ICE bodycam footage shows Minneapolis woman weaponized her vehicle in attack on agent

[Soupnazi630]

Did she commit the kind of crimes that justify shooting a fleeing subject?

She was shot in self defense

 

[martybegan]

So you’re still defending someone who WAS actually attacking a police barricade and attacking someone who was trying to get AWAY from a police situation

Again, why didn't Byrd shoot the people actually trying to destroy the door/barricade?

You don't get to escape THROUGH a police officer.

 

[martybegan]

“When he put himself in front”

What LEO manual says to do that?

He CAUSED this

She caused it by interfering with the lawful actions of ICE officers.

 

[marvin martian]

Resistance of any sort will not be tolerated

Eh?

Sure. Ask Ashli Babbitt and Charlie Kirk.

You celebrated when they died. And if this terrorist Good-riddance had succeeded in killing ICE agents, you would be celebrating right now.

Hey, maybe YOU'RE the problem here.

 

[Lesh]

Sure. Ask Ashli Babbitt and Charlie Kirk.

You celebrated when they died. And if this terrorist Good-riddance had succeeded in killing ICE agents, you would be celebrating right now.

Hey, maybe YOU'RE the problem here.

So let’s see

You claim the shooting of a woman who was in the act of breaching a police barricade protecting Congress during a massive violent riot was wrong…

But this one… where the cop intentionally put himself in harms way to protect… what.. his dignity? Was a good shoot..

That kinda tells us everything

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Sure. Ask Ashli Babbitt and Charlie Kirk.

You celebrated when they died. And if this terrorist Good-riddance had succeeded in killing ICE agents, you would be celebrating right now.

Hey, maybe YOU'RE the problem here.

.

It's going to be so delightful when the leftist murder cult no longer has a stage from which to whine.

Make Asylums Great Again

.

 

[Fang]

Her wheels were turned AWAY from the ICE thug. Had he not fired she would have passed him unharmed

I keep hearing this argument from the Left. The issue is the officer most likely cannot see the tires from his angle. If the driver is trying to turn right, she still needed to point the car in the direction of the officer AND she needed to make contact with his body to pass because that is where he is standing. Based on other video, it's clear the car did in fact make contact with the officer. Have you even been hit by a vehicle even if it's only going 10MPH? It's completely irrelevant if he's unharmed. What is relevant is it could have been deadly for the officer.

He had 1.13 seconds to make a decision before the car hit his body. Is he justified in firing his weapon? Was he trained properly? Great questions.

These are the facts:

• Good was there solely to disrupt ICE operations.
• Good did not adhere to ICE directions.
• Good was blocking the road.
• Good did not exit the vehicle as she was instructed.
• Good attempted to drive off as her wife told her to.
• Good's car made contact with the officer as she was driving.

I would NEVER say she deserved to be shot or deserved to die. No matter what side you're on This is TRAGIC situation.

The only question given all the facts is did the officer reasonably fear for his life or someone else's? We have the benefit of slowing video down and looking at her eyes and the front tires while going over the incident repeatedly. The officer had 1.13 seconds. I can't say without a shadow of doubt that this wasn't self defense IN HIS MIND given all the facts and the time he had to make a decision. Perhaps if the car never made contact with the officer I'd see it your way.

 

[Lesh]

I keep hearing this argument from the Left. The issue is the officer most likely cannot see the tires from his angle. If the driver is trying to turn right, she still needed to point the car in the direction of the officer AND she needed to make contact with his body to pass because that is where he is standing. Based on other video, it's clear the car did in fact make contact with the officer. Have you even been hit by a vehicle even if it's only going 10MPH? It's completely irrelevant if he's unharmed. What is relevant is it could have been deadly for the officer.

He had 1.13 seconds to make a decision before the car hit his body. Is he justified in firing his weapon? Was he trained properly? Great questions.

