Human appearance on earth.

[Likkmee]

Zation began 6000 or so years back. The Civil part has yet to evolve

 

[Gdjjr]

But, is today today, or, tomorrow yesterday?

 

[ding]

Ancient man believed that man was created from the earth.

Some did. Some didn't. Were the other ones wrong?

Sure. Do you have any texts from them? No.

the texts we do have which are based upon being passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years say that man came from the earth. They weren’t wrong.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I even quoted from the link where it said 5 to 7 million years ago

I don't care what an author for the ny times says. I care what the theory says.

I ask again:

Evolutionary theory makes the claim that all species have a common ancestor. Humans and mice. Humans and elephants. Humans and starfish.

Why are you focused on monkeys and apes? Do you think .... Oh just maybe ... it's because they look more like humans than do mice, or starfish?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Sure. Do you have any texts from them? No.

Neither do you. You seem very confused about when your iron aged handbook was written.

 

[ding]

Sure. Do you have any texts from them? No.

Neither do you. You seem very confused about when your iron aged handbook was written.

Right. Because they don’t exist. Yet you are certain it is different from what does exist which you continually misstate.

that iron aged handbook that you keep dismissing was passed down orally from generation to generation for thousands of years. There’s nothing like it in antiquity. Yet you would throw it away.

why? Because of your bias. You are hateful and that won’t end well for you.

So here is what you are dismissing. I dare say ancient man has given considerably more thought to the origin questions than you have.

1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Right. Because they don’t exist.

Right. They were passed down verbally in other mythologies, just like your preferred mythology. Ding, this is simple stuff, try to keep up.

 

[ding]

Right. Because they don’t exist.

Right. They were passed down verbally in other mythologies, just like your preferred mythology. Ding, this is simple stuff, try to keep up.

You say mythology. I say allegorical accounts. Also prior to the migration from Mesopotamia they all shared the same culture so it makes perfect sense that there are similarities.

but don’t forget that this is what you are dismissing.

1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation


Because you don’t seem to be able to address any of this.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

As educated people may know, the creation and human origin stories from the Hindu religion may predate the old testament. These are just myths originated by ignorant, superstitious people. They deserve no mention or deference in a thread about science. USMB should just call the science section the Religious Troll section.

 

[harmonica]

According to science man is 5 to 7 million years old. Don't ask for proof though cause al they can ACTUALLY prove is 400000 years. And don't ask for them to explain a 2 million year fudge factor either.

it is all conjecture, guesses and assumptions. You know, science.

....are you saying you don't believe in evolution? humans did ''appear'' but the time frame is opinionable? what?

There is no actual evidence that a single mammal species has ever evolved into 2 or more entirely different species.

there is no actual evidence of creation of man

Ancient man believed that man was created from the earth. Were they wrong?

ancient man/the Church thought:
the Earth was flat
the Earth was the center of the Universe
--the Church villified and punished Galileo for that
believed in ghosts/witches
etc etc

 

[harmonica]

Ignoring the links that CLEARLY stated that science believes man came from a group of apes that started walking on 2 legs not all 4.

False. No link says that.

You keep making stuff up and making silly errors. Does this give you any pause at all? Do you have any shame?

Dumb ass I even quoted from the link where it said 5 to 7 million years ago a group of apes started walking up right which was the first sign of man, The liar would be you.

When Humans Became Human

On the biggest steps in early human evolution scientists are in agreement. The first human ancestors appeared between five million and seven million years ago, probably when some apelike creatures in Africa began to walk habitually on two legs.

you are wrong:
1. it says ''apelike---not apes
2. it says human '''ancestors''

 

[harmonica]

When Humans Became Human

Timeline of human evolution - Wikipedia

Human evolution - Wikipedia

So you agree they are full of shit.

You are very confused. the timeline you are referring to is the estimate of when our genetic line split off from the most recent common ancestor of us and our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees.

clearly you did not read a single word of any of those links, or you would already have this information.

Actually RETARD this whole thread is because several people in another thread , several of your buddy liberals, all insist that man appeared 5 to 7 million years ago and if you BOTHERED to read any of the links I posted they SAY that. IN PLAIN ENGLISH and attribute it to science and talk like it is a fact.

