If Romney is Elected he Will be a One term President

Publius1787

Gold Member
Jan 11, 2011
6,211
676
190
If Romney is Elected he Will be a One term President

To begin with, the only reason why I care about this election is because of a possible Supreme Court nomination/s. Justice Ginsburg has conveyed her intent on retiring in 2015 and Kennedy might step down as well. Obviously, a Romney White House could restore the Court from the almost 65-70 years of damage done by the left. The magically ever changing U.S. Constitution that makes socialism possible through unrestrained federal power has almost always been the majority of the court ever since “The Switch in Time That Saved the 9.”

Now on to Romney

Romney isn’t going to get the same treatment as Obama did on the economy. With quantitative easing, a practice never before successfully attempted in economic history, the potential for economic turmoil and inflation is no doubt a growing threat. Furthermore, with similar but worse situations in Europe, the failure other continents and economic systems are no doubt going to play a heavy negative role in our economy. Likewise, China is currently attempting to cool down their much overheated command economy without falling on its face. If their performance on building ghosts cities is any indicator of their incompetence, were in for a wild ride. Romney faces all of this.

Once again Romney is not going to get the same treatment in the media as Obama did. The potential for economic disaster is great and any attempt by Romney to implement his policies (Conservative policies I hope, but hey, it’s Romney so well never know) will be viewed as failures no matter if they fail or not. Furthermore, Romney is not the best rhetorician on conservatism, well, because deep down inside he is not a conservative and he can’t defend basic misconceptions about conservative policy. Any plan that he comes up with or implement will hopefully be a cross between Ryan’s plan with a Romney twist and not the other way around. Even then we don’t know if he will listen to and implement Ryan on fiscal policy. Once again the potential for outside disaster is great and Obama has done absolutely nothing with respect to advancing our economy, so Romney has nothing to work with upon inauguration day.

With this in mind, a voice in the back of my head is telling me that this election really isn’t all that important for Conservatives. We know that Obama is wrecking the country, but we also know that cleaning up the Obama economy will be much worse now than if conservative principles were applied immediately after the crash in 2008 and carried on up until now. Romney is walking in to a fiscal and economic trap that has the potential to ruin the conservative name for years to come. The media certainly won’t blame Obama for his failed economic policies in a Romney era as they still blame Bush today. Therefore, in the name of true conservative government, perhaps it would be better to let Obama continue to implement liberalism and destroy this economy and the America sought by our founders rather than waste our one chance to properly fix it.

You see, a second Obama term will effectively turn America away from liberalism for decades to come. After all of the failures, all of the unconstitutional acts, all of the lack of transparency, all of the ignoring the rule of law, and all of the using the Justice Department as a political wing of the White House, can you imagine what Obama will do in a second term with no incentive to play straight amidst the public eye?

Liberals deep down know that their utopian welfare state cannot exist the way it has for years as we pull ourselves out of this recession. They know their ideas defy fiscal sanity so they want the Republicans to be the ones to change them. They are ready to pass the torch. They’re asking for programs they know we can’t afford for political gain and telling their constituency that they want to give them other people’s money. They know that they are going to lose the Senate and the White House. And when Romney enters the White House, implements the necessary reforms, does all the hard political suicidal work of reforming entitlements, and sets the economy on the right track, with the support of both houses of congress, liberals will be foaming out their mouths claiming that greedy Republicans took their government goodies away and they, the Democrats, want to restore them.

No, I believe that conservatism will be far more popular after Obamas’ second term where he can show America what true liberalism is. Romney and Ryan will no doubt do what is necessary to fix this economy to the extent that government can fix it. However, what's necessary is not what’s popular unless the people understand why it's necessary. That lack of understanding is what will kill Romney in his re-election effort. That’s why it would be best for Obama to teach them why with a second term. To forever show what true liberalism is and why it doesn’t work. Else Romney/Ryans unpopular but necessary policies will limit him to one term.
 
Last edited:
An Obama second term will be the coup de grace for America's destruction. If there is to be ANY hope of a nation as envisioned by the men who created it the madness must stop NOW.

ETA: It may already be too late...
 
Last edited:
An Obama second term will be the coup de grace for America's destruction. If there is to be ANY hope of a nation as envisioned by the men who created it the madness must stop NOW.

ETA: It may already be too late...

What better to re-establish individual liberty, constitutional government, and fiscal responsibility than an Obama second term? They say you don't miss it until it's gone. But perhaps your right. The precedence Obama's setting is that of a third world dictator. Thats dangerous within itself. Plus the SCOTUS is on the line. I vote Judge Vinsen! Of course, if it is too late, it certainly supports the thesis of the op.
 
Last edited:
An Obama second term will be the coup de grace for America's destruction. If there is to be ANY hope of a nation as envisioned by the men who created it the madness must stop NOW.

ETA: It may already be too late...

It's not too late. It all depends on turn out. And it must be massive on the conservative side.

We did it up here. But you must have the votes without question.

Personally I would ask Jimmy Carter's group to monitor this election.

Why?:D Because the Carter foundation believes in voter ID to prevent voter fraud.
 
If Romney is Elected he Will be a One term President

To begin with, the only reason why I care about this election is because of a possible Supreme Court nomination/s. Justice Ginsburg has conveyed her intent on retiring in 2015 and Kennedy might step down as well. Obviously, a Romney White House could restore the Court from the almost 65-70 years of damage done by the left. The magically ever changing U.S. Constitution that makes socialism possible through unrestrained federal power has almost always been the majority of the court ever since “The Switch in Time That Saved the 9.”

Now on to Romney

Romney isn’t going to get the same treatment as Obama did on the economy. With quantitative easing, a practice never before successfully attempted in economic history, the potential for economic turmoil and inflation is no doubt a growing threat. Furthermore, with similar but worse situations in Europe, the failure other continents and economic systems are no doubt going to play a heavy negative role in our economy. Likewise, China is currently attempting to cool down their much overheated command economy without falling on its face. If their performance on building ghosts cities is any indicator of their incompetence, were in for a wild ride. Romney faces all of this.

Once again Romney is not going to get the same treatment in the media as Obama did. The potential for economic disaster is great and any attempt by Romney to implement his policies (Conservative policies I hope, but hey, it’s Romney so well never know) will be viewed as failures no matter if they fail or not. Furthermore, Romney is not the best rhetorician on conservatism, well, because deep down inside he is not a conservative and he can’t defend basic misconceptions about conservative policy. Any plan that he comes up with or implement will hopefully be a cross between Ryan’s plan with a Romney twist and not the other way around. Even then we don’t know if he will listen to and implement Ryan on fiscal policy. Once again the potential for outside disaster is great and Obama has done absolutely nothing with respect to advancing our economy, so Romney has nothing to work with upon inauguration day.

With this in mind, a voice in the back of my head is telling me that this election really isn’t all that important for Conservatives. We know that Obama is wrecking the country, but we also know that cleaning up the Obama economy will be much worse now than if conservative principles were applied immediately after the crash in 2008 and carried on up until now. Romney is walking in to a fiscal and economic trap that has the potential to ruin the conservative name for years to come. The media certainly won’t blame Obama for his failed economic policies in a Romney era as they still blame Bush today. Therefore, in the name of true conservative government, perhaps it would be better to let Obama continue to implement liberalism and destroy this economy and the America sought by our founders rather than waste our one chance to properly fix it.

You see, a second Obama term will effectively turn America away from liberalism for decades to come. After all of the failures, all of the unconstitutional acts, all of the lack of transparency, all of the ignoring the rule of law, and all of the using the Justice Department as a political wing of the White House, can you imagine what Obama will do in a second term with no incentive to play straight amidst the public eye?

