How were the “experts” so wrong about 2024 election and will it carry to 2028?

[WelfareQueen]

Once again, popular election polls are irrelevant

The only polls that matter are polls in key swing states. That is how elections are won

Trump was ahead in swing state polls

Yes, and according to NPR (the link I provided) the swing state polls were off 3% pro Dim biased against Trump. This is the norm with legacy media polling. Only idiots would believe it.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes, and according to NPR (the link I provided) the swing state polls were off 3% pro Dim biased against Trump. This is the norm with legacy media polling. Only idiots would believe it.

Polls don’t know who they are asking

 

[Blisterfinger]

Except they weren't really wrong.

They said it was a close race and it was.

So Trump barely managed to beat an opponent that was hobbled by being a last minute replacement.

Looks like Trump soundly trounced the idiot Harris. Your party sucked and still does.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Polls don’t know who they are asking

They do by Party affiliation. The way the legacy media rigs the polls is exactly like this. You poll roughly 1/3 Dims, 1/3 GOP, and 1/3 independent voters.

Sounds fair, right?


But the self-identified "independent voters" come from where? If you are a self-identified independent voter in Arkansas or Montana as an example, you likely lean right. However, if you are a self-identified "independent voter" in San Francisco or New York, you likely lean Left.

So, the legacy media oversamples "independent voters" in large urban areas that they know likely lean Left. That builds in a 3-4% polling bias every time. Hence, why mainstream media polls suck.

rightwinger I knew Trump would win three weeks before the election because the 4 or 5 legit polls said so. The best polling organizations are Atlas/Intel, Emerson, Trafalgar, Insider Advantage, and Rasmussen. The mainstream media never quotes these polls because they are correct, and they make their bullshit polls look bad. All of those polls I listed above had Trump winning the popular vote by 1-2% and winning all the swing states. That is exactly what happened.

 

[JoeB131]

As I said you root for drug dealers!

No proof that they are "drug dealers".

Venezuela isn't even a major source of drugs to the US. Cocaine is so 1980s, man.

But even if they were, then you seize the boats, you arrest the smugglers, and you find out who they are working for, and if they have government support, you take it up with EVIDENCE!

 

[rightwinger]

But even if they were, then you seize the boats, you arrest the smugglers, and you find out who they are working for, and if they have government support, you take it up with EVIDENCE!

Exactly

We have never taken a position of killing smugglers without any evidence

But MAGA killing brown people causes them no regret

 

[whitehall]

The biased political "experts" will persist in the media because the media protects it's own.

 

[SweetTea]

Exactly

We have never taken a position of killing smugglers without any evidence

But MAGA killing brown people causes them no regret

Sure, it's about their race. You guys have one track minds.

 

[JoeB131]

Sure, it's about their race. You guys have one track minds.

Do you think they'd be blowing up white people without evidence?

 

[rightwinger]

Sure, it's about their race. You guys have one track minds.

MAGA hates brown people and doesn’t believe they have human rights

It is evident in their use of ICE and destroying boats off the coast of Venezuela

 

[SweetTea]

Do you think they'd be blowing up white people without evidence?

Yes, if they were trafficking drugs. It has absolutely nothing to do with race.

 

[rightwinger]

Yes, if they were trafficking drugs. It has absolutely nothing to do with race.

Traditionally, boats suspected of trafficking drugs were intercepted and those on board were arrested

Trumps…..Kill them all and let God sort them out is barbaric

 

[JoeB131]

Sure, it's about their race. You guys have one track minds.

Do you think they'd be blowing up white people without evidence?

Yes, if they were trafficking drugs. It has absolutely nothing to do with race.

Except there's no evidence they were trafficking drugs.

 

[rightwinger]

Except there's no evidence they were trafficking drugs.

Kill them first and then use the fact that you killed them as evidence they were running drugs

 

[SweetTea]

Traditionally, boats suspected of trafficking drugs were intercepted and those on