I am a Democrat. I didn't kill Charlie Kirk.

[Papageorgio]

One individual's opinion could very well be another individual's definition of hate.

I respectfully disagree.

An opinion is a personal belief, viewpoint, or feeling about something. It can be positive, negative, or neutral — but it allows for discussion and difference.

Hate, on the other hand, goes beyond personal preference. It carries hostility, contempt, or malice toward a person or group. It’s not just disagreeing — it’s rejecting or demeaning someone for who they are.

We can have differing opinions and it not be hate, if done respectfully.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

An opinion is a personal belief, viewpoint, or feeling about something. It can be positive, negative, or neutral — but it allows for discussion and difference.

The negative rules the roost on the Inn3rt00bs right now, killing the dialogue. Social media is a cancer. People take too much offense at every level of discourse. That's what I see.

Hate, on the other hand, goes beyond personal preference. It carries hostility, contempt, or malice toward a person or group.

Yes.

We can have differing opinions and it not be hate, if done respectfully.

Correct. Appreciate it.

 

[Correll]

Traditional Americans having interests? What does that mean?

In every context, if someone speaks out in favor of what in that angle is the or even A traditional American group having an interest, libs don't address the point, they attack the person for the idea that that group has an interest.

Whites? The libs call you a racist.

Men? THe libs call you an incel.

Christians? The libs call you a Christian Nationalist, or some such shit.

ect.

They will also employ the most retarded claims, and deadly serious about it, such as whites "not having a culture" or blacks "not able to be racist".

And if you prove them wrong on that, ridicule them with facts to the point that they admit that was bullshit, they still don't change their positions, revealing that they always knew it was bullshit, from the start.

You know immigrants must first obtain citizenship before they can vote, right?

And you just provided me an example of such retardness.


That was a completely retarded thing to say. YOu said it not because it countered my point in any logical fashion, but because you know that my point is true and you want to bury it in shit talk, to avoid discussing it serously.

 

[j-mac]

That........."stole money from a charity, raped a woman, cheated on his wife with a porn star, plotted to steal an election he lost, and refused to comply with a subpoena for stolen classified docs" is a recitation of facts.

No one cares about your lies anymore…

 

[The piss off patriot]

I am a registered republican but I wasn’t apart or wasn’t even near Washington DC but, I feel like I get lumped into this insurrection because if I support the president then I am somehow a sympathetic to these people who were there on that day. Which is funny because no one has ever asked me and, I haven’t been active on this platform daily. But if I was. I don’t expect anyone would privately message me about. I don’t blame every democrat for what happened but if they don’t condemn what happened. In my opinion, I think there’s a question do they really think that this rhetoric is ok?

 

[Independent thinker]

Some of you are Republicans, you didn't kill Melissa Hortman.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/07/us/vance-boelter-minnesota-lawmakers-shot

We need to get away from broad brushing people of each party, holding them responsible for the acts of people they may share some ideological beliefs with but do not endorse their actions.

I supported the BLM protests, not the minority of people involved in the violent riots. You may believe millions and millions of votes were fraudulently cast in 2020 but do not endorse what the J6 mob did.

Demonizing people because of their party affiliation makes it easier to forget we are all Americans with similar backgrounds, similar experiences, and similar desires for ourselves and our families. Something we would do well to remember.

False equivelency. The left radicalized Kirk's shooter to do what he did. We still don't completely understand why the Hortman's shooter did what he did. He was gunning after state politicians but he was not radicalized by the right and the fact that he shot democrats may just be attributed to the fact that there aren't that many Republican politicians around Minnesota.

 

[berg80]

In every context, if someone speaks out in favor of what in that angle is the or even A traditional American group having an interest, libs don't address the point, they attack the person for the idea that that group has an interest.

Whites? The libs call you a racist.

Men? THe libs call you an incel.

Christians? The libs call you a Christian Nationalist, or some such shit.

ect.

They will also employ the most retarded claims, and deadly serious about it, such as whites "not having a culture" or blacks "not able to be racist".