Liberals deep down know that their utopian welfare state cannot exist the way it has for years as we pull ourselves out of this recession. They know their ideas defy fiscal sanity so they want the Republicans to be the ones to change them. They are ready to pass the torch. They’re asking for programs they know we can’t afford for political gain and telling their constituency that they want to give them other people’s money. They know that they are going to lose the Senate and the White House. And when Romney enters the White House, implements the necessary reforms, does all the hard political suicidal work of reforming entitlements, and sets the economy on the right track, with the support of both houses of congress, liberals will be foaming out their mouths claiming that greedy Republicans took their government goodies away and they, the Democrats, want to restore them.

No, I believe that conservatism will be far more popular after Obamas’ second term where he can show America what true liberalism is. Romney and Ryan will no doubt do what is necessary to fix this economy to the extent that government can fix it. However, what's necessary is not what’s popular unless the people understand why it's necessary. That lack of understanding is what will kill Romney in his re-election effort. That’s why it would be best for Obama to teach them why with a second term. To forever show what true liberalism is and why it doesn’t work. Else Romney/Ryans unpopular but necessary policies will limit him to one term.

Excellent post but Publius I glazed over by the second paragraph. Most won't get past that.
Most libs won't even understand what a paragraph is.

Well done though. Quite eloquent and from the heart.
Bravo. Your heart is in the right place.
 
An Obama second term will be the coup de grace for America's destruction. If there is to be ANY hope of a nation as envisioned by the men who created it the madness must stop NOW.

ETA: It may already be too late...

You have to laugh, don't you?

After eight years of Bush's overspending and mismanagement the entire global economy meltsdown - and you wonder if Obama will destroy America.

When I see these posts I wonder if the poster doesn't remember 2008, or somehow thinks the President has no impact on the conomy. In which case - why moan about Obama?
 
An Obama second term will be the coup de grace for America's destruction. If there is to be ANY hope of a nation as envisioned by the men who created it the madness must stop NOW.

ETA: It may already be too late...

You have to laugh, don't you?

After eight years of Bush's overspending and mismanagement the entire global economy meltsdown - and you wonder if Obama will destroy America.

When I see these posts I wonder if the poster doesn't remember 2008, or somehow thinks the President has no impact on the conomy. In which case - why moan about Obama?

It's obvious from your post that you didn't read it.
 
Publius -

I read it.

I thought it was interesting, but so incredily distorted and biased that no one could take it seriously as any form of political commentary.

"We know that Obama is wrecking the country,"

Really?

And that is a sane, balanced assessment is it?

Has the author ever been to a country that is really wrecked to find out what they look like?
 
If Romney is Elected he Will be a One term President

To begin with, the only reason why I care about this election is because of a possible Supreme Court nomination/s. Justice Ginsburg has conveyed her intent on retiring in 2015 and Kennedy might step down as well. Obviously, a Romney White House could restore the Court from the almost 65-70 years of damage done by the left. The magically ever changing U.S. Constitution that makes socialism possible through unrestrained federal power has almost always been the majority of the court ever since “The Switch in Time That Saved the 9.”

Now on to Romney

Romney isn’t going to get the same treatment as Obama did on the economy. With quantitative easing, a practice never before successfully attempted in economic history, the potential for economic turmoil and inflation is no doubt a growing threat. Furthermore, with similar but worse situations in Europe, the failure other continents and economic systems are no doubt going to play a heavy negative role in our economy. Likewise, China is currently attempting to cool down their much overheated command economy without falling on its face. If their performance on building ghosts cities is any indicator of their incompetence, were in for a wild ride. Romney faces all of this.

Once again Romney is not going to get the same treatment in the media as Obama did. The potential for economic disaster is great and any attempt by Romney to implement his policies (Conservative policies I hope, but hey, it’s Romney so well never know) will be viewed as failures no matter if they fail or not. Furthermore, Romney is not the best rhetorician on conservatism, well, because deep down inside he is not a conservative and he can’t defend basic misconceptions about conservative policy. Any plan that he comes up with or implement will hopefully be a cross between Ryan’s plan with a Romney twist and not the other way around. Even then we don’t know if he will listen to and implement Ryan on fiscal policy. Once again the potential for outside disaster is great and Obama has done absolutely nothing with respect to advancing our economy, so Romney has nothing to work with upon inauguration day.

