Hr 3962 passes!

[namvet]

You hard right losers have lost. It does not matter what you think. This is over.

forgot about the people aready huh ????? count them out huh ???

 

[Polk]

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, July 2, 1964) was a landmark piece of legislation in the United States that outlawed racial segregation in schools, public places, and employment. Conceived to help African Americans, the bill was amended prior to passage to protect women, and explicitly included white people for the first time.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

...

Both fully within the scope of the constitution as written.

And yet, at the time you guys howled that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unconstitutional.

 

[Chris]

You hard right losers have lost. It does not matter what you think. This is over.

It hasn't gone through the Senate yet.
That means it isn't over.
Try and engage your brain before typing.

Astounding isn't it? And IT will be met with a Court challange due to the Bill's Contents making it a FELONY for NOT complying. Can a citizen be compelled to exercise commerce when they choose NOT to?

This is a question of Liberty.

YOUNG people should PAY particuliar attention to this one since they are usually the ones that opt OUT of Healhcare in their young lives.

You are on the wrong side of history.

You remind me of Ronald Reagan saying Medicare would lead to a communist takeover of America. He even made a record album about it.

He was wrong and so are you.

 

[Ame®icano]

It hasn't gone through the Senate yet.
That means it isn't over.
Try and engage your brain before typing.

Astounding isn't it? And IT will be met with a Court challange due to the Bill's Contents making it a FELONY for NOT complying. Can a citizen be compelled to exercise commerce when they choose NOT to?

This is a question of Liberty.

YOUNG people should PAY particuliar attention to this one since they are usually the ones that opt OUT of Healhcare in their young lives.

You are on the wrong side of history.

You remind me of Ronald Reagan saying Medicare would lead to a communist takeover of America. He even made a record album about it.

He was wrong and so are you.

Reagan was right, that's exactly what is happening in America today.

 

[Chris]

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, July 2, 1964) was a landmark piece of legislation in the United States that outlawed racial segregation in schools, public places, and employment. Conceived to help African Americans, the bill was amended prior to passage to protect women, and explicitly included white people for the first time.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

...

Both fully within the scope of the constitution as written.

And yet, at the time you guys howled that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unconstitutional.

The conservatives are almost always on the wrong side of history.

They were against Medicare, Social Security, women's voting rights, blacks voting rights, and integration.

They are almost alway wrong about everything.

 

[Chris]

Astounding isn't it? And IT will be met with a Court challange due to the Bill's Contents making it a FELONY for NOT complying. Can a citizen be compelled to exercise commerce when they choose NOT to?

This is a question of Liberty.

YOUNG people should PAY particuliar attention to this one since they are usually the ones that opt OUT of Healhcare in their young lives.

You are on the wrong side of history.

You remind me of Ronald Reagan saying Medicare would lead to a communist takeover of America. He even made a record album about it.

He was wrong and so are you.

Reagan was right, that's exactly what is happening in America today.

Horseshit.

Communism is pretty much dead except for Cuba.

 

[The T]

It hasn't gone through the Senate yet.
That means it isn't over.
Try and engage your brain before typing.

Astounding isn't it? And IT will be met with a Court challange due to the Bill's Contents making it a FELONY for NOT complying. Can a citizen be compelled to exercise commerce when they choose NOT to?

This is a question of Liberty.

YOUNG people should PAY particuliar attention to this one since they are usually the ones that opt OUT of Healhcare in their young lives.

You are on the wrong side of history.

You remind me of Ronald Reagan saying Medicare would lead to a communist takeover of America. He even made a record album about it.

He was wrong and so are you.

No. I am ON the right side of History. HealthCare is a responsibility...NOT a Right.

Government getting IN the way of you exercising that responsibility is what is wrong. therefore Reagan and I are correct.

An for you to say what you have is tentamount for saying that the Founder were WRONG in what they did too...

You REALLY wanna stretch this one out, Chris? Seriously?

 

[Ame®icano]

You are on the wrong side of history.

You remind me of Ronald Reagan saying Medicare would lead to a communist takeover of America. He even made a record album about it.

He was wrong and so are you.

Reagan was right, that's exactly what is happening in America today.

Horseshit.

Communism is pretty much dead except for Cuba.

Cuban people are entitled for everything that government allows them.

What can you learn from Cuban example? Obviously nothing.

 

[Navy1960]

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, July 2, 1964) was a landmark piece of legislation in the United States that outlawed racial segregation in schools, public places, and employment. Conceived to help African Americans, the bill was amended prior to passage to protect women, and explicitly included white people for the first time.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

...

Both fully within the scope of the constitution as written.

And yet, at the time you guys howled that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unconstitutional.

At 9:51 on the morning of June 10, 1964, Senator Robert C. Byrd completed an address that he had begun 14 hours and 13 minutes earlier. The subject was the pending Civil Rights Act of 1964, a measure that occupied the Senate for 57 working days, including six Saturdays. A day earlier, Democratic Whip Hubert Humphrey, the bill's manager, concluded he had the 67 votes required at that time to end the debate.

Georgia Democrat Richard Russell offered the final arguments in opposition. Minority Leader Everett Dirksen, who had enlisted the Republican votes that made cloture a realistic option, spoke for the proponents with his customary eloquence. Noting that the day marked the 100th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln's nomination to a second term, the Illinois Republican proclaimed, in the words of Victor Hugo, "Stronger than all the armies is an idea whose time has come." He continued, "The time has come for equality of opportunity in sharing in government, in education, and in employment. It will not be stayed or denied. It is here!"

U.S. Senate: Art & History Home > Historical Minutes > 1964-Present > Civil Rights Filibuster Ended


Because of Democratic opposition and amendment of The Civil Rights Act of 1957, it was largely ineffective in its enforcement and its scope..

Civil Rights Act of 1957 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


In the 26 major civil rights votes after 1933, a majority of Democrats opposed civil rights legislation in over 80 percent of the votes. By contrast, the Republican majority favored civil rights in over 96 percent of the votes.
[See http://www.congresslink.org/civil/essay.html and http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1982/3/82.03.04.x.html.]

Enough said in answer to the claim about republican opposition to the Civil Rights Act.

 

[KittenKoder]

It hasn't gone through the Senate yet.
That means it isn't over.
Try and engage your brain before typing.

Astounding isn't it? And IT will be met with a Court challange due to the Bill's Contents making it a FELONY for NOT complying. Can a citizen be compelled to exercise commerce when they choose NOT to?

This is a question of Liberty.

YOUNG people should PAY particuliar attention to this one since they are usually the ones that opt OUT of Healhcare in their young lives.

You are on the wrong side of history.

You remind me of Ronald Reagan saying Medicare would lead to a communist takeover of America. He even made a record album about it.

He was wrong and so are you.

Actually ... he probably wasn't wrong ... thanks to Medicare morons like you are stupid enough to support idiotic bills like this. You can't prove him wrong until history is over ... the beauty of such word play ... and if you look at it, Medicare is a communist policy.

 

[Modbert]

Navy, lets not play ignorance. We both know after Nixon that Southern Democrats and such became Republicans.

 

[Polk]

And yet, who did the party nominate for president in the first election after passage of the 1964 bill? Barry Goldwater, who not only voted against the bill, but also wrote a book (Conscience of a Conservative) were he rants about the bill being unconstitutional. Nixon wins the nomination in 1968 and of course is renominated 1972. Ford is the incumbent, by faces a primary challenge from an ardent segregationist in 1976 who win the nomination in 1980.

 

[blu]

I, on the other hand, am vastly amused at all the wing-nuts losing their heads, and running around screaming, "the sky is falling, they're gonna take our kidneys, OH MY GOD, we might actually HAVE to get health insurance, the INJUSTICE of it all, OMG, it's the END OF AMERICA"

LMAO, no wonder you people lost the last couple of elections, you're a bunch of whining ninnies. You're exactly the same kind of ninnies that cried when Social Security was first enacted a 70 years ago, and when Medicare was done in the 1960s. You act like this is some "marxist plot" to destroy America, instead of an overhaul of an over-priced health-care system that leaves 40 million people without access to preventive medicine.

By all means, keep up the hysterics, it's funny as hell!

who the fuck wants social security? If would opt out of it in a second

careful what you wish for

why would i want SS? I pay into so that I can receive a s hitty amount of $ every year when I am old and grey? I can do more investing that money myself

 

[Navy1960]

H.R. 6675, The Social Security Admendments of 1965, began life in the House Ways & Means Committee where it passed the Committee on March 23, 1965 (President Johnson issued a statement in support of the bill after the favorable Committee vote) and a Final Report was sent to the House on March 29, 1965. The House took up consideration of the bill on April 7th, and passed the bill the next day by a vote of 313-115 (with 5 not voting).

The Senate Finance Committee reported the bill out on June 30th and debate began on the Senate floor that same day, concluding with passage on July 9, 1965 by a vote of 68-21 (with 11 not voting).
Social Security Online

The Conference Committee to reconcile the differing bills of the two houses completed its work on July 26th. The reconciled version of H.R. 6675 then went to final passage in the House on July 27th and final passage in the Senate the following day. (The detailed vote tallies on final passage are reproduced below.)


The most prominent opponent of national medical insurance was the American Medical Association (AMA); others included the American Hospital Association, the Chamber of Commerce, and the Life Insurance Association of People.
Social Security Act of 1965 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Let me see when half the Republicans in the House and roughly half in the Senate vote for the measure they are considered what then? This retro-active history that the democrats would like people to believe is simply not the case when you look at the record. In fact I see little if any democrats calling into question the 48 some odd members of their own party in the house and the 7 Senators that voted against Medicare.

 

[Navy1960]

Navy, lets not play ignorance. We both know after Nixon that Southern Democrats and such became Republicans.

I will give you that the dixiecrats became Republicans After Nixon, however it still does not change the fact that that Republicans have a long history of support for Civil rights issues and it's only been in the last 40 years that people seem to be under the impression that Republicans have little if anything to do with Civil Rights and excuse their own party's involvement in it.

 

[Chris]

Navy, lets not play ignorance. We both know after Nixon that Southern Democrats and such became Republicans.

I will give you that the dixiecrats became Republicans After Nixon, however it still does not change the fact that that Republicans have a long history of support for Civil rights issues and it's only been in the last 40 years that people seem to be under the impression that Republicans have little if anything to do with Civil Rights and excuse their own party's involvement in it.

The Republicans have become the old, white, Southerners party.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241, July 2, 1964) was a landmark piece of legislation in the United States that outlawed racial segregation in schools, public places, and employment. Conceived to help African Americans, the bill was amended prior to passage to protect women, and explicitly included white people for the first time.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

...

Both fully within the scope of the constitution as written.

And yet, at the time you guys howled that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unconstitutional.

The conservatives are almost always on the wrong side of history.

They were against Medicare, Social Security, women's voting rights, blacks voting rights, and integration.

They are almost alway wrong about everything.

That's your fucked up opinion.....now lets look at the facts......

Medicare...broke...rife with 500 billion dollars in fraudulent claims.
Social Security...broke....2017..benefits paid exceed revenues collected...53 trillion in the hole by 2040..
Democrats have created a perpetual state of poverty for all minorities in America....

You and what you represent are all thats bad for America....history has proven that time and time again.

 

[Chris]

And yet, at the time you guys howled that the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was unconstitutional.

The conservatives are almost always on the wrong side of history.

They were against Medicare, Social Security, women's voting rights, blacks voting rights, and integration.

They are almost alway wrong about everything.

That's your fucked up opinion.....now lets look at the facts......

Medicare...broke...rife with 500 billion dollars in fraudulent claims.
Social Security...broke....2017..benefits paid exceed revenues collected...53 trillion in the hole by 2040..
Democrats have created a perpetual state of poverty for all minorities in America....

You and what you represent are all thats bad for America....history has proven that time and time again.

Medicare and Social Security are not broke, and a minority is now president of the United States thanks to the progessives who fought for civil rights.

The "perpetual state of poverty" was largely a function of racism, which the Republican Party perpetuates.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

The conservatives are almost always on the wrong side of history.

They were against Medicare, Social Security, women's voting rights, blacks voting rights, and integration.

They are almost alway wrong about everything.

That's your fucked up opinion.....now lets look at the facts......

Medicare...broke...rife with 500 billion dollars in fraudulent claims.
Social Security...broke....2017..benefits paid exceed revenues collected...53 trillion in the hole by 2040..
Democrats have created a perpetual state of poverty for all minorities in America....

You and what you represent are all thats bad for America....history has proven that time and time again.

Medicare and Social Security are not broke, and a minority is now president of the United States thanks to the progessives who fought for civil rights.

The "perpetual state of poverty" was largely a function of racism, which the Republican Party perpetuates.

You need to check your facts before engaging your brain and mouth. What's the balance in the SSA's bank account? What's the balance in Medicare's bank account?

 

[PatekPhilippe]

The "perpetual state of poverty" was largely a function of racism, which the Republican Party perpetuates.

oh yeah...it's all the Republican's fault...

You're a fucking moron.