Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This is truly ignorant.If Darwinism is true, there ought to be specimens of that in-between species between ape and human...
This is truly ignorant.If Darwinism is true, there ought to be specimens of that in-between species between ape and human...
Humans did not evolve from apes. ...
Where are they?
Who cares about the bible? It's just another one of many sacred texts that include origin myths.Read the Bible. The early species of human (like monkeys) had a diet of fruits from various trees.There was......actually several...and some of them we carry their genes.
They did not wear clothes.
Bible Gateway passage: Genesis 2:8-9 - King James Version
And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed. And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.www.biblegateway.com
Then they realized they were naked and fashioned themselves garments after one sort or another.Bible Gateway passage: Genesis 2:25 - King James Version
And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.
There was a hunt, of the bounty of the Lord's blessing.Bible Gateway passage: Genesis 3:7 - King James Version
And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.
Abel raised sheep for food and clothing, again with the Lord's blessing.Bible Gateway passage: Genesis 3:21 - King James Version
Unto Adam also and to his wife did the LORD God make coats of skins, and clothed them.
Lot was a caveman.Bible Gateway passage: Genesis 4:1-2 - King James Version
And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD. And she again bare his brother Abel. And Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.
Lot dwelt in a cave, his wife was a pillar of salt, and his sons-in-law were such perfect angels. They "drank wine" and told stories after a manner of speaking because had to stay in hiding from the enemies who almost broke into his house with a battering ram.
The "missing link" was never missing. It is a trick thought game.
... 185000000 generations ago your our ancestors were fish ...
I think it’s pretty clear there will never be enough evidence to convince you of the fact of evolution. The evidence is not in doubt among the relevant science community. There is literally no evidence for the Magical Kingdom of Eden, yet you choose to believe that unquestioningly. What does that say about your objective decision-making skills?Personally I believe god did both create Adam and Eve from scratch and create other people by evolution. Cain had to marry some one as did Adam and Eve's other kids. I just don't see the evidence evolution happened the way science says with out more evidence.
you believe with out actual evidence so don't talk to me about religion.I think it’s pretty clear there will never be enough evidence to convince you of the fact of evolution. The evidence is not in doubt among the relevant science community. There is literally no evidence for the Magical Kingdom of Eden, yet you choose to believe that unquestioningly. What does that say about your objective decision-making skills?Personally I believe god did both create Adam and Eve from scratch and create other people by evolution. Cain had to marry some one as did Adam and Eve's other kids. I just don't see the evidence evolution happened the way science says with out more evidence.
Your conspiracy theory that there is evidence for biological evolution stands in contrast to the documented evidence.you believe with out actual evidence so don't talk to me about religion.I think it’s pretty clear there will never be enough evidence to convince you of the fact of evolution. The evidence is not in doubt among the relevant science community. There is literally no evidence for the Magical Kingdom of Eden, yet you choose to believe that unquestioningly. What does that say about your objective decision-making skills?Personally I believe god did both create Adam and Eve from scratch and create other people by evolution. Cain had to marry some one as did Adam and Eve's other kids. I just don't see the evidence evolution happened the way science says with out more evidence.
And "Evolution" would have to have happened twice -Where are they?
Earth is estimated to be 4.54 billion years old, plus or minus about 50 million years, and the universe 13.8 billion years old.
While we're on this evolution thing that some people can't graspThat is only the visible universe !!
I never claimed evidence of adam and eve. I accept that on faith, like you accept the non existent proof of man from ape like creature on faith.Your conspiracy theory that there is evidence for biological evolution stands in contrast to the documented evidence.you believe with out actual evidence so don't talk to me about religion.I think it’s pretty clear there will never be enough evidence to convince you of the fact of evolution. The evidence is not in doubt among the relevant science community. There is literally no evidence for the Magical Kingdom of Eden, yet you choose to believe that unquestioningly. What does that say about your objective decision-making skills?Personally I believe god did both create Adam and Eve from scratch and create other people by evolution. Cain had to marry some one as did Adam and Eve's other kids. I just don't see the evidence evolution happened the way science says with out more evidence.
It is a pattern of behavior for religionists such that you do tend to be anti-science. Evidence really is irrelevant to the religionist because the faith nullifies actual proofs-- a convenient loophole of theistic belief but one endemic to all of them.
LOL that isn't how it worksAnd "Evolution" would have to have happened twice -Where are they?
with Male and Female.
God would be happier if apes had ruled.I never claimed evidence of adam and eve. I accept that on faith, like you accept the non existent proof of man from ape like creature on faith.
you obviously have not seen planet of the apes series of movies )God would be happier if apes had ruled.I never claimed evidence of adam and eve. I accept that on faith, like you accept the non existent proof of man from ape like creature on faith.
At least they wouldn't nuke the whole place.
you obviously have not seen planet of the apes series of movies )
I have no need for faith in the process of biological evolution. Faith doesn’t claim evidence and it can not claim evidence. That's because faith isn't a tool-- it is a belief. Faith is not a path to knowledge -- else, if the item is known, it no longer needs faith. If one can be said to "know Adam and Eve existed as supernatural creations 6,000 years ago" -- then of what need is there for evidence? How does anyone provide evidence of the supernatural.I never claimed evidence of adam and eve. I accept that on faith, like you accept the non existent proof of man from ape like creature on faith.Your conspiracy theory that there is evidence for biological evolution stands in contrast to the documented evidence.you believe with out actual evidence so don't talk to me about religion.I think it’s pretty clear there will never be enough evidence to convince you of the fact of evolution. The evidence is not in doubt among the relevant science community. There is literally no evidence for the Magical Kingdom of Eden, yet you choose to believe that unquestioningly. What does that say about your objective decision-making skills?Personally I believe god did both create Adam and Eve from scratch and create other people by evolution. Cain had to marry some one as did Adam and Eve's other kids. I just don't see the evidence evolution happened the way science says with out more evidence.
It is a pattern of behavior for religionists such that you do tend to be anti-science. Evidence really is irrelevant to the religionist because the faith nullifies actual proofs-- a convenient loophole of theistic belief but one endemic to all of them.
God would be happier if apes had ruled.I never claimed evidence of adam and eve. I accept that on faith, like you accept the non existent proof of man from ape like creature on faith.
At least they wouldn't nuke the whole place.
you can NOT provide actual evidence that an ape like creature from 7 million years ago developed into modern man.I have no need for faith in the process of biological evolution. Faith doesn’t claim evidence and it can not claim evidence. That's because faith isn't a tool-- it is a belief. Faith is not a path to knowledge -- else, if the item is known, it no longer needs faith. If one can be said to "know Adam and Eve existed as supernatural creations 6,000 years ago" -- then of what need is there for evidence? How does anyone provide evidence of the supernatural.I never claimed evidence of adam and eve. I accept that on faith, like you accept the non existent proof of man from ape like creature on faith.Your conspiracy theory that there is evidence for biological evolution stands in contrast to the documented evidence.you believe with out actual evidence so don't talk to me about religion.I think it’s pretty clear there will never be enough evidence to convince you of the fact of evolution. The evidence is not in doubt among the relevant science community. There is literally no evidence for the Magical Kingdom of Eden, yet you choose to believe that unquestioningly. What does that say about your objective decision-making skills?Personally I believe god did both create Adam and Eve from scratch and create other people by evolution. Cain had to marry some one as did Adam and Eve's other kids. I just don't see the evidence evolution happened the way science says with out more evidence.
It is a pattern of behavior for religionists such that you do tend to be anti-science. Evidence really is irrelevant to the religionist because the faith nullifies actual proofs-- a convenient loophole of theistic belief but one endemic to all of them.
On the other hand, iological history can be source with reasoned, supported arguments from well-considered, peer reviewed scholars. Faith? Well, I think I'll let the more courageous souls here trailblaze that watery path across the sea. When it comes to "evidence of things unseen" ... the examples devolve quickly into personal experience,The facts support it.
I have already provided ample evidence of the progression of an ape-like creature to modern human. I don’t need faith to reach conclusions about the supported science.
Yes !!!Earth is estimated to be 4.54 billion years old, plus or minus about 50 million years, and the universe 13.8 billion years old.While we're on this evolution thing that some people can't graspThat is only the visible universe !!
too well, this is a question for you and anyone else reading this;
Do you have any doubt that there are other planets that have evolved
with intelligent beings out there, even though we've never contacted any (that we're told about) ? I would venture to say there are several living planets in our Milky Way alone as well as all the other galaxies.
But, as none of that addresses our own confusion about the
human species, it's a glaring reminder of how relatively insignificant we are.
View attachment 486300
