I dont want to hear about "Karens" while this is happening on a regular basis

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
69,111
Reaction score
17,262
Points
2,290
You mean the reasons why we had a civil rights movement? Or sufferage?

You want to write a nicer version of real history.
Hey, it's not Republicans tearing down statues all over the country. That's your people who are trying to erase history; a neo version of book burning.
 

sealybobo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
88,168
Reaction score
7,855
Points
1,845
Location
Michigan
You mean the reasons why we had a civil rights movement? Or sufferage?

You want to write a nicer version of real history.
Hey, it's not Republicans tearing down statues all over the country. That's your people who are trying to erase history; a neo version of book burning.
We saw at the capitol last week what the confederate flag means. It means the south believes the civil war isn’t over and they will rise again.

Germans didn't let nazis wave their nazi flags after ww2 you know
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
69,111
Reaction score
17,262
Points
2,290
We saw at the capitol last week what the confederate flag means. It means the south believes the civil war isn’t over and they will rise again.

Germans didn't let nazis wave their nazi flags after ww2 you know
People from the south don't look at it as a sign of the civil war, they consider the flag as a symbol of southern pride. Plus we're talking about one guy who had it, probably on the same mentality as the clown that dressed up like one of those wrestlers on fake wrestling.

It's funny how you people on the left get so upset over a confederate flag, yet when we get upset when a commie burns an American flag, you people tell us it's just a piece of cloth and means nothing.
 

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
13,812
Reaction score
5,494
Points
350
How much would the homicide rate drop if they didn't have such easy access to guns and drugs.
Guns have been regulated all my life and recreational narcotics the same. But unless you can tap your slippers together and repeat "There's no place like home, there's no place like home" and actually return to paradise, it's something we all have to live with.
The unfortunate thing is we live with it in lower income black neighborhoods not white ones, why is that? Why is it we don't see drugs being sold on the corners in lower income white neighborhoods? Why don't we see prostitutes walking the streets in lower income white neighborhoods? See the police are in lower income black neighborhoods to contain the crime in the neighborhood, not prevent it or stop it.
How many of the lower income black neighborhoods are under Democrat mayors, Democrat city councils, and Democrat Congressional Representatives?
How many redneck, racist neighborhoods are under Democratic control?
The redneck racist neighborhoods are not relevant to your complaints about the drugs, guns, and crime in low income Black neighborhoods which I agree with you, it’s a valid complaint. Who is in a position to fix that? The mayor, city councils, and congressional representatives. What party has occupied those seats for the last 50 plus years? Largely, Democrats. They should be held accountable. They are in the best position to address those problems.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
9,377
Reaction score
1,690
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
How much would the homicide rate drop if they didn't have such easy access to guns and drugs.
Guns have been regulated all my life and recreational narcotics the same. But unless you can tap your slippers together and repeat "There's no place like home, there's no place like home" and actually return to paradise, it's something we all have to live with.
The unfortunate thing is we live with it in lower income black neighborhoods not white ones, why is that? Why is it we don't see drugs being sold on the corners in lower income white neighborhoods? Why don't we see prostitutes walking the streets in lower income white neighborhoods? See the police are in lower income black neighborhoods to contain the crime in the neighborhood, not prevent it or stop it.
How many of the lower income black neighborhoods are under Democrat mayors, Democrat city councils, and Democrat Congressional Representatives?
How many redneck, racist neighborhoods are under Democratic control?
The redneck racist neighborhoods are not relevant to your complaints about the drugs, guns, and crime in low income Black neighborhoods which I agree with you, it’s a valid complaint. Who is in a position to fix that? The mayor, city councils, and congressional representatives. What party has occupied those seats for the last 50 plus years? Largely, Democrats. They should be held accountable. They are in the best position to address those problems.
America created the problem why would they want to fix it? Democrats and Republicans alike want these activities to stay in the black neighborhoods. Look at where the landfills, airports, plants that produce toxins, etc. are located around or near black neighborhoods. If America moves opportunity into the "hood", if they take the guns and drugs out where does it go? Into the white neighborhoods.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
74,045
Reaction score
16,279
Points
2,220
YOu stated it as though the 3 "racists" in Georgia, just decided to attack some random black guy and murder him.
There is always a "reason" for a lynching. He looked at a white lady. He was on my property for some suspicious reason...he was uppity...

