Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am merely human and accept my limitations.I am not sure I follow "none", but one or many leads me to contemplating something greater than three dimensions. If there should be more than three dimensions would one seem like many, or many like one? A many multi-dimensional being would indeed make it impossible for a three-dimensional being to truly know the multi-dimensional being.It means that a god can be none, one, or many - even simultaneously. To insist otherwise is to attempt to limit god.
I don't think it is a matter of insisting, but one of observation--or perhaps overlooking.To insist that a god must (or must not) exist is to impose a human limitation upon a god.
That is comprehensible by humans.I am not sure I follow "none", but one or many leads me to contemplating something greater than three dimensions. If there should be more than three dimensions would one seem like many, or many like one? A many multi-dimensional being would indeed make it impossible for a three-dimensional being to truly know the multi-dimensional being.It means that a god can be none, one, or many - even simultaneously. To insist otherwise is to attempt to limit god.
We agree on the first sentence. There is a caveat to the second. The etymology of the 'omni' words does not stop at 'all' but at all things possible. Of course, what is impossible for humans may not be impossible for all beings, hence the term 'supernatural'.That is comprehensible by humans.
A god both existing and not existing is beyond the human capacity to understand, but gods, by definition, can do all things.
If humans acknowledge a god as having the capacity to transcend normal limitations, that is what humans must accept as the divine prerogative in all things.I don't think it is a matter of insisting, but one of observation--or perhaps overlooking.
.If humans acknowledge a god as having the capacity to transcend normal limitations, that is what humans must accept as the divine prerogative in all things.I don't think it is a matter of insisting, but one of observation--or perhaps overlooking.
.If humans acknowledge a god as having the capacity to transcend normal limitations, that is what humans must accept as the divine prerogative in all things.
Without reference to the scriptural accretions of any flavor of religion, I merely accept that the generally-accepted concept of a god as transcending human limitations, being omnipotent. Humans cannot impose existence upon a god, even if they are unable to grasp a god's ability to not exist.what does not exist can not be acknowledged or granted "capacity to .... "
your statement is meaningless without the particular subject being acknowledged to be known to exist to prove the acknowledgement is warranted.
as all things biblical are purely subjective / speculative for their god - the same is not true for the, verifiable, underlying religion. that does exist.
Humans can order a god
Omnipotence was originally defined as 'Almighty power'. This is different from 'All power'. For example, in early times it was noted that omnipotence/almighty power indeed limited. Almighty power was limited by holiness...it could not do wrong, and it also meant all power it was possible to have.I am merely attesting to divine omnipotence.
.Without reference to the scriptural accretions of any flavor of religion, I merely accept that the generally-accepted concept of a god as transcending human limitations, being omnipotent. Humans cannot impose existence upon a god, even if they are unable to grasp a god's ability to not exist.what does not exist can not be acknowledged or granted "capacity to .... "
your statement is meaningless without the particular subject being acknowledged to be known to exist to prove the acknowledgement is warranted.
as all things biblical are purely subjective / speculative for their god - the same is not true for the, verifiable, underlying religion. that does exist.
When I state that a god can both exist and not exist, and can even do so simultaneously, I am merely attesting to divine omnipotence. Humans can order a god, "You must exist!", but humans should not expect to be obeyed by a god.
.Without reference to the scriptural accretions of any flavor of religion, I merely accept that the generally-accepted concept of a god as transcending human limitations, being omnipotent. Humans cannot impose existence upon a god, even if they are unable to grasp a god's ability to not exist.
I do not opine regarding the musings of the various religions..Without reference to the scriptural accretions of any flavor of religion, I merely accept that the generally-accepted concept of a god as transcending human limitations, being omnipotent. Humans cannot impose existence upon a god, even if they are unable to grasp a god's ability to not exist.what does not exist can not be acknowledged or granted "capacity to .... "
your statement is meaningless without the particular subject being acknowledged to be known to exist to prove the acknowledgement is warranted.
as all things biblical are purely subjective / speculative for their god - the same is not true for the, verifiable, underlying religion. that does exist.
When I state that a god can both exist and not exist, and can even do so simultaneously, I am merely attesting to divine omnipotence. Humans can order a god, "You must exist!", but humans should not expect to be obeyed by a god.
