If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.

[tyroneweaver]

They say the Bible is fake news. But they quote it quite often when it suits their purpose.

11 Times The Anti-Bible Democrats Cited The Bible To Defend Their Big Government Programs

 

[Freewill]

They say the Bible is fake news. But they quote it quite often when it suits their purpose.

11 Times The Anti-Bible Democrats Cited The Bible To Defend Their Big Government Programs

Liberals don't like it when anyone tells them they are doing is wrong. Especially when the Bible is referenced But they have no moral code of their own so they have to borrow one. But only when it can be used against someone else.

 

[Pogo]

If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.[sic]

You ah.... you do realize that "libs" is politics and "the bible" is religion, right?
Dafuck does one have to do with the other?

They say the Bible is fake news.

Do they now.

---- Link?

 

[BreezeWood]

.
in order to readminister the truths the 4th century book misconstrued to suite their political agenda they substituted in their place to appear as the real 1st century events they actually opposed. primarily an acceptance for free Spirited thought the liberal 1st represented.

 

[Freewill]

If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.[sic]

You ah.... you do realize that "libs" is politics and "the bible" is religion, right?
Dafuck does one have to do with the other?

They say the Bible is fake news.

Do they now.

---- Link?

I think the point of the Op is exactly what you are saying. I think it is liberals that have the problem knowing the difference.

 

[Pogo]

If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.[sic]

You ah.... you do realize that "libs" is politics and "the bible" is religion, right?
Dafuck does one have to do with the other?

They say the Bible is fake news.

Do they now.

---- Link?

I think the point of the Op is exactly what you are saying. I think it is liberals that have the problem knowing the difference.

Thanks, that's clear as mud. Perhaps the OP would care to tackle it.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

They say the Bible is fake news. But they quote it quite often when it suits their purpose.

11 Times The Anti-Bible Democrats Cited The Bible To Defend Their Big Government Programs

They erroneously believe that they have influence in such matters by citing it, but the Christian Left is based in "social justice" nonsense, not the teachings of Christ.

No one pays attention but themselves.

 

[hobelim]

If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.

Libs? really?

To answer your question, believing the Bible is a book of fairy tales does not mean it is of no value.

Fairy tales convey teaching and moral lessons.

Thats why.

If Cons believe the Bible is the word of God, why would they object to it being quoted?

 

[ding]

If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.

Libs? really?

To answer your question, believing the Bible is a book of fairy tales does not mean it is of no value.

Fairy tales convey teaching and moral lessons.

Thats why.

If Cons believe the Bible is the word of God, why would they object to it being quoted?

For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument.

 

[rightwinger]

Who says you can't quote works of fiction?

People quote Shakespeare

 

[hobelim]

If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.

Libs? really?

To answer your question, believing the Bible is a book of fairy tales does not mean it is of no value.

Fairy tales convey teaching and moral lessons.

Thats why.

If Cons believe the Bible is the word of God, why would they object to it being quoted?

For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument.

So you dismiss out of hand well documented, reviewed and accepted scientific facts that begin to explain in part, not justify, deviant behavior?

 

[ding]

If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.

Libs? really?

To answer your question, believing the Bible is a book of fairy tales does not mean it is of no value.

Fairy tales convey teaching and moral lessons.

Thats why.

If Cons believe the Bible is the word of God, why would they object to it being quoted?

For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument.

So you dismiss out of hand well documented, reviewed and accepted scientific facts that begin to explain in part, not justify, deviant behavior?

No, I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. I thought I made that pretty clear.

 

[hobelim]

If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.

Libs? really?

To answer your question, believing the Bible is a book of fairy tales does not mean it is of no value.

Fairy tales convey teaching and moral lessons.

Thats why.

If Cons believe the Bible is the word of God, why would they object to it being quoted?

For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument.

So you dismiss out of hand well documented, reviewed and accepted scientific facts that begin to explain in part, not justify, deviant behavior?

No, I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. I thought I made that pretty clear.

If you are trying to become a professional liar you are going to have to learn how to become more subtle. Try putting a little more shade on your shit.

 

[ding]

If libs believe the Bible is a fairy tale why do they quote it.

Libs? really?

To answer your question, believing the Bible is a book of fairy tales does not mean it is of no value.

Fairy tales convey teaching and moral lessons.

Thats why.

If Cons believe the Bible is the word of God, why would they object to it being quoted?

For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument.

So you dismiss out of hand well documented, reviewed and accepted scientific facts that begin to explain in part, not justify, deviant behavior?

No, I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. I thought I made that pretty clear.

