HUGE: House Speaker McCarthy Handed Over 41,000 Hours of Jan 6 Video to Tucker Carlson

[JoeC]

Just Tuck, because he's one of Trump's asseaters. One of many over at Fox, the network of traitors, liars, bullshit artists, scumbags, perverts, degenerates, sexual predators, Fascists & Putin apologists.

I think you are confused. That is CNN. CNN would lick the sweat off Bidens nut sack

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I already explained his high crimes.

Impeachment doesn’t have judicial review. This is not some legal case about the first amendment.

Trump committed numerous crimes against the Republic in his effort to overturn the election and make himself president against the will of the people. I’ve listed them. You ignored them and pretended they didn’t exist. The riot on Jan 6th was merely the culmination of these efforts. The last gasp of a failed corrupt enterprise.

All you can do is pretend to be ignorant. Hide from the facts. Hide from the truth. Hide from who Trump is.

Don’t lecture me about what America is. In America, the voters decide. Not the politicians. Trump thought he could tell us who we voted for. Not the other way around. He deserves every inch of scorn that he’s ever gotten. If you actually knew what America was all about, you’d agree. But you don’t care about the country anymore. It’s just about winning.

Let me tell you what America is all about: We are a Republic guided by a document called the US Constitution. We on the right worship it but you on the left are disgusted by it. That's why in spite of me pointing out there was no impeachable offense in either case, your Nazi response is "impeachment doesn't have judicial rule" in other words, F the Constitution. We Nazis do what we damn well please Constitution be damned.

If Trump committed any crime, show me what that crime is and the law that makes it a crime. No, questioning an election or looking for ways to win a presidency is not a crime. Having a rally is not a crime. No, Trump had nothing to do with the riot or any other actions by other people, again, that's in your home country of North Korea, but not here.

 

[Marener]

Let me tell you what America is all about: We are a Republic guided by a document called the US Constitution. We on the right worship it but you on the left are disgusted by it. That's why in spite of me pointing out there was no impeachable offense in either case, your Nazi response is "impeachment doesn't have judicial rule" in other words, F the Constitution. We Nazis do what we damn well please Constitution be damned.

If Trump committed any crime, show me what that crime is and the law that makes it a crime. No, questioning an election or looking for ways to win a presidency is not a crime. Having a rally is not a crime. No, Trump had nothing to do with the riot or any other actions by other people, again, that's in your home country of North Korea, but not here.

You don’t worship the constitution. You worship Trump.

That’s why you defend his attempt to overturn the constructional provisions for electing presidents. That’s why you attack Congress exercising their constitutional ability to impeach a president for high crimes (crimes which I’ve explained numerous times and you simply ignore).

There is only ONE way to win an election and that is to get more votes. The voting ended on Election Day. Trying to change the outcome after Election Day isn’t Trump trying to win. It’s trying to steal what does not belong to him. If you actually worshiped the constitution as you claim, you wouldn’t support Trump. The two are opposite forces.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

You don’t worship the constitution. You worship Trump.

That’s why you defend his attempt to overturn the constructional provisions for electing presidents. That’s why you attack Congress exercising their constitutional ability to impeach a president for high crimes (crimes which I’ve explained numerous times and you simply ignore).

There is only ONE way to win an election and that is to get more votes. The voting ended on Election Day. Trying to change the outcome after Election Day isn’t Trump trying to win. It’s trying to steal what does not belong to him. If you actually worshiped the constitution as you claim, you wouldn’t support Trump. The two are opposite forces.

And yet you still fail to list what that crime was. It's not a crime to challenge an election or try to figure out ways to win it.

Show me the law that states you can't ask people to do things. I can ask for you to steal a car for me to get to work in the morning, but there is no law against me asking that of you. There are laws against you stealing a car regardless what it's for.

Trump had no power to force anybody to do anything. He wanted Republicans not to certify the election count. They certified it anyway. Why? Trump had no ability to stop them, all he could do is ask them, and there is no crime against that.

 

[Marener]

And yet you still fail to list what that crime was. It's not a crime to challenge an election or try to figure out ways to win it.

Show me the law that states you can't ask people to do things. I can ask for you to steal a car for me to get to work in the morning, but there is no law against me asking that of you. There are laws against you stealing a car regardless what it's for.

Trump had no power to force anybody to do anything. He wanted Republicans not to certify the election count. They certified it anyway. Why? Trump had no ability to stop them, all he could do is ask them, and there is no crime against that.

I’ve explained already in several posts. It is illegal to conspire with people to violate the law. Trump threatened DoJ officials with dismissal if they didn’t lie for him. He filed fraudulent lawsuits with information he knew to be false.

The fake electors are a violation of law. It’s fraud.
Asking Pence to not count the votes is a violation of law. The electoral count act.
Submitting known false information in a federal lawsuit is a violation of law. It’s fraud.
Asking Raffensperger to change the vote tally is a violation of law. It’s corruptly influencing an election official.

I bet you didn’t know any of that.

High crime.

Our founders were very worried about a demagogue like Trump taking over and playing on the emotions of his followers. His corrupt influence over them is absolutely qualifying as a high crime worthy of impeachment.

Corruptly influencing his followers to the point that they engaged in violence to support him. He had a right to speak his mind, but there might be consequences.

The constitution says that Congress has the power to impeach. That’s what they did, rightfully so.

I could go on and on but you just ignore anything that isn’t convenient for you.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I’ve explained already in several posts. It is illegal to conspire with people to violate the law. Trump threatened DoJ officials with dismissal if they didn’t lie for him. He filed fraudulent lawsuits with information he knew to be false.

So who did he conspire with? What was the outcome?

There is no law against filing a lawsuit. In this country you can sue anybody for anything if you're willing to spend the money.

 

[Marener]

So who did he conspire with? What was the outcome?

There is no law against filing a lawsuit. In this country you can sue anybody for anything if you're willing to spend the money.

There are rules against filing lawsuits with information you know to be false.

He conspired with many people. If you want a full accounting, you have to read the Jan 6th report.

He asked Pence to break the electoral count act. He asked Eastman for advice on how to break the law. He asked Raffensperger to change the vote totals. He conspired with fake electors (whom you somehow don’t believe exist despite their signing their names and submitting fake certificates to the government).

 

[JoeC]

There are rules against filing lawsuits with information you know to be false.

He conspired with many people. If you want a full accounting, you have to read the Jan 6th report.

He asked Pence to break the electoral count act. He asked Eastman for advice on how to break the law. He asked Raffensperger to change the vote totals. He conspired with fake electors (whom you somehow don’t believe exist despite their signing their names and submitting fake certificates to the government).

It’s interesting that you were ok with all election laws that were circumvented during the scamdemic. Without any Congressional approval.

 

[Marener]

It’s interesting that you were ok with all election laws that were circumvented during the scamdemic. Without any Congressional approval.

Like what?

 

[notmyfault2020]

So if you miss the Tucker show that shows the footage, are you ass out?

 

[JoeC]

Like what?

All of them. No chain of custody. Drop boxes with unverified ballots cast. Mass mailing of ballots,again with no way to identify or verify the voter.

 

[Marener]

All of them. No chain of custody. Drop boxes with unverified ballots cast. Mass mailing of ballots,again with no way to identify or verify the voter.

Drop boxes are used all over the place all the time. The ballot verification didn’t change. There was no mass mailing of ballots. That’s a lie. The chain of custody was the same as every other election and didn’t change.

You are just making shit up. None of this is true.

 

[JoeC]

Drop boxes are used all over the place all the time. The ballot verification didn’t change. There was no mass mailing of ballots. That’s a lie. The chain of custody was the same as every other election and didn’t change.

You are just making shit up. None of this is true.

No they were not.Yes it did.Yes there was...it is the truth.No it was not.No I'm not. Yes it is all true and you are delusional to say or think otherwise.

 

[Marener]

No they were not.Yes it did.Yes there was...it is the truth.No it was not.No I'm not. Yes it is all true and you are delusional to say or think otherwise.

If it’s all true, can you prove it?

 

[JoeC]

If it’s all true, can you prove it?

Changes to election dates, procedures, and administration in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

 

[Care4all]

What you people think is it's wrong to release it period because Tucker has first grabs at it. It's not security concerns of yours, it's not you're worried about showing secret passage ways, it's that it burns your ass McCarthy gave it to a right-wing source. If Piglosi gave it to a left-wing source you'd have no problem with it and no concerns at all.

But we both know that Fox is not going to be showing secret passageways or video of Pence being escorted out. There is 14,000 hours of video and Fox isn't going to show 1% of it. They are only going to show the potential controversial parts of the video that may be indicative of the securities participation in egging it on, or perhaps ridiculous charges and prison time for people that only entered the building and did nothing more.

I don't know what's on those videos, and you don't know what's on those videos. So let's see what's on them and what allegations will be before making judgement.

Why try to make up about what I think when I have already written it down, for all to see?

Under every condition that I mentioned in my post about McCarthy's doings is correct.

If he was going to release this, as Speaker of the House, with intentions to make it public to all, and hold up to scrutiny, then it should have been released to the full press to scrutinize and not just a political hack....that he favors to cover for Trumpers, but everyone.

Tucker could still tell his stories, but the rest of the press would have the means to fact check... which is what right wingers seemingly HATE the most.

This isn't some Political October surprise only given to the post by Giuliani, and REFUSING to let other members of the press to scrutinize the NY POST story....

Or Elon Musk having only the two reporters he CHOSE to see and tell their story on the Twitter files, for goodness sake....!

 

[Marener]

Changes to election dates, procedures, and administration in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

Great. Which one violated the law?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Why try to make up about what I think when I have already written it down, for all to see?

Under every condition that I mentioned in my post about McCarthy's doings is correct.

If he was going to release this, as Speaker of the House, with intentions to make it public to all, and hold up to scrutiny, then it should have been released to the full press to scrutinize and not just a political hack....that he favors to cover for Trumpers, but everyone.

Tucker could still tell his stories, but the rest of the press would have the means to fact check... which is what right wingers seemingly HATE the most.

This isn't some Political October surprise only given to the post by Giuliani, and REFUSING to let other members of the press to scrutinize the NY POST story....

Or Elon Musk having only the two reporters he CHOSE to see and tell their story on the Twitter files, for goodness sake....!

We're not talking audio or written words, we're talking about video here. There is nothing to scrutinize about video. It's either there or it isn't. There is nothing that can be fact checked more than a video itself.

 

[Blaster]

You’re still ignoring the full scope. You won’t even admit the known facts about what happened after the election and before January 6th.

Trump was using fraud, lies, deceit, coercion and even threats (both legal and physical) to overturn an election he lost.

When it comes from the sitting president with an enormous base of support in the country, it absolutely is a threat to the Republic and that is what impeachment is for. Trump’s actions rise to the level of high crimes.

The founders were very worried about someone like Trump and wrote extensively about it.

Just more partisan gibberish from you.

 

[Nova78]

Just Tuck, because he's one of Trump's asseaters. One of many over at Fox, the network of traitors, liars, bullshit artists, scumbags, perverts, degenerates, sexual predators, Fascists & Putin apologists.

What does this have to with your breath smelling like Biden's dick?