If Elected Would Hillary Make A Better President Than Obama ?

Hillary would be Obama II?
Pretty much.

She'd be just the latest in the long line of liberal socialists trying to make an unworkable economic idea, work. And soon, the latest to fail at it.

(yawn)

I disagree. Age is an issue. A President with dementia drooling on the Resolution desk is not the same as a cogent narcissist sociopath. Even if they have the same policy objectives.

.

Do you think Hilary might end up like this guy?


"Reagan was ........I was quite sure of my diagnosis". Lesley Stahl - from her book "Reporting Live"

Ask Lesley.

.
.

Hillary would be Obama II?

I am not so sure. Alzheimer's rarely afflicts the early 50s crowd.

.

Oh, I thought you had some opinion, maybe even a little expertise in these matters.
 
That Obama is better than Bush is not saying a whole lot for Obama.

Stephanie would have been better than Bush.

Hillary is far more a neo-con than BHO, and that would count for the military industrial freaks in the country.
If Obama sucks so bad even following Bush, the only way the next prez won't come out smelling like a rose is if he's someone the caliber of Al Sharpton or Eric Holder.

Or Sean Hannitty or Alan West.
 
No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.
Come on, when you come up with "He's done a good job all things considered.", that is tantamount to admitting complete failure. Except for a shrinking hard core, no oné is buying that.

Nope. He's not failed by any normal person's metric. He inherited an economic mess and a a pair of stupid wars. He has had no help from half of Congress.......they've intentionally hindered, in fact.

All things considered...........a job well done.
 
No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.
Come on, when you come up with "He's done a good job all things considered.", that is tantamount to admitting complete failure. Except for a shrinking hard core, no oné is buying that.

Nope. He's not failed by any normal person's metric. He inherited an economic mess and a a pair of stupid wars. He has had no help from half of Congress.......they've intentionally hindered, in fact.

All things considered...........a job well done.
:lmao:
 
this question is mainly for the left who will be the ones voting for her .do you think she would do a better job running this country than Obama ?

I'm not a Leftie by any means but I see the Left voting for Hillary in order to give Bill Clinton another term. Bill would be calling the shots in all major issues.


I agree that the Left, at least the low information Left, thinks they would be voting for another term for Bill.

However, I seriously doubt that Hillary would let him call the shots.
 
No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.
Come on, when you come up with "He's done a good job all things considered.", that is tantamount to admitting complete failure. Except for a shrinking hard core, no oné is buying that.

Nope. He's not failed by any normal person's metric. He inherited an economic mess and a a pair of stupid wars. He has had no help from half of Congress.......they've intentionally hindered, in fact.

All things considered...........a job well done.
He's failed across the board. His administration has divided the country far more than anyone in recent history, foreign policy is practically non-existent, the economy still sucks;, his signature Obamacare is fodder for political failure, race relations are far worse and America is ridiculed and used as a doormat by the likes of China, Russia, ISIS, Brazil, Germany and almost any other country or organization that matters.

By what standard is Obama successful?

You've got very little,...practically nothing.
 
She would enter the White House with much more experience, and much more qualifications than Obama.
It's quite entertaining to see the resident leftists discussing with straight faces, whether THIS person implementing socialism, theft, and government-backed lies and smears, will have a "better" effect than THAT person implementing socialism, theft, and government-backed lies and smears.
 
She would enter the White House with much more experience, and much more qualifications than Obama.
It's quite entertaining to see the resident leftists discussing with straight faces, whether THIS person implementing socialism, theft, and government-backed lies and smears, will have a "better" effect than THAT person implementing socialism, theft, and government-backed lies and smears.

You may have a point. The Chicago crowd are much more experienced at corruption than these hillbillies from Arkansas.

If the Clintons were from Louisiana, it would be another story.

.
 
No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.
Come on, when you come up with "He's done a good job all things considered.", that is tantamount to admitting complete failure. Except for a shrinking hard core, no oné is buying that.

Republicans were making these failure accusations in 2012. It didn't convince enough people, did it?
 
No. He's done a good job all things considered. She could do a fine job as well.
Come on, when you come up with "He's done a good job all things considered.", that is tantamount to admitting complete failure. Except for a shrinking hard core, no oné is buying that.

Republicans were making these failure accusations in 2012. It didn't convince enough people, did it?

52 more days and it will.
 
She would enter the White House with much more experience, and much more qualifications than Obama.

More experience, true, but then since he had no directly related specialized experience (to use a Federal government personnel term), that's not saying much.

And, just as important, she's failed at every executive post she's held.

Just the other day some news folks inquired of her staff as to iterate some of her accomplishments. Not one of the aids asked could even list one accomplishment.
 

Forum List

Back
Top