So, what is the WaPo saying here? To avoid possible violence we should convict somebody even if the court decides that the evidence does not prove guilt? Is that our new form or definition of justice now? Convict somebody whether the evidence convinces the court of guilt or not, because there could be violence if there's no conviction? That is going to be a factor in determining the court's decision? Somebody is guilty because some people don't like him? Fuck that.
The Dim version of justice: Accept our verdict or we'll burn down your neighborhood!
What's really scary is that these assholes feel free to say these things on a public forum.
They will until people start shooting them... That's coming sooner than later...
I just ordered an AR-15 so I have one before Biden's gun confiscation passes. All these Democrat Reich NAZIs swore up and down that Biden had no intention of taking our guns.
I hear ya, bro. I don't have an AR-15 or the like, but I do have 4 revolvers that I keep loaded all the time in the house. Them things will not jam up, I trust them more than a semi-auto with a spring in it. Once a month, I got out somewhere and fire off the 5 loads in each gun and then clean and reload. I swear, when I fired that .357 off in the house one time, it sounded like a freakin' cannon. The wife wasn't home, thank God. Gotta scare the shit outta anybody breakin' in.
I don't think Biden and the Dems can confiscate our guns, although I do think they'll try like hell. The SCOTUS as it is now won't let 'em do that.
Back to the thread, I don't think the Dems have the slightest leg to stand on when it comes to owning violence. Not after they way the lib/dem mayors and governors allowed nightly riots to go on for months on end.