With this in mind, a voice in the back of my head is telling me that this election really isn’t all that important for Conservatives. We know that Obama is wrecking the country, but we also know that cleaning up the Obama economy will be much worse now than if conservative principles were applied immediately after the crash in 2008 and carried on up until now. Romney is walking in to a fiscal and economic trap that has the potential to ruin the conservative name for years to come. The media certainly won’t blame Obama for his failed economic policies in a Romney era as they still blame Bush today. Therefore, in the name of true conservative government, perhaps it would be better to let Obama continue to implement liberalism and destroy this economy and the America sought by our founders rather than waste our one chance to properly fix it.

You see, a second Obama term will effectively turn America away from liberalism for decades to come. After all of the failures, all of the unconstitutional acts, all of the lack of transparency, all of the ignoring the rule of law, and all of the using the Justice Department as a political wing of the White House, can you imagine what Obama will do in a second term with no incentive to play straight amidst the public eye?

Liberals deep down know that their utopian welfare state cannot exist the way it has for years as we pull ourselves out of this recession. They know their ideas defy fiscal sanity so they want the Republicans to be the ones to change them. They are ready to pass the torch. They’re asking for programs they know we can’t afford for political gain and telling their constituency that they want to give them other people’s money. They know that they are going to lose the Senate and the White House. And when Romney enters the White House, implements the necessary reforms, does all the hard political suicidal work of reforming entitlements, and sets the economy on the right track, with the support of both houses of congress, liberals will be foaming out their mouths claiming that greedy Republicans took their government goodies away and they, the Democrats, want to restore them.

No, I believe that conservatism will be far more popular after Obamas’ second term where he can show America what true liberalism is. Romney and Ryan will no doubt do what is necessary to fix this economy to the extent that government can fix it. However, what's necessary is not what’s popular unless the people understand why it's necessary. That lack of understanding is what will kill Romney in his re-election effort. That’s why it would be best for Obama to teach them why with a second term. To forever show what true liberalism is and why it doesn’t work. Else Romney/Ryans unpopular but necessary policies will limit him to one term.

Excellent post but Publius I glazed over by the second paragraph. Most won't get past that.
Most libs won't even understand what a paragraph is.

Well done though. Quite eloquent and from the heart.
Bravo. Your heart is in the right place.

Thank you very much. I'm flattered because I didn't put too much time in to it and I hate crappy work! . I could have done better with a thesis statement, more merited/qualified partisan comments , more developed body, better transitions (They are horrible), and a solid conclusion. But hey, I'm not writing academia for a message board if you know what I mean. I guess, sense you were nice enough to take the time to read it, I want you to know that I can do better. However, people here don’t like to read anything, so it is what it is.

Thanks again
 
An Obama second term will be the coup de grace for America's destruction. If there is to be ANY hope of a nation as envisioned by the men who created it the madness must stop NOW.

ETA: It may already be too late...

You have to laugh, don't you?

After eight years of Bush's overspending and mismanagement the entire global economy meltsdown - and you wonder if Obama will destroy America.

When I see these posts I wonder if the poster doesn't remember 2008, or somehow thinks the President has no impact on the conomy. In which case - why moan about Obama?

Your problem is you don't understand that Bush and Obama BOTH work for Goldman-Sachs. So does Romney, but the difference is Obama is in overdrive while Romney MIGHT be willing to downshift.

Which is why I said it may be too late already. You idiots with your Left/Right, Dem/Rep paradigm may have already fucked the rest of us out of our country.
 
Publius -

I read it.

I thought it was interesting, but so incredily distorted and biased that no one could take it seriously as any form of political commentary.

"We know that Obama is wrecking the country,"

Really?

And that is a sane, balanced assessment is it?

Has the author ever been to a country that is really wrecked to find out what they look like?

I've been to Nigeria, South Africa, Mexico, Okinawa Japan, Tokyo Japan, Singapore, Philippines, Iraq, Kuwait, Germany, Spain, Thailand, Guam, Australia, Hong Kong, & South Korea. How’s that for eight years of active duty in the United States Marine Corps? Yeah, I think I know what a wrecked country looks like. And I don't believe that the op was meant for your type of audience. I was never intending to be nonpartisan, nor did I intend to qualify every statement. I'm not writing academia for a message board. Who would?
 
What better to re-establish individual liberty, constitutional government, and fiscal responsibility…
Nonsense.

Americans enjoy comprehensively greater individual liberty today than at any time in this Nation’s history.

There is no need to ‘re-establish’ Constitutional government; Constitutional government is up and running and functioning today just as the Framers intended.

And ‘fiscal responsibility’ is not the capricious, irresponsible cutting of taxes, elimination of programs, or gutting of regulations in accordance with conservative political and economic dogma.
 
If Romney is Elected he Will be a One term President? No... He will not be like Barry Soetoro.
 
If Romney is Elected he Will be a One term President

To begin with, the only reason why I care about this election is because of a possible Supreme Court nomination/s. Justice Ginsburg has conveyed her intent on retiring in 2015 and Kennedy might step down as well. Obviously, a Romney White House could restore the Court from the almost 65-70 years of damage done by the left. The magically ever changing U.S. Constitution that makes socialism possible through unrestrained federal power has almost always been the majority of the court ever since “The Switch in Time That Saved the 9.”

Now on to Romney

Romney isn’t going to get the same treatment as Obama did on the economy. With quantitative easing, a practice never before successfully attempted in economic history, the potential for economic turmoil and inflation is no doubt a growing threat. Furthermore, with similar but worse situations in Europe, the failure other continents and economic systems are no doubt going to play a heavy negative role in our economy. Likewise, China is currently attempting to cool down their much overheated command economy without falling on its face. If their performance on building ghosts cities is any indicator of their incompetence, were in for a wild ride. Romney faces all of this.

Once again Romney is not going to get the same treatment in the media as Obama did. The potential for economic disaster is great and any attempt by Romney to implement his policies (Conservative policies I hope, but hey, it’s Romney so well never know) will be viewed as failures no matter if they fail or not. Furthermore, Romney is not the best rhetorician on conservatism, well, because deep down inside he is not a conservative and he can’t defend basic misconceptions about conservative policy. Any plan that he comes up with or implement will hopefully be a cross between Ryan’s plan with a Romney twist and not the other way around. Even then we don’t know if he will listen to and implement Ryan on fiscal policy. Once again the potential for outside disaster is great and Obama has done absolutely nothing with respect to advancing our economy, so Romney has nothing to work with upon inauguration day.

With this in mind, a voice in the back of my head is telling me that this election really isn’t all that important for Conservatives. We know that Obama is wrecking the country, but we also know that cleaning up the Obama economy will be much worse now than if conservative principles were applied immediately after the crash in 2008 and carried on up until now. Romney is walking in to a fiscal and economic trap that has the potential to ruin the conservative name for years to come. The media certainly won’t blame Obama for his failed economic policies in a Romney era as they still blame Bush today. Therefore, in the name of true conservative government, perhaps it would be better to let Obama continue to implement liberalism and destroy this economy and the America sought by our founders rather than waste our one chance to properly fix it.

You see, a second Obama term will effectively turn America away from liberalism for decades to come. After all of the failures, all of the unconstitutional acts, all of the lack of transparency, all of the ignoring the rule of law, and all of the using the Justice Department as a political wing of the White House, can you imagine what Obama will do in a second term with no incentive to play straight amidst the public eye?

