and even if you could, find one that said it changed their mind to vote for Trump instead of Hillary.
It's all made up. There is nothing there. Can you tell me why they locked up Rich's computer? Can you tell me why they stopped investigating the murder? Can you tell me why he was killed and nothing was stolen from him? Just a coincidence?
That's what they should be investigating.
You miss the point
Was there collusion?
if there was....it is treason
Do you agree?
If Trump traded concessions in return for help winning an election?
You don't investigate something based on what people make up in their heads. You investigate when there is some kind of evidence that something was done illegally. There is nothing.....not even a smidgen of evidence that Trump had anything to do with the Russians.
That would be similar if you lived down the street from me, and I went to the police and said I think you're a murderer. No body, no evidence, no names, just I decided that you were. Do you think the police department would send their detectives out to investigate you based on something I made up in my head?
DNC servers were hacked
FBI needs to find the details and report what they find
If Trump was trading policy concessions for leaked information, do you believe he should be prosecuted?
What policy concessions do you speak of?
We have two things going on here. One is that Wikileaks already stated their source was not anybody from Russia, and two, It's more than likely that the source of the leaks was a DNC guy himself.