Zone1 If Jesus Was A Jew

[ding]

NAME ONE

Anyone who is objective and follows the dictates of the conscience despite how it might affect them. It can be anyone at anytime. If you are expecting people to always do it, maybe don't hold your breath.

 

[ding]

nope

Yep, nope you can't make one and you are too prideful to admit that the universal objective truth is that rape and slavery are wrong.

 

[ding]

long ago----two EUGLENAS had the audacity to CONJUGATE right
there on my microscope slide (in a drop of water)---they swapped
carmine particles as they rolled around with each other. SUBJECTIVELY
I did not condemn their IMORALITY

I doubt there was anything subjective about it.

All I can say is thank God you weren't around in ancient times. The Torah may have never been written. I've always suspected that given the number of Jews who self identify as Democrats that a large number of them must be moral relativists which I find shocking given the history.

 

[rosends]

How so? And feel free to share the reasons if you can.

In Judaism, different groups are held to different standards and expectations. Priests may not attend burials, People at certain ages are subject to different laws. Nazirites may not drink wine, professional gamblers cannot provide legal testimony. In the same way, Jews and non Jews are bound by different sets of laws.

 

[ding]

In Judaism, different groups are held to different standards and expectations. Priests may not attend burials, People at certain ages are subject to different laws. Nazirites may not drink wine, professional gamblers cannot provide legal testimony. In the same way, Jews and non Jews are bound by different sets of laws.

Not really what we are discussing.

 

[irosie91]

Yep, nope you can't make one and you are too prideful to admit that the universal objective truth is that rape and slavery are wrong.

argue that one with a QADI or the less-then honorable KARIM KHAN

 

[rosends]

Feel free to explain. Because...

Standards do not exist to measure success or failure to the standard. Standards exist to prevent or mitigate certain consequences from occurring. Now here is the important part, standards exist for logical reasons. If you deviate from the standard the reason the standard existed will be discovered through outcomes or consequences.

Note that no where in there does an exception apply because of race, creed or color. The predictable surprises of normalizing one's deviance to the standard affect everyone exactly the same way. Which is to say in a probabilistic manner. Many times people get away with violating a standard. Which is why they normalize their deviance from the standard in the first place. But rest assured given enough time predictable surprises will occur.

In a school that tracks students, different groups of students are held to different standards. Even within a single classroom, different students might have different standards applied. Even in terms of behavior.

 

[rosends]

Not really what we are discussing.

Quite wrong. Exactly what I was discussing.

 

[irosie91]

Not really what we are discussing.

nevertheless---INTERESTING

Feel free to explain. Because...

Standards do not exist to measure success or failure to the standard. Standards exist to prevent or mitigate certain consequences from occurring. Now here is the important part, standards exist for logical reasons. If you deviate from the standard the reason the standard existed will be discovered through outcomes or consequences.

Note that no where in there does an exception apply because of race, creed or color. The predictable surprises of normalizing one's deviance to the standard affect everyone exactly the same way. Which is to say in a probabilistic manner. Many times people get away with violating a standard. Which is why they normalize their deviance from the standard in the first place. But rest assured given enough time predictable surprises will occur.

you are describing evolutionary pressure

 

[ding]

argue that one with a QADI or the less-then honorable KARIM KHAN

No idea who that is. I'm not as smart as you.

 

[ding]

In a school that tracks students, different groups of students are held to different standards. Even within a single classroom, different students might have different standards applied. Even in terms of behavior.

So using that logic people who have weak self control can violate Leviticus 18:22 because they are held to a different standard?

 

[irosie91]

No idea who that is. I'm not as smart as you.

Qadi is a judge in a Shariah court

 

[ding]

Quite wrong. Exactly what I was discussing.

Actually this started with Leviticus 18:22 which you incorrectly said only applied to Jewish males. So, no. Not what we were talking about. You took this train so far off the rails it's now an anchor at the bottom of the sea.

 

[irosie91]

So using that logic people who have weak self control can violate Leviticus 18:22 because they are held to a different standard?

there are mitigating circumstances

 

[ding]

Qadi is a judge in a Shariah court

ok, so what? Is he advocating genocide for all Jews. Because according to rosends and apparently you, they may be held to different standards and what they are doing is just fine with God.

 

[irosie91]

Actually this started with Leviticus 18:22 which you incorrectly said only applied to Jewish males. So, no. Not what we were talking about. You took this train so far off the rails it's now an anchor at the bottom of the sea.

Leviticus 18:22 applies only to sane adult male jews. CORRECT

 

[ding]

there are mitigating circumstances

You mean like that guy was really attractive so it's ok. Hey, don't get me wrong, I'm loving all this freedom you and rosends are sending my way. I've been going about this all wrong. Maybe I should have been stealing and bearing false witness to enrich myself. Different people get to have different standards.

No wonder so many Jewish people have become atheists.

 

[ding]

Leviticus 18:22 applies only to sane adult male jews. CORRECT

Maybe talk to Lisa about that because she made a really strong case for why that isn't true.

 

[ding]

nevertheless---INTERESTING

you are describing evolutionary pressure

No. Not at all. I'm talking about the law of compensation that is built into nature by God. We are free to do anything we want but we are not free from suffering the consequences of our choices.

 

[irosie91]

ok, so what? Is he advocating genocide for all Jews. Because according to rosends and apparently you, they may be held to different standards and what they are doing is just fine with God.

The standard for a QADI is shariah law. The "gawd" at issue is "allah" who
according to scholars of islam enacted shariah law at the time of "creation"