If Elected Would Hillary Make A Better President Than Obama ?

[the_human_being]

She would enter the White House with much more experience, and much more qualifications than Obama.

It's quite entertaining to see the resident leftists discussing with straight faces, whether THIS person implementing socialism, theft, and government-backed lies and smears, will have a "better" effect than THAT person implementing socialism, theft, and government-backed lies and smears.

You may have a point. The Chicago crowd are much more experienced at corruption than these hillbillies from Arkansas.

If the Clintons were from Louisiana, it would be another story.

.

Both the Obama machine and the Clinton machine have exhibited an extreme capability for fixing elections though.

 

[Redfish]

an old, angry, senile, post menapausal woman, with a philandering husband would not make a good president.

Sorry, hilly but obozo took your turn, now its too late.

 

[Redfish]

Hillary would be Obama II?

Pretty much.

She'd be just the latest in the long line of liberal socialists trying to make an unworkable economic idea, work. And soon, the latest to fail at it.

(yawn)

I disagree. Age is an issue. A President with dementia drooling on the Resolution desk is not the same as a cogent narcissist sociopath. Even if they have the same policy objectives.

.

Do you think Hillary might end up like this guy?


"Reagan was as shriveled as a kumquat. He was so frail, his skin so paper-thin. I could almost see the sunlight through the back of his withered neck…His eyes were coated. Larry introduced us, but he had to shout. Had Reagan turned off his hearing aid?
…Reagan didn't seem to know who I was. He gave me a distant look with those milky eyes and shook my hand weakly. Oh, my, he's gonzo, I thought. I have to go out on the lawn tonight and tell my countrymen that the president of the United States is a doddering space cadet. My heart began to hammer with the import...I was aware of the delicacy with which I would have to write my script. But I was quite sure of my diagnosis". Lesley Stahl - from her book "Reporting Live"

no one denies that Nancy ran the country during Reagan's last year in office. And yes, Hillary could be exactly like that, she is already showing signs of senility.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.

Come on, when you come up with "He's done a good job all things considered.", that is tantamount to admitting complete failure. Except for a shrinking hard core, no oné is buying that.

Nope. He's not failed by any normal person's metric. He inherited an economic mess and a a pair of stupid wars. He has had no help from half of Congress.......they've intentionally hindered, in fact.

All things considered...........a job well done.

He's failed across the board. His administration has divided the country far more than anyone in recent history, foreign policy is practically non-existent, the economy still sucks;, his signature Obamacare is fodder for political failure, race relations are far worse and America is ridiculed and used as a doormat by the likes of China, Russia, ISIS, Brazil, Germany and almost any other country or organization that matters.

By what standard is Obama successful?

You've got very little,...practically nothing.

The far right tried to divide the country and failed.

That's why those wimps are whining out in the country and here on the Board.

They have dried and wizened up like old raisins.

No one cares much about you guys, but we do appreciate Cruz for the humour he and Lee bring to the table.

 

[Redfish]

No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.

Come on, when you come up with "He's done a good job all things considered.", that is tantamount to admitting complete failure. Except for a shrinking hard core, no oné is buying that.

Nope. He's not failed by any normal person's metric. He inherited an economic mess and a a pair of stupid wars. He has had no help from half of Congress.......they've intentionally hindered, in fact.

All things considered...........a job well done.

He's failed across the board. His administration has divided the country far more than anyone in recent history, foreign policy is practically non-existent, the economy still sucks;, his signature Obamacare is fodder for political failure, race relations are far worse and America is ridiculed and used as a doormat by the likes of China, Russia, ISIS, Brazil, Germany and almost any other country or organization that matters.

By what standard is Obama successful?

You've got very little,...practically nothing.

The far right tried to divide the country and failed.

That's why those wimps are whining out in the country and here on the Board.

They have dried and wizened up like old raisins.

No one cares much about you guys, but we do appreciate Cruz for the humour he and Lee bring to the table.

no, snake. you have it wrong. the far left tried to divide the country and succeeded. thats why obozo got two terms.

its the country as a whole that has wizened up. a large majority of americans now see the failures of liberalism. Obama brought that to light and america thanks him. In a strange way he may have saved this country.

 

[jasonnfree]

Of course.

A pile of dogshit would be a better president than Obama.

This is NOT to say Hillary would be a good president, though.

I consider a pile of dogshit as someone who can

No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.

Come on, when you come up with "He's done a good job all things considered.", that is tantamount to admitting complete failure. Except for a shrinking hard core, no oné is buying that.

Republicans were making these failure accusations in 2012. It didn't convince enough people, did it?

52 more days and it will.

Elections? Doesn't necessarily mean the president is a failure you know.

No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.

Come on, when you come up with "He's done a good job all things considered.", that is tantamount to admitting complete failure. Except for a shrinking hard core, no oné is buying that.

Nope. He's not failed by any normal person's metric. He inherited an economic mess and a a pair of stupid wars. He has had no help from half of Congress.......they've intentionally hindered, in fact.

All things considered...........a job well done.

He's failed across the board. His administration has divided the country far more than anyone in recent history, foreign policy is practically non-existent, the economy still sucks;, his signature Obamacare is fodder for political failure, race relations are far worse and America is ridiculed and used as a doormat by the likes of China, Russia, ISIS, Brazil, Germany and almost any other country or organization that matters.

By what standard is Obama successful?

You've got very little,...practically nothing.

The far right tried to divide the country and failed.

That's why those wimps are whining out in the country and here on the Board.

They have dried and wizened up like old raisins.

