If the elections as the Democrats/MSM/Soros/et.al. were 100% legitimate, why are they withholding evidence?

Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Give an example of the kind of evidence you will accept / respect.

Just one.
Nevermind us, what kind of evidence will the courts accept and why hasn't anything been presented that is acceptable? Any fool can babble about alleged fraud or say his cousin's sister's gardener's hairdresser saw someone use a sharpie. What actual concrete evidence is there of widespread voter fraud? Just saying so doesn't make it true.
Seriously.

How do YOU know that the evidence presented was not valid, significant or otherwise acceptable.

Note the absence of a question mark.
Because all the lawsuits are being laughed out of court?

Like as it was with Roe, the courts have shown that they can will ignore and dismiss thr facts and evidence, or at least weigh it against their own anticipation of a backlash from the people their devisions will affect.

The courts are not objective and they certainly are not BLIND arbitersof justice.
 
Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Give an example of the kind of evidence you will accept / respect.

Just one.
Nevermind us, what kind of evidence will the courts accept and why hasn't anything been presented that is acceptable? Any fool can babble about alleged fraud or say his cousin's sister's gardener's hairdresser saw someone use a sharpie. What actual concrete evidence is there of widespread voter fraud? Just saying so doesn't make it true.
Seriously.

How do YOU know that the evidence presented was not valid, significant or otherwise acceptable.

Note the absence of a question mark.
Because all the lawsuits are being laughed out of court?

Like as it was with Roe, the courts have shown that they can will ignore and dismiss thr facts and evidence, or at least weigh it against their own anticipation of a backlash from the people their devisions will affect.

The courts are not objective and they certainly are not BLIND arbitersof justice.
It's the State Legislatures that are tasked with State Election law. They kind of sat on their asses as this storm was brewing, with a sudden hail Mary thrown to the Court once the obvious slapped them in the face.

There isn't a lot they can do at this point, other than take control of the election processes as the Constitution charges them to and have things fixed by the next statewide election, for the GA State Legislature, that means NOW! Early voting starts in two weeks.
 
If they have nothing to hide as the MSM attests, there was no fraud, then why are they resisting?
And this world renowned expert wants to know the following:
Although he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz who's credentials are:
include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert.
Things are getting fun.has looked at available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that information, he concluded

1. The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
2. The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
3. One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden's favor.
4. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
5. The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
6. The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
7. The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They demonstrated manipulation.
For example, in Pennsylvania, it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours.
8. Dominion used Chinese parts, and there's reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
9. There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers
in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
10. The systems failed to produce any auditable results.

Based on the above findings, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with "high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a [sic] hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred [sic] to Vice President Biden."

So remember my last post...
Why did Dominion voting machines weigh each vote @ 1.25 for Biden while weighing Trump at .75...means for example.. out of 20,000 Biden votes.
Maybe the above expert with his world renowned cybersecurity expertise(see above credentials)
His qualifications include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert. Things are getting fun.

Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.
You asked u s to call you when there was 1 single case of fraud....so we did.

Then you asked us to call you when there were more than one.....so we did.

Now you want us to call you when the fraud is widespread. Stay close to the phone while your deciding how to change the goalposts again.
Not a case of ‘fraud,’ evidence of ‘fraud’ – you’ve failed to provide any evidence.

No goalposts are being moved, you’ve simply failed to provide objective, documented evidence of ‘fraud.’
Lie to yourself if you choose.
 
During the weeks following November 3, innumerable election experts and statistical analysts have pored over the voting data upon which former Vice President Joe Biden’s purported campaign victory ostensibly stands. A growing body of evidence ranging from straightforward ballot audits to complex quantitative analyses suggests that the tabulation of the votes was characterized by enough chicanery to alter the outcome of the election. Consequently, a consensus has gradually developed among the auditors of publicly available information released by the states, and it contradicts the narrative promulgated by the Democrats and the media. The more data experts see, the less convinced they are that Biden won. Legitimacy of Biden Win Buried by Objective Data | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics
 
If they have nothing to hide as the MSM attests, there was no fraud, then why are they resisting?
And this world renowned expert wants to know the following:
Although he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz who's credentials are:
include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert.
Things are getting fun.has looked at available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that information, he concluded

1. The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
2. The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
3. One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden's favor.
4. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
5. The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
6. The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
7. The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They demonstrated manipulation.
For example, in Pennsylvania, it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours.
8. Dominion used Chinese parts, and there's reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
9. There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers
in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
10. The systems failed to produce any auditable results.

