If the Jan 6th Insurrectionists and QANON Shaman are "Peaceful Protestors", then Why Plead Guilty, go to Trial and Win.

[The Banker]

Only the guilty plead guilty. In a public case like this, no innocent person would plead guilty at all. One guy went to trial and he lost on all charges, and the jury said 100% guilty.

Why don't these Jan 6th Insurrectionists just go to trial, and prove their supposed innocence??

Because they are 100% guilty, and the evidence against them is overwhelming, they rioted at the Capitol and committed acts of violence. That's why

In certain situations innocent people plead guilty to crimes they did not commit, but that is not what happened here, these people admitted guilt because they are guilty, and the evidence says they are guilty.

 

[Mac1958]

Why don't these Jan 6th Insurrectionists just go to trial, and prove their supposed innocence??

They'll say the courts are rigged with evil Hitler commies.

Same reason they keep losing their ass on the Big Lie.

Always the innocent victims. Always.

 

[Oddball]

It's called "lawfare", dickless.

 

[Confederate Soldier]

They were mostly facing lengthy prison sentences, and would take a guilty plea deal for a lesser sentence.

 

[Oddball]

They were mostly facing lengthy prison sentences, and would take a guilty plea deal for a lesser sentence.

They were threatened with the bottomless pockets of The State, and a jury pool that is the farthest left demographic this side of CCP.

The defendants are facing both bankruptcy and being locked up for absurdly stiff sentences if they don't roll over.

 

[jotathought]

From PBS:

Why defendants plead guilty to crimes they didn’t commit​

.... It turns out that trials are increasingly rare in today's broken justice system. About 95 percent of all felony cases end with guilty pleas.

Defendants more often than in the past accept deals to avoid risking more serious charges and penalties at a trial, even if they didn't commit the crime.

As John Yang reports, plea bargains can have long-lasting consequences.

and Forbes

Are Innocent People Pleading Guilty? A New Report Says Yes​

Defendants in federal cases face life changing choices once they have been charged, plead guilty and take a less severe penalty, or exercise their right to a trial and risk years (decades) in prison. It is no wonder that some have pondered whether innocent people are pleading guilty to crimes they did not commit.

 

[Thunk]

After being held in solitary confinement for 2 years without charge or trail...tortured...not allowed to speak to a lawyer or family...You would plead anything they told you to plead!

Still over 100 AMERICANS being held in that same position.

All I can say is payback's going to be a bitch

 

[1srelluc]

The .gov left them in jail for months in deplorable conditions. That's been well documented.

After so long they will plea-out just go somewhere and do their time where they will be treated like human beings.

It's called judicial coercion.

 

[Harry Dresden]

the banker and mac.....a phony banker and a phony ......

 

[struth]

Only the guilty plead guilty. In a public case like this, no innocent person would plead guilty at all. One guy went to trial and he lost on all charges, and the jury said 100% guilty.

Why don't these Jan 6th Insurrectionists just go to trial, and prove their supposed innocence??

Because they are 100% guilty, and the evidence against them is overwhelming, they rioted at the Capitol and committed acts of violence. That's why

In certain situations innocent people plead guilty to crimes they did not commit, but that is not what happened here, these people admitted guilt because they are guilty, and the evidence says they are guilty.

one can be a peaceful protester and still be guilty of trespassing and civil disobedience

your demklan locked up people throughout history for that sort of think….look at MLK

 

[The Banker]

They were mostly facing lengthy prison sentences, and would take a guilty plea deal for a lesser sentence.

if they are innocent why go to prison for 4 years, why not prove your innocence in court?

We all know why, you people are just too pathetic to say why.
This is what weakness looks like.

 

[The Banker]

one can be a peaceful protester and still be guilty of trespassing and civil disobedience

your demklan locked up people throughout history for that sort of think….look at MLK

too bad they are pleading guilty to assaulting cops or other crimes and all getting about 3-4 years, in most cases and all of them are guilty.

If they are onnocent they could just plead guilty, but they aren't

 

[Oddball]

if they are innocent why go to prison for 4 years, why not prove your innocence in court?

We all know why, you people are just too pathetic to say why.
This is what weakness looks like.

Where is the jury pool being drawn from, you fucking dope?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

They were threatened with the bottomless pockets of The State, and a jury pool that is the farthest left demographic this side of CCP.

The defendants are facing both bankruptcy and being locked up for absurdly stiff sentences if they don't roll over.

.

They were railroaded.

That's all the leftist vermin have -- cheating.

.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

The .gov left them in jail for months in deplorable conditions. That's been well documented.

After so long they will plea-out just go somewhere and do their time where they will be treated like human beings.

It's called judicial coercion.

.

Why are we not surprised that the OP is not intelligent enough to have thought this through?

.

 

[The Banker]

They were threatened with the bottomless pockets of The State, and a jury pool that is the farthest left demographic this side of CCP.

The defendants are facing both bankruptcy and being locked up for absurdly stiff sentences if they don't roll over.

Translation

I have no valid response but to cry like a bitch because these people are all clearly guilty because they all plead guilty

 

[struth]

too bad they are pleading guilty to assaulting cops or other crimes and all getting about 3-4 years, in most cases and all of them are guilty.

If they are onnocent they could just plead guilty, but they aren't

sh

too bad they are pleading guilty to assaulting cops or other crimes and all getting about 3-4 years, in most cases and all of them are guilty.

If they are onnocent they could just plead guilty, but they aren't

the Shaman dude did not plead guilty to assaulting cops

you lie

 

[Harry Dresden]

.

Why are we not surprised that the OP is not intelligent enough to have thought this through?

.

he not only thinks he is a banker he also thinks he is a Lawyer....

 

[Confederate Soldier]

if they are innocent why go to prison for 4 years, why not prove your innocence in court?

We all know why, you people are just too pathetic to say why.
This is what weakness looks like.

It seems that now we know evidence was withheld, at least with Buffalo Bill guy. Courts were throwing the book at them, juries convicting left and right to long sentences, etc. They were going to be convicted of something, it had to happen because of the political ramifications of it. They took the lesser punishment.

Don't get me wrong, those people deserve something, they're fucking inbred retards too stupid to see it was a trap... I'm just answering your question. Take the plea, to get the lesser sentence.

 

[The Banker]

After being held in solitary confinement for 2 years without charge or trail...tortured...not allowed to speak to a lawyer or family...You would plead anything they told you to plead!

Still over 100 AMERICANS being held in that same position.

All I can say is payback's going to be a bitch

ahahahah !!!
what a joke you are
too bad none of that happened.