No one cares much about you guys, but we do appreciate Cruz for the humour he and Lee bring to the table.

no, snake. you have it wrong. the far left tried to divide the country and succeeded. thats why obozo got two terms.

its the country as a whole that has wizened up. a large majority of americans now see the failures of liberalism. Obama brought that to light and america thanks him. In a strange way he may have saved this country.

The country has embraced socialism. Government education, social security, medicare/medicaid, food stamps for those in need. Both republicans and democrats use these socialist programs and don't want to see them go away.

 

[kaz]

That Obama is better than Bush is not saying a whole lot for Obama.

Stephanie would have been better than Bush.

Hillary is far more a neo-con than BHO, and that would count for the military industrial freaks in the country.

Give an example of a position that Hillary has that differs from Obama. Not the words she uses to describe her position, and actual position.

 

[the_human_being]

No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.

You're one of the 38% I suppose you are aware? The rest won't even admit they voted for him.

 

[Stephanie]

She's no more qualified than he is. But she did write a paper in college on Alinsky , rules for radicals. So she'd be just another Obama little lighter color and dressed in a pantsuit

SNIP:


Reading Hillary Rodham's hidden thesis

Photo illustration by Clay Frost / MSNBC.com
Hillary Rodham in 1965, when she was president of Wellesley College's Young Republicans, shown here with the cover page of her senior thesis from 1969 on radical organizer Saul D. Alinsky.

By Bill Dedman Investigative reporter
msnbc.com
updated 5/9/2007 1139 AM ET 2007-05-09T1539
WELLESLEY, Mass. — The senior thesis of Hillary D. Rodham, Wellesley College class of 1969, has been speculated about, spun, analyzed, debated, criticized and defended. But rarely has it been read, because for the eight years of Bill Clinton’s presidency it was locked away.
As forbidden fruit, the writings of a 21-year-old college senior, examining the tactics of radical community organizer Saul D. Alinsky, have gained mythic status among her critics — a “Rosetta Stone,” in the words of one, that would allow readers to decode the thinking of the former first lady and 2008 presidential candidate.
Despite the fervent interest in the thesis, few realize that it is no longer kept under lock and key. As MSNBC.com found, it is available to anyone who visits the archive room of the prestigious women’s college outside Boston. With Clinton’s opponents in the 2008 presidential race looking for the next “Swift Boat” attack ad, and the senator herself trying to cast off her liberal image, Clinton's 92-page thesis is certain to be read and reread by opposition researchers and reporters visiting the campus.

ALL of it here:
Reading Hillary Clinton s hidden thesis - politics - Decision 08 - Hillary Clinton News NBC News

 

[JakeStarkey]

If Hillary runs for office and her opponents try to swift boat her, they will find themselves outwomaned and outgunned while sinking into the mud of the swamp she chased them into. Newt is telling insiders he tied that with the USS Bill and was sunk without much effort.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

No. She would make a horrible president. We would be going from terrible to horrible. Why should we want to do that?

 

[HenryBHough]

If Hillary runs for office and her opponents try to swift boat her, they will find themselves outwomaned and outgunned while sinking into the mud of the swamp she chased them into. Newt is telling insiders he tied that with the USS Bill and was sunk without much effort.

Is that the official DNC position or are you running around off the reservation in those pretty pink pajamas again?

 

[kaz]

If Hillary runs for office and her opponents try to swift boat her, they will find themselves outwomaned and outgunned while sinking into the mud of the swamp she chased them into. Newt is telling insiders he tied that with the USS Bill and was sunk without much effort.

Swiftboat her? What does that mean Jake. The liars were Kerry and the Democrats.

 

[yidnar]

She would enter the White House with much more experience, and much more qualifications than Obama.

then why did the left pull the race card and throw her under the bus in 08 ?

 

[JakeStarkey]

I had met the rear admiral, a lifetime alcoholic who hated Kerry for beating him up in Vietnam.

The closer the story got to the men in the boats near him and in his boat, the lies of the admiral and the henchmen were obvious.

Hillary and Bill will crush anyone or group or PAC that tries such a thing. I am not sure she would make a good president (she's a neo-con), but I know that Bill, like me, can throw a much harder punch than her opponents.

 

[rightwinger]

She would enter the White House with much more experience, and much more qualifications than Obama.

It's quite entertaining to see the resident leftists discussing with straight faces, whether THIS person implementing socialism, theft, and government-backed lies and smears, will have a "better" effect than THAT person implementing socialism, theft, and government-backed lies and smears.

You may have a point. The Chicago crowd are much more experienced at corruption than these hillbillies from Arkansas.

If the Clintons were from Louisiana, it would be another story.

.

Both the Obama machine and the Clinton machine have exhibited an extreme capability for fixing elections though.

Better known as kicking GOP butt

 

[blackhawk]

this question is mainly for the left who will be the ones voting for her .do you think she would do a better job running this country than Obama ?

At one time I would have said yes today I really don't know my feeling is much like Obama she would be great at campaigning and fundraising but not at governing.

 

[kaz]

She would enter the White House with much more experience, and much more qualifications than Obama.

then why did the left pull the race card and throw her under the bus in 08 ?

I'm not sure they intended to "pull the race card." They just thought it would be more cool to have the black than the woman who agreed on every issue.

 

[JakeStarkey]

If she had been president, she would have destroyed the six Dem congress critters that was holding up the ACA.

She would have bribed several dozen GOP folks as well with gray jobs after office or would have destroyed them in their districts with phony charges of embezzlement, groping folks that they should not be grouping and other ideas as may be, etc.

Obama ain't clean, but he is nothing like Ms Clinton or Senator Cruz: they don't come dirtier.

 

[GWV5903]

This is like saying do you want to burn one hand off or both?

How are they different? Both are LPOS...