Idaho Republicans pass resolution urging Supreme Court to end marriage equality

[JustAGuy1]

Idaho Republicans pass resolution urging Supreme Court to end marriage equality - LGBTQ Nation

I really have to ask…what the hell is wrong with these people ? Why can’t they just leave others alone to live their lives as they choose ? Same sex marriage has been the law of the land in all 50 states for nearly a decade. It has been legal in some states and in other countries for much longer. It’s really not much of an issue anymore . Married same sex couples inhabit nearly every community across the country. They have become part of the fabric of society. They own homes, have families, hold jobs, pay taxes , volunteer in their towns and are good neighbors. Most people don’t even notice them and those who do don’t care . They bother no one

I challenge these people to provide and evidence at all that same sex marriage has in any way been detrimental to society , or to them personally . There is absolutely no reason for them to seek to upend the lives of these people and take from them that which they can take for granted . The only explanation for this is the creeping scourge of Christian Nationalism that seeks to impose their distorted and cruel suede Christian beliefs and values on others .

Selected excerpts from the above link:

" Why can’t they just leave others alone to live their lives as they choose ? "

You can't make this shit up. You people want to make us all do whatever YOU think is right.

 

[San Souci]

What if there is no straight parent who is capable of caring for a child.? What if that person is a drug dealer or sexual predator.? Should the child be placed with mean old aunt Lillie, or become a ward of the state rather than be care for by the gay parent? THINK!!

Grandparents? Foster care? Adoption? Children should NOT be exposed to depravity.

 

[San Souci]

So that's your problem!! Your living in the 60 ! I would have actually guessed the 50's but what ever. What the hell is "fagging off" anyway?

Still waiting for some answers from you. Lets recap:

You said Yes."children should NOT be exposed to this depravity"

And you that "people should keep their sex lives private"...suggesting that gay do not keep it private

In both cases I tried to get you to explain exactly what you meant. What are gay people doing with their sex lives or with children that you find problematic.

I have gotten nothing but more outrage and whimpering from you about perversions and depravity without even attempting to articulate what it is that you think is going on. Do you think at all ? Or, is it just and autonomic response in reaction to any mention of gay people? It all makes me wonder whether or not there is any cellular activity going on above your neck.

"Gay Pride Rallies"? That is PRIVATE? How can a Pillow biter have any pride in getting punked?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It's reality. That you have to deny reality to have your viewpoints just shows how fucked up you are.

Just like men pretending to be women aren't women.

So, you still won't answer the question!! Not surprised at all. How the hell am I denying reality . The reality is that this procreation crap is all a smokescreen to avoid admitting that you just don't want gays to be able to marry or care for children You need to grow a spine and admit it and stop dancing around it. You have some strange ideas about gay people and their ability to be parents based on old school and debunked ideas about them but you seem to be to much of a coward to admit it- probably because you know you cant defend it.

For the hell of it....the question once again:

If you think that "creating a family through biological means with each other." is so important , what is your policy for hetero sexual couples who are incapable of creating a family through biological means with each other.

 

[San Souci]

So, you still won't answer the question!! Not surprised at all. How the hell am I denying reality . The reality is that this procreation crap is all a smokescreen to avoid admitting that you just don't want gays to be able to marry or care for children You need to grow a spine and admit it and stop dancing around it. You have some strange ideas about gay people and their ability to be parents based on old school and debunked ideas about them but you seem to be to much of a coward to admit it- probably because you know you cant defend it.

For the hell of it....the question once again:

If you think that "creating a family through biological means with each other." is so important , what is your policy for hetero sexual couples who are incapable of creating a family through biological means with each other.

BINGO! You got it. Gays and Trannys should not be around children.

 

[martybegan]

So, you still won't answer the question!! Not surprised at all. How the hell am I denying reality . The reality is that this procreation crap is all a smokescreen to avoid admitting that you just don't want gays to be able to marry or care for children You need to grow a spine and admit it and stop dancing around it. You have some strange ideas about gay people and their ability to be parents based on old school and debunked ideas about them but you seem to be to much of a coward to admit it- probably because you know you cant defend it.

For the hell of it....the question once again:

If you think that "creating a family through biological means with each other." is so important , what is your policy for hetero sexual couples who are incapable of creating a family through biological means with each other.

If people vote for SSM I'm for it. If gays want to adopt, go ahead.

But don't give me the pseudo-scientific bullshit that it's the same as hetero relationships, which are what biology dictates is the species default.

You keep going back to parenting, because your orthodoxy forbids you from admitting two same sex people simply cannot have a child together.

Irrelevant.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Grandparents? Foster care? Adoption? Children should NOT be exposed to depravity.

