Because all the lawsuits are being laughed out of court?Seriously.Nevermind us, what kind of evidence will the courts accept and why hasn't anything been presented that is acceptable? Any fool can babble about alleged fraud or say his cousin's sister's gardener's hairdresser saw someone use a sharpie. What actual concrete evidence is there of widespread voter fraud? Just saying so doesn't make it true.Call us when you have evidence of widespread voter fraud.
Give an example of the kind of evidence you will accept / respect.
Just one.
How do YOU know that the evidence presented was not valid, significant or otherwise acceptable.
Note the absence of a question mark.
Like as it was with Roe, the courts have shown that they can will ignore and dismiss thr facts and evidence, or at least weigh it against their own anticipation of a backlash from the people their devisions will affect.
The courts are not objective and they certainly are not BLIND arbitersof justice.