ICE arresting more innocent people than criminals. Up 800% more under Trump!

The court heard arguments on May 15 and then released its decision on June 27. In Trump v. CASA, writing for a 6-3 conservative majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett determined that universal injunctions likely exceed the authority of the lower courts and are, in many cases, unnecessary to provide complete relief to those challenging a policy. The court’s opinion left open the possibility of nationwide class-based injunctions, as well as nationwide injunctions in cases challenging agency actions as illegal, as Mila Sohoni previously wrote for SCOTUSblog.

The decision was one of the most significant of the 2024-25 term, as well as a major victory for the Trump administration in its effort to implement its policy goals through executive action. But when it came to the birthright citizenship battle, in particular, it quickly became clear that the ruling wasn’t a slam dunk for federal officials, since it provided a road map to new, class-based injunctions that would also apply nationwide
Feelings over facts is your gig alone
 
AI Overview

In fiscal year 2025 (starting October 1, 2024), ICE has arrested a significant number of individuals with no criminal convictions. Data from June indicates that 65% of the over 204,000 people booked into detention had no criminal convictions, according to the Cato Institute. Furthermore, over 93% of those detained had no history of violent offenses, according to the American Immigration Council.

Human and legal rights are being thrown out the window by the Trump administration.

AI Overview

Based on recent news reports and statements from civil rights and human rights organizations, there are concerns and allegations regarding the Trump administration's approach to human and legal rights in 2025. These include:
  • Immigration Enforcement: The administration has been accused of adopting policies that disregard due process for immigrants and asylum seekers, including expanding immigration enforcement to target foreign nationals, particularly students and researchers, attempting to end birthright citizenship via executive order, and carrying out mass deportations and raids. A former Department of Justice lawyer, Erez Reuveni, has also accused the Trump administration of ignoring court rulings and pressuring attorneys to prioritize the President's agenda over ethical obligations in deportation cases.
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI): The administration has moved to terminate grants related to DEI programs and prohibit federally-funded entities from engaging in such initiatives, prompting legal challenges.
    • Housing Discrimination: The Department of Housing and Urban Development is reportedly preparing to shut down investigations into housing discrimination and segregation cases.
    • Education: There are concerns about the Trump administration's dismantling of the Education Department's civil rights division and attacks on academic freedom and free expression at universities.
  • Targeting of Critics:
    • Law Firms: Some law firms have been targeted with executive orders, facing sanctions like revoked security clearances and restricted access to federal buildings, for their pro bono work or associations with investigations involving President Trump.
    • Media and NGOs: There are concerns about undermining press freedom and the critical role of independent media. The administration has also cut funding to organizations supporting human rights defenders and independent journalists.
Is losing your rights to freedom and justice something that you want? If by any chance, you personally (or a member of your family) get arrested and thrown in jail (or worse, deported) without any chance of defending yourself, would you still be a Trump supporter?

By the way and for all of you that accuse these OP's as being TDS, may I remind you that Trump is doing things that no other U.S. president has done? He is changing the U.S. in ways that are against what our Constitution was built on. Do you honestly think that it should be ignored and Trump allowed to do it, without trying to change it (to the nth degree)?
Fools! They are illegal and that is why they are taken into detention! Arrest them ALL! :)
 
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws

Exactly!

Now, deport all those illegal aliens!
 
In the 1840's, more than 14 million immigrants came to the U.S. They weren't considered illegal because there was no law against immigrants coming here at that time.

In the 1870's, the first laws determining who was illegal were passed, and it had to do with preventing criminals from coming here. In 1924, another law was passed that gave quotas as to how many could come here from each nation.

None of these laws prevented anyone (other than a criminal) from coming here, meaning that people coming here that were not criminals were basically "innocent".

With the laws changing so often since then, it does mean that most of the people coming here do not know they are "breaking the law". As such, they cannot be considered guilty as it takes knowledge that a crime is being committed to qualify as committing a crime. Most of those coming here are people fighting for their own existence and survival. That is not a crime. Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is something every living person has a right to.

Can this clown spin or not, lol.
 
The court heard arguments on May 15 and then released its decision on June 27. In Trump v. CASA, writing for a 6-3 conservative majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett determined that universal injunctions likely exceed the authority of the lower courts and are, in many cases, unnecessary to provide complete relief to those challenging a policy. The court’s opinion left open the possibility of nationwide class-based injunctions, as well as nationwide injunctions in cases challenging agency actions as illegal, as Mila Sohoni previously wrote for SCOTUSblog.

The decision was one of the most significant of the 2024-25 term, as well as a major victory for the Trump administration in its effort to implement its policy goals through executive action. But when it came to the birthright citizenship battle, in particular, it quickly became clear that the ruling wasn’t a slam dunk for federal officials, since it provided a road map to new, class-based injunctions that would also apply nationwide
Feelings over facts is your gig alone
 
In the 1840's, more than 14 million immigrants came to the U.S. They weren't considered illegal because there was no law against immigrants coming here at that time.

In the 1870's, the first laws determining who was illegal were passed, and it had to do with preventing criminals from coming here. In 1924, another law was passed that gave quotas as to how many could come here from each nation.

None of these laws prevented anyone (other than a criminal) from coming here, meaning that people coming here that were not criminals were basically "innocent".

With the laws changing so often since then, it does mean that most of the people coming here do not know they are "breaking the law". As such, they cannot be considered guilty as it takes knowledge that a crime is being committed to qualify as committing a crime. Most of those coming here are people fighting for their own existence and survival. That is not a crime. Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is something every living person has a right to.

With the laws changing so often since then, it does mean that most of the people coming here do not know they are "breaking the law".

Deport all the illegal aliens, even the ones who claim "ignorance of the law".

As such, they cannot be considered guilty as it takes knowledge that a crime is being committed to qualify as committing a crime.

Liar.

Most of those coming here are people fighting for their own existence and survival.

That's very sad. I hope they'll be okay when they get back home.

That is not a crime.

They can fight for their own existence and survival, in their home country.

Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is something every living person has a right to.

Exactly. But they don't all have the right to that in the US.
 
Also they could have said humans or even people but since they were addressing persons of the USA they did not
 
Glad law enforcement was there to save her, instead of being assaulted by demafasict brownshirts…but geez why didn’t inside edition at least blur her face out and give a little more respect to her privacy? That’s f’ed up
.

I'd agree, but she asked that her face be shown.


.
 
AI Overview

In fiscal year 2025 (starting October 1, 2024), ICE has arrested a significant number of individuals with no criminal convictions. Data from June indicates that 65% of the over 204,000 people booked into detention had no criminal convictions, according to the Cato Institute. Furthermore, over 93% of those detained had no history of violent offenses, according to the American Immigration Council.

Human and legal rights are being thrown out the window by the Trump administration.

AI Overview

Based on recent news reports and statements from civil rights and human rights organizations, there are concerns and allegations regarding the Trump administration's approach to human and legal rights in 2025. These include:
  • Immigration Enforcement: The administration has been accused of adopting policies that disregard due process for immigrants and asylum seekers, including expanding immigration enforcement to target foreign nationals, particularly students and researchers, attempting to end birthright citizenship via executive order, and carrying out mass deportations and raids. A former Department of Justice lawyer, Erez Reuveni, has also accused the Trump administration of ignoring court rulings and pressuring attorneys to prioritize the President's agenda over ethical obligations in deportation cases.
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI): The administration has moved to terminate grants related to DEI programs and prohibit federally-funded entities from engaging in such initiatives, prompting legal challenges.
    • Housing Discrimination: The Department of Housing and Urban Development is reportedly preparing to shut down investigations into housing discrimination and segregation cases.
    • Education: There are concerns about the Trump administration's dismantling of the Education Department's civil rights division and attacks on academic freedom and free expression at universities.
  • Targeting of Critics:
    • Law Firms: Some law firms have been targeted with executive orders, facing sanctions like revoked security clearances and restricted access to federal buildings, for their pro bono work or associations with investigations involving President Trump.
    • Media and NGOs: There are concerns about undermining press freedom and the critical role of independent media. The administration has also cut funding to organizations supporting human rights defenders and independent journalists.
Is losing your rights to freedom and justice something that you want? If by any chance, you personally (or a member of your family) get arrested and thrown in jail (or worse, deported) without any chance of defending yourself, would you still be a Trump supporter?

By the way and for all of you that accuse these OP's as being TDS, may I remind you that Trump is doing things that no other U.S. president has done? He is changing the U.S. in ways that are against what our Constitution was built on. Do you honestly think that it should be ignored and Trump allowed to do it, without trying to change it (to the nth degree)?

You're clueless about "concentration camps". That's obvious

It’s very offensive to Jewish people to draw parallels to what happened to their law-abiding ancestors to the air-conditioned facility where illegals get three meals a day.

The Jews were lucky if they got a stale piece of bread while they sweltered in the heat, being worked half-to-death (or to death, in many cases), and the libs are complaining about the toilet being too close to the toothbrush for illegal aliens.

SIGH-------------> My Conservative friends, RELOOK at the thread header by UNLUCKY-incompetent-DUCKY. What does it say?

Here---------------> UP 800% over Trump!

We should all AGREE! Unlucky-E-Ducky has posted an honest thread, and the reason why is actually quite simple------------> Because Jose' Biteme NEVER ARRESTED ANY ILLEGALS! He let them all in! So of course, anything pertaining to arrests would have growth when pertaining to ILLEGALS, and be up massively..............including throwing the INVADERS out of the country, AFTER being arrested.

And so............if Jose' arrested 1 ILLEGAL that was innocent of not breaking the law besides being ILLEGAL; which of course IS an oxymoron, and Trump arrested 8, why the Trump administration is up 800%!

But here is the thing------------>UNLUCKY-E-PHONY considers crossing the border ILLEGALLY as being innocent, now don't you UNLUCKY, hehehehehehehehe. So even though they have broken Federal law, he considers them pure as the wind driven snow.........and that is how LEFTISTS gaslight, and propagandize you! They spin as fast as they can, and before you catch on to their bullsh**, they jump to another phony thread!
 
Where have I stated that "I want them here illegally"?

What I want is to be is what we have been for 248 years, which is a nation based on the Constitution and the laws that we fought so hard to achieve and institute. What Trump is doing is getting rid of one problem and substituting it with a bigger one. It means our nation is taking one step forward and two steps back.

Why do YOU want that?
So you want a constitutionally correct entry into the USA?... then you must agree that every migrant pleading asylum must prove he or she is in danger from where the come from and to send them back to the nearest safe haven nation next to their nation...
You also want mental and physical health screening too...
And you must want them to have the means to support themselves... that's immigration law...
You also must want them to never vote in a national election... and you must be against a president just opening our border and allowing the world's poor and sick to flood into America...
Am I right???
And you also must agree that criminal aliens must be deported...
 
So you want a constitutionally correct entry into the USA?... then you must agree that every migrant pleading asylum must prove he or she is in danger from where the come from and to send them back to the nearest safe haven nation next to their nation...
You also want mental and physical health screening too...
And you must want them to have the means to support themselves... that's immigration law...
You also must want them to never vote in a national election... and you must be against a president just opening our border and allowing the world's poor and sick to flood into America...
Am I right???
And you also must agree that criminal aliens must be deported...
I am talking reality and not fantasy. What presently exists and what the Constitution and the existing laws say about what can be done.
 
15th post
I am talking reality and not fantasy. What presently exists and what the Constitution and the existing laws say about what can be done.
No you talked about law... constitutional laws... now you want to say its fantasy?... we have immigration laws for a reason and you can't pick and choose which ones you want to follow...
 
AI Overview

In fiscal year 2025 (starting October 1, 2024), ICE has arrested a significant number of individuals with no criminal convictions. Data from June indicates that 65% of the over 204,000 people booked into detention had no criminal convictions, according to the Cato Institute. Furthermore, over 93% of those detained had no history of violent offenses, according to the American Immigration Council.

Human and legal rights are being thrown out the window by the Trump administration.