If you are trying to become a professional liar you are going to have to learn how to become more subtle. Try putting a little more shade on your shit.

What part of "For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument." did you not understand? And how was it not clear that I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. Your ability to use reason and logic is below average.

 

[hobelim]

Libs? really?

To answer your question, believing the Bible is a book of fairy tales does not mean it is of no value.

Fairy tales convey teaching and moral lessons.

Thats why.

If Cons believe the Bible is the word of God, why would they object to it being quoted?

For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument.

So you dismiss out of hand well documented, reviewed and accepted scientific facts that begin to explain in part, not justify, deviant behavior?

No, I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. I thought I made that pretty clear.

If you are trying to become a professional liar you are going to have to learn how to become more subtle. Try putting a little more shade on your shit.

What part of "For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument." did you not understand? And how was it not clear that I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. Your ability to use reason and logic is below average.

All studies that show a link to deviant behavior do not attempt to justify or rationalize that behavior.

Like I said, try putting a little more shade on your shit ..

 

[ding]

For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument.

So you dismiss out of hand well documented, reviewed and accepted scientific facts that begin to explain in part, not justify, deviant behavior?

No, I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. I thought I made that pretty clear.

If you are trying to become a professional liar you are going to have to learn how to become more subtle. Try putting a little more shade on your shit.

What part of "For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument." did you not understand? And how was it not clear that I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. Your ability to use reason and logic is below average.

All studies that show a link to deviant behavior do not attempt to justify or rationalize that behavior.

Like I said, try putting a little more shade on your shit ..

Right? So what? People who use those studies do. Just like atheists liberals use the Bible to justify their social causes which is the point the OP was making and you questioned. Now do you understand?

 

[hobelim]

So you dismiss out of hand well documented, reviewed and accepted scientific facts that begin to explain in part, not justify, deviant behavior?

No, I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. I thought I made that pretty clear.

If you are trying to become a professional liar you are going to have to learn how to become more subtle. Try putting a little more shade on your shit.

What part of "For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument." did you not understand? And how was it not clear that I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. Your ability to use reason and logic is below average.

All studies that show a link to deviant behavior do not attempt to justify or rationalize that behavior.

Like I said, try putting a little more shade on your shit ..

Right? So what? People who use those studies do. Just like atheists liberals use the Bible to justify their social causes which is the point the OP was making and you questioned. Now do you understand?

Go home already. Take a bath, put on some clean clothing. I've had about enough of you knocking on my door, standing there dressed in filthy rags, reeking of cheap wine and vomit, trying to sneak into a place where you cannot go in your degraded condition..

You stink.

 

[norwegen]

In a Christian society, invoking the Scriptures lends credibility to deviance. Leftists invoked them to justify slavery in America and genocide in Nazi Germany.

 

[ding]

No, I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. I thought I made that pretty clear.

If you are trying to become a professional liar you are going to have to learn how to become more subtle. Try putting a little more shade on your shit.

What part of "For the same reason we object to using genetics as a false rationale to justify deviant behavior. It is a logical fallacy argument." did you not understand? And how was it not clear that I dismiss out of hand the rationalization of them as acceptable. Your ability to use reason and logic is below average.

All studies that show a link to deviant behavior do not attempt to justify or rationalize that behavior.

Like I said, try putting a little more shade on your shit ..

Right? So what? People who use those studies do. Just like atheists liberals use the Bible to justify their social causes which is the point the OP was making and you questioned. Now do you understand?

Go home already. Take a bath, put on some clean clothing. I've had about enough of you knocking on my door, standing there dressed in filthy rags, reeking of cheap wine and vomit, trying to sneak into a place where you cannot go in your degraded condition..

You stink.

Don't blame me for your poor arguments or inability to use reason and logic.

 

[BreezeWood]

In a Christian society, invoking the Scriptures lends credibility to deviance. Leftists invoked them to justify slavery in America and genocide in Nazi Germany.

.

In a Christian society, invoking the Scriptures lends credibility to deviance. Leftists invoked them to justify slavery in America and genocide in Nazi Germany.

In a Christian society, invoking the Scriptures lends credibility to deviance.

an astute observation and the flaw the 4th century book fails to remedy but rather is the reason for the disparacy.


Leftists invoked them to justify slavery in America and genocide in Nazi Germany.

this proves you are a corrupt 4th century christian and not a believer in the 1st century beliefs representing the true religion.


the above is the example the OP cunningly dismisses as the justification for 1st century religiosity objecting to the 4th century Idolators, calling them atheists, who have disguised their political agenda as the religion of the 1st century and using their duplicitous book for that unholy purpose.