More good news for the USA: The UN is about to go broke.

Bye bye US veto (You hearing that Israel?)
Thank you, one of our resident neo-Nazis.
UN involved in creating Israel, and the resulting "Palestinian problem".

Bye bye US veto, means Bye bye USA site for UN,
Bye bye USA major role in "Peace-keeping" forces
Bye bye USA paying most of the bills of UN
Bye bye USA handouts to about 3/4 of deadbeat member countries
Etc.
 
Thank you, one of our resident neo-Nazis.
UN involved in creating Israel, and the resulting "Palestinian problem".

Bye bye US veto, means Bye bye USA site for UN,
Bye bye USA major role in "Peace-keeping" forces
Bye bye USA paying most of the bills of UN
Bye bye USA handouts to about 3/4 of deadbeat member countries
Etc.

I'm seeing a definite upside
 
Well said, while people starve and can't afford a home or a hospital stay in the USA and their kids get shot while at school, and thousands die from addiction to drugs, your government tries to intimidate other countries using all the money that it could have spent on its own people, that's nothing to be proud of sonny.
From another of our resident trolls and cowards ...
...

Oops! We ran into some problems.​

This member limits who may view their full profile.
 
Good. Shut it down, and kick them out of the country.

Waste of money spent bashing the US and western culture.



UN Promises Bankruptcy by July Unless Trump Gives Lots of Cash

Deep in mid-winter blues and suffering through never-ending images of shrieking Karens, their soy-boys and the judges and elected officials obstructing the deportation of rapists, fraudsters, and run-of-the-mill 75 IQ illegals, I thought we could use a pick-me-up, a bit of cheerful news. Well, I've got it. The UN is facing bankruptcy. UN operations may cease by the end of February, and the last flabby, underworked UN bureaucrat could receive a final check, assuming it doesn't bounce, in July.


The United Nations said on Friday that it was facing imminent financial collapse and would run out of money by July if countries, namely the United States, did not pay their annual dues that amount to billions of dollars.

Senior U.N. officials said that if the cash ran out, the agency would be forced to shut down its landmark headquarters in New York by August. The U.N. Security Council, a 15-member body responsible for maintaining international peace and stability, convenes its meetings at U.N. headquarters.

It would also have to cancel the annual General Assembly gathering of world leaders held in September and shut the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, which responds to global emergencies like conflicts and natural disasters, it sa

How did we get to this state of near nirvana? Part of the story seems to be utter nonsense.

The United States is responsible for about 95 percent of the money owed to the United Nations, about $2.2 billion, according to a senior U.N. official who briefed reporters on the agency’s budget crisis. That amount is a combination of the U.S. annual dues for 2025, which has not been paid, and for 2026, the U.N. official said.
The U.S. paid $1.3 billion to the UN in FY 2025; our dues were $820 million for regular budgeted activities, and the remainder went to all manner of silly and counterproductive silliness. We have not paid the 2026 assessment, but the entire amount has been appropriated. The real problem seems to be one of the UN shooting itself in the foot and then complaining of the pain.


Think about that for a moment. The UN makes a budget; a particular program is not executed, so the entire program's budget must be rebated, even though the money was never collected.

Guterres said a rule that the UN must return unspent money on particular programmes to members if it could not implement a budget created a "double blow" in which it was "expected to give back cash that does not exist".
I'm open to correction on this issue, but I've read at least eight sources, and they all "seem" to say the same thing. The implication is that nations could be rebated even without paying dues.

I think the real bone of contention, and the real reason that virtually all articles harp on the U.S. not paying up when we have only failed to pay for the current fiscal year because those funds have yet to be appropriated by Congress, it because President Trump has decided to cease paying to the worst UN programs and actively killed a UN carbon tax scheme that would have given UN bureaucrats a giant slush fund


Like so many other things in life, the Left destroyed what could have been a good idea.
I can't wait to see the "Going Out Of Business Sale - Everything Must Go!" sign outside of the UN Headquarters.
 