AI Overview

Based on recent news reports and statements from civil rights and human rights organizations, there are concerns and allegations regarding the Trump administration's approach to human and legal rights in 2025. These include:
  • Immigration Enforcement: The administration has been accused of adopting policies that disregard due process for immigrants and asylum seekers, including expanding immigration enforcement to target foreign nationals, particularly students and researchers, attempting to end birthright citizenship via executive order, and carrying out mass deportations and raids. A former Department of Justice lawyer, Erez Reuveni, has also accused the Trump administration of ignoring court rulings and pressuring attorneys to prioritize the President's agenda over ethical obligations in deportation cases.
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI): The administration has moved to terminate grants related to DEI programs and prohibit federally-funded entities from engaging in such initiatives, prompting legal challenges.
    • Housing Discrimination: The Department of Housing and Urban Development is reportedly preparing to shut down investigations into housing discrimination and segregation cases.
    • Education: There are concerns about the Trump administration's dismantling of the Education Department's civil rights division and attacks on academic freedom and free expression at universities.
  • Targeting of Critics:
    • Law Firms: Some law firms have been targeted with executive orders, facing sanctions like revoked security clearances and restricted access to federal buildings, for their pro bono work or associations with investigations involving President Trump.
    • Media and NGOs: There are concerns about undermining press freedom and the critical role of independent media. The administration has also cut funding to organizations supporting human rights defenders and independent journalists.
Is losing your rights to freedom and justice something that you want? If by any chance, you personally (or a member of your family) get arrested and thrown in jail (or worse, deported) without any chance of defending yourself, would you still be a Trump supporter?

By the way and for all of you that accuse these OP's as being TDS, may I remind you that Trump is doing things that no other U.S. president has done? He is changing the U.S. in ways that are against what our Constitution was built on. Do you honestly think that it should be ignored and Trump allowed to do it, without trying to change it (to the nth degree)?
Sneaking into a country illegally is not innocent. Most of these countries shoot and kill people who try to sneak into their countries. Biden and the Democrats intentionally created a system where millions of illegal immigrants from over 150 countries from all over the world including adversarial countries invaded our country. The reason they did it was to create a whole new voter base for the Democrat party in these sanctuary states where voter fraud is rampant.

Trump is cleaning up Biden’s shit and reversing the national suicide path our country was on.
 
AI Overview

In fiscal year 2025 (starting October 1, 2024), ICE has arrested a significant number of individuals with no criminal convictions. Data from June indicates that 65% of the over 204,000 people booked into detention had no criminal convictions, according to the Cato Institute. Furthermore, over 93% of those detained had no history of violent offenses, according to the American Immigration Council.

Human and legal rights are being thrown out the window by the Trump administration.

AI Overview

Based on recent news reports and statements from civil rights and human rights organizations, there are concerns and allegations regarding the Trump administration's approach to human and legal rights in 2025. These include:
  • Immigration Enforcement: The administration has been accused of adopting policies that disregard due process for immigrants and asylum seekers, including expanding immigration enforcement to target foreign nationals, particularly students and researchers, attempting to end birthright citizenship via executive order, and carrying out mass deportations and raids. A former Department of Justice lawyer, Erez Reuveni, has also accused the Trump administration of ignoring court rulings and pressuring attorneys to prioritize the President's agenda over ethical obligations in deportation cases.
    • Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI): The administration has moved to terminate grants related to DEI programs and prohibit federally-funded entities from engaging in such initiatives, prompting legal challenges.
    • Housing Discrimination: The Department of Housing and Urban Development is reportedly preparing to shut down investigations into housing discrimination and segregation cases.
    • Education: There are concerns about the Trump administration's dismantling of the Education Department's civil rights division and attacks on academic freedom and free expression at universities.
  • Targeting of Critics:
    • Law Firms: Some law firms have been targeted with executive orders, facing sanctions like revoked security clearances and restricted access to federal buildings, for their pro bono work or associations with investigations involving President Trump.
    • Media and NGOs: There are concerns about undermining press freedom and the critical role of independent media. The administration has also cut funding to organizations supporting human rights defenders and independent journalists.
Is losing your rights to freedom and justice something that you want? If by any chance, you personally (or a member of your family) get arrested and thrown in jail (or worse, deported) without any chance of defending yourself, would you still be a Trump supporter?

By the way and for all of you that accuse these OP's as being TDS, may I remind you that Trump is doing things that no other U.S. president has done? He is changing the U.S. in ways that are against what our Constitution was built on. Do you honestly think that it should be ignored and Trump allowed to do it, without trying to change it (to the nth degree)?
If they came here illegally then they are criminals and not innocent.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom