ICE arresting more innocent people than criminals. Up 800% more under Trump!

[Stuartbirdan2]

Dem voters are usually fecal.

Playground

 

[WEATHER53]

But these are pretty much dormant accounts that spring into action. Were they contacted by America’s adversaries, and told to spring into action, and paid by the post?

All part of the inexplicable manner of operations here

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Playground

Keep your dem pervs away from the playground.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

None of the laws do and there is no proof about the most Americans lie

 

[Luckyone]

I’m sure at least a few citizens have been mistakenly detained

But thats understandable with so many migrants in the country illegally

When crimes occur, societies often cannot know for certain if a suspect is guilty or innocent. Consequently, societies must grapple with what type of "mistakes" they will tolerate more—sometimes punishing or scrutinizing innocent people or sometimes allowing guilty people go free.73 The American system, grounded in the British Common Law, has long erred on the side of protecting innocence. Thus we presume an accused person's innocence until they are proven guilty. As the preeminent English jurist William Blackstone wrote,"etter that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer."74 This principle can also be found in religious texts and in the writings of the American Founders.75 Benjamin Franklin went further arguing "it is better a hundred guilty persons should escape than one innocent person should suffer

[td width="443px"]Blackstone's Ratio: Is it more important to protect innocence or punish guilt?[/td]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

When crimes occur, societies often cannot know for certain if a suspect is guilty or innocent. Consequently, societies must grapple with what type of "mistakes" they will tolerate more—sometimes punishing or scrutinizing innocent people or sometimes allowing guilty people go free.73 The American system, grounded in the British Common Law, has long erred on the side of protecting innocence. Thus we presume an accused person's innocence until they are proven guilty. As the preeminent English jurist William Blackstone wrote,"etter that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer."74 This principle can also be found in religious texts and in the writings of the American Founders.75 Benjamin Franklin went further arguing "it is better a hundred guilty persons should escape than one innocent person should suffer

[td width="443px"]Blackstone's Ratio: Is it more important to protect innocence or punish guilt?[/td]



View attachment 1139000

Now ask about deporting illegal aliens!

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Yes, most voters wanted Trump to secure the border and deport the illegal aliens.

Like this man, most of those voters were misled.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

None of the laws do and there is no proof about the most Americans lie

After intense public pressure and criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the political spectrum, President Trump has called for a federal judge to release grand jury testimony related to the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of sexually trafficking children.

Trump says no one cares about Epstein. Why won't his base let it go?
Consider This from NPR
Trump says no one cares about Epstein. Why won't his base let it go?
The Department of Justice has also formally asked the federal court judge who was assigned to the Epstein case to unseal the testimony. In a motion filed Friday to the Southern District of New York, Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote: "Given the public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation into Epstein, the Department of Justice moves the Court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts in United States v. Epstein, subject to appropriate redactions of victim-related and other personal identifying information

 

[Mac-7]

When crimes occur, societies often cannot know for certain if a suspect is guilty or innocent. Consequently, societies must grapple with what type of "mistakes" they will tolerate more—sometimes punishing or scrutinizing innocent people or sometimes allowing guilty people go free.73 The American system, grounded in the British Common Law, has long erred on the side of protecting innocence. Thus we presume an accused person's innocence until they are proven guilty. As the preeminent English jurist William Blackstone wrote,"etter that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer."74 This principle can also be found in religious texts and in the writings of the American Founders.75 Benjamin Franklin went further arguing "it is better a hundred guilty persons should escape than one innocent person should suffer

[td width="443px"]Blackstone's Ratio: Is it more important to protect innocence or punish guilt?[/td]



View attachment 1139000

Both are equally wrong

But as the poll suggests, the criminals are more protected than their victims are

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Keep your dem pervs away from the playground.

After intense public pressure and criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the political spectrum, President Trump has called for a federal judge to release grand jury testimony related to the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of sexually trafficking children.

Consider This from NPR​

Trump says no one cares about Epstein. Why won't his base let it go?​

The Department of Justice has also formally asked the federal court judge who was assigned to the Epstein case to unseal the testimony. In a motion filed Friday to the Southern District of New York, Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote: "Given the public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation into Epstein, the Department of Justice moves the Court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts in United States v. Epstein, subject to appropriate redactions of victim-related and other personal identifying information

 

[Lisa558]

When crimes occur, societies often cannot know for certain if a suspect is guilty or innocent. Consequently, societies must grapple with what type of "mistakes" they will tolerate more—sometimes punishing or scrutinizing innocent people or sometimes allowing guilty people go free.73 The American system, grounded in the British Common Law, has long erred on the side of protecting innocence. Thus we presume an accused person's innocence until they are proven guilty. As the preeminent English jurist William Blackstone wrote,"etter that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer."74 This principle can also be found in religious texts and in the writings of the American Founders.75 Benjamin Franklin went further arguing "it is better a hundred guilty persons should escape than one innocent person should suffer

[td width="443px"]Blackstone's Ratio: Is it more important to protect innocence or punish guilt?[/td]



View attachment 1139000

They’re talking about innocent American citizens.

No illegal alien is innocent. They violated immigration law.

 

[Lisa558]

After intense public pressure and criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the political spectrum, President Trump has called for a federal judge to release grand jury testimony related to the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of sexually trafficking children.

Consider This from NPR​

Trump says no one cares about Epstein. Why won't his base let it go?​

The Department of Justice has also formally asked the federal court judge who was assigned to the Epstein case to unseal the testimony. In a motion filed Friday to the Southern District of New York, Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote: "Given the public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation into Epstein, the Department of Justice moves the Court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts in United States v. Epstein, subject to appropriate redactions of victim-related and other personal identifying information

Wrong thread.

The topic here is the illegal alien invasion and the deportation of these scofflaws.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Both are equally wrong

But as the poll suggests, the criminals are more protected than their victims are

Indeed, glad to see your discussing Israeli settlers rationally for once.

American beaten to death by Israeli settlers in the West Bank

The Council on American-Islamic Relations called on President Donald Trump to hold Israel accountable for the killing of U.S. citizen Sayfollah Musallet, 20.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[Lisa558]

Biden won in a landslide in 2020. Fickle. My bad

Sure…..with harvested votes trucked in during the dead of night, after shutting down the counting.

It was clearly Plan B.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

 

[Mac-7]

After intense public pressure and criticism from lawmakers on both sides of the political spectrum, President Trump has called for a federal judge to release grand jury testimony related to the disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who was accused of sexually trafficking children.

Consider This from NPR​

Trump says no one cares about Epstein. Why won't his base let it go?​

The Department of Justice has also formally asked the federal court judge who was assigned to the Epstein case to unseal the testimony. In a motion filed Friday to the Southern District of New York, Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote: "Given the public interest in the investigative work conducted by the Department of Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation into Epstein, the Department of Justice moves the Court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts in United States v. Epstein, subject to appropriate redactions of victim-related and other personal identifying information

I think libs are going to be hugely disappointed to find no incriminating evidence against trump

Which is the only reason they care about Epstein

 

[Lisa558]

Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

And all these illegals were neither born here nor naturalized.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Sure…..with harvested votes trucked in during the dead of night, after shutting down the counting.

It was clearly Plan B.

How did trump win two rigged elections?

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

Unless your name is Rosie O'Donnell, as we now know those laws don't apply to her!

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

And all these illegals were neither born here nor naturalized.

nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws