I recall being suspicious of this at the time.

[Lesh]

Fauci indeed did commit perjury.

That’s the best you got?

Where was he charged and indicted?

 

[pknopp]

That’s the best you got?

Where was he charged and indicted?

You can be as obstinate as MAGA. He wasn't charged because he was pardoned. You understand he committed perjury but like MAGA that you condemn, you will run interference for your guy.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Clearly the price of eggs took precedence over his history of sexual assaults, stealing money from a charity, orchestrating a subversion of the Constitution, pathological lying, bankruptcies, and refusing to comply with a subpoena for stolen classified docs.

The enemy democrat problem is that none of that was true. Once the lies were exposed, it was all over for them.

 

[berg80]

Anything you refuse to condemn your guy for will only continue to get worse with the next.

Like what?

 

[pknopp]

Like what?

LOL.

 

[berg80]

Fauci indeed did commit perjury.

Being accused of perjury and actually committing it are two different things.

Fauci and Paul, Round 2 - FactCheck.org

At a July 20 Senate hearing, Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, once again had a testy exchange over whether the U.S. funded gain-of-function research in China, with each man accusing the other of "lying."

www.factcheck.org

 

[berg80]

LOL.

No examples come to mind?

 

[beagle9]

Who's "art" stopped selling the instant dear old dad was no longer president.

Gee, I wonder why....

The so called art was probably just a way to transfer the kick back money that was promised or owed before it was too late. If anyone including the leftist think that Hunter all of a sudden became not only an energy sector engineer on the board of Burisma, but a Rembrandt Artist too, then I got a Mega Bridge in Arizona quickly to sell to the radical leftist Democrat party.

 

[Lesh]

You can be as obstinate as MAGA. He wasn't charged because he was pardoned. You understand he committed perjury but like MAGA that you condemn, you will run interference for your guy.

I’ll speak out against the persecution of a guy who deserves much better

 

[pknopp]

Being accused of perjury and actually committing it are two different things.

Fauci and Paul, Round 2 - FactCheck.org

At a July 20 Senate hearing, Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, once again had a testy exchange over whether the U.S. funded gain-of-function research in China, with each man accusing the other of "lying."

www.factcheck.org

He committed perjury.

 

[pknopp]

I’ll speak out against the persecution of a guy who deserves much better

Perjury is perjury even if one believes he is a great guy.

 

[beagle9]

Being accused of perjury and actually committing it are two different things.

Fauci and Paul, Round 2 - FactCheck.org

At a July 20 Senate hearing, Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, once again had a testy exchange over whether the U.S. funded gain-of-function research in China, with each man accusing the other of "lying."

www.factcheck.org

Yeah and the definition of is ain't always is either right ? You idiots fell or covered for that one too didn't ya ????

 

[pknopp]

Yeah and the definition of is ain't always is either right ? You idiots fell or covered for that one too didn't ya ????

If you are going to call people idiots for providing cover, you have a lot of accusations to make.

 

[Lesh]

Perjury is perjury even if one believes he is a great guy.

I’ve not seen anything that rises to the level of prosecutable perjury

But ****. Let’s go down that stupid QAnon rabbit hole

What was the perjury?

 

[pknopp]

I’ve not seen anything that rises to the level of prosecutable perjury

Of course you haven't.

But ****. Let’s go down that stupid QAnon rabbit hole

What was the perjury?

He argued we didn't fund the research. We did.

 

[Lesh]

Of course you haven't.




He argued we didn't fund the research. We did.

If one is going to claim perjury one needs to be exact. You are not that.

‘If anybody is lying here, it is you’: Fauci turns tables on inquisitor Rand Paul

The senator bit off more than he could chew when he accused Biden’s top health adviser of lying about US-funded virus research

www.theguardian.com

 

[pknopp]

If one is going to claim perjury one needs to be exact. You are not that.

‘If anybody is lying here, it is you’: Fauci turns tables on inquisitor Rand Paul

The senator bit off more than he could chew when he accused Biden’s top health adviser of lying about US-funded virus research

www.theguardian.com

No, we are on a stupid message board. I do not need to bring a prosecutorial case.

 

[beagle9]

I feel badly that you went to all that trouble to post a list of the horseshit R's compiled when they thought Joe would be the candidate Dotard faced on election day.

The irony being if all that bullshit was true, and trump had done all those things (in real life he did worse), The Following would not have hesitated to vote for him anyway.

That just proves just how bad the Democrats spoiled their food before attempting to cook it. You are proving that the Democrats were 100 time's worse than a Trump cabinet could ever be. Keep up the great screw job of your own party by trying to leverage Trumps victories as if they are bad in every way, shape or form.

 

[Lesh]

No, we are on a stupid message board. I do not need to bring a prosecutorial case.

Surrender accepted. Please don’t make accusations you can’t defend

 

[berg80]

The so called art was probably just a way to transfer the kick back money that was promised or owed before it was too late. If anyone including the leftist think that Hunter all of a sudden became not only an energy sector engineer on the board of Burisma, but a Rembrandt Artist too, then I got a Mega Bridge in Arizona quickly to sell to the radical leftist Democrat party.

The only thing that matters with respect to Joe is whether, as R's have alleged, he benefitted financially from Hunter's unethical use of the Biden name to obtain positions and compensation he wasn't qualified to receive. Absolutely no credible evidence has been produced to that effect.