ICE arresting more innocent people than criminals. Up 800% more under Trump!

So a BS reply to my proving my point. Why am I not surprised?

You are funny, just like Trump saying that he is the best president ever. Hahahahaha!
You can't be trusted with crayons? You tend to go out of the lines?
 
Off hand I cant think of any trump policies that I strongly disagree with
I already mentioned a few but here are a few more:

Policies:

1) taking advantage of the poor
2) enriching his friends at the cost of others
3) loyalty is more important than competence
4) creating disunity
5) revenge and rage are good things
6) using a hacksaw is better than using of a scalpel
7) blaming others for mistakes made (rather than himself) is the way to go forward
 
Targeting of Critics:
  • Law Firms: Some law firms have been targeted with executive orders, facing sanctions like revoked security clearances and restricted access to federal buildings, for their pro bono work or associations with investigations involving President Trump.
  • Media and NGOs: There are concerns about undermining press freedom and the critical role of independent media. The administration has also cut funding to organizations supporting human rights defenders and independent journalists.
It's not targeting, its return fire.
 
I already mentioned a few but here are a few more:

Policies:

1) taking advantage of the poor
2) enriching his friends at the cost of others
3) loyalty is more important than competence
4) creating disunity
5) revenge and rage are good things
6) using a hacksaw is better than using of a scalpel
7) blaming others for mistakes made (rather than himself) is the way to go forward
Thats all utter nonsense

Starting with number one

Trump does not take advantage of the poor

Can you give an example?
 
Thats all utter nonsense

Starting with number one

Trump does not take advantage of the poor

Can you give an example?

Wow, you make things so hard (NOT) for me. What can I do?

Well, how about giving you TWO (not just one) example?

#1

Trump Admin. Accidentally Admits It Will Hurt the Poor to Give Bigger Tax Windfall to the Ultra-Wealthy

and #2:

Trump Pays $2 Million to 8 Charities for Misuse of Foundation

Misuse (used the funds for himself) of foundation funds for CHARITIES (the poor)
 
I fully understand what you are saying but you need to understand that when a person has more policies that do harm than policies that do good, it means one step forward and two steps back.

I guess you think that is a good thing, right?

Trade and immigration, those are two really, really, REALLY, big policies.
 
All humans (whether illegal or not) have rights. Those rights include being taken to court to plead their cases. Trump is taking those human rights away.

I am sure that if something like this was happening to you (either here, on when traveling to another country), you would want your legal rights upheld. Or am I wrong?
You seem to have no clue on law but want to pretend you do. Anyone entering the country needs only be interviewed by a border patrol or ICE agent. If the interviewer determines that they have a legitimate reason to be in the country then they will be given a court date. They do not automatically get time in court.
 
Wow, you make things so hard (NOT) for me. What can I do?

Well, how about giving you TWO (not just one) example?

#1

Trump Admin. Accidentally Admits It Will Hurt the Poor to Give Bigger Tax Windfall to the Ultra-Wealthy

and #2:

Trump Pays $2 Million to 8 Charities for Misuse of Foundation

Misuse (used the funds for himself) of foundation funds for CHARITIES (the poor)
.

Keep in mind that many of us know how dangerous it is to click unidentified left cultists' "links".

I'll never do it again.




.
 
Wow, you make things so hard (NOT) for me. What can I do?

Well, how about giving you TWO (not just one) example?

#1

Trump Admin. Accidentally Admits It Will Hurt the Poor to Give Bigger Tax Windfall to the Ultra-Wealthy

and #2:

Trump Pays $2 Million to 8 Charities for Misuse of Foundation

Misuse (used the funds for himself) of foundation funds for CHARITIES (the poor)
You really are a disturbed individual….Do you really think you’re accomplishing anything other than making yourself look foolish?

You must have had daddy issues during toilet training…
 
You seem to have no clue on law but want to pretend you do. Anyone entering the country needs only be interviewed by a border patrol or ICE agent. If the interviewer determines that they have a legitimate reason to be in the country then they will be given a court date. They do not automatically get time in court.
We are talking about apples and oranges. The OP is about deportation of those that have ALREADY come here. The 4th and 5th amendments address that specific issue.

What you are talking about is when they are met by ICE as they ARE COMING in.
 
We are talking about apples and oranges. The OP is about deportation of those that have ALREADY come here. The 4th and 5th amendments address that specific issue.

What you are talking about is when they are met by ICE as they ARE COMING in.
No child if you do not come in through a port of entry then you are immediately considered to have no real reason to be here. They can still interview you and decide if you have a real reason but the fact you did not come through a port actually works against your claim.
There is no requirement that you get a court date.
But hey democrats do need their slaves. Even if they do have to pay very low wages and allow them to live of democrats property.
 
We are talking about apples and oranges. The OP is about deportation of those that have ALREADY come here. The 4th and 5th amendments address that specific issue.

What you are talking about is when they are met by ICE as they ARE COMING in.

They aren't being unreasonably seized and don't have to incriminate themselves while they are being legally deported.
 
15th post
One more time

Purple haired nose-ringers at Yale came up with something far different back in 2018 before the Biden invasion.
 
Back
Top Bottom