It's a list of Trump quotes that are untrue statements with reference to the day they were said. The source that collected them doesn't really matter
Of course it doesn't to you, you support lying sacks of shit news (
) sources I suspect, then make sanctimonious moral judgements. It was just another hit piece from a liberal rag for collusive political propaganda. Should we rehash major lies (I'd rather not) of the Democratic Party that actually affected lives?
That's a "you too" fallacy, meaning it doesn't change
Slade3200 's point, but, yes, the Democrats are as big a group of ******* low life liars like Donald Trump. Feel better now?
Hillary would have been a more competent President than President Twit-ter, but she was also
much more corrupt. As the Russian hacks revealed, she had the DNC by the balls and was squeezing them for all the power she needed to become both their nominee and POTUS. What her cronyism and corruption couldn't control was John Q. Public, the American voter. It explains both why both candidates received less than 50% of the vote and why the winner has low approval ratings; the American public didn't like either of them. I strongly doubt Hillary's approval ratings would be above 50% had she won the election.
