If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America...?

[Phoenall]

If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America because of history?

We gave them back a good chunk of Maine. Seems fair.

So would you accept a corner of your plot when the revolution ends, after all it seems fair....................................

?

Think about what was said...........................

 

[Phoenall]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

Hahahahaha....

That would be European history then would it Phoney!

What a schmuck....

The rights of peoples to 'historical land' is just BS

So where would pene get her history from, after all she is a dumb American housewife with no education..........


So you admit the arab muslims don't have any rights to Jewish land, nice of you to tell us at last.

 

[Phoenall]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

Weren't they Nomads? So who they are now may not have been who they were 2k years ago. Or am I completely off base?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Depends on what context you want to take the subject from. If they were nomads and kept their nomadic culture then they are still nomads. If they gave up their nomadic culture then they are no longer nomads.

The Jews were settled by the time of the end of the Egyptian dynasty and were no longer nomadic

 

[Humanity]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

Hahahahaha....

That would be European history then would it Phoney!

What a schmuck....

The rights of peoples to 'historical land' is just BS

So where would pene get her history from, after all she is a dumb American housewife with no education..........



So you admit the arab muslims don't have any rights to Jewish land, nice of you to tell us at last.

Want to show me where, in my post, you were able to have another episode of 'making shit up'?

 

[cnm]

The various Indian reservations in this country are considered "sovereign nations" in their own right.

What hypocrisy. Sovereignty for Indian nations is a fig leaf to cover their subjugation. They have no right to make treaties with other sovereign nations, nor issue passports nor join the UN. They have the sovereignty you have when you don't have sovereignty.

 

[Phoenall]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

Hahahahaha....

That would be European history then would it Phoney!

What a schmuck....

The rights of peoples to 'historical land' is just BS

So where would pene get her history from, after all she is a dumb American housewife with no education..........



So you admit the arab muslims don't have any rights to Jewish land, nice of you to tell us at last.

Want to show me where, in my post, you were able to have another episode of 'making shit up'?

The rights of peoples to 'historical land' is just BS

 

[Humanity]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

Hahahahaha....

That would be European history then would it Phoney!

What a schmuck....

The rights of peoples to 'historical land' is just BS

So where would pene get her history from, after all she is a dumb American housewife with no education..........



So you admit the arab muslims don't have any rights to Jewish land, nice of you to tell us at last.

Want to show me where, in my post, you were able to have another episode of 'making shit up'?

The rights of peoples to 'historical land' is just BS

So why the FUCK do you support 'historical land' claims by Jews who have ONLY some random historical connection to the land currently known as Israel?

 

[Penelope]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

No they were, just in the bible and jewish wrote history.

 

[Phoenall]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

No they were, just in the bible and jewish wrote history.

Wrong as people from Europe travelled overland to the M.E 3000 years ago. 2000 years ago the Roman empire conquered the holy land, is that Jewish wrote history as well. Have you heard of the spice trail that brought spices from India and China overland to Europe that was going on before the birth of Jesus.

History does not begin and end with islam you know, they were the last of a long line of arrivals.

 

[flacaltenn]

If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America because of history?

Yes .. American Indians have a claim on their lands. By treaty.. And they are recognized as sovereign nations by the US of A..

Palestinians never signed a treaty or an armistice. Don't even have recognized representatives to DO THAT for them.

If it was up to me -- I'd take the 40% of the land that the BLM so ineptly manages and GIVE IT BACK to the Indians. They'd do a better job and we'd save a bundle of cash on land that nobody else wants.. Time for them to ask for it...

 

[jillian]

If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America because of history?

you have it backward....

the proper question is should the native americans demand a right of return to their pre-war lands?

or should we be boycotted if we don't give it to them?

is mexico entitled to california and texas?

see how blind your jew-hating makes you?

 

[peach174]

If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America because of history?

you have it backward....

the proper question is should the native americans demand a right of return to their pre-war lands?

or should we be boycotted if we don't give it to them?

is mexico entitled to california and texas?

see how blind your jew-hating makes you?

America paid Mexico for California and Texas

 

[jillian]

If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America because of history?

you have it backward....

the proper question is should the native americans demand a right of return to their pre-war lands?

or should we be boycotted if we don't give it to them?

is mexico entitled to california and texas?

see how blind your jew-hating makes you?

America paid Mexico for California and Texas

after a war, bubbalah.

when did the pals sign a peace treaty or stop terrorist attacks on israel?

 

[Two Thumbs]

If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America because of history?

No, they are not from here and they were conquered.

 

[peach174]

If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America because of history?

you have it backward....

the proper question is should the native americans demand a right of return to their pre-war lands?

or should we be boycotted if we don't give it to them?

is mexico entitled to california and texas?

see how blind your jew-hating makes you?

America paid Mexico for California and Texas

after a war, bubbalah.

And the Brits won the land from war with the Turks.

when did the pals sign a peace treaty or stop terrorist attacks on israel?

They have broke every one of the peace treaties and they continue to attack Israel.

 

[Two Thumbs]

If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America because of history?

you have it backward....

the proper question is should the native americans demand a right of return to their pre-war lands?

or should we be boycotted if we don't give it to them?

is mexico entitled to california and texas?

see how blind your jew-hating makes you?

America paid Mexico for California and Texas

after a war, bubbalah.

when did the pals sign a peace treaty or stop terrorist attacks on israel?

Land for peace - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[jillian]

If Jews have rights to Israel because of history, do American Indians have rights to America because of history?

you have it backward....

the proper question is should the native americans demand a right of return to their pre-war lands?

or should we be boycotted if we don't give it to them?

is mexico entitled to california and texas?

see how blind your jew-hating makes you?

America paid Mexico for California and Texas

after a war, bubbalah.

when did the pals sign a peace treaty or stop terrorist attacks on israel?

Land for peace - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

and when appropriate, israel has done that.

the Pals don't want peace. so they don't have peace

 

[Humanity]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

No they were, just in the bible and jewish wrote history.

Wrong as people from Europe travelled overland to the M.E 3000 years ago. 2000 years ago the Roman empire conquered the holy land, is that Jewish wrote history as well. Have you heard of the spice trail that brought spices from India and China overland to Europe that was going on before the birth of Jesus.

History does not begin and end with islam you know, they were the last of a long line of arrivals.

And history does not begin and end with Judaism either...

The sooner that people start accepting that, well, there were human beings BEFORE Judaism AND Islam in what we now call the middle east the better!

It's utter BS that EITHER side should stake a claim on a piece of land based on ancient historical beliefs... Particularly, based upon the words of some made up entity!

'Modern' history doesn't really have a beginning, it is an evolution of historical events...

To suggest that one specific group has more rights to a piece of land than another is just ludicrous!

 

[peach174]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

No they were, just in the bible and jewish wrote history.

Wrong as people from Europe travelled overland to the M.E 3000 years ago. 2000 years ago the Roman empire conquered the holy land, is that Jewish wrote history as well. Have you heard of the spice trail that brought spices from India and China overland to Europe that was going on before the birth of Jesus.

History does not begin and end with islam you know, they were the last of a long line of arrivals.

And history does not begin and end with Judaism either...

The sooner that people start accepting that, well, there were human beings BEFORE Judaism AND Islam in what we now call the middle east the better!

It's utter BS that EITHER side should stake a claim on a piece of land based on ancient historical beliefs... Particularly, based upon the words of some made up entity!

'Modern' history doesn't really have a beginning, it is an evolution of historical events...

To suggest that one specific group has more rights to a piece of land than another is just ludicrous!

The British won the Turkish Ottoman war and it was theirs to do with as they pleased and they decided to give it to the Jews.
Get over it. The Jews will remain right where they are.

 

[montelatici]

Hebrews are unknown in history, but American Indians are historical. No ancient history mentions Hebrews.

No history prior to about 1500 mentions the Amerindians, so where do you get your ancient history from. The Jews or Hebrews where known about 2000 years ago

No they were, just in the bible and jewish wrote history.

Wrong as people from Europe travelled overland to the M.E 3000 years ago. 2000 years ago the Roman empire conquered the holy land, is that Jewish wrote history as well. Have you heard of the spice trail that brought spices from India and China overland to Europe that was going on before the birth of Jesus.

History does not begin and end with islam you know, they were the last of a long line of arrivals.

And history does not begin and end with Judaism either...

The sooner that people start accepting that, well, there were human beings BEFORE Judaism AND Islam in what we now call the middle east the better!

It's utter BS that EITHER side should stake a claim on a piece of land based on ancient historical beliefs... Particularly, based upon the words of some made up entity!

'Modern' history doesn't really have a beginning, it is an evolution of historical events...

To suggest that one specific group has more rights to a piece of land than another is just ludicrous!

The British won the Turkish Ottoman war and it was theirs to do with as they pleased and they decided to give it to the Jews.
Get over it. The Jews will remain right where they are.

No, the British had signed the Covenant of the League of Nations which under Article 22, required them to assist the native people of Palestine to become an independent nation. 90% of the people were still Christians and Muslims at the time.

"ARTICLE 22.
To those colonies and territories which as a consequence of the late war have ceased to be under the sovereignty of the States which formerly governed them and which are inhabited by peoples not yet able to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world, there should be applied the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation and that securities for the performance of this trust should be embodied in this Covenant.

The best method of giving practical effect to this principle is that the tutelage of such peoples should be entrusted to advanced nations who by reason of their resources, their experience or their geographical position can best undertake this responsibility, and who are willing to accept it, and that this tutelage should be exercised by them as Mandatories on behalf of the League."

The character of the mandate must differ according to the stage of the development of the people, the geographical situation of the territory, its economic conditions and other similar circumstances.

Certain communities formerly belonging to the Turkish Empire have reached a stage of development where their existence as independent nations can be provisionally recognized subject to the rendering of administrative advice and assistance by a Mandatory until such time as they are able to stand alone. The wishes of these communities must be a principal consideration in the selection of the Mandatory."

Avalon Project - The Covenant of the League of Nations