I Don't Understand Why Democrats Keep Calling For Free Speech

[RetiredGySgt]

Unless you are Jimmy Kimmel or any of the people JD Vance has directed the MAGA horde to report to their employers for thoughtcrimes.

we never said there weren't consequences to your free speech.

 

[ChristisKing]

we never said there weren't consequences to your free speech.

Brilliant

 

[BlindBoo]

I don't actually know specifically what it states in the second amendment but something about the right to bear arms if the government tries to overthrow you or something

Seriously? What is that? Some sort of sneaky backwards punt? If you can kill a bear you have every right to it's arms, imho.

 

[buttercup]

Would you please list all of the freedoms you want to remove?

She means well, but I too am getting tired of all these threads calling for more government restrictions and trampling on our most important freedoms. You might disagree with me on this, but what I've been trying to get through to her is that she has been manipulated to do these things. Problem - Reaction - Solution. Her threads are the "reaction" part of that equation. Calling for the government to "do something!" And they sure as hell will. But at TIR said, if you give them an inch, they take a mile. And any power that one gives to a government they trust will be in the hands of a government they don't trust when the pendulum swings back the other way. And it will be used against us. This isn't rocket science. But some people aren't thinking, or they lack foresight.

 

[ChristisKing]

She means well, but I too am getting tired of all these threads calling for more government restrictions and trampling on our most important freedoms. You might disagree with me on this, but what I've been trying to get through to her is that she has been manipulated to do these things. Problem - Reaction - Solution. Her threads are the "reaction" part of that equation. Calling for the government to "do something!" And they sure as hell will. But at TIR said, if you give them an inch, they take a mile. And any power that one gives to a government they trust will be in the hands of a government they don't trust, and it will be used against us. This isn't rocket science. But some people aren't thinking, or they lack foresight.

He misunderstood me that time.

 

[Robert W]

Nothing this time. I don't actually know specifically what it states in the second amendment but something about the right to bear arms if the government tries to overthrow you or something, but I was simply suggesting that if even a threat against you is verbal it should be legal to shoot somebody because if that were the case Charlie Kirk would still be alive.




He probably would have been taken out by the government though in that case. Why he wasn't even arrested until it was too late is way beyond the realm of my understanding.


Btw, you should have known that I wasn't a democrat due to my other thread of saying that I don't want any part in uniting with them.

I suggest you study Democrats articles since they talk like this too. Kirk's killer will be executed so watch for that.

 

[ChristisKing]

I suggest you study Democrats articles since they talk like this too. Kirk's killer will be executed so watch for that.

Yeah but the only difference is I want America to have the right to kill people to protect people from harm's way even if it's verbally. Not for skin color, religious differences, sexual preferences, difference of opinion and God knows what else.

 

[The Irish Ram]

I refuse to fight for Schumer.

Ok. When I look at Schumer, I see pure evil. Nevertheless, if you get to muzzle him, then whose rights get suppressed next? Sanders? AOC? Warren? Hannity? Beck? Trump? Who will the next administration decide to silence?

Who do you trust enough in our government to decide who gets censored vs who gets to keep their voice?
The UK doesn't just silence their citizens anymore, they have moved on to arresting them now. Next up, for those who refuse to shut up..."reeducation camps".

 

[Robert W]

He misunderstood me that time.

On the contrary. You said you do not understand the 2nd amendment. Never read it you say I believe. For some reason you operate as if it says it is fine to murder others because you have a gun.

It does not make such a claim. Kirks killer will be executed.

 

[Robert W]

Yeah but the only difference is I want America to have the right to kill people to protect people from harm's way even if it's verbally. Not for skin color, religious differences, sexual preferences, difference of opinion and God knows what else.

We hear you saying you want us to keep the second amendment rights, which is as you like.

 

[Robert W]

Who do you trust enough in our government to decide who gets censored vs who gets to keep their voice?

Nobody on this issue you bring up.

 

[ChristisKing]

On the contrary. You said you do not understand the 2nd amendment. Never read it you say I believe. For some reason you operate as if it says it is fine to murder others because you have a gun.

It does not make such a claim. Kirks killer will be executed.

Nope, I don't think that I even indicated that.

We hear you saying you want us to keep the second amendment rights, which is as you like.

Obviously unless you're delusional like Robinson.

 

[ChristisKing]

It does not make such a claim. Kirks killer will be executed.

And good as he should be.

 

[Robert W]

Ok. When I look at Schumer, I see pure evil. Nevertheless, if you get to muzzle him, then whose rights get suppressed next?

So do I. I have yet to call to muzzle him or his hateful speech. I see it this way. I have no tools, or systems to muzzle Schumer.

 

[Robert W]

Nope, I don't think that I even indicated that.



Obviously unless you're delusional like Kirk.

Charlie Kirk was never delusional.

 

[ChristisKing]

Charlie Kirk was never delusional.

Oops sorry I meant Robinson my bad.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Yeah but the only difference is I want America to have the right to kill people to protect people from harm's way even if it's verbally. Not for skin color, religious differences, sexual preferences, difference of opinion and God knows what else.

Ok, honey. Who do you give the task of deciding who lives and who dies to?
Make yourself the judge, and go to the taunting forums here and see if you can pick out who is a threat to humanity and should be euthanized, and who are just running their mouths. And keep in mind that your picks lose their lives as the result of your decisions.

 

[ChristisKing]

Ok, honey. Who do you give the task of deciding who lives and who dies to?
Make yourself the judge, and go to the taunting forums here and see if you can pick out who is a threat to humanity and should be euthanized, and who are just running their mouths. And keep in mind that your picks lose their lives as the result of your decisions.

That's easy. I'm talking about the people that are actually making threats.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

She means well, but I too am getting tired of all these threads calling for more government restrictions and trampling on our most important freedoms. You might disagree with me on this, but what I've been trying to get through to her is that she has been manipulated to do these things. Problem - Reaction - Solution. Her threads are the "reaction" part of that equation. Calling for the government to "do something!" And they sure as hell will. But at TIR said, if you give them an inch, they take a mile. And any power that one gives to a government they trust will be in the hands of a government they don't trust when the pendulum swings back the other way. And it will be used against us. This isn't rocket science. But some people aren't thinking, or they lack foresight.

Some of you need to go back to the Founding Fathers and understand what the limits to free speech really is. This country has lost its way

 

[ChristisKing]

Some of you need to go back to the Founding Fathers and understand what the limits to free speech really is. This country has lost its way

I'm only talking about threats being the limit.