And if you prove them wrong on that, ridicule them with facts to the point that they admit that was bullshit, they still don't change their positions, revealing that they always knew it was bullshit, from the start.



And you just provided me an example of such retardness.


That was a completely retarded thing to say. YOu said it not because it countered my point in any logical fashion, but because you know that my point is true and you want to bury it in shit talk, to avoid discussing it serously.

You wrote..... "It was more along the lines of controlling the debate to the point that any mention of traditional Americans even HAVING interests was pounced on"

First, who are the traditional Americans?

 

[Correll]

You wrote..... "It was more along the lines of controlling the debate to the point that any mention of traditional Americans even HAVING interests was pounced on"

First, who are the traditional Americans?

I just addressed that question, you ******* retard.

 

[berg80]

I just addressed that question, you ******* retard.

Please give me the post #. Should I assume by "traditional Americans" you mean white, christian, men?

 

[Correll]

Please give me the post #. Should I assume by "traditional Americans" you mean white, christian, men?

The group being discussed varies based on context. As I already told you, you ******* retard.


The relevant point is, that in EVERY case, you are AGAINST the American.


Indeed, generally leftards like you attack the very idea of Traditional Americans even HAVING interests, to be politically represented or addressed.


That was my point.

 

[berg80]

The relevant point is, that in EVERY case, you are AGAINST the American.


Indeed, generally leftards like you attack the very idea of Traditional Americans even HAVING interests, to be politically represented or addressed.


That was my point.

You appear to be conflating "traditional Americans" with people who are conservatives. I don't attack the idea of them HAVING interests nor do I object to those interests being represented or addressed. I've got to say, you have some very odd, confused views.

My cousin, a history teacher, traced my dad's lineage back to early 1700's MA. This was before the sites using DNA. It took a lot of research. Being that I am a white man with a long family history in America don't I qualify as a "traditional American?" I certainly want to have my views represented.

Are you beginning to see just how fucked up you are?

 

[22lcidw]

Please give me the post #. Should I assume by "traditional Americans" you mean white, christian, men?

Its more traditional ways of living even with gays. And we are far out of that. Culture, language and borders make us survive. And you are against that even as you live off of it.

 

[Correll]

You appear to be conflating "traditional Americans" with people who are conservatives. I don't attack the idea of them HAVING interests nor do I object to those interests being represented or addressed. I've got to say, you have some very odd, confused views.

Nope. That is just you playing dumb to refuse to face my point.

My cousin, a history teacher, traced my dad's lineage back to early 1700's MA. This was before the sites using DNA. It took a lot of research. Being that I am a white man with a long family history in America don't I qualify as a "traditional American?" I certainly want to have my views represented.

Are you beginning to see just how fucked up you are?

Give one serious issue on which you want "white man" interests represented.

 

[gold something]

Some

So you're a Democrat and did not kill Kirk. Well, good for you, I guess.

 

[berg80]

Nope. That is just you playing dumb to refuse to face my point.

I not only faced your "point," if you can call that nonsense a point, I dismantled it, chewed it up, and spit it out.

 

[gold something]

I not only faced your "point," if you can call that nonsense a point, I dismantled it, chewed it up, and spit it out.

^^ chess pigeon

 

[gold something]

Being that I am a white man with a long family history in America don't I qualify as a "traditional American?" I certainly want to have my views represented.

Drag queen story hour and pedophilia are not traditional American views.

 

[struth]

I think that's a misread of the poll. People saying they may have to "resort" to violence (who knows what factors caused that belief) is not the same as saying they think violence is the answer.

Um believing they have to resort of violence is saying they think it’s an answer. Assassination culture has taken root in the Dem party

https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/NCRI-Assassination-Culture-Brief.pdf

 

[Moonglow]

So you're a Democrat and did not kill Kirk. Well, good for you, I guess.

Only one person killed Kirk.

 

[Moonglow]

Um believing they have to resort of violence is saying they think it’s an answer. Assassination culture has taken root in the Dem party

https://networkcontagion.us/wp-content/uploads/NCRI-Assassination-Culture-Brief.pdf

The DNC did not commit the murder..