These are the facts:

• Good was there solely to disrupt ICE operations.
• Good did not adhere to ICE directions.
• Good was blocking the road.
• Good did not exit the vehicle as she was instructed.
• Good attempted to drive off as her wife told her to.
• Good's car made contact with the officer as she was driving.

I would NEVER say she deserved to be shot or deserved to die. No matter what side you're on This is TRAGIC situation.

The only question given all the facts is did the officer reasonably fear for his life or someone else's? We have the benefit of slowing video down and looking at her eyes and the front tires while going over the incident repeatedly. The officer had 1.13 seconds. I can't say without a shadow of doubt that this wasn't self defense IN HIS MIND given all the facts and the time he had to make a decision. Perhaps if the car never made contact with the officer I'd see it your way.

Ya know what he COULD see? Her turning the wheel away from him

Know how I know? Because “I” saw it on his body cam

 

[Fang]

Ya know what he COULD see? Her turning the wheel away from him

Know how I know? Because “I” saw it on his body cam

Again. 1.13 seconds to make the decision. The car made contact with his body so clearly she didn't turn the wheel enough.

 

[jknowgood]

Which she wasn’t doing

She was using that 2 ton vehicle to escape the situation

The irony here is just LAST ******* WEEK

The people trying to justify this murder we’re screaming about Ashes Babbitt… who was actually attacking police barricade protecting Congress

Okay so she ignored the cop telling her to get out of her car. Then hit another law enforcement officer. So you're saying, she was in the right?

 

[jknowgood]

So you’re still defending someone who WAS actually attacking a police barricade and attacking someone who was trying to get AWAY from a police situation

No he is saying the cops just don't shoot innocent people dumbass.

 

[Lesh]

Again. 1.13 seconds to make the decision. The car made contact with his body so clearly she didn't turn the wheel enough.

Why does his cam never show that contact?

Why in fact does it never show his weapon in front of him firing?

All it shows is… something. Some kind of disruption. His jumping back? Recoil from his service revolver?

It never shows contact. How does a camera pointed straight forward NOT show contact?

 

[Lesh]

No he is saying the cops just don't shoot innocent people dumbass.

But they do… we know that

 

[jknowgood]

So let’s see

You claim the shooting of a woman who was in the act of breaching a police barricade protecting Congress during a massive violent riot was wrong…

But this one… where the cop intentionally put himself in harms way to protect… what.. his dignity? Was a good shoot..

That kinda tells us everything

The cop was trying to do his job. She was impeding with that and then tried to kill him with her car. There I made you word salad legit, you're welcome.

 

[jknowgood]

But they do… we know that

Sometimes, but the officer had a good reason to shoot her. She tried to kill him, with her car.

 

[Rawley]

She’s dead because that cop shot her. For no good reason

Seems like a very good reason.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Okay so she ignored the cop telling her to get out of her car. Then hit another law enforcement officer. So you're saying, she was in the right?

.

He/she/it has only to disagree with what the sensible posters say. It's deeply indoctrinated into whatever is left of his/her/its brain.

.

 

[Rawley]

Why does his cam never show that contact?

Why in fact does it never show his weapon in front of him firing?

All it shows is… something. Some kind of disruption. His jumping back? Recoil from his service revolver?

It never shows contact. How does a camera pointed straight forward NOT show contact?

You still trying to argue she didn't hit him? Even your loon master Frey admitted she hit him.

 

[Fang]

Why does his cam never show that contact?

Why in fact does it never show his weapon in front of him firing?

All it shows is… something. Some kind of disruption. His jumping back? Recoil from his service revolver?

It never shows contact. How does a camera pointed straight forward NOT show contact?

I'm not gonna do your research for you. But another video came out clearly showing contact.

 

[marvin martian]

Why does his cam never show that contact?

Why in fact does it never show his weapon in front of him firing?

All it shows is… something. Some kind of disruption. His jumping back? Recoil from his service revolver?

It never shows contact. How does a camera pointed straight forward NOT show contact?

"Service revolver"?

LOL, what ******* century are you living in?