List of lynching victims in the United States - Wikipedia

DId the lynching victims always start a fight with the "lynchers"?
If someone was trying to lynch you, would you fight?
If someone pointed a shot gun at me and told me to stand there, while they called the cops, I would probably not fight.
When did Travis tell him that? You don't know what you will do, it's easy to say what you will do when you are not in that situation.

I would probably threaten to press charges later, and make them grovel and apologize, if not pay me off big time.
I wonder how many times that worked? Never.

But fighting fists vs shotgun, not my first choice.
It was probably his only choice.

If the video shows Travis just getting out of his truck and opening fire, I will admit it was a lynching.

If teh video shows Travis getting out of his truck and brandishing the gun and NOT just opening up and Arbery then fighting, will you admit that it was NOT a lynching, and instead was botched vigilantism?
What part of they chased this young man down brandishing weapons don't you understand? One clown hit the man with his truck.

You are the one that called in a lynching. A lynching is extra judicial punishment.

Chasing him down, brandishing weapons with the intent of holding him for the police, would not be that.


What part of that are you not getting?
Didn’t you guys just try to lynch mike pence?

If by "you guys" you mean a few people at one riot that we don't know who they are yet,

then no. It was not us as a group.
Neither were the people who rioted this summer. That was not us as a group.

And they may not have been you personally but you all personally defended the rioters. Didn’t you?

1. It was not you as a group. But you as a group, defended the rioters, and supported them.

2. Depends what you mean by "Defend". I did not state that the violence was justified. I have pointed out that I do not think it was a serious attempt to overthrow the government, as some have claimed.
So you’re claiming ignorance
1. It was not you as a group. But you as a group, defended the rioters, and supported them.

2. Depends what you mean by "Defend". I did not state that the violence was justified. I have pointed out that I do not think it was a serious attempt to overthrow the government, as some have claimed.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
74,045
Reaction score
16,279
Points
2,220
1. It was not you as a group. But you as a group, defended the rioters, and supported them.
I know of many who defended protesters.

I know of no one who defended rioters.

Referring to the summer protests.

You folks have pretty consistently defended and justified the Capitol rioters.

You are a lying whore.
 

Ray From Cleveland

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Messages
69,111
Reaction score
17,262
Points
2,290
America created the problem why would they want to fix it? Democrats and Republicans alike want these activities to stay in the black neighborhoods. Look at where the landfills, airports, plants that produce toxins, etc. are located around or near black neighborhoods. If America moves opportunity into the "hood", if they take the guns and drugs out where does it go? Into the white neighborhoods.
I wish I could follow that logic but I really can't. It's not like we have limited amount of guns or drugs that will find better places to go once out of black society. Even if it were possible to do that, blacks would simply find more drugs and guns and bring them right back to the ghetto.

Here (like I'm sure all commie cities) they have this ridiculous gun buy back program from time to time. Did that take guns out of the hood? Hell no. In fact we've had the most murders here since ten years ago. It didn't do any good. Worse than that is it's a no questions program. That means you could be giving them a gun used in a murder, which could be future evidence, and they will just toss it in the bin and have it melted down. It does more harm to the black community than good.
 

marvin martian

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Messages
1,657
Reaction score
2,933
Points
1,893
America created the problem why would they want to fix it? Democrats and Republicans alike want these activities to stay in the black neighborhoods. Look at where the landfills, airports, plants that produce toxins, etc. are located around or near black neighborhoods. If America moves opportunity into the "hood", if they take the guns and drugs out where does it go? Into the white neighborhoods.
I wish I could follow that logic but I really can't. It's not like we have limited amount of guns or drugs that will find better places to go once out of black society. Even if it were possible to do that, blacks would simply find more drugs and guns and bring them right back to the ghetto.

Here (like I'm sure all commie cities) they have this ridiculous gun buy back program from time to time. Did that take guns out of the hood? Hell no. In fact we've had the most murders here since ten years ago. It didn't do any good. Worse than that is it's a no questions program. That means you could be giving them a gun used in a murder, which could be future evidence, and they will just toss it in the bin and have it melted down. It does more harm to the black community than good.
All the Democrats' "gun control" policies have one goal and one goal only; to disarm law-abiding citizens (especially black and brown ones) and leave us at the mercy of predators. That equation has been fueling the Democrats' very intentional destruction of American cities for decades.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
74,045
Reaction score
16,279
Points
2,220
YOu stated it as though the 3 "racists" in Georgia, just decided to attack some random black guy and murder him.
There is always a "reason" for a lynching. He looked at a white lady. He was on my property for some suspicious reason...he was uppity...

List of lynching victims in the United States - Wikipedia

DId the lynching victims always start a fight with the "lynchers"?
If someone was trying to lynch you, would you fight?
If someone pointed a shot gun at me and told me to stand there, while they called the cops, I would probably not fight.
When did Travis tell him that? You don't know what you will do, it's easy to say what you will do when you are not in that situation.

I would probably threaten to press charges later, and make them grovel and apologize, if not pay me off big time.
I wonder how many times that worked? Never.

But fighting fists vs shotgun, not my first choice.
It was probably his only choice.

If the video shows Travis just getting out of his truck and opening fire, I will admit it was a lynching.

If teh video shows Travis getting out of his truck and brandishing the gun and NOT just opening up and Arbery then fighting, will you admit that it was NOT a lynching, and instead was botched vigilantism?
What part of they chased this young man down brandishing weapons don't you understand? One clown hit the man with his truck.

You are the one that called in a lynching. A lynching is extra judicial punishment.

Chasing him down, brandishing weapons with the intent of holding him for the police, would not be that.


What part of that are you not getting?
Didn’t you guys just try to lynch mike pence?

If by "you guys" you mean a few people at one riot that we don't know who they are yet,

then no. It was not us as a group.
Neither were the people who rioted this summer. That was not us as a group.

And they may not have been you personally but you all personally defended the rioters. Didn’t you?

1. It was not you as a group. But you as a group, defended the rioters, and supported them.

2. Depends what you mean by "Defend". I did not state that the violence was justified. I have pointed out that I do not think it was a serious attempt to overthrow the government, as some have claimed.
How Biden Is Erasing Trump’s White Supremacist Legacy

Biden issued an executive order. On top of the executive order, the White House’s push to raise the minimum wage would have outsize effects on African Americans, helping to narrow the black-white income gap.

The executive order on racial justice erased two of the Trump administration’s most blatantly racist policies. Biden reversed Trump’s move to ban all federal agencies and contractors from conducting any kind of diversity training or programs that dealt with concepts like systemic racism or white privilege.

The order also got rid of Trump’s “1776 Commission,” an attempt to whitewash American history by playing down, even excusing slavery.

Increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour would give 38% of Black workers a raise compared with 23% of white workers, according to research cited by economists writing for Equitable Growth.


1. "Diversity training" is anti-white discrimination. Being against that, is not ws.

2. I bet it did not "excuse" slavery.

3. NOT having a 15$/hour rate, was not ws. That you pretend it was, shows how absurd talking of ws today is.

4. This country has had a bi-partisan consensus on equality for blacks since the early 60s. The vast majority of accusations of wacism since then, have been differences in how to achieve it, such yes or no to 15 dollars an hours.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
9,377
Reaction score
1,690
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
America created the problem why would they want to fix it? Democrats and Republicans alike want these activities to stay in the black neighborhoods. Look at where the landfills, airports, plants that produce toxins, etc. are located around or near black neighborhoods. If America moves opportunity into the "hood", if they take the guns and drugs out where does it go? Into the white neighborhoods.
I wish I could follow that logic but I really can't.
Of course you can't, because you don't have a clue.

It's not like we have limited amount of guns or drugs that will find better places to go once out of black society. Even if it were possible to do that, blacks would simply find more drugs and guns and bring them right back to the ghetto.
What you don't understand and probably don't know that many of these communities were not always ghettos, what turned them into ghettoes? LACK OF OPPORTUNITY. Alot of these communities were thriving communities at one time, but when the industry, job market, etc. moved out the guns and drugs moved in.

Here (like I'm sure all commie cities) they have this ridiculous gun buy back program from time to time. Did that take guns out of the hood? Hell no.
It was and is a stupid program, the gang bangers are not going to give you a gun that is worth 500 - 1K for a hundred dollars.

In fact we've had the most murders here since ten years ago. It didn't do any good. Worse than that is it's a no questions program. That means you could be giving them a gun used in a murder, which could be future evidence, and they will just toss it in the bin and have it melted down. It does more harm to the black community than good.
I am giving you root cause and solutions and you are giving me bullshit. It is something that has been allowed to go on for decades so it is going to take time to fix.
 

LeftofLeft

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
13,812
Reaction score
5,494
Points
350
How much would the homicide rate drop if they didn't have such easy access to guns and drugs.
Guns have been regulated all my life and recreational narcotics the same. But unless you can tap your slippers together and repeat "There's no place like home, there's no place like home" and actually return to paradise, it's something we all have to live with.
The unfortunate thing is we live with it in lower income black neighborhoods not white ones, why is that? Why is it we don't see drugs being sold on the corners in lower income white neighborhoods? Why don't we see prostitutes walking the streets in lower income white neighborhoods? See the police are in lower income black neighborhoods to contain the crime in the neighborhood, not prevent it or stop it.
How many of the lower income black neighborhoods are under Democrat mayors, Democrat city councils, and Democrat Congressional Representatives?
How many redneck, racist neighborhoods are under Democratic control?
The redneck racist neighborhoods are not relevant to your complaints about the drugs, guns, and crime in low income Black neighborhoods which I agree with you, it’s a valid complaint. Who is in a position to fix that? The mayor, city councils, and congressional representatives. What party has occupied those seats for the last 50 plus years? Largely, Democrats. They should be held accountable. They are in the best position to address those problems.
America created the problem why would they want to fix it? Democrats and Republicans alike want these activities to stay in the black neighborhoods. Look at where the landfills, airports, plants that produce toxins, etc. are located around or near black neighborhoods. If America moves opportunity into the "hood", if they take the guns and drugs out where does it go? Into the white neighborhoods.
Well, do you want to solve the problem? Sounds like you want to stay focused on blame and revenge.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
9,377
Reaction score
1,690
Points
160
Location
North Carolina
How much would the homicide rate drop if they didn't have such easy access to guns and drugs.
Guns have been regulated all my life and recreational narcotics the same. But unless you can tap your slippers together and repeat "There's no place like home, there's no place like home" and actually return to paradise, it's something we all have to live with.
The unfortunate thing is we live with it in lower income black neighborhoods not white ones, why is that? Why is it we don't see drugs being sold on the corners in lower income white neighborhoods? Why don't we see prostitutes walking the streets in lower income white neighborhoods? See the police are in lower income black neighborhoods to contain the crime in the neighborhood, not prevent it or stop it.
How many of the lower income black neighborhoods are under Democrat mayors, Democrat city councils, and Democrat Congressional Representatives?
How many redneck, racist neighborhoods are under Democratic control?
The redneck racist neighborhoods are not relevant to your complaints about the drugs, guns, and crime in low income Black neighborhoods which I agree with you, it’s a valid complaint. Who is in a position to fix that? The mayor, city councils, and congressional representatives. What party has occupied those seats for the last 50 plus years? Largely, Democrats. They should be held accountable. They are in the best position to address those problems.
America created the problem why would they want to fix it? Democrats and Republicans alike want these activities to stay in the black neighborhoods. Look at where the landfills, airports, plants that produce toxins, etc. are located around or near black neighborhoods. If America moves opportunity into the "hood", if they take the guns and drugs out where does it go? Into the white neighborhoods.
Well, do you want to solve the problem? Sounds like you want to stay focused on blame and revenge.
I have told you how to solve the problem, you right wing ass clowns who don't give a damn about the folks in the "hood" don't want it fixed.
 

marvin martian

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2020
Messages
1,657
Reaction score
2,933
Points
1,893
How much would the homicide rate drop if they didn't have such easy access to guns and drugs.
Guns have been regulated all my life and recreational narcotics the same. But unless you can tap your slippers together and repeat "There's no place like home, there's no place like home" and actually return to paradise, it's something we all have to live with.
The unfortunate thing is we live with it in lower income black neighborhoods not white ones, why is that? Why is it we don't see drugs being sold on the corners in lower income white neighborhoods? Why don't we see prostitutes walking the streets in lower income white neighborhoods? See the police are in lower income black neighborhoods to contain the crime in the neighborhood, not prevent it or stop it.
How many of the lower income black neighborhoods are under Democrat mayors, Democrat city councils, and Democrat Congressional Representatives?
How many redneck, racist neighborhoods are under Democratic control?
The redneck racist neighborhoods are not relevant to your complaints about the drugs, guns, and crime in low income Black neighborhoods which I agree with you, it’s a valid complaint. Who is in a position to fix that? The mayor, city councils, and congressional representatives. What party has occupied those seats for the last 50 plus years? Largely, Democrats. They should be held accountable. They are in the best position to address those problems.
America created the problem why would they want to fix it? Democrats and Republicans alike want these activities to stay in the black neighborhoods. Look at where the landfills, airports, plants that produce toxins, etc. are located around or near black neighborhoods. If America moves opportunity into the "hood", if they take the guns and drugs out where does it go? Into the white neighborhoods.
Well, do you want to solve the problem? Sounds like you want to stay focused on blame and revenge.
I have told you how to solve the problem, you right wing ass clowns who don't give a damn about the folks in the "hood" don't want it fixed.
The "hood" is entirely controlled by DemoKKKrats. That's why it's the hood. Why is homicide the leading cause of death for young black men in EVERY place run by people like you?
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
74,045
Reaction score
16,279
Points
2,220
How much would the homicide rate drop if they didn't have such easy access to guns and drugs.
Guns have been regulated all my life and recreational narcotics the same. But unless you can tap your slippers together and repeat "There's no place like home, there's no place like home" and actually return to paradise, it's something we all have to live with.
The unfortunate thing is we live with it in lower income black neighborhoods not white ones, why is that? Why is it we don't see drugs being sold on the corners in lower income white neighborhoods? Why don't we see prostitutes walking the streets in lower income white neighborhoods? See the police are in lower income black neighborhoods to contain the crime in the neighborhood, not prevent it or stop it.
How many of the lower income black neighborhoods are under Democrat mayors, Democrat city councils, and Democrat Congressional Representatives?
How many redneck, racist neighborhoods are under Democratic control?
The redneck racist neighborhoods are not relevant to your complaints about the drugs, guns, and crime in low income Black neighborhoods which I agree with you, it’s a valid complaint. Who is in a position to fix that? The mayor, city councils, and congressional representatives. What party has occupied those seats for the last 50 plus years? Largely, Democrats. They should be held accountable. They are in the best position to address those problems.
America created the problem why would they want to fix it? Democrats and Republicans alike want these activities to stay in the black neighborhoods. Look at where the landfills, airports, plants that produce toxins, etc. are located around or near black neighborhoods. If America moves opportunity into the "hood", if they take the guns and drugs out where does it go? Into the white neighborhoods.
Well, do you want to solve the problem? Sounds like you want to stay focused on blame and revenge.
I have told you how to solve the problem, you right wing ass clowns who don't give a damn about the folks in the "hood" don't want it fixed.

Good jobs at good wages so that black men can be good providers.

For that you need America First Trade and immigration policies.


Which is why I voted for Trump.
 

sealybobo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
88,168
Reaction score
7,855
Points
1,845
Location
Michigan
We saw at the capitol last week what the confederate flag means. It means the south believes the civil war isn’t over and they will rise again.

Germans didn't let nazis wave their nazi flags after ww2 you know
People from the south don't look at it as a sign of the civil war, they consider the flag as a symbol of southern pride. Plus we're talking about one guy who had it, probably on the same mentality as the clown that dressed up like one of those wrestlers on fake wrestling.

It's funny how you people on the left get so upset over a confederate flag, yet when we get upset when a commie burns an American flag, you people tell us it's just a piece of cloth and means nothing.
Only one confederate soldier carries the flag for the entire regiment.

So now it means nothing just because they didn’t all hav3 confederate flags? You’ll justify anything.

We kept our mouths shut about the confederate flag and allowed you seditionists to wave them until you used it as the symbol for your fucking attempted coup
 

sealybobo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
88,168
Reaction score
7,855
Points
1,845
Location
Michigan
YOu stated it as though the 3 "racists" in Georgia, just decided to attack some random black guy and murder him.
There is always a "reason" for a lynching. He looked at a white lady. He was on my property for some suspicious reason...he was uppity...

List of lynching victims in the United States - Wikipedia

DId the lynching victims always start a fight with the "lynchers"?
If someone was trying to lynch you, would you fight?
If someone pointed a shot gun at me and told me to stand there, while they called the cops, I would probably not fight.
When did Travis tell him that? You don't know what you will do, it's easy to say what you will do when you are not in that situation.

I would probably threaten to press charges later, and make them grovel and apologize, if not pay me off big time.
I wonder how many times that worked? Never.

But fighting fists vs shotgun, not my first choice.
It was probably his only choice.

If the video shows Travis just getting out of his truck and opening fire, I will admit it was a lynching.

If teh video shows Travis getting out of his truck and brandishing the gun and NOT just opening up and Arbery then fighting, will you admit that it was NOT a lynching, and instead was botched vigilantism?
What part of they chased this young man down brandishing weapons don't you understand? One clown hit the man with his truck.

You are the one that called in a lynching. A lynching is extra judicial punishment.

Chasing him down, brandishing weapons with the intent of holding him for the police, would not be that.


What part of that are you not getting?
Didn’t you guys just try to lynch mike pence?

If by "you guys" you mean a few people at one riot that we don't know who they are yet,

then no. It was not us as a group.
Neither were the people who rioted this summer. That was not us as a group.

And they may not have been you personally but you all personally defended the rioters. Didn’t you?

1. It was not you as a group. But you as a group, defended the rioters, and supported them.

2. Depends what you mean by "Defend". I did not state that the violence was justified. I have pointed out that I do not think it was a serious attempt to overthrow the government, as some have claimed.
How Biden Is Erasing Trump’s White Supremacist Legacy

Biden issued an executive order. On top of the executive order, the White House’s push to raise the minimum wage would have outsize effects on African Americans, helping to narrow the black-white income gap.

The executive order on racial justice erased two of the Trump administration’s most blatantly racist policies. Biden reversed Trump’s move to ban all federal agencies and contractors from conducting any kind of diversity training or programs that dealt with concepts like systemic racism or white privilege.

The order also got rid of Trump’s “1776 Commission,” an attempt to whitewash American history by playing down, even excusing slavery.

Increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour would give 38% of Black workers a raise compared with 23% of white workers, according to research cited by economists writing for Equitable Growth.


1. "Diversity training" is anti-white discrimination. Being against that, is not ws.

2. I bet it did not "excuse" slavery.

3. NOT having a 15$/hour rate, was not ws. That you pretend it was, shows how absurd talking of ws today is.

4. This country has had a bi-partisan consensus on equality for blacks since the early 60s. The vast majority of accusations of wacism since then, have been differences in how to achieve it, such yes or no to 15 dollars an hours.
I like the idea of raising the minimum wage. It will help all poor people. Just so happens it’ll help 38% of black workers and only 23% of white workers. I suppose you’ll say that’s racist towards whites?
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
74,045
Reaction score
16,279
Points
2,220
We saw at the capitol last week what the confederate flag means. It means the south believes the civil war isn’t over and they will rise again.

Germans didn't let nazis wave their nazi flags after ww2 you know
People from the south don't look at it as a sign of the civil war, they consider the flag as a symbol of southern pride. Plus we're talking about one guy who had it, probably on the same mentality as the clown that dressed up like one of those wrestlers on fake wrestling.

It's funny how you people on the left get so upset over a confederate flag, yet when we get upset when a commie burns an American flag, you people tell us it's just a piece of cloth and means nothing.
Only one confederate soldier carries the flag for the entire regiment.

So now it means nothing just because they didn’t all hav3 confederate flags? You’ll justify anything.

We kept our mouths shut about the confederate flag and allowed you seditionists to wave them until you used it as the symbol for your fucking attempted coup

No, you didn't. You people have been whining about that shit for years.

One guy carried the flag and there is no indication that he was any "flag carrier" for any "regiment".
 

sealybobo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
88,168
Reaction score
7,855
Points
1,845
Location
Michigan
We saw at the capitol last week what the confederate flag means. It means the south believes the civil war isn’t over and they will rise again.

Germans didn't let nazis wave their nazi flags after ww2 you know
People from the south don't look at it as a sign of the civil war, they consider the flag as a symbol of southern pride. Plus we're talking about one guy who had it, probably on the same mentality as the clown that dressed up like one of those wrestlers on fake wrestling.

It's funny how you people on the left get so upset over a confederate flag, yet when we get upset when a commie burns an American flag, you people tell us it's just a piece of cloth and means nothing.
Only one confederate soldier carries the flag for the entire regiment.

So now it means nothing just because they didn’t all hav3 confederate flags? You’ll justify anything.

We kept our mouths shut about the confederate flag and allowed you seditionists to wave them until you used it as the symbol for your fucking attempted coup

No, you didn't. You people have been whining about that shit for years.

One guy carried the flag and there is no indication that he was any "flag carrier" for any "regiment".
Naive and gullible or you’re a great liar or spinster.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
74,045
Reaction score
16,279
Points
2,220
YOu stated it as though the 3 "racists" in Georgia, just decided to attack some random black guy and murder him.
There is always a "reason" for a lynching. He looked at a white lady. He was on my property for some suspicious reason...he was uppity...

List of lynching victims in the United States - Wikipedia

DId the lynching victims always start a fight with the "lynchers"?
If someone was trying to lynch you, would you fight?
If someone pointed a shot gun at me and told me to stand there, while they called the cops, I would probably not fight.
When did Travis tell him that? You don't know what you will do, it's easy to say what you will do when you are not in that situation.

I would probably threaten to press charges later, and make them grovel and apologize, if not pay me off big time.
I wonder how many times that worked? Never.

But fighting fists vs shotgun, not my first choice.
It was probably his only choice.

If the video shows Travis just getting out of his truck and opening fire, I will admit it was a lynching.

If teh video shows Travis getting out of his truck and brandishing the gun and NOT just opening up and Arbery then fighting, will you admit that it was NOT a lynching, and instead was botched vigilantism?
What part of they chased this young man down brandishing weapons don't you understand? One clown hit the man with his truck.

You are the one that called in a lynching. A lynching is extra judicial punishment.

Chasing him down, brandishing weapons with the intent of holding him for the police, would not be that.


What part of that are you not getting?
Didn’t you guys just try to lynch mike pence?

If by "you guys" you mean a few people at one riot that we don't know who they are yet,

then no. It was not us as a group.
Neither were the people who rioted this summer. That was not us as a group.

And they may not have been you personally but you all personally defended the rioters. Didn’t you?

1. It was not you as a group. But you as a group, defended the rioters, and supported them.

2. Depends what you mean by "Defend". I did not state that the violence was justified. I have pointed out that I do not think it was a serious attempt to overthrow the government, as some have claimed.
How Biden Is Erasing Trump’s White Supremacist Legacy

Biden issued an executive order. On top of the executive order, the White House’s push to raise the minimum wage would have outsize effects on African Americans, helping to narrow the black-white income gap.

The executive order on racial justice erased two of the Trump administration’s most blatantly racist policies. Biden reversed Trump’s move to ban all federal agencies and contractors from conducting any kind of diversity training or programs that dealt with concepts like systemic racism or white privilege.

The order also got rid of Trump’s “1776 Commission,” an attempt to whitewash American history by playing down, even excusing slavery.

Increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour would give 38% of Black workers a raise compared with 23% of white workers, according to research cited by economists writing for Equitable Growth.


1. "Diversity training" is anti-white discrimination. Being against that, is not ws.

2. I bet it did not "excuse" slavery.

3. NOT having a 15$/hour rate, was not ws. That you pretend it was, shows how absurd talking of ws today is.

4. This country has had a bi-partisan consensus on equality for blacks since the early 60s. The vast majority of accusations of wacism since then, have been differences in how to achieve it, such yes or no to 15 dollars an hours.
I like the idea of raising the minimum wage. It will help all poor people. Just so happens it’ll help 38% of black workers and only 23% of white workers. I suppose you’ll say that’s racist towards whites?

It depends on your intention.

If you are fine with harming the interests of supposedly white employers or investors because it is more important to benefit other people, based on skin color, than it is racist.


If, you are supporting the policy because you think that the idea of raising the minimal wage will help all poor people and that balances out the cost to the employers, then that is NOT racist.


That you need that explained to you, indicates that you have no idea what actual racism IS.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top