Three days ago:
Yesterday:
Today:
Actually (i.e. later today) it's already up to 49,594 with 622 perished. We're actually about to top fifty thousand, the third country to do so after China and Italy, and leading the world in new infections detected.
Looks like President Trump's ramped up testing is working. Nice job, President Trump.
1.2% mortality rate in the US. Nice job, President Trump.
Thanks for the numbers.
All these members calculated wrong.. You cannot GET a mortality rate if you DO NOT know the infection rate.. From listening to Fauci and whatshername, the ONLY estimates on mortality assume that ACTUAL infections are about twice the "Diagnosed cases" numbers... So don't divide "diagnosed" by "mortality"... It's a guess and the REAL NUMBER is 0.75%... Fauci confirmed that GUESS yesterday...
That's FAR BETTER than the 2 or 4% that MANY were projecting and apparently, some politicos are pandering with fear to the public...
NOBODY knows the "infection" numbers because MANY FOLKS present entirely Asymptomatic, don't seek/need med help, or are misdiagnosed as some other respiratory disease because the cases are mild enough... They are simply (for now) taking the diagnosed cases and multiplying by about 2....
Obviously they have no way of knowing exact numbers. I was using the ones
Pogo pulled out of his ass.
I will be interested in seeing how he calculated a US mortality rate of over 62% from his numbers.
Actually the numbers are right off the stats on Worldometer where we've all been tracking them. "Exact" is exactly what they are, although, and I seem to be the only one of us noting this, they're also fluid.
You have 983 total resolved cases. Of those 622 died and 361 have recovered (so far --- which is exactly why I stipulated "so far"... that number can and will rise).
Whelp, then you take the number 622 (dead -- you see, "mortality" means "dead), and divide it into the number 983 (the total). And you get 62.3%. See how simple?
Here, let me educate you since you are clearly ignorant as to how mortality rate is calculated...'
Case fatality rate, also called case fatality ratio, in epidemiology, the proportion of people who die from a specified disease among all individuals diagnosed with the disease over a certain period of time.
Case fatality rate, in epidemiology, the proportion of people who die from a specified disease among all individuals diagnosed with the disease over a certain period of time. Case fatality rate typically is used as a measure of disease severity and is often used for prognosis (predicting disease
www.britannica.com
IF the disease is REPORTED or accurately differentiated from SIMILAR symptoms/tests. We're not there yet because of the # of unreported, misdiagnosed, etc....
Who cares. I was demonstrating the fact
Pogo is ignorant on how mortality rate is calculated. Idiot thinks it is over 62% in the US.
That's changed. It's now 64.4%. More deaths reported.
It's also ---AGAIN---- meaningless unti those numbers have enough time to settle.
I showed you how the medical community, and all other thinking people, calculate the mortality rate.
Only a blithering idiot would think you calculate it the way you are calculating it, which explains your problem.
No, Intestinal Tract, you linked to a Worldometer page which disproves your bullshit.
Let's go there even now, and see what it says. Ready?
>>
How to calculate the mortality rate during an outbreak
At present, it is tempting to estimate the case fatality rate by dividing the number of known deaths by the number of confirmed cases. The resulting number, however, does not represent the true case fatality rate and might be off by orders of magnitude [...]
A precise estimate of the case fatality rate is therefore impossible at present.
2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV): estimating the case fatality rate – a word of caution - Battegay Manue et al., Swiss Med Wkly, February 7, 2020
The case fatality rate (CFR) represents the proportion of cases who eventually die from a disease.
Once an epidemic has ended, it is calculated with the formula:
deaths / cases.
But
while an epidemic is still ongoing, as it is the case with the current novel coronavirus outbreak,
this formula is, at the very least, "naïve" and can be "
misleading if, at the time of analysis, the outcome is unknown for a non negligible proportion of patients." [
8]
<<