I can't believe this is from San Francisco!!!

I don't get the "can't believe... San Francisco" connection here.

San Francisco's a wonderful town but it's very expensive to live there. You know that, right?
Why is it so expensive? Because of continual rules and regulations like this increase in minimum wage!
Don't you comprehend the concept of raising costs of doing business raises prices people pay?
I'm sure you think those small business people are making a fortune and need to be taken down a peg by re-distribution!

Unmitigated Horseshit.

It's a bookstore, hello? And not only a bookstore but an independent specialty bookstore (SciFi). Such businesses have been losing ground for years to internet sources like Amazon (which now dominates book sales), eBay, eReaders, and before that large chains like Borders ad Barnes & Noble -- BOTH of which have also closed in San Francisco -- and all over -- along with a dozen or so other indie book stores as listed on post 34. ALL of that happened before any minimum wage action, and ALL of that happens inside and outside San Francisco. Nationally, over a thousand bookstores folded up between 2000 and 2007 alone.

That's two hits, one a technological shift and one a monopoly-BigBox pressure. In both cases it's the free market at work. Like it or lump it but this cherrypicking one case at a convenient time to make a post hoc fallacy belongs in the Bullshit section.

BUT you are forgetting the two owners state clearly why they are closing...

In November, San Francisco voters overwhelmingly passed a measure that will increase the minimum wage within the city to $15 per hour by 2018.
Although all of us at Borderlands support the concept of a living wage in principal and we believe that it’s possible that the new law will be good for San Francisco —
Borderlands Books as it exists is not a financially viable business if subject to that minimum wage.
Consequently we will be closing our doors no later than March 31st. …

Not at all. I'm talking to them too.
Don't be so quick to just swallow every story at face value just because it fits some preconceived agenda. Kind of ironic since books are all about context-- that their pithy statement completely ignores the context of their own business, or simply didn't want to go into complexities. You're ignoring the same thing to cherrypick one case out of thousands.

They were going out of business anyway. Bookstores are on the way out --- that's not only a fact but a known established fact.

Everything that happens has context. To ignore the context is to cherrypick.
 
Last edited:
I don't get the "can't believe... San Francisco" connection here.

San Francisco's a wonderful town but it's very expensive to live there. You know that, right?
Why is it so expensive? Because of continual rules and regulations like this increase in minimum wage!
Don't you comprehend the concept of raising costs of doing business raises prices people pay?
I'm sure you think those small business people are making a fortune and need to be taken down a peg by re-distribution!

Unmitigated Horseshit.

It's a bookstore, hello? And not only a bookstore but an independent specialty bookstore (SciFi). Such businesses have been losing ground for years to internet sources like Amazon (which now dominates book sales), eBay, eReaders, and before that large chains like Borders and Barnes & Noble -- BOTH of which have also closed in San Francisco -- and all over -- along with a dozen or so other indie book stores as listed in post 34. ALL of that happened before any minimum wage action, and ALL of that happens inside and outside San Francisco. Nationally, over a thousand bookstores folded up between 2000 and 2007 alone.

That's two hits, one a technological shift and one a monopoly-BigBox pressure. In both cases it's the free market at work. Like it or lump it but this cherrypicking one case at a convenient time to make a post hoc fallacy belongs in the Bullshit section.

A dozen local bookstores close in SF, including big boxes, thousands of bookstores close coast to coast, and all of a sudden this one is a result of a wage increase? :eusa_hand:

The issues are pretty specific to this business. As the owner explains, the books have the prices printed on the covers. They can't just raise prices to match the wage increases because of that specific fact.

They could easily on the connected cafe. Which is why the connected cafe is remaining open. And the bookstore isn't. Those trying to draw vast generalizations from this specific case are ignoring the specifics of this case.
Much as I love bookstores, and I do, most of what I buy now downloads in about 20 seconds at half the price, or even much less. I get TV the same way, and the porn is totally free. That's life in capitalism when you build a better mousetrap.
 
I don't get the "can't believe... San Francisco" connection here.

