I Don't Understand Why Democrats Keep Calling For Free Speech

I wouldn't know. Why are you obsessed with Muslims?
Well you told me how they are approved by you and you said you hate men marrying over one woman and you are ignorant about US laws as to who can marry. Simple question our forum expert on everything, are Muslims who have more than one wife arrested in your state or any state?
 
Your post is a perfect example of why this country is in such deep shit trouble. It is because no one wants to listen to the other side, and everyone wants a one-sided conversation.

I think the term is snowflake for someone easily offended.

Honestly, if you don't want free speech, move to an Islamic country, North Korea, China, and a whole litany of other nations where speech is limited.

By the way, and this applies to all those like you, if you don't like free speech, what the hell are you doing on a political board?
Tell that to Hillary Clinton, who flew to Europe to pressure the EU to enact censorship on US social media platforms:

 
Again, Context.

The LDS cult had been terrorizing the people of Illinois and Missouri for years with their Navou Legion and their Danite terror squads, including the attempted assassination of former Missouri Governor Lilburn Boggs.


They had watched Smith evade justice for years, from when he was convicted of fraud in 1825 in New York to the Kirkland Bank Scandal to the expulsion from Missouri, and just decided that the legal system wasn't going to deal with these guys, so they had to.
First he got jailed for treason and not the reason you claim. Good people do not go into jails and murder inmates.
 
Joseph Smith wasn't in Utah when he married those 14-year-old girls. He was in Illinois, where such behavior was illegal.
Joseph Smith published the book of his marriages,

In his book Nauvoo Polygamy, Smith provides a list of Joseph Smith’s future wives and the interval between the first encounter with the Mormon found and the Navuoo marriage. Here is Table 1.1 found on page 36 of his book.
Future wifeYear metAge at meetingAge at marriageYear of marriage
Loiusa Beaman182712261841
Zina Huntington183615201841
Presendia Huntington183625311841
Agnes Coolbrith183221301842
Lucinda Pendleton183837401842
Mary Elizabeth Rollins183112231842
Sylvia Sessions183719231842
Patty Bartlett183742471842
Sarah Kingsley1835/3947/51531842
Elizabeth Jane Davis183140501842
Marinda Johnson183116261842
Delcena Johnson183226351842
Eliza Snow1831-2327381842
Sarah Rapson–49–1842
Sarah Ann Whitney18315171842
Martha McBride183328371842
Ruth Vose183224351843
Flora Ann Woodworthby 184114161843
Emily Partridge18317191843
Eliza Partridge183110221843
Almera Johnson183219291843
Lucy Walker184115171843
Sarah Lawrence183711161843
Maria Lawrence183713191843
Helen Mar Kimballby 18368141843
Elvira Cowles183522291843
Rhoda Ricahrds184358581843
Hannah Ellsby 184027301843
Mary Ann Frostby 183728341843
Olive Frost184326271843
Nancy Winchesterca. 18346141843
Desdemona Fullmer183627331843
Melissa Lott183612191843
Sarah Scott–25–1843
Phebe Watrousby 184136381843
Mary Huston–25–1843
Fanny Young183346551843
 
Joseph Smith wasn't in Utah when he married those 14-year-old girls. He was in Illinois, where such behavior was illegal.
I didn’t say he was in Utah. You had denied that polygynyo was legal in the US in the 19th Century. I merely corrected you on that point.

I don’t know or care about the legality, then, of marrying a 14 year old. So I didn’t comment on that assertion one way or the other.
 
Last edited:
I didn’t say he was in Utah. You had denied that polygyny was legal in the US in the 19th Century. I merely corrected you on that point.

I don’t know or care about the legality, then, of marrying a 14 year old. So I didn’t comment on that assertion one way or the other.
That is why JoeB131 loves Illinois. HE fell in love with being severely ruled by his state.
 
Did you not read the article!? These people are downright dangerous and violent people!! This is what happens when there's no line drawn!! All these people involved should be locked up forever if not put down as people are feeling that their safety is at risk here!!
Honestly, I ponder if we shouldn't just look at a couple of things. The second amendment comes right after the first. Dueling was legal back then. In a very primitive and tribal fashion, the second regulates the first. Run your stupid mouth too much exercising the first amendment, and someone will exercise the second on your ass.

After all, this is the example the anti-gun Democratic socialist communists gave us. They still want to take our guns, but keep theirs so they can silence our speech when they don't like it.

Should we then instead of 'infringing' upon their first amendment rights by firings and such just go to shooting back? It seems to be the only thing they want.
 
Again, who is "they" and who is "their"? Please answer this Beagle, instead of being very vague and broad brush-y...

unless that is your intent?
You should be able to answer your own question. YOU FOOL NO ONE WITH YOUR BULL CHIT ACT.
 
You should be able to answer your own question. YOU FOOL NO ONE WITH YOUR BULL CHIT ACT.
Okee dokie.

Why would answering that question bother you sooooooooo much? Weird, weird, weird!
 
Terrorists need to be prosecuted.

Threatening conservatives by calling them Nazis.
Would you like to see some clips of Bowman and Trump calling liberals Nazis and fascists, comrade?
 
Well you told me how they are approved by you and you said you hate men marrying over one woman and you are ignorant about US laws as to who can marry. Simple question our forum expert on everything, are Muslims who have more than one wife arrested in your state or any state?

I'm sure that if there is a Muslim with multiple wives and the State finds out about it, he'd be in trouble.

But your boy was violating the laws of Illinois in 1845. Probably not worth killing him over, but they were sick of his shit.

That is why @JoeB131 loves Illinois. HE fell in love with being severely ruled by his state.

Really, I barely have any interaction with the state. (County and municiple governments are another issue.)
 
15th post
Four examples of Trump calling his opponents fascists:

 
Last edited:
vance-text-trump-hitler.jpg
 
Did you not read the article!? These people are downright dangerous and violent people!! This is what happens when there's no line drawn!! All these people involved should be locked up forever if not put down as people are feeling that their safety is at risk here!!
Who gets to decide what is dangerous speech? Does paranoia get to decide who is or isn't dangerous? Does one group get to remove another group by calling them menacing?

Give the government an inch and they will take a mile. What seemed like a good idea in the UK, has turned into a nightmare for its citizens, They arrest dozens daily for saying they don't think Muslims should be taking over their country. Innocuous things like, "I'm walking my dog whether Muslims are offended or not." gets jail time. Many countries are using social media posts to arrest their citizens. They are dismantling freedom one step at a time. Now their government has included flying their own flag to being offensive.
If you look at what has been said here about Trump, every one who posted negative things about him would be in jail if they lived anywhere else. It's the freedom to speak your mind here that separates us from them.
Here in the USA we take this approach:
"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll fight to the death for your right to say it."
 
Last edited:
"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll fight to the death for your right to say it."
Unless you are Jimmy Kimmel or any of the people JD Vance has directed the MAGA horde to report to their employers for thoughtcrimes.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom