If I were the devil.............

[Pogo]

Yes, pay no attention to Paul Harvey's prophecy.

Pay no attention that it has come true.

Distract them by telling people there is no devil.

You know who makes that argument? The devil.

And there it is, just as predicted. Speak of the proverbial....

 

[ding]

Yes, pay no attention to Paul Harvey's prophecy.

Pay no attention that it has come true.

Distract them by telling people there is no devil.

You know who makes that argument? The devil.

And there it is, just as predicted. Speak of the proverbial....

So what reasoning did I use that was circular? Can you explain it to me?

 

[Pogo]

Yes, pay no attention to Paul Harvey's prophecy.

Pay no attention that it has come true.

Distract them by telling people there is no devil.

You know who makes that argument? The devil.

And there it is, just as predicted. Speak of the proverbial....

So what reasoning did I use that was circular? Can you explain it to me?

Circular reasoning:

"God exists" (says who?) "the bible" (who wrote the bible?) "God".


"Satan exists. If you don't believe he exists it's because he makes you not believe in him".

The premise is "God" or "Satan". You can't prove either one exists by declaring that that premise either declares himself to exist, or to not exist. The original premise is not established as valid to have that standing to so declare.

​

See the last panel especially. All he did is restate the same thing in the reverse order. Neither concept proves the other.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Yes, pay no attention to Paul Harvey's prophecy.

Pay no attention that it has come true.

Distract them by telling people there is no devil.

You know who makes that argument? The devil.

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

 

[ding]

Yes, pay no attention to Paul Harvey's prophecy.

Pay no attention that it has come true.

Distract them by telling people there is no devil.

You know who makes that argument? The devil.

And there it is, just as predicted. Speak of the proverbial....

So what reasoning did I use that was circular? Can you explain it to me?

Circular reasoning:

"God exists" (says who?) "the bible" (who wrote the bible?) "God".


"Satan exists. If you don't believe he exists it's because he makes you not believe in him".

The premise is "God" or "Satan". You can't prove either one exists by declaring that that premise either declares himself to exist, or to not exist. The original premise is not established as valid to have that standing to so declare.

I didn't bring up God, Einstein.

I only brought up the devil because it's the basis for the OP about Harvey's prophecy.

It's like you ran off to left field chasing butterflies, dude.

The intent of my post was to point out the distraction that you were using.

Harvey's prophecies came true. Didn't they?

 

[ding]

Yes, pay no attention to Paul Harvey's prophecy.

Pay no attention that it has come true.

Distract them by telling people there is no devil.

You know who makes that argument? The devil.

The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist.

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!

 

[Pogo]

Yes, pay no attention to Paul Harvey's prophecy.

Pay no attention that it has come true.

Distract them by telling people there is no devil.

You know who makes that argument? The devil.

And there it is, just as predicted. Speak of the proverbial....

So what reasoning did I use that was circular? Can you explain it to me?

Circular reasoning:

"God exists" (says who?) "the bible" (who wrote the bible?) "God".


"Satan exists. If you don't believe he exists it's because he makes you not believe in him".

The premise is "God" or "Satan". You can't prove either one exists by declaring that that premise either declares himself to exist, or to not exist. The original premise is not established as valid to have that standing to so declare.

I didn't bring up God, Einstein.

I only brought up the devil because it's the basis for the OP about Harvey's prophecy.

It's like you ran off to left field chasing butterflies, dude.

The intent of my post was to point out the distraction that you were using.

Harvey's prophecies came true. Didn't they?

You didn't bring up "employees" either. But you DID ask for an explanation of circular reasoning. I gave you THREE. Now you want to whine because you got an answer? Or just because it's over your head?

This is why you're on Ignore.

 

[ding]

Yes, pay no attention to Paul Harvey's prophecy.

Pay no attention that it has come true.

Distract them by telling people there is no devil.

You know who makes that argument? The devil.

And there it is, just as predicted. Speak of the proverbial....

So what reasoning did I use that was circular? Can you explain it to me?

Circular reasoning:

"God exists" (says who?) "the bible" (who wrote the bible?) "God".


"Satan exists. If you don't believe he exists it's because he makes you not believe in him".

The premise is "God" or "Satan". You can't prove either one exists by declaring that that premise either declares himself to exist, or to not exist. The original premise is not established as valid to have that standing to so declare.

I didn't bring up God, Einstein.

I only brought up the devil because it's the basis for the OP about Harvey's prophecy.

It's like you ran off to left field chasing butterflies, dude.

The intent of my post was to point out the distraction that you were using.

Harvey's prophecies came true. Didn't they?

You DID ask for an explanation of circular reasoning. I gave you THREE. Now you want to whine because you got an answer? Or just because it's over your head?

This is why you're on Ignore.

Right, and none of them applied to what I wrote.

You were trying to deflect from the OP. End of story. Nothing circular there.

 

[daisiesRwild]

I would also use as Satan is the Bible to deceive people and Religion to confuse people. Jesus wants a personal reltionship with us.