Sure !! Just ******* brilliant !! Lets take a 3 year old , or a 5 year old who is bonded to his or her gay parent and place that child with a stranger . What the **** do you think that the effect on that child will be? Do you know a damned thing about children and their emotional development. Never mind. I know the answer

You're still whimpering about that "exposure to depravity " and you are still unable to articulate what it is that you think happens to children in the care of gay parents . As I said before It makes me wonder if there is any cellular activity going on above your neck.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

BINGO! You got it. Gays and Trannys should not be around children.

How the hell is that supposed to be an appropriate response to my post ?

But to respond to you....You are either to much of a coward, or just to brain dead to explain why you think so

 

[San Souci]

Sure !! Just ******* brilliant !! Lets take a 3 year old , or a 5 year old who is bonded to his or her gay parent and place that child with a stranger . What the **** do you think that the effect on that child will be? Do you know a damned thing about children and their emotional development. Never mind. I know the answer

You're still whimpering about that "exposure to depravity " and you are still unable to articulate what it is that you think happens to children in the care of gay parents . As I said before It makes me wonder if there is any cellular activity going on above your neck.

Yes. I raised 3 children. All are grown up and successful.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Yes. I raised 3 children. All are grown up and successful.

How the **** is that supposed to address the issue of bonding and your cruel suggestion that children should be taken away from a parent who is gay ? You claim to know something about children but I don't think so. If you did you would understand the devastation of of taking a child away from a parent

I'm getting a little sick of you.

 

[initforme]

I am for God getting out of civil unions and getting back into marriages. The state’s position is secondary to God. People can apply for a civil union and need to go through their church if they want to have a contract with God. As far as divorce, never entertained one nor would I recommend one.

People can and should be able to get married without having to go thru a church. That's already been established and this is not a theocracy. As a lifelong Christian I would fight against a Christian theocracy. Tooth and nail.

 

[initforme]

No. Normalizing perverted behavior is wrong.

Not having kids is perfectly normal for a traditionally married couple and it has zero effect on the nation ...child free couples arr on the rise. I'm talking man and woman married couples who spire to other things

 

[initforme]

They are physically incapable of creating a family through biological means with each other.

Procreation is not a necessary part of marriage.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

If people vote for SSM I'm for it. If gays want to adopt, go ahead.

Vote? You don't get to vote on a civil right. The courts decide on constitutional grounds Adoption? Every thing that you have said so far indicates that your full of shit

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

But don't give me the pseudo-scientific bullshit that it's the same as hetero relationships, which are what biology dictates is the species default.

Numerous studies have shown that same sex parenting is in fact the same as opposite sex parenting . Biology is not the determining factor when it comes to parenting outcomes . The pseudo science comes from those who try to prove that children who have gay parents do not do as well. I know all of the charlatans out there who push that shit, Don't test me. You will look foolish

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You keep going back to parenting, because your orthodoxy forbids you from admitting two same sex people simply cannot have a child together.

That is as stupid as stupid gets , When did I ever say that ? Answer....I never did. I said that it doesn't matter and you know it Stop lying!!

You still refuse to answer the question: What is your policy for hetero couple who can't have a child one on one? Stop being such a coward and answer the question. I don't think that you will because to do so honestly would require your admission to being a bigot.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

"Gay Pride Rallies"? That is PRIVATE? How can a Pillow biter have any pride in getting punked?

What about gay pride rallies? They are not what they used to be back when gays needed to be outrageous and militant to be heard. Ever been to Mardi Gras ? How about spring break in Ft Lauderdale ? There is a lot of public lewdness there . Bet you would like it because they aren't gay

They take pride in the fact that they have -to some degree - overcame and survived the bigotry and marginalization inflicted by people like you. Your hatred and ignorance is on full display here

 

[San Souci]

What about gay pride rallies? They are not what they used to be back when gays needed to be outrageous and militant to be heard. Ever been to Mardi Gras ? How about spring break in Ft Lauderdale ? There is a lot of public lewdness there . Bet you would like it because they aren't gay

They take pride in the fact that they have -to some degree - overcame and survived the bigotry and marginalization inflicted by people like you. Your hatred and ignorance is on full display here

So taking it up the bunghole is not degrading?

 

[San Souci]

Procreation is not a necessary part of marriage.

Then what is the point? Why not just have a relationship?

 

[San Souci]

How the **** is that supposed to address the issue of bonding and your cruel suggestion that children should be taken away from a parent who is gay ? You claim to know something about children but I don't think so. If you did you would understand the devastation of of taking a child away from a parent

I'm getting a little sick of you.

Go bite a pillow then.