I am a Democrat. I didn't kill Charlie Kirk.
- Thread starter berg80
- Start date
marvin martian
Diamond Member
No, I already know what's happening.
NetJedi
Diamond Member
- Nov 16, 2024
- 1,123
- 1,614
- 1,938
Sure, sure wake me up when "the right" starts burning cities down, assaulting federal officers, assassinating people for speaking their minds and attempting to murder presidential candidates, along with all the other mayhem the left has been up to over the last 10 years.
"If the left wants peace, there will be peace, if the right wants war there will be no left"
Don't think they get it...
They jumped and down when George Floyd was killed but now want respect for Charlie Kirk...
Charlie Kirk did not deserve to die and what happened was wrong... But he was dealing in mocking and belittling people, he shouldn't be targeted, a lot are at it from both sides.....
The whole going on to Campus and taking on Students... It was the equivalent of a professional who spend his whole time researching and putting together arguments versus some random dude... Even if the random gets in a few points, they cut him out...
Look at when Kirk went to Cambridge.. The long form videos show him getting schooled...
He gets owned, they know their topics and take Kirk apart...
But then you look at Kirk's version... 6 min long and he wants a victory lap... Welcome to video editing...
Polishprince
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2016
- 51,813
- 43,429
- 3,615
And you libs have learned absolutely nothing from the atrocity.
Continuing to talk ill of the dead, even after you made his old lady a widow.
No wonder why fiends like Tyler Robinson feel they are justified.
Mac1958
Diamond Member
At least they aren't demanding Mt Rushmore yet.
Of course, that one is reserved for the orange buffoon.
Incredible.
martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 102,625
- 53,448
- 2,615
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 33,572
- 27,373
- 2,820
- Thread starter
- #109
I disagree. What I think is fair to criticize trump about is the outsized difference in his reactions to Kirk's and Hortman's murders.
In response to the murder of Hortman, Trump offered a brief, impersonal condemnation of her killing on Truth Social, stating that “such horrific violence will not be tolerated.” He didn’t do much else. He did not offer a substantial eulogy for her, or deliver an address on political violence, as he did after Kirk’s death. Unlike former President Joe Biden, Trump did not attend the funeral. The day after Hortman’s killing, when Trump was asked if he had called Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, he said, “I could be nice and call, but why waste time?” Trump suggested that part of the reason he didn’t want to call Walz was because he thought Walz was to blame for the killing, or at least the events leading up to it.
Trump's partisan double standard for assassinations is chilling
Why Trump’s different responses to Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman's assassinations matter.
www.msnbc.com
When did the left... Sorry you can't blame everything in life you don't like on left because it is convenient...
Capitol Hill insurrection... Plenty of police assaulted there...
ICE agents seem to continually break the law... They are not repeating private property and are tress passing at will...
Sorry they were ex Trump voters or supporters shooting at him...
So object with the right to protest... So did a lad in Germany in the 1930s...
Thanks for the threat...
whitehall
Diamond Member
Yeah but it seems that most democrats support Jay Jones who texted his fantasy of "putting two bullets in the head of a rival republican".
- Jan 19, 2010
- 83,860
- 84,265
- 3,605
You killed Charlie with your TDS hatred and the way you voted... Biden had the most corrupt administration in American history and it rubbed off on all of you...
So don't try and white wash your sins pal...
I disagree. What I think is fair to criticize trump about is the outsized difference in his reactions to Kirk's and Hortman's murders.
In response to the murder of Hortman, Trump offered a brief, impersonal condemnation of her killing on Truth Social, stating that “such horrific violence will not be tolerated.” He didn’t do much else. He did not offer a substantial eulogy for her, or deliver an address on political violence, as he did after Kirk’s death. Unlike former President Joe Biden, Trump did not attend the funeral. The day after Hortman’s killing, when Trump was asked if he had called Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, he said, “I could be nice and call, but why waste time?” Trump suggested that part of the reason he didn’t want to call Walz was because he thought Walz was to blame for the killing, or at least the events leading up to it.
Trump's partisan double standard for assassinations is chilling
Why Trump’s different responses to Charlie Kirk and Melissa Hortman's assassinations matter.
Generally speaking, the trend in America today is the left, refusing to engage in normal political dialog and wanting to use undemocratic, oppressive and/or violent means to achieve control and to thus marginalize their enemies, ie traditional Americans so that their interests are never again represented in national policy.
As such, Kirk's assassination is a national issue that requires a national response.
HOrtman? Explain if you think that is somehow the same.
Votto
Diamond Member
- Oct 31, 2012
- 68,728
- 77,328
- 3,605
And you are a somebody?
Tell us, what qualifies someone as a nobody?
Is Nancy Pelosi and Trump a "somebody"?
Leftard is just shit talking.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 52,491
- 38,561
- 3,545
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 33,572
- 27,373
- 2,820
- Thread starter
- #117
Leading Democrats Are Condemning Charlie Kirk’s Murder
Why is the online right having such a hard time recognizing that?
Leading Democrats Are Condemning Charlie Kirk’s Murder
Why is the online right having such a hard time recognizing that?
www.theatlantic.com
Dorian Mode
Diamond Member
- Apr 19, 2025
- 2,881
- 4,209
- 1,918
Are you saying the left should stop painting all non-leftists as racists, fascists, misogynists, homophobes, transphobes, MAGAts, anti-democracy, anti-free speech, stupid, rednecks, uneducated, pedophile supporters and so many other typical insults, or are you asking just the opposition to stop broad brushing leftists as socialists and Marxists? Because, if a leftist doesn't call the entire opposition racists, fascists, misogynists, homophobes, transphobes, MAGAts, anti-democracy, anti-free speech, stupid, rednecks, uneducated, pedophile supporters and so many other typical insults, won't they be kicked out of the club for supporting the opposition?
If you want the right to put down their pitchforks, all I have to say is "you first." The right has the upper hand at this point in the game.
Leading Democrats Are Condemning Charlie Kirk’s Murder
Why is the online right having such a hard time recognizing that?
Leading Democrats Are Condemning Charlie Kirk’s Murder
Why is the online right having such a hard time recognizing that?
Because while they say they "Condemn" the murder, they are fully supporting the world view and rhetoric that frames such action as LEGITIMATE and even reasonable.
You can't call someone a ******* nazis and then act surprised when someone kills him because he was a nazis.
EVERYTHING, about the way that the left has been operating over the last couple of decades has clearly been laying the mental framework for the left to work itself up to embracing VIOLENCE as a way of taking complete control.
So, some mealy mouthed words after the fact, just don't count for much.
Paleman
Diamond Member
I that vision were true-----thee would be not DemonRat party.
Similar threads
- Locked
New Topics
-
-
-
-
The latest greatest antics of our elected representatives is the so-called Save Act.
- Started by Dante
- Replies: 17
-
