Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
View attachment 850725
The bar graph in the upper right labeled "Change in Global Temperature" provides the information you've been seeking Frank.
When asked if radiation was released at Three Mile Island or Fukushima, you said, "Oh, that is an easy question to answer. None, zero, zilch, nada.". In fact, radiation was released at both locations. That's not word salad. It's the correction of your demonstrably false statement.
Oh, that is an easy question to answer. None, zero, zilch, nada.
Unlike the design the Soviets used, both of those plants had a lot of shielding in their construction, so there was no significant release of radioactive contaminants. Both plants were shut down because of the damage to the plant itself and the contamination inside, but the actual radioactive release was insignificant
That's how real science works right? You silence the opposition for being deniers
You were in such a rush to play gotcha that you didn't bother to read what Mushroom was responding to. The question wasn't if radiation had been released. The question was how many people died as a result of what happened at Three-Mile Island and Fukushima. Your link proved what Mushroom had said was correct. That was a classic strawman argument that you destroyed but didn't come close to a correction of Mushroom's statement.
I love that chart. According to that chart the planet shouldn't have transitioned from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet when with CO2 levels of 600 ppm.View attachment 850725
The bar graph in the upper right labeled "Change in Global Temperature" provides the information you've been seeking Frank.
This is from Page 92 of TS.3 from Working Group I's Technical Summary in The Physical Science Basis from AR6.
If you repeat this query, my response will be "ASKED AND ANSWERED".
Why can’t you answer it? Just circle back to ClimateGate CentralGo to the link I provided and look up the new version of the radiative forcing diagram you've seen here a hundred times Frank. That chart now contains the information you've been whining about for so long. I have posted it here multiple times and have pointed out that it answers your old chestnut quite clearly.
It’s the biggest “scientific” fraud ever, nothing comes close to it. Worse yet, it’s designed to ONLY destroy the US economy.Yep. And by holding opinion polls. Because everybody knows that opinions and "consensus" is what real science actually is.
I gave you a number -- 42 -- and "incoherent" simply describes your query accurately. You should be embarrassed. I'm not in the slightest. You keep attacking the messenger and still haven't supplied anywhere near enough information for anyone to respond more intelligently.Do you find it embarrassing that you DON"T have a number??? You can easily do an experiment controlling for CO2 and show the increase is far out in decimal places, and NOT 1.5F. Completely embarrassing that the AGWCult never gives a number, only insults
Welcome to AGW/ACC denier central. The answer to that query is no one knows regarding Fukushima. As always, the government and industry have acted to prevent related bad news spreading to the wider public. Nonetheless, no one's been buying Japanese fish for quite a while. They've now stopped buying Chinese fish..The question wasn't if radiation had been released. The question was how many people died as a result of what happened at Three-Mile Island and Fukushima.
It’s the biggest “scientific” fraud ever, nothing comes close to it. Worse yet, it’s designed to ONLY destroy the US economy.
Welcome to AGW/ACC denier central. The answer to that query is no one knows regarding Fukushima. As always, the government and industry have acted to prevent related bad news spreading to the wider public. Nonetheless, no one's been buying Japanese fish for quite a while. They've now stopped buying Chinese fish..
What does it mean to you that a theory is "accepted science"?Yep. And by holding opinion polls. Because everybody knows that opinions and "consensus" is what real science actually is.
Reported? Of course they do. Keep stabbing that straw..No one knows if there were radiation deaths in Japan?
That's a different question.The question was how many people died as a result of what happened at Three-Mile Island and Fukushima.
I gave you a number -- 42 -- and "incoherent" simply describes your query accurately.
The answer to that query is no one knows regarding Fukushima. As always, the government and industry have acted to prevent related bad news spreading to the wider public.
Of course they do.
Your belief that the government of Japan does not act to support and protect its own nuclear industry sure is wacko.this conspiracy you mentioned earlier.
Your belief that the government of Japan does not act to support and protect its own nuclear industry sure is wacko.
What does it mean to you that a theory is "accepted science"?
