FDR didn't create the middle class---he prolonged the recession by 10 YEARS----------------harming many and pushing many from the middle class down to the poverty class.
Um, okay, I'm sure that's what you heard on Hate Radio... but the fact is, the Great Depression was over by 1936, that's why he got a second term.
World War 2 with women joining the workforce came and pulled us out of the depression and created unknown wealth in the US leading to a boom in the middle class.
Actually, you are a bit confused there. WWII was hardly the panacea you guys claim it was. There was severe rationing of gasoline, meat, sugar and just about every other commodity. Want to buy a new car? Too bad, that factory is too busy making tanks and jeeps. In fact, when the war was over, there was a recession as all those men found there were no jobs for them, even with the ladies going home.
What created the middle class was that FDR established a minimum wage, which kept employers from firing their whole staffs and hiring people who'd work cheaper. He supported unions, strengthening the position of working people. They created the greatest wealth in history... and the Wealthy couldn't stand it.
View attachment 396421
Good gawd try reading a history book from economists--FDR prolonged the depression by 10 years.
Jason Livingood, writing for Accuracy in Academia (Dec. 2003): Although historians and educators tell us that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt ended the Great Depression, in reality, the New Deal prolonged chronic unemployment in the U.S. in the 1930s, Cato Institute scholar Jim Powell said...
historynewsnetwork.org
"Although historians and educators tell us that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt ended the Great Depression, in reality, the New Deal prolonged chronic unemployment in the U.S. in the 1930s, Cato Institute scholar Jim Powell said early this month.
"The New Deal was substantially financed on the backs of the middle class and the poor," Powell said at a Cato Institute Forum. The Cato Institute is a libertarian think tank.
Powell spoke, along with Michael Barone of U.S. News & World Report, on the findings of his new book, FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression (Crown Forum, 2003). Powell's book brings together evidence from the recent findings of several dozen economists at Princeton, Stanford, Columbia, Brown, the University of Chicago, and the University of California at Berkeley.
Throughout the Depression, unemployment rates averaged about 17 percent. What help the New Deal did provide did not go to those who needed it most. Meanwhile, other New Deal policies impeded, rather than helped, the creation of new jobs, particularly for unskilled workers.
New Deal policies, Powell said, were especially harsh on black Americans. Wages set by the government above market level meant that 500,000 black Americans lost their jobs. By lowering farm production the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 cost thousands of poor black sharecroppers their jobs while increasing food prices.
The many public works projects FDR introduced became an active drag on the U.S. economy, while doing little to help, Powell said. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA), for example, probably did much more harm than good. The TVA flooded an estimated 730,000 acres of land. Thousands of citizens lost their property and homes to the flooding waters. Tenant farmers were not given compensation for their loss of land and property.
At the same time, the electricity that the TVA eventually provided did almost nothing to benefit Tennessee farmers that had been most affected by the project's construction. Tennessee farmers did not need electricity, Powell pointed out. They needed gasoline or other engine fuel for farming equipment. Moreover, electricity prices from the TVA were overly high, thus further restricting its usefulness to lower and middle class workers.
FDR referred to investors and corporate leaders with contemptuous language, calling them"economic royalists." This habit made businessmen more worried about making investments for it implied that the fruit of their efforts might be taken from them by some future reform. The values of hard work were similarly played down."
And good grief---yes the war create a shortage on basics-------------but it also created work for women during the war giving many young couple the money to buy homes and appliances which spurred the economy FOLLOWING THE WAR. It also brought manufacturing to America which we then exported--------spurring the economy and jobs as well HENCE WHY THE 1950'S WERE SO PROSPEROUS.