I have to thank Trump for trying to rid Congress of Massie

[Alicia J]

She already cleared his name, as did the victims of Epstein. They testified the Donald never did anything to them or witnessed him do anything to anyone else.

No, she didn't. She had a private conversation with Trump stooge Todd Blanche. That is all. That is not testimony under oath.

You’re grasping at straws. Epstein hated Donald Trump because he couldn’t blackmail him with sick sex stuff. Epstein was a big Democrat donor, and hung out with top Democrat celebs and politicians even after accusations against him became public.

You're a Trump cuck and nothing you say is worth listening to. The two assholes were best friends for years. You're a total joke.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Gee, here is what I found when searching for your description, do you have a link to these exact words in the Epstein files?

No, there is no record of the FBI investigating this specific image in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein files. [1, 2]
While hundreds of thousands of documents and photographs have been made public from the federal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein, official reports confirm that the materials seized from his properties did not contain images matching this description. [1, 2]

Seized Media in the Epstein Investigation
According to internal Department of Justice memos and summaries provided by federal prosecutors:

• Nature of the Content: The media recovered from Epstein's electronic devices and residences primarily consisted of nude or semi-nude images of young females, some of whom appeared to be minors.
• Lack of Graphic Violence: Official FBI reviews explicitly state that investigators did not locate any videos or photos showing victims being physically or sexually abused, nor did they find images depicting multiple males assaulting a minor in the manner described.
• Exclusion of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM): Although investigators noted that one of Epstein's devices contained a small number of commercial CSAM images downloaded from the internet, federal authorities stated that none of those images depicted Epstein’s actual victims or linked back to a broader active network of third-party perpetrators

Recent Document Releases
Recent tranches of documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act—including photo drops by the House Oversight Committee—have included highly controversial and disturbing items, such as images of a toddler near Epstein, photographs of women with Lolita quotes written on their skin, and uncensored personal identification records. However, a forensic image matching the highly specific details of the graphic, violent assault described has not appeared in any verified or declassified FBI file related to the case

There were some parts redacted, that she looks "prepubescent"

It was EFTA00078198. I think this too has been removed to protect the guilty

Including results for EFTA00078198
Search only for ETFA00078198

AI Overview
EFTA00078198 (often referenced with a transposed "TF") refers to a highly publicized, deeply disturbing 2-page document from the federal DOJ Epstein Files.

www.reddit.com
·r/Epstein
+1
This document contains a written witness account that graphically describes a photograph depicting the severe abuse of a young victim.

www.reddit.com
·r/Epstein
+1
Key context regarding the document:
Nature of the Content: The file contains a narrative describing a 5-year-old girl being abused. The photograph itself is heavily redacted (blacked out) in the public release, but the surrounding text provides a written description of the image.

www.reddit.com
·r/Epstein
+1
Public Reaction: The explicit nature of the text has made it a focal point of public outrage and online discussions, with many advocates and critics debating the lack of subsequent legal action against the individuals described.

www.facebook.com
·Christina Lorey
+2
Source & Verification: You can view the actual unredacted-text document on the U.S. Department of Justice website. It was released to the public along with millions of other pages as part of the Epstein files disclosures.


Yup, looks like it's been pulled from the transparent DOJ website

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Also file under "Epstein victim comes forward" Chuz Life , jc456

Found the original file

Age Verification | United States Department of Justice

 

[CrusaderFrank]

 

[OldFlame]

There were some parts redacted, that she looks "prepubescent"

It was EFTA00078198. I think this too has been removed to protect the guilty

Including results for EFTA00078198
Search only for ETFA00078198

AI Overview
EFTA00078198 (often referenced with a transposed "TF") refers to a highly publicized, deeply disturbing 2-page document from the federal DOJ Epstein Files.

www.reddit.com
·r/Epstein
+1
This document contains a written witness account that graphically describes a photograph depicting the severe abuse of a young victim.

www.reddit.com
·r/Epstein
+1
Key context regarding the document:
Nature of the Content: The file contains a narrative describing a 5-year-old girl being abused. The photograph itself is heavily redacted (blacked out) in the public release, but the surrounding text provides a written description of the image.

www.reddit.com
·r/Epstein
+1
Public Reaction: The explicit nature of the text has made it a focal point of public outrage and online discussions, with many advocates and critics debating the lack of subsequent legal action against the individuals described.

www.facebook.com
·Christina Lorey
+2
Source & Verification: You can view the actual unredacted-text document on the U.S. Department of Justice website. It was released to the public along with millions of other pages as part of the Epstein files disclosures.


Yup, looks like it's been pulled from the transparent DOJ website

I looked it up and read it, and if you had as well maybe you wouldn't be wasting everyone's time. These photos and descriptions thereof were in a letter to the US Attourney's Office from the Marsh Law Firm who claimed to have a victim (Israeli) that had first hand knowledge and was supposedly abused in the early to mid 90's by her 'foster' parents Shiela and Mike, who then took her to what she claimed was Epstein's mansion. Her parents apparently left her there with the foster parents, and when taking her home never questioned any of the bruises or markings on her. The photo being described was supposedly a part of that letter, and the victim claims that it was sent to her on her phone as a warning about what would happen to her after she started talking to her therapist in 2019, when her therapist was supposedly the only person she had disclosed any of this abuse to (Dr. Silberg). She was the one that turned over the photos that the victim showed her on her phone to authorities. She thought the photos could possibly be tied to Epstein's house, and the other photos claimed to have the victim's face in full view, including the one described, along with 'Mike' the supposed foster father.

Dr. Joyanna Silberg is not an associate of Jeffrey Epstein, but rather a prominent clinical psychologist and expert on childhood trauma. Her mention in the Epstein-related files stems from the use of her therapeutic techniques and co-authorship of case documents in court exhibits. [1, 2, 3]
Context within the Epstein Documents

• The Record: Dr. Silberg was referenced in unsealed legal and investigative files (such as Case EFTA00078198) regarding the forensic evaluation and psychological care of an abuse survivor.
• The Controversy: The inclusion of her name in public discussions revolves around the skepticism of some critics regarding recovered memories and the therapeutic methods utilized to treat trauma-induced amnesia.
• Professional Background: Dr. Silberg is a highly regarded specialist in dissociative disorders in children and author of the clinical book The Child Survivor: Healing Developmental Trauma and Dissociation. She served as the past president of the International Society for the Study of Trauma & Dissociation (ISSTD) and as Executive Vice-President of the Leadership Council on Child Abuse & Interpersonal Violence. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

So you have to believe that the FBI received this letter with all of this documentation in 2020, that the perpetrators of the crime sent the victim these photos of herself being abused 25 years later, that also apparently clearly showed them abusing as well, and that the FBI didn't investigate any of it. So this description of a picture had nothing to do with Epstein at all, the victim is still around today and could easily take all of this evidence that she has to any law enforcement agency to be investigated, could question her parents as to who her 'foster' parents were and why they left her with them. But we have none of that information, and you don't find any of that questionable or strange at all, you just gladly go throwing it out there without knowing anything about its origins. Like I said, totally irresponsible and you only do it to feed your own biases.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I looked it up and read it, and if you had as well maybe you wouldn't be wasting everyone's time. These photos and descriptions thereof were in a letter to the US Attourney's Office from the Marsh Law Firm who claimed to have a victim (Israeli) that had first hand knowledge and was supposedly abused in the early to mid 90's by her 'foster' parents Shiela and Mike, who then took her to what she claimed was Epstein's mansion. Her parents apparently left her there with the foster parents, and when taking her home never questioned any of the bruises or markings on her. The photo being described was supposedly a part of that letter, and the victim claims that it was sent to her on her phone as a warning about what would happen to her after she started talking to her therapist in 2019, when her therapist was supposedly the only person she had disclosed any of this abuse to (Dr. Silberg). She was the one that turned over the photos that the victim showed her on her phone to authorities. She thought the photos could possibly be tied to Epstein's house, and the other photos claimed to have the victim's face in full view, including the one described, along with 'Mike' the supposed foster father.

Dr. Joyanna Silberg is not an associate of Jeffrey Epstein, but rather a prominent clinical psychologist and expert on childhood trauma. Her mention in the Epstein-related files stems from the use of her therapeutic techniques and co-authorship of case documents in court exhibits. [1, 2, 3]
Context within the Epstein Documents

• The Record: Dr. Silberg was referenced in unsealed legal and investigative files (such as Case EFTA00078198) regarding the forensic evaluation and psychological care of an abuse survivor.
• The Controversy: The inclusion of her name in public discussions revolves around the skepticism of some critics regarding recovered memories and the therapeutic methods utilized to treat trauma-induced amnesia.
• Professional Background: Dr. Silberg is a highly regarded specialist in dissociative disorders in children and author of the clinical book The Child Survivor: Healing Developmental Trauma and Dissociation. She served as the past president of the International Society for the Study of Trauma & Dissociation (ISSTD) and as Executive Vice-President of the Leadership Council on Child Abuse & Interpersonal Violence. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

So you have to believe that the FBI received this letter with all of this documentation in 2020, that the perpetrators of the crime sent the victim these photos of herself being abused 25 years later, that also apparently clearly showed them abusing as well, and that the FBI didn't investigate any of it. So this description of a picture had nothing to do with Epstein at all, the victim is still around today and could easily take all of this evidence that she has to any law enforcement agency to be investigated, could question her parents as to who her 'foster' parents were and why they left her with them. But we have none of that information, and you don't find any of that questionable or strange at all, you just gladly go throwing it out there without knowing anything about its origins. Like I said, totally irresponsible and you only do it to feed your own biases.

Based on the activity to date, it's obvious the FBI did nothing except cover up for Epstein.

At least you're consistent in your unmitigated apathy for the victims.