If nothing else the hearings thus far have achieved something notable.

[BlindBoo]

McCarthy had the lawful power to choose anyone he wanted...Piglosi rejected his slections, so the "select committee" is operation outside the bounds of the law.

Uh huh. Some Neo-Turd tried that theory out in court too, and lost.

 

[Oddball]

Uh huh. Some Neo-Turd tried that theory out in court too, and lost.

Link or STFU

 

[BlindBoo]

Link or STFU

Like a link will change your mind? lol.

"For example, Kelly rejected the notion that the committee has been operating improperly because it has no members selected by GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy. McCarthy initially recommended five members to the panel, but Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected two of them — Reps. Jim Banks and Jim Jordan — contending that they were too closely linked to Trump to be legitimate investigators. In response, McCarthy withdrew all five picks and boycotted the panel.

But Kelly argued that just because Pelosi disagreed with him — and then opted to permit the select committee to operate without its full 13-member contingent — does not make the committee invalid"

Judge upholds Jan. 6 committee subpoena for RNC records

U.S. District Court Judge Tim Kelly said the select committee had demonstrated its need for the party’s data on its fundraising emails.

www.politico.com

 

[BackAgain]

Like a link will change your mind? lol.

"For example, Kelly rejected the notion that the committee has been operating improperly because it has no members selected by GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy. McCarthy initially recommended five members to the panel, but Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected two of them — Reps. Jim Banks and Jim Jordan — contending that they were too closely linked to Trump to be legitimate investigators. In response, McCarthy withdrew all five picks and boycotted the panel.

But Kelly argued that just because Pelosi disagreed with him — and then opted to permit the select committee to operate without its full 13-member contingent — does not make the committee invalid"

Judge upholds Jan. 6 committee subpoena for RNC records

U.S. District Court Judge Tim Kelly said the select committee had demonstrated its need for the party’s data on its fundraising emails.

www.politico.com

A judge made a ruling. It’s obviously wrong, but it was a judicial ruling.

 

[ElmerMudd]

And there you have it.

There's no legal outcome here, only a political one.....Ends justify the means.

You're beneath scum.

Your posts continue to show how stupid you are. Did you attend school at any point in your life. Did you ever have a government class? Congress continually has informational hearings to determine the need for legislation. The information can be used by DOJ for criminal proceedings.
You are absolutely clueless.

 

[BS Filter]

You clapping seals are enthralled by a dog and pony show while the American people are suffering. You're going to pay dearly.

 

[Oddball]

Your posts continue to show how stupid you are. Did you attend school at any point in your life. Did you ever have a government class? Congress continually has informational hearings to determine the need for legislation. The information can be used by DOJ for criminal proceedings.
You are absolutely clueless.

Go piss up a rope, moonbat.

These "informational hearings" are as masturbatory as Trey Gowdy's Kabuki shit show on Benghazi.

You fuckwits are going absolutely nowhere with your "select committee" Soviet show trial, and y'all damn well know it.

 

[BlindBoo]

A judge made a ruling. It’s obviously wrong, but it was a judicial ruling.

Snot over.

Select committee drops bid to obtain RNC records in time for public hearings

At issue are some Republican National Committee records held by a third-party vendor.

www.politico.com

 

[ElmerMudd]

You clapping seals are enthralled by a dog and pony show while the American people are suffering. You're going to pay dearly.

Is that a threat? What is going to happen. It sounds like the threats made against Pence on January 6th.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Go piss up a rope, moonbat.

These "informational hearings" are as masturbatory as Trey Gowdy's Kabuki shit show on Benghazi.

You fuckwits are going absolutely nowhere with your "select committee" Soviet show trial, and y'all damn well know it.

You are an idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[berg80]

You aren’t even able to defend your own claims. Not with facts, not with logic and not with any shred of honesty.