Liberals deep down know that their utopian welfare state cannot exist the way it has for years as we pull ourselves out of this recession. They know their ideas defy fiscal sanity so they want the Republicans to be the ones to change them. They are ready to pass the torch. They’re asking for programs they know we can’t afford for political gain and telling their constituency that they want to give them other people’s money. They know that they are going to lose the Senate and the White House. And when Romney enters the White House, implements the necessary reforms, does all the hard political suicidal work of reforming entitlements, and sets the economy on the right track, with the support of both houses of congress, liberals will be foaming out their mouths claiming that greedy Republicans took their government goodies away and they, the Democrats, want to restore them.

No, I believe that conservatism will be far more popular after Obamas’ second term where he can show America what true liberalism is. Romney and Ryan will no doubt do what is necessary to fix this economy to the extent that government can fix it. However, what's necessary is not what’s popular unless the people understand why it's necessary. That lack of understanding is what will kill Romney in his re-election effort. That’s why it would be best for Obama to teach them why with a second term. To forever show what true liberalism is and why it doesn’t work. Else Romney/Ryans unpopular but necessary policies will limit him to one term.

Excellent post but Publius I glazed over by the second paragraph. Most won't get past that.
Most libs won't even understand what a paragraph is.

Well done though. Quite eloquent and from the heart.
Bravo. Your heart is in the right place.

Thank you very much. I'm flattered because I didn't put too much time in to it and I hate crappy work! . I could have done better with a thesis statement, more merited/qualified partisan comments , more developed body, better transitions (They are horrible), and a solid conclusion. But hey, I'm not writing academia for a message board if you know what I mean. I guess, sense you were nice enough to take the time to read it, I want you to know that I can do better. However, people here don’t like to read anything, so it is what it is.

Thanks again

No dear heart. Thanks be to you. You are one in a million. Rarely seen on a board.

yours,
td

PS though

Stick around if you dare and get ready to rumble. :D We hit top ropes here and leave grammar behind but it's a fun world.
 
Last edited:
What better to re-establish individual liberty, constitutional government, and fiscal responsibility…
Nonsense.

Americans enjoy comprehensively greater individual liberty today than at any time in this Nation’s history.

There is no need to ‘re-establish’ Constitutional government; Constitutional government is up and running and functioning today just as the Framers intended.

And ‘fiscal responsibility’ is not the capricious, irresponsible cutting of taxes, elimination of programs, or gutting of regulations in accordance with conservative political and economic dogma.

Really?? The Constitution written to restrain the Federal beast now through the Commerce Clause feeding it?

I guess all lawyers aren't so smart, after all...
 
What better to re-establish individual liberty, constitutional government, and fiscal responsibility…
Nonsense.

Americans enjoy comprehensively greater individual liberty today than at any time in this Nation’s history.

There is no need to ‘re-establish’ Constitutional government; Constitutional government is up and running and functioning today just as the Framers intended.

And ‘fiscal responsibility’ is not the capricious, irresponsible cutting of taxes, elimination of programs, or gutting of regulations in accordance with conservative political and economic dogma.

Unqualified claims all around ladies and gentlemen! Don’t worry I won’t indulge. The merits of the op rely solely on if Romney is elected he will be a one term president. Or perhaps two terms for Obama will advance long term conservatism more so than a short term electoral victory. I can’t say that I support my own conclusions. But it is fun to think outside the box. Come on, what conservative would ever write such a mess? It’s unique, you must give me that.
 
Last edited:
You may be right Publius. But I simply can't stand the thought of another four years of this hack in office, with nothing to lose and what he'll see as a mandate from the American people to continue pushing his radical policies. If Obama gets another term with his health tax plan, cap and trade, a fully liberal court and the unfathomable damage he will do to our relations with our allies and enemies alike, I don't think 2 decades of solid Republican leadership will matter much.
 
An Obama second term will be the coup de grace for America's destruction. If there is to be ANY hope of a nation as envisioned by the men who created it the madness must stop NOW.

ETA: It may already be too late...

You folks give presidents too much credit for the economy.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top