.Without reference to the scriptural accretions of any flavor of religion, I merely accept that the generally-accepted concept of a god as transcending human limitations, being omnipotent. Humans cannot impose existence upon a god, even if they are unable to grasp a god's ability to not exist.
you keep referring to human limitations as well as - benign religious affiliation ...
can there be a level of omnipotence above the level of purity - as for admission to the Everlasting as prescribed is to triumph in such a way as to become pure, the triumph of good vs evil - the means to free one's spirit to persist after their physiology expires and as prescribed would then become the equal to the god even if not a god.
after the judgement of which triumph actually occurred. for all beings, fauna and flora. Garden Earth.
God can't oppose Himself. God can't go against His own Nature.God can be anything god decides. God is beyond human understanding.How can a god be none?
Now I understand why you don't appreciate the viewpoints of others but what does that have to do with her?Viewpoints from others cannot be appreciated without first learning to laugh at oneself.
So... God could choose not to exist?God knows.How can a god be none?
,I do not opine regarding the musings of the various religions..Without reference to the scriptural accretions of any flavor of religion, I merely accept that the generally-accepted concept of a god as transcending human limitations, being omnipotent. Humans cannot impose existence upon a god, even if they are unable to grasp a god's ability to not exist.what does not exist can not be acknowledged or granted "capacity to .... "
your statement is meaningless without the particular subject being acknowledged to be known to exist to prove the acknowledgement is warranted.
as all things biblical are purely subjective / speculative for their god - the same is not true for the, verifiable, underlying religion. that does exist.
When I state that a god can both exist and not exist, and can even do so simultaneously, I am merely attesting to divine omnipotence. Humans can order a god, "You must exist!", but humans should not expect to be obeyed by a god.
.Without reference to the scriptural accretions of any flavor of religion, I merely accept that the generally-accepted concept of a god as transcending human limitations, being omnipotent. Humans cannot impose existence upon a god, even if they are unable to grasp a god's ability to not exist.
you keep referring to human limitations as well as - benign religious affiliation ...
can there be a level of omnipotence above the level of purity - as for admission to the Everlasting as prescribed is to triumph in such a way as to become pure, the triumph of good vs evil - the means to free one's spirit to persist after their physiology expires and as prescribed would then become the equal to the god even if not a god.
after the judgement of which triumph actually occurred. for all beings, fauna and flora. Garden Earth.
I merely accept the definition of a god as being capable of all things, including, necessarily, those that are beyond human understanding.
- can there be a level of omnipotence above the level of purity ...
.I merely accept the definition of a god as being capable of all things, including, necessarily, those that are beyond human understanding.
,I do not opine regarding the musings of the various religions..Without reference to the scriptural accretions of any flavor of religion, I merely accept that the generally-accepted concept of a god as transcending human limitations, being omnipotent. Humans cannot impose existence upon a god, even if they are unable to grasp a god's ability to not exist.what does not exist can not be acknowledged or granted "capacity to .... "
your statement is meaningless without the particular subject being acknowledged to be known to exist to prove the acknowledgement is warranted.
as all things biblical are purely subjective / speculative for their god - the same is not true for the, verifiable, underlying religion. that does exist.
When I state that a god can both exist and not exist, and can even do so simultaneously, I am merely attesting to divine omnipotence. Humans can order a god, "You must exist!", but humans should not expect to be obeyed by a god.
.Without reference to the scriptural accretions of any flavor of religion, I merely accept that the generally-accepted concept of a god as transcending human limitations, being omnipotent. Humans cannot impose existence upon a god, even if they are unable to grasp a god's ability to not exist.
you keep referring to human limitations as well as - benign religious affiliation ...
can there be a level of omnipotence above the level of purity - as for admission to the Everlasting as prescribed is to triumph in such a way as to become pure, the triumph of good vs evil - the means to free one's spirit to persist after their physiology expires and as prescribed would then become the equal to the god even if not a god.
after the judgement of which triumph actually occurred. for all beings, fauna and flora. Garden Earth.
I merely accept the definition of a god as being capable of all things, including, necessarily, those that are beyond human understanding.
- can there be a level of omnipotence above the level of purity ....I merely accept the definition of a god as being capable of all things, including, necessarily, those that are beyond human understanding.
sortof wish you had answered the question, is omnipotence greater than purity.
to not have to repeat why you believe - "beyond human understanding". and or for all beings - as the goals to accomplish to attain the same crucible of godlyness.
and if it is not your religion that is shaping your conviction - and hopefully not as a closet christian. are you including whatever is a messiah.
I don't know, but would theorize that they are indistinguishable, inseparable characteristics exclusive to godhood.... sort of wish you had answered the question, is omnipotence greater than purity.