The report goes beyond prior analyses to provide the first in-depth treatment of the voluminous publicly available evidence and the relevant law, including possible defenses. It reviews the evidence as to whether Trump as a matter of law conspired with his outside counsel John Eastman, administration lawyer Jeffrey Clark, and others to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 by scheming to block the electoral count on January 6, 2021 and to subvert the Department of Justice’s election enforcement work. The report similarly reviews the evidence as to whether Trump and Eastman violated 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c) with their scheme to obstruct the congressional count.

Trump on Trial: A Guide to the January 6 Hearings and the Question of Criminality | Brookings

A report reviewing the substantial evidence that Donald Trump conspired to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, by scheming to block the electoral count on January 6, 2021.

www.brookings.edu

If you had read the info at the link I provided I wouldn't have had to take the trouble to call bullshit on your claim. You'd already know it was bullshit.

 

[berg80]

Is that a threat? What is going to happen. It sounds like the threats made against Pence on January 6th.

There's a case to be made Trump was purposely putting Pence in harm's way in order to get him to leave the Capital so 1/6 would come and go without Biden being certified, thus leaving the answer to the question...."what happens next".....up in the air.

 

[skews13]

Who doesn't love a trial without due process to be televised around the world?

Right wingers and their silly due process Constitution thingy.

The trials come after the hearings.

The defendants will get all the due process they have coming to them.

 

[BS Filter]

Is that a threat? What is going to happen. It sounds like the threats made against Pence on January 6th.

Oh yeah, that's a threat. I just sent someone to stick an ice cream cone into Biden's face.

 

[Ralph Norton]

Your posts continue to show how stupid you are. Did you attend school at any point in your life. Did you ever have a government class? Congress continually has informational hearings to determine the need for legislation. The information can be used by DOJ for criminal proceedings.
You are absolutely clueless.

The fact that "the information can be used by DOJ for criminal proceedings" is not at all relevant to THESE proceedings. Oddball is absolutely correct when he states "there will be no legal outcome here'.
You might want to refrain from calling other people clueless.

 

[BackAgain]

The report goes beyond prior analyses to provide the first in-depth treatment of the voluminous publicly available evidence and the relevant law, including possible defenses. It reviews the evidence as to whether Trump as a matter of law conspired with his outside counsel John Eastman, administration lawyer Jeffrey Clark, and others to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 by scheming to block the electoral count on January 6, 2021 and to subvert the Department of Justice’s election enforcement work. The report similarly reviews the evidence as to whether Trump and Eastman violated 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c) with their scheme to obstruct the congressional count.

Trump on Trial: A Guide to the January 6 Hearings and the Question of Criminality | Brookings

A report reviewing the substantial evidence that Donald Trump conspired to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, by scheming to block the electoral count on January 6, 2021.

www.brookings.edu

If you had read the info at the link I provided I wouldn't have had to take the trouble to call bullshit on your claim. You'd already know it was bullshit.

Zzz. The distort ain’t worth shit.

 

[BS Filter]

There's a case to be made Trump was purposely putting Pence in harm's way in order to get him to leave the Capital so 1/6 would come and go without Biden being certified, thus leaving the answer to the question...."what happens next".....up in the air.

Yeah, you got that right. No one really knows how close this country came to being overthrown by the people. First attempted coup by free citizens in the history of the World. Exciting times we live in, huh.

 

[berg80]

Oddball is absolutely correct when he states "there will be no legal outcome here'.

One wonders why he felt he needed to mention that fact since it is apparent to anyone paying attention. Not to mention it's irrelevant to the purpose of the hearings, which is to inform the public about what transpired.

 

[BS Filter]

One wonders why he felt he needed to mention that fact since it is apparent to anyone paying attention. Not to mention it's irrelevant to the purpose of the hearings, which is to inform the public about what transpired.

Goodness gracious, yes. We came too close to losing a stolen election. Downright scary.

 

[berg80]

Zzz. The distort ain’t worth shit.

You just wrote....... You aren’t even able to defend your own claims. Not with facts, not with logic and not with any shred of honesty.........and yet you are unable to do what you demanded of me. I provided factual material, you replied with an unsubstantiated assertion. Prove it.