Based on the above findings, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with "high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a [sic] hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred [sic] to Vice President Biden."

So remember my last post...
Why did Dominion voting machines weigh each vote @ 1.25 for Biden while weighing Trump at .75...means for example.. out of 20,000 Biden votes.
Maybe the above expert with his world renowned cybersecurity expertise(see above credentials)
His qualifications include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert. Things are getting fun.

Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.
You asked u s to call you when there was 1 single case of fraud....so we did.

Then you asked us to call you when there were more than one.....so we did.

Now you want us to call you when the fraud is widespread. Stay close to the phone while your deciding how to change the goalposts again.

I think you got the wrong number....
 
If they have nothing to hide as the MSM attests, there was no fraud, then why are they resisting?
And this world renowned expert wants to know the following:
Although he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz who's credentials are:
include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert.
Things are getting fun.has looked at available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that information, he concluded

1. The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
2. The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
3. One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden's favor.
4. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
5. The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
6. The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
7. The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They demonstrated manipulation.
For example, in Pennsylvania, it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours.
8. Dominion used Chinese parts, and there's reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
9. There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers
in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
10. The systems failed to produce any auditable results.

Based on the above findings, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with "high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a [sic] hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred [sic] to Vice President Biden."

So remember my last post...
Why did Dominion voting machines weigh each vote @ 1.25 for Biden while weighing Trump at .75...means for example.. out of 20,000 Biden votes.
Maybe the above expert with his world renowned cybersecurity expertise(see above credentials)
His qualifications include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert. Things are getting fun.

Because the election was a fraud. They know it. We know it. The American People know it.
 
If the Democrats had ability to fix the election their way, then why did they nominate Biden of all people?
And why did they lose so many down ballot races?????

Hey, settle down. Let's not get carried away with logical thinking.
You cant spend time doing down ballot circles when you have to fake 120k+ ballots for Biden, sheesh!
BULLSHIT!
The Dems wanted to win the Senate as badly as they did the presidency, If they cheated as you LIE, they could have simply hired more people for the ballot dump.
 
If they have nothing to hide as the MSM attests, there was no fraud, then why are they resisting?
And this world renowned expert wants to know the following:
Although he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz who's credentials are:
include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert.
Things are getting fun.has looked at available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that information, he concluded

1. The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
2. The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia to pretend to halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
3. One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden's favor.
4. Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
5. The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
6. The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
7. The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They demonstrated manipulation.
For example, in Pennsylvania, it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours.
8. Dominion used Chinese parts, and there's reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
9. There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers
in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
10. The systems failed to produce any auditable results.

Based on the above findings, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia concluded with "high confidence that the election 2020 data were altered in all battleground states resulting in a [sic] hundreds of thousands of votes that were cast for President Trump to be transferred [sic] to Vice President Biden."

So remember my last post...
Why did Dominion voting machines weigh each vote @ 1.25 for Biden while weighing Trump at .75...means for example.. out of 20,000 Biden votes.
Maybe the above expert with his world renowned cybersecurity expertise(see above credentials)
His qualifications include a B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. in various areas of electrical and computer engineering.
In addition, "I have advanced trained from the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), National Security Agency (NSA),
DHS office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A) and Massachusetts Institution of Technology (MIT)."
Is that enough credentials for him to conclude:
And with the New York Times touting Dr. Keshavarz-Nia's brilliance and his ability to sniff out fraud, they'll struggle to that he's not a reliable expert. Things are getting fun.

Because the election was a fraud. They know it. We know it. The American People know it.
The American people know you are full of shit!
 

Forum List

Back
Top