There is no intimidation for one. We have interests that we WILL protect and enforce. Part of that is if what you are doing threatens us, we'll put an end to it.
Tell that to a Venezuelan, Cuban, Greenlander, Iranian, Yemeni, Canadian etc.
Sounds like those people need to make better life choices. Whining about it like your doing, doesn't get it fixed.
So kids should wear flak jackets to school? good point.
What is very telling is that you went FULLY off topic to avoid yelping from that singing slap I gave you.
I mentioned the UN veto, you went from that to the power of the US miliary, I went from that to the intimidation of militarily weaker states.
Have a nice day.
Enjoy the military show of strength, I know you love that kind of thing, this looks like one country you won't be bullying:

 
Thank you, one of our resident neo-Nazis.
Not me, I've always opposed fascism, my country was bombed by them once.


UN involved in creating Israel, and the resulting "Palestinian problem".
Britain enabled the existence of the neo-Zionist colony twenty five years before the UN existed.
Bye bye US veto, means Bye bye USA site for UN,
Bye bye USA major role in "Peace-keeping" forces
Bye bye USA paying most of the bills of UN
Bye bye USA handouts to about 3/4 of deadbeat member countries
Etc.
Bye Bye planet.
 
Last edited:
Not me, I've always opposed fascism, my country was bombed by them once.



Britain enabled the existence of the neo-Zionist colony twenty five years before the UN existed.

Bye Bye planet.

You weren't part of that, and are a disgrace to Churchill; the furthest thing from him.
You are a phony and a red herring.
YHWH enabled the existence of Zion/Israel about 4000+ years ago.
The UN tried to define workable boundaries for a "Two-State Solution".
Fascist neo-Nazis like you have supported and enabled the Jihadists in their 77+ year agenda to finish what your Nazi predecessors started.
 
1769974728339.webp


~S~
 
You weren't part of that, and are a disgrace to Churchill; the furthest thing from him.
I never said I was a participant in WW2, get your eyes checked.
You are a phony and a red herring.
I disagree with you, get used to it you big baby.
YHWH enabled the existence of Zion/Israel about 4000+ years ago.
Not according to this man, you claim to interpret scripture better than he does? why should I listen to your hysterical ranting rather than to him?



The UN tried to define workable boundaries for a "Two-State Solution".
The security council attempted to impose manufactured borders within a region of Palestine, the majority of people who lived there refused to accept any border that would lead them to be subject to a colonial power that was based on neo-Zionism, Jew supremacy.
Fascist neo-Nazis like you have supported and enabled the Jihadists in their 77+ year agenda to finish what your Nazi predecessors started.
Speaking of Nazis, here's another Jewish man for you to learn from:



You don't have a good grasp of history, do you really not know that Zionist terrorists murdered non-Zionist Jews in Palestine back in the 1920s and 1930s?

Did you really not know that the British and early Zionist planners discussed ethnic cleansing of (what they called) "Palestinian Peasantry" as early as 1919? thirty years before the UN recognized the state of Israel?

Its clear from your sickening rejection of these Jews (one of whom was a Holocaust survivor who lived under the Nazis), that your are the true antisemite here.

I support and always have supported Jews, I just don't support neo-Zionism nor should you, you should be ashamed of yourself man.
 
Last edited:
Bona fides that you might be other than a phony and troll.
Like what? what could I possibly say in my profile that would enable you to draw such a conclusion?

Perhaps if I make it public and say "I'm not a phony troll", you'd be happier?

You really aren't very good at this are you, no wonder you find trump intelligent.
 
Last edited:
15th post
My first move as king, is to kick the UN out of the, errrrr, 'my' country.
 
In the past, I recommended that we remain in the UN because we have a veto power in the Security Council. You know: keep those idiots at bay.

But I’m reconsidering.

If the Security Counc were ever to vote for some “blue helmet” mischief, I am pretty sure we could shut it down at will. And the benefits of not being in that international shit show are enormous
 
The entire world (including the USA) is going broke.

If you or I were in debt to the tune of $100,000.00 we'd be considered "broke." America is in debt to the tune of nearly $40 Trillion (-$40,000,000,000,000.00). That certainly ain't rich.

National Debt Clock:

And we can blame the UN scam for a lot of it.

I never claimed we are rich. We are beyond broke. That’s why it’s time to give the world’s leaches the middle finger. The UN is a good start.
 
Back
Top Bottom