San Francisco's a wonderful town but it's very expensive to live there. You know that, right?
Why is it so expensive? Because of continual rules and regulations like this increase in minimum wage!
Don't you comprehend the concept of raising costs of doing business raises prices people pay?
I'm sure you think those small business people are making a fortune and need to be taken down a peg by re-distribution!

Unmitigated Horseshit.

It's a bookstore, hello? And not only a bookstore but an independent specialty bookstore (SciFi). Such businesses have been losing ground for years to internet sources like Amazon (which now dominates book sales), eBay, eReaders, and before that large chains like Borders and Barnes & Noble -- BOTH of which have also closed in San Francisco -- and all over -- along with a dozen or so other indie book stores as listed in post 34. ALL of that happened before any minimum wage action, and ALL of that happens inside and outside San Francisco. Nationally, over a thousand bookstores folded up between 2000 and 2007 alone.

That's two hits, one a technological shift and one a monopoly-BigBox pressure. In both cases it's the free market at work. Like it or lump it but this cherrypicking one case at a convenient time to make a post hoc fallacy belongs in the Bullshit section.

A dozen local bookstores close in SF, including big boxes, thousands of bookstores close coast to coast, and all of a sudden this one is a result of a wage increase? :eusa_hand:

The issues are pretty specific to this business. As the owner explains, the books have the prices printed on the covers. They can't just raise prices to match the wage increases because of that specific fact.

Moreover, books simply have less market value in a world where you can just go search Amazon or eBay and find a used excellent-condition copy of what you want, or in a lot of cases just find the content free on Google Books or elsewhere on the internets. Same thing's been happening with newspapers for the same reason.

So that printed price on the new book is harder and harder for the consumer to justify. That means the seller is inevitably going to lose business.
 
I don't get the "can't believe... San Francisco" connection here.

San Francisco's a wonderful town but it's very expensive to live there. You know that, right?
Why is it so expensive? Because of continual rules and regulations like this increase in minimum wage!
Don't you comprehend the concept of raising costs of doing business raises prices people pay?
I'm sure you think those small business people are making a fortune and need to be taken down a peg by re-distribution!

Unmitigated Horseshit.

It's a bookstore, hello? And not only a bookstore but an independent specialty bookstore (SciFi). Such businesses have been losing ground for years to internet sources like Amazon (which now dominates book sales), eBay, eReaders, and before that large chains like Borders and Barnes & Noble -- BOTH of which have also closed in San Francisco -- and all over -- along with a dozen or so other indie book stores as listed in post 34. ALL of that happened before any minimum wage action, and ALL of that happens inside and outside San Francisco. Nationally, over a thousand bookstores folded up between 2000 and 2007 alone.

That's two hits, one a technological shift and one a monopoly-BigBox pressure. In both cases it's the free market at work. Like it or lump it but this cherrypicking one case at a convenient time to make a post hoc fallacy belongs in the Bullshit section.

A dozen local bookstores close in SF, including big boxes, thousands of bookstores close coast to coast, and all of a sudden this one is a result of a wage increase? :eusa_hand:

The issues are pretty specific to this business. As the owner explains, the books have the prices printed on the covers. They can't just raise prices to match the wage increases because of that specific fact.

They could easily on the connected cafe. Which is why the connected cafe is remaining open. And the bookstore isn't. Those trying to draw vast generalizations from this specific case are ignoring the specifics of this case.
Much as I love bookstores, and I do, most of what I buy now downloads in about 20 seconds at half the price, or even much less. I get TV the same way, and the porn is totally free. That's life in capitalism when you build a better mousetrap.

Zackly. I got rid of my TV altogether when it dawned on me that anything I wanted from TV was already on the internet.
 
I don't get the "can't believe... San Francisco" connection here.

San Francisco's a wonderful town but it's very expensive to live there. You know that, right?
Why is it so expensive? Because of continual rules and regulations like this increase in minimum wage!
Don't you comprehend the concept of raising costs of doing business raises prices people pay?
I'm sure you think those small business people are making a fortune and need to be taken down a peg by re-distribution!
It's expensive (and always has been) because it is desirable to live there. Just like Hawaii is expensive and Mississippi is not.
 
I don't get the "can't believe... San Francisco" connection here.

San Francisco's a wonderful town but it's very expensive to live there. You know that, right?
Why is it so expensive? Because of continual rules and regulations like this increase in minimum wage!
Don't you comprehend the concept of raising costs of doing business raises prices people pay?
I'm sure you think those small business people are making a fortune and need to be taken down a peg by re-distribution!

Unmitigated Horseshit.

It's a bookstore, hello? And not only a bookstore but an independent specialty bookstore (SciFi). Such businesses have been losing ground for years to internet sources like Amazon (which now dominates book sales), eBay, eReaders, and before that large chains like Borders and Barnes & Noble -- BOTH of which have also closed in San Francisco -- and all over -- along with a dozen or so other indie book stores as listed in post 34. ALL of that happened before any minimum wage action, and ALL of that happens inside and outside San Francisco. Nationally, over a thousand bookstores folded up between 2000 and 2007 alone.

That's two hits, one a technological shift and one a monopoly-BigBox pressure. In both cases it's the free market at work. Like it or lump it but this cherrypicking one case at a convenient time to make a post hoc fallacy belongs in the Bullshit section.

A dozen local bookstores close in SF, including big boxes, thousands of bookstores close coast to coast, and all of a sudden this one is a result of a wage increase? :eusa_hand:

The issues are pretty specific to this business. As the owner explains, the books have the prices printed on the covers. They can't just raise prices to match the wage increases because of that specific fact.

They could easily on the connected cafe. Which is why the connected cafe is remaining open. And the bookstore isn't. Those trying to draw vast generalizations from this specific case are ignoring the specifics of this case.

Interesting YOU make the statement "draw vast generalizations from this specific case"!!!
What about these examples of "vast generalizations"...
Partly because it’s not treated as effectively as it could be. Right now if we paid a family if a family care physician works with his or her patient to help them lose weight, modify diet, monitors whether they are taking their medications in a timely fashion, they might get reimbursed a pittance.
But if that same doctor Ends up getting their foot amputated, that’s $30,000, $40,000, $50,000. Immediately the surgeon is reimbursed."

So from this "Specific generalization" (which by the way is totally fabricated as NO family physician performs amputations and make $50,000 doing so).. we had the ACA passed.
Or this generalization ...
“I don’t have to explain to you that nearly 46 million Americans don’t have health insurance coverage today. In the wealthiest nation on Earth, 46 million of our fellow citizens have no coverage.”
Wild Exaggeration ... when 10 million were NOT citizens, 14 million eligible for Medicaid/SCHIP and 18 million didn't WANT insurance!

These WILD exaggerations and "vast generalizations" OK as far as you are concerned?
 
I don't get the "can't believe... San Francisco" connection here.

San Francisco's a wonderful town but it's very expensive to live there. You know that, right?
Why is it so expensive? Because of continual rules and regulations like this increase in minimum wage!
Don't you comprehend the concept of raising costs of doing business raises prices people pay?
I'm sure you think those small business people are making a fortune and need to be taken down a peg by re-distribution!

Unmitigated Horseshit.

It's a bookstore, hello? And not only a bookstore but an independent specialty bookstore (SciFi). Such businesses have been losing ground for years to internet sources like Amazon (which now dominates book sales), eBay, eReaders, and before that large chains like Borders and Barnes & Noble -- BOTH of which have also closed in San Francisco -- and all over -- along with a dozen or so other indie book stores as listed in post 34. ALL of that happened before any minimum wage action, and ALL of that happens inside and outside San Francisco. Nationally, over a thousand bookstores folded up between 2000 and 2007 alone.

That's two hits, one a technological shift and one a monopoly-BigBox pressure. In both cases it's the free market at work. Like it or lump it but this cherrypicking one case at a convenient time to make a post hoc fallacy belongs in the Bullshit section.

A dozen local bookstores close in SF, including big boxes, thousands of bookstores close coast to coast, and all of a sudden this one is a result of a wage increase? :eusa_hand:

The issues are pretty specific to this business. As the owner explains, the books have the prices printed on the covers. They can't just raise prices to match the wage increases because of that specific fact.

They could easily on the connected cafe. Which is why the connected cafe is remaining open. And the bookstore isn't. Those trying to draw vast generalizations from this specific case are ignoring the specifics of this case.

Interesting YOU make the statement "draw vast generalizations from this specific case"!!!
What about these examples of "vast generalizations"...

So you're just completely abandoning the OP then?
 
I don't get the "can't believe... San Francisco" connection here.

San Francisco's a wonderful town but it's very expensive to live there. You know that, right?
Why is it so expensive? Because of continual rules and regulations like this increase in minimum wage!
Don't you comprehend the concept of raising costs of doing business raises prices people pay?
I'm sure you think those small business people are making a fortune and need to be taken down a peg by re-distribution!

Unmitigated Horseshit.

It's a bookstore, hello? And not only a bookstore but an independent specialty bookstore (SciFi). Such businesses have been losing ground for years to internet sources like Amazon (which now dominates book sales), eBay, eReaders, and before that large chains like Borders and Barnes & Noble -- BOTH of which have also closed in San Francisco -- and all over -- along with a dozen or so other indie book stores as listed in post 34. ALL of that happened before any minimum wage action, and ALL of that happens inside and outside San Francisco. Nationally, over a thousand bookstores folded up between 2000 and 2007 alone.

That's two hits, one a technological shift and one a monopoly-BigBox pressure. In both cases it's the free market at work. Like it or lump it but this cherrypicking one case at a convenient time to make a post hoc fallacy belongs in the Bullshit section.

A dozen local bookstores close in SF, including big boxes, thousands of bookstores close coast to coast, and all of a sudden this one is a result of a wage increase? :eusa_hand:

The issues are pretty specific to this business. As the owner explains, the books have the prices printed on the covers. They can't just raise prices to match the wage increases because of that specific fact.

They could easily on the connected cafe. Which is why the connected cafe is remaining open. And the bookstore isn't. Those trying to draw vast generalizations from this specific case are ignoring the specifics of this case.

Interesting YOU make the statement "draw vast generalizations from this specific case"!!!
What about these examples of "vast generalizations"...

So you're just completely abandoning the OP then?

He should go to a bookstore and get one on Red Herrings. If he can find one that's still open.
 
I don't get the "can't believe... San Francisco" connection here.

San Francisco's a wonderful town but it's very expensive to live there. You know that, right?
Why is it so expensive? Because of continual rules and regulations like this increase in minimum wage!
Don't you comprehend the concept of raising costs of doing business raises prices people pay?
I'm sure you think those small business people are making a fortune and need to be taken down a peg by re-distribution!

Unmitigated Horseshit.

It's a bookstore, hello? And not only a bookstore but an independent specialty bookstore (SciFi). Such businesses have been losing ground for years to internet sources like Amazon (which now dominates book sales), eBay, eReaders, and before that large chains like Borders and Barnes & Noble -- BOTH of which have also closed in San Francisco -- and all over -- along with a dozen or so other indie book stores as listed in post 34. ALL of that happened before any minimum wage action, and ALL of that happens inside and outside San Francisco. Nationally, over a thousand bookstores folded up between 2000 and 2007 alone.

That's two hits, one a technological shift and one a monopoly-BigBox pressure. In both cases it's the free market at work. Like it or lump it but this cherrypicking one case at a convenient time to make a post hoc fallacy belongs in the Bullshit section.

A dozen local bookstores close in SF, including big boxes, thousands of bookstores close coast to coast, and all of a sudden this one is a result of a wage increase? :eusa_hand:

The issues are pretty specific to this business. As the owner explains, the books have the prices printed on the covers. They can't just raise prices to match the wage increases because of that specific fact.

They could easily on the connected cafe. Which is why the connected cafe is remaining open. And the bookstore isn't. Those trying to draw vast generalizations from this specific case are ignoring the specifics of this case.

