If we already know GOP policies don't help the economy, why should we vote for a GOP candidate?

[Preacher]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

You do realize Obama EXTENDED Bush's tax cuts that helped the rich right? OH and ONLY Trump is aiming to help the working man and woman...Clinton is just another politician in the pockets of wall street as are Rubio and Cruz.

tax cuts for the rich have the potential to do more for the economy than redistribution of wealth.

No they don't. Just allows the rich to buy more politicians and get things they want passed. Making the rich pay their fair share is not only more fair but it makes more sense. EVERYONE should benefit from the system NOT just the rich.

 

[nat4900]

Most poles

Really???

 

[Nyvin]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

You do realize Obama EXTENDED Bush's tax cuts that helped the rich right? OH and ONLY Trump is aiming to help the working man and woman...Clinton is just another politician in the pockets of wall street as are Rubio and Cruz.

tax cuts for the rich have the potential to do more for the economy than redistribution of wealth.

See: Kansas and Wisconsin

 

[Maryland Patriot]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

You do realize Obama EXTENDED Bush's tax cuts that helped the rich right? OH and ONLY Trump is aiming to help the working man and woman...Clinton is just another politician in the pockets of wall street as are Rubio and Cruz.

tax cuts for the rich have the potential to do more for the economy than redistribution of wealth.

No they don't. Just allows the rich to buy more politicians and get things they want passed. Making the rich pay their fair share is not even more fair but it makes more sense. EVERYONE should benefit from the system NOT just the rich.

theres that fair share thing again.
if one person pays 70% of his dollar to cover a bill, and another that actually uses more services pays 15% of his dollar to cover that bill, who is not paying his fair share?
the rich pay more than their "Fair Share" already.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

You do realize Obama EXTENDED Bush's tax cuts that helped the rich right? OH and ONLY Trump is aiming to help the working man and woman...Clinton is just another politician in the pockets of wall street as are Rubio and Cruz.

tax cuts for the rich have the potential to do more for the economy than redistribution of wealth.

See: Kansas and Wisconsin

lots to see there, any chance you could be more specific?

 

[Preacher]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

You do realize Obama EXTENDED Bush's tax cuts that helped the rich right? OH and ONLY Trump is aiming to help the working man and woman...Clinton is just another politician in the pockets of wall street as are Rubio and Cruz.

tax cuts for the rich have the potential to do more for the economy than redistribution of wealth.

No they don't. Just allows the rich to buy more politicians and get things they want passed. Making the rich pay their fair share is not even more fair but it makes more sense. EVERYONE should benefit from the system NOT just the rich.

theres that fair share thing again.
if one person pays 70% of his dollar to cover a bill, and another that actually uses more services pays 15% of his dollar to cover that bill, who is not paying his fair share?
the rich pay more than their "Fair Share" already.

No they don't.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

You do realize Obama EXTENDED Bush's tax cuts that helped the rich right? OH and ONLY Trump is aiming to help the working man and woman...Clinton is just another politician in the pockets of wall street as are Rubio and Cruz.

tax cuts for the rich have the potential to do more for the economy than redistribution of wealth.

No they don't. Just allows the rich to buy more politicians and get things they want passed. Making the rich pay their fair share is not even more fair but it makes more sense. EVERYONE should benefit from the system NOT just the rich.

theres that fair share thing again.
if one person pays 70% of his dollar to cover a bill, and another that actually uses more services pays 15% of his dollar to cover that bill, who is not paying his fair share?
the rich pay more than their "Fair Share" already.

No they don't.

No they don't does not prove any point.
any chance you can tell my why paying three times the amount to a bill is not at least a fair share?

 

[Brain357]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

WI has done every republican policy in the book and still have poor job creation and not a great economy.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

WI has done every republican policy in the book and still have poor job creation and not a great economy.

have you looked at Detroit? Baltimore? any other democrat run city?
both political parties are messing up, its why Trump is attractive. (as president, not as a human being thats going to end up on the front of GQ magazine.)

 

[Brain357]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

WI has done every republican policy in the book and still have poor job creation and not a great economy.

have you looked at Detroit? Baltimore? any other democrat run city?
both political parties are messing up, its why Trump is attractive. (as president, not as a human being thats going to end up on the front of GQ magazine.)

Look at MN. Much better than WI with liberal policies.

 

[Brain357]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

WI has done every republican policy in the book and still have poor job creation and not a great economy.

have you looked at Detroit? Baltimore? any other democrat run city?
both political parties are messing up, its why Trump is attractive. (as president, not as a human being thats going to end up on the front of GQ magazine.)

Trump is attractive? Bankruptcy is attractive? How about trump university?

 

[Silhouette]

If we already know GOP policies don't help the economy, why should we vote for a GOP candidate?

So that two gay dudes can't legally force a catholic adoption agency to hand over little boys to their "situation" where no mother will be there to monitor things for the orphan's life.

Money, it turns out, isn't as viscerally-important of an issue as child endangerment..

 

[Billy000]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earn

This argument would make sense if the recession that Obama inherited from BUSH wasn't the biggest we have ever had. You have to think these things through.

 

[Billy000]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

O has pummeled the economy. 9 trillion more in debt and still counting. Real unemployment between 15-20 percent, 95 plus million out of jobs, record numbers on welfare.

The U6 rate was higher under Bush's last few years. 12 million private jobs have been added since Obama came to office. That was unprecedented job growth. The labor participation began to decline under Bush.

 

[Deleted member 53821]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

O has pummeled the economy. 9 trillion more in debt and still counting. Real unemployment between 15-20 percent, 95 plus million out of jobs, record numbers on welfare.

The U6 rate was higher under Bush's last few years. 12 million private jobs have been added since Obama came to office. That was unprecedented job growth. The labor participation began to decline under Bush.

That is like saying the Great Depression didn't suck because we were adding jobs to the economy.

 

[Deleted member 53821]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

O has pummeled the economy. 9 trillion more in debt and still counting. Real unemployment between 15-20 percent, 95 plus million out of jobs, record numbers on welfare.

The U6 rate was higher under Bush's last few years. 12 million private jobs have been added since Obama came to office. That was unprecedented job growth. The labor participation began to decline under Bush.

It seem to accelerate under Obama and it seems to be increasing.

 

[Kondor3]

If we already know GOP policies don't help the economy, why should we vote for a GOP candidate?

Probably the difference between GOP Policies = Stagnation and Status Quo VS Dem Policies = Spendthrift Bankrupt Rush to Hell in a Handbasket?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"If we already know GOP policies don't help the economy, why should we vote for a GOP candidate?

We shouldn't, clearly.

The republican candidates are wrong on most – if not all – the issues.
And republicans are not only wrong concerning the economy, but they're wrong on social issues and regulatory policy as well.

The problem isn't republicans per se, but the extremists and blind ideologues who have misappropriated the GOP – there was a time when a majority of republicans were interested in sound, responsible governance and public policy, before the advent of the bane of the social right, the TPM, and libertarian reactionaries.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earners does jack shit to help the middle class or poor.

I think deep down conservatives know this. They are just too immature to admit it.

O has pummeled the economy. 9 trillion more in debt and still counting. Real unemployment between 15-20 percent, 95 plus million out of jobs, record numbers on welfare.

The U6 rate was higher under Bush's last few years. 12 million private jobs have been added since Obama came to office. That was unprecedented job growth. The labor participation began to decline under Bush.

It seem to accelerate under Obama and it seems to be increasing.

Only to a rightwing partisan hack and liar.

 

[Iceweasel]

All of the candidates' policies benefit the wealthy. We already know easing the tax burden on the top earn

This argument would make sense if the recession that Obama inherited from BUSH wasn't the biggest we have ever had. You have to think these things through.

You can't think period. Everything obama did made it worse, Reagan showed us how it was done. Have an adult explain the chart to you instead of pretending to be smart.