...so you believe a fully formed human just appeared like a Star Trek Energizer--there was no evolution?

I believe God created man.

....like I said in the other thread--FIRST you have to prove there is a god--which no one can't and no one has --so god creating anything is undeniably false

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

it says ''apelike-

Which I always find unfortunate, when in articles meant for laypeople.

It confuses people somewhat. One would be just as correct to say "human like", though on a somewhat different scale. And, humans ARE apes. So it's redundant, in a way.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

it says ''apelike-

Which I always find unfortunate, when in articles meant for laypeople.

It confuses people somewhat. One would be just as correct to say "human like", though on a somewhat different scale. And, humans ARE apes. So it's redundant, in a way.

Here you admit what you keep claiming isn't true.

 

[ding]

According to science man is 5 to 7 million years old. Don't ask for proof though cause al they can ACTUALLY prove is 400000 years. And don't ask for them to explain a 2 million year fudge factor either.

it is all conjecture, guesses and assumptions. You know, science.

....are you saying you don't believe in evolution? humans did ''appear'' but the time frame is opinionable? what?

There is no actual evidence that a single mammal species has ever evolved into 2 or more entirely different species.

there is no actual evidence of creation of man

Ancient man believed that man was created from the earth. Were they wrong?

ancient man/the Church thought:
the Earth was flat
the Earth was the center of the Universe
--the Church villified and punished Galileo for that
believed in ghosts/witches
etc etc

Ancient man believed...

1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Here you admit what you keep claiming isn't true.

Don't make people ask you to explain yourself. Make your point, and be specific.



Then, if you have your big boy pants on, answer the question I asked you:

Evolutionary theory makes the claim that all species have a common ancestor. Humans and mice. Humans and elephants. Humans and starfish.

Why are you focused on monkeys and apes? Do you think .... Oh just maybe ... it's because they look more like humans than do mice, or starfish?

 

[harmonica]

....are you saying you don't believe in evolution? humans did ''appear'' but the time frame is opinionable? what?

There is no actual evidence that a single mammal species has ever evolved into 2 or more entirely different species.

there is no actual evidence of creation of man

Ancient man believed that man was created from the earth. Were they wrong?

ancient man/the Church thought:
the Earth was flat
the Earth was the center of the Universe
--the Church villified and punished Galileo for that
believed in ghosts/witches
etc etc

Ancient man believed...

1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation

you posting on USMB is UNDENIABLE evidence of god



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

 

[ding]

As educated people may know, the creation and human origin stories from the Hindu religion may predate the old testament. These are just myths originated by ignorant, superstitious people. They deserve no mention or deference in a thread about science. USMB should just call the science section the Religious Troll section.

I don’t find you to be an educated man. Educated men speak to others with respect.

 

[ding]

There is no actual evidence that a single mammal species has ever evolved into 2 or more entirely different species.

there is no actual evidence of creation of man

Ancient man believed that man was created from the earth. Were they wrong?

ancient man/the Church thought:
the Earth was flat
the Earth was the center of the Universe
--the Church villified and punished Galileo for that
believed in ghosts/witches
etc etc

Ancient man believed...

1. God created existence
2. Everything he created is good
3. What he created was done in steps
4. Man is a product of that creation
5. Man is unlike any other creature in creation
6. Man is made in God’s image in that he is a being which knows and creates
7. Man was told to go forth and be fruitful
8. Man was told to do as the original creator; to create for 6 days and then rest
9. Man knows right from wrong
10. Rather than abandoning the concept of right and wrong when man does wrong, he rationalizes he didn’t do wrong
11. Successful behaviors naturally lead to success
12. Failed behaviors naturally lead to failure
13. Pass it down to the next generation

you posting on USMB is UNDENIABLE evidence of god



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

No. Your posting on USMB is undeniable evidence of God.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don’t find you to be an educated man.

So what? You defer to silly mythologies written by ignorant, primitive, superstitious people. Coming from you, that's a compliment.