Interesting YOU make the statement "draw vast generalizations from this specific case"!!!
What about these examples of "vast generalizations"...

So you're just completely abandoning the OP then?
Looks like he is.
 
If You Support Higher Minimum Wages, You Hate Bookstores

You don't hate bookstores. Do you?
Similarly, this is why some burger joints are experimenting with machines that literally make the burgers automatically. Fewer people in the kitchen means less labor purchased. This is why the CBO projected that increasing the minimum wage to $10.10 could cost half-a-million jobs.
In November, San Francisco voters overwhelmingly passed a measure that will increase the minimum wage within the city to $15 per hour by 2018.
Although all of us at Borderlands support the concept of a living wage in principal and we believe that it’s possible that the new law will be good for San Francisco —
Borderlands Books as it exists is not a financially viable business if subject to that minimum wage.
Consequently we will be closing our doors no later than March 31st. …


The change in minimum wage will mean our payroll will increase roughly 39%.
That increase will in turn bring up our total operating expenses by 18%.
To make up for that expense, we would need to increase our sales by a minimum of 20%.
We do not believe that is a realistic possibility for a bookstore in San Francisco at this time.

The other obvious alternative to increasing sales would be to decrease expenses.
The only way to accomplish the amount of savings needed would be to reduce our staff to: the current management (Alan Beatts and Jude Feldman), and one other part-time employee.

Alan would need to take over most of Jude’s administrative responsibilities and Jude would work the counter five to six days per week. Taking all those steps would allow management to increase their work hours by 50-75% while continuing to make roughly the same modest amount that they make now (by way of example, Alan’s salary was $28,000 last year).
That’s not an option for obvious reasons and for at least one less obvious one — at the planned minimum wage in 2018, either of them would earn more than their current salary working only 40 hours per week at a much less demanding job that paid minimum wage.
If You Support Higher Minimum Wages You Hate Bookstores Washington Free Beacon
Did you somehow miss the idea of Creative Destruction: Creative destruction - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

If you can't pay a Living Wage then there is no reason for you to be in business here, none at all.
Minimum wage is not meant to be living wage. If you can't afford a living wage you won't be in business. Just too simple for idiot libtards like you to comprehend.
If you can't afford to pay a living wage then you shouldn't be in business. And if you say Well, if they have to pay that then the business will have to close, good, it shouldn't be open then. A real business will pay its workers a wage they can live on, assuming that they work full-time.

Hey, that really helps the employees! When are you liberal turds going to admit you don't give a fuck about the common man?
 
If You Support Higher Minimum Wages, You Hate Bookstores

You don't hate bookstores. Do you?
Similarly, this is why some burger joints are experimenting with machines that literally make the burgers automatically. Fewer people in the kitchen means less labor purchased. This is why the CBO projected that increasing the minimum wage to $10.10 could cost half-a-million jobs.
In November, San Francisco voters overwhelmingly passed a measure that will increase the minimum wage within the city to $15 per hour by 2018.
Although all of us at Borderlands support the concept of a living wage in principal and we believe that it’s possible that the new law will be good for San Francisco —
Borderlands Books as it exists is not a financially viable business if subject to that minimum wage.
Consequently we will be closing our doors no later than March 31st. …


The change in minimum wage will mean our payroll will increase roughly 39%.
That increase will in turn bring up our total operating expenses by 18%.
To make up for that expense, we would need to increase our sales by a minimum of 20%.
We do not believe that is a realistic possibility for a bookstore in San Francisco at this time.

The other obvious alternative to increasing sales would be to decrease expenses.
The only way to accomplish the amount of savings needed would be to reduce our staff to: the current management (Alan Beatts and Jude Feldman), and one other part-time employee.

Alan would need to take over most of Jude’s administrative responsibilities and Jude would work the counter five to six days per week. Taking all those steps would allow management to increase their work hours by 50-75% while continuing to make roughly the same modest amount that they make now (by way of example, Alan’s salary was $28,000 last year).
That’s not an option for obvious reasons and for at least one less obvious one — at the planned minimum wage in 2018, either of them would earn more than their current salary working only 40 hours per week at a much less demanding job that paid minimum wage.
If You Support Higher Minimum Wages You Hate Bookstores Washington Free Beacon
Did you somehow miss the idea of Creative Destruction: Creative destruction - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

If you can't pay a Living Wage then there is no reason for you to be in business here, none at all.
Minimum wage is not meant to be living wage. If you can't afford a living wage you won't be in business. Just too simple for idiot libtards like you to comprehend.
If you can't afford to pay a living wage then you shouldn't be in business. And if you say Well, if they have to pay that then the business will have to close, good, it shouldn't be open then. A real business will pay its workers a wage they can live on, assuming that they work full-time.

Hey, that really helps the employees! When are you liberal turds going to admit you don't give a fuck about the common man?
Employees who make a starvation wage aren't being helped. Any business that can pay only at that level we don't need.
 
I'll take Dallas any day of the week.

I like Dallas. I love San Francisco. Fisherman's Wharf and China Town are unique in my experience. Los Angeles and New York have a China Town, but they are nothing like SF.

Stumbling back to the BART down Market street after a fine dinner and a stop in every bar or pub along the way is an experience every adult should have.

San Francisco was around long before the Communists took it over, and will go on after they fade to dust.

Nice place to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there. I had a long term consulting gig there once. I tried to find an apartment to rent. The best I could do was a 50 year-old un-refurbished two-bedroom on the other side of the bay at the very end of the BART line for $1800/mo. All the other consultants on the job were double bunking. By that I mean they were sharing a bedroom. The traffic is ridiculous and it's always cold and windy.
 
If You Support Higher Minimum Wages, You Hate Bookstores

You don't hate bookstores. Do you?
Similarly, this is why some burger joints are experimenting with machines that literally make the burgers automatically. Fewer people in the kitchen means less labor purchased. This is why the CBO projected that increasing the minimum wage to $10.10 could cost half-a-million jobs.
In November, San Francisco voters overwhelmingly passed a measure that will increase the minimum wage within the city to $15 per hour by 2018.
Although all of us at Borderlands support the concept of a living wage in principal and we believe that it’s possible that the new law will be good for San Francisco —
Borderlands Books as it exists is not a financially viable business if subject to that minimum wage.
Consequently we will be closing our doors no later than March 31st. …


The change in minimum wage will mean our payroll will increase roughly 39%.
That increase will in turn bring up our total operating expenses by 18%.
To make up for that expense, we would need to increase our sales by a minimum of 20%.
We do not believe that is a realistic possibility for a bookstore in San Francisco at this time.

The other obvious alternative to increasing sales would be to decrease expenses.
The only way to accomplish the amount of savings needed would be to reduce our staff to: the current management (Alan Beatts and Jude Feldman), and one other part-time employee.

Alan would need to take over most of Jude’s administrative responsibilities and Jude would work the counter five to six days per week. Taking all those steps would allow management to increase their work hours by 50-75% while continuing to make roughly the same modest amount that they make now (by way of example, Alan’s salary was $28,000 last year).
That’s not an option for obvious reasons and for at least one less obvious one — at the planned minimum wage in 2018, either of them would earn more than their current salary working only 40 hours per week at a much less demanding job that paid minimum wage.
If You Support Higher Minimum Wages You Hate Bookstores Washington Free Beacon
Did you somehow miss the idea of Creative Destruction: Creative destruction - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

If you can't pay a Living Wage then there is no reason for you to be in business here, none at all.
Minimum wage is not meant to be living wage. If you can't afford a living wage you won't be in business. Just too simple for idiot libtards like you to comprehend.
If you can't afford to pay a living wage then you shouldn't be in business. And if you say Well, if they have to pay that then the business will have to close, good, it shouldn't be open then. A real business will pay its workers a wage they can live on, assuming that they work full-time.

Hey, that really helps the employees! When are you liberal turds going to admit you don't give a fuck about the common man?
Employees who make a starvation wage aren't being helped. Any business that can pay only at that level we don't need.

