Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A court reverses a parent's grounding of his 12 year-old daughter.
globeandmail.com: Father doesn't know best, court rules in girl's fight to get grounding overruled
No they're not. Don't be silly.
Parents are losing control over their children, and this ruling doesn't help. Children seem to have more rights than their parents nowadays, and it's about time parents stood up and took a stand against this crap.
I mean, I'm not for spanking, but if that is the way a parent chooses to disipline their child, they can do so.
Now a bratty 12 year old has more control over her parents than they do over here. What is the world coming to?
No they're not. Don't be silly.
Parents are losing control over their children, and this ruling doesn't help. Children seem to have more rights than their parents nowadays, and it's about time parents stood up and took a stand against this crap.
I mean, I'm not for spanking, but if that is the way a parent chooses to disipline their child, they can do so.
Now a bratty 12 year old has more control over her parents than they do over here. What is the world coming to?
I spanked one of my daughters once. She was about 4 and had gotten out of her car seat (they never invented one that could hold her) in the back seat of the car and leapt for the door handle with the intent of jumping out while I was going 65 mph down the interstate. I caught the whole incident out of the corner of my eye. After putting the car into a sideways spin to throw her away from the door, sliding into the shoulder throwing cubic yards of dirt and sod in every direction and bringing the highway to a screeching halt I got out, pulled her out of the back and spanked her in front of God and everyone on the highway. I don't think a single soul on the road was objecting to my actions and she never got out of her car seat again. There are certain lessons that require a forceful response to make an impression that will never go away and leaves no doubt as to its intent.
No, that's not "communist." Communism is a socioeconomic political system where the productive assets of the country are owned by the state. As much as I disagree with the Human Rights Council ruling - as I often do - this is not evidence of a communist government.
Extremist rhetoric does not help your argument.
Wow! I never knew communism allowed for free speech and freedom of religion.
Wow! I never knew communism allowed for free speech and freedom of religion.
Courts, interpreting the constitution, don't allow the 10 Commandments posted inside government buildings, which is a restriction on free speech and religion.
I guess the US is a communist country then.
Courts, interpreting the constitution, don't allow the 10 Commandments posted inside government buildings, which is a restriction on free speech and religion.
I guess the US is a communist country then.
Last time I checked it still says "In God We Trust" on all of our currency. And NOWHERE in the US Constitution are the words "seperation of church and state." That phrase comes from our "beloved" Supreme Court in some of their more assine decisions.
HUGE difference between what goes on inside a government (taxpayer paid) building and what an INDIVIDUAL says out in public. To ORDER someone to renounce their faith???????
And....YOU KNOW THAT!
That Mr. Boissoin and the Concerned Christian Coalition Inc. be formally disallowed to publish discriminatory letters in newspapers by email, on the radio, in public speeches and on the internet in the future. Further, that they be prohibited from making disparaging remarks in the future against the complainant or any of the complainants witnesses relating to their involvement in the complaint.
The Panel also agrees with the submissions of Mr. Boissoin when he states that this is not a criminal case. It would be inappropriate to punish Mr. Boissoin for his actions and I find that the purpose of the remedy in this case, is not to punish but rather to attempt as far as possible, to ameliorate the effects of the discrimination insofar as is possible and to denunciate the actions which were the subject of the complaint with a view to educate and hopefully prevent actions of this nature in future.