Let's see, which is better, minimum wage or zero? You tell me.
 
Did you somehow miss the idea of Creative Destruction: Creative destruction - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

If you can't pay a Living Wage then there is no reason for you to be in business here, none at all.
Minimum wage is not meant to be living wage. If you can't afford a living wage you won't be in business. Just too simple for idiot libtards like you to comprehend.
If you can't afford to pay a living wage then you shouldn't be in business. And if you say Well, if they have to pay that then the business will have to close, good, it shouldn't be open then. A real business will pay its workers a wage they can live on, assuming that they work full-time.

Hey, that really helps the employees! When are you liberal turds going to admit you don't give a fuck about the common man?
Employees who make a starvation wage aren't being helped. Any business that can pay only at that level we don't need.

Let's see, which is better, minimum wage or zero? You tell me.
Zero. Your question is the same as which is better, being beaten by your husband or not having a roof over your head? Neither are good.
 
Minimum wage is not meant to be living wage. If you can't afford a living wage you won't be in business. Just too simple for idiot libtards like you to comprehend.
If you can't afford to pay a living wage then you shouldn't be in business. And if you say Well, if they have to pay that then the business will have to close, good, it shouldn't be open then. A real business will pay its workers a wage they can live on, assuming that they work full-time.

Hey, that really helps the employees! When are you liberal turds going to admit you don't give a fuck about the common man?
Employees who make a starvation wage aren't being helped. Any business that can pay only at that level we don't need.

Let's see, which is better, minimum wage or zero? You tell me.
Zero. Your question is the same as which is better, being beaten by your husband or not having a roof over your head? Neither are good.


Yeah, he will certainly be well fed with an income of zero! You're such a humanitarian!

Beating your wife is a violation of her rights. You have no right to a job or a specific income.
 
San Francisco is high demand real estate. It's very expensive to maintain, and the construction and remodeling never ceases. And, SF has a lot of parks. You'd be surprised how many businesses skirt regulations. Those Asian massage parlors are providing happy endings. There are too many shananigans going on for the regulators to keep pace.

But, for a business like Amoeba Records on Haight Street a $15 minimum wage might be fatal.

The fast food worker robot has already been invented. It's just waiting for the numbers to reach parity. They don't spit in your drink. They don't live in rent controlled housing. They don't steal from the register, don't qualify for Obamacare and don't smoke rock.
 
If you can't afford to pay a living wage then you shouldn't be in business. And if you say Well, if they have to pay that then the business will have to close, good, it shouldn't be open then. A real business will pay its workers a wage they can live on, assuming that they work full-time.

Hey, that really helps the employees! When are you liberal turds going to admit you don't give a fuck about the common man?
Employees who make a starvation wage aren't being helped. Any business that can pay only at that level we don't need.

Let's see, which is better, minimum wage or zero? You tell me.
Zero. Your question is the same as which is better, being beaten by your husband or not having a roof over your head? Neither are good.


Yeah, he will certainly be well fed with an income of zero! You're such a humanitarian!

Beating your wife is a violation of her rights. You have no right to a job or a specific income.
You have the right to it if we say you do...
 
San Francisco is high demand real estate. It's very expensive to maintain, and the construction and remodeling never ceases. And, SF has a lot of parks. You'd be surprised how many businesses skirt regulations. Those Asian massage parlors are providing happy endings. There are too many shananigans going on for the regulators to keep pace.

But, for a business like Amoeba Records on Haight Street a $15 minimum wage might be fatal.

The fast food worker robot has already been invented. It's just waiting for the numbers to reach parity. They don't spit in your drink. They don't live in rent controlled housing. They don't steal from the register, don't qualify for Obamacare and don't smoke rock.
Creative Destruction. Not too many corset-makers around anymore, but the ones who are are well paid. And just think, if you don't want the robot-burger you can go the fancy place down the street for a human-made burger, pay three times as much, and what do you know, look at that, they can afford to pay their workers a living wage...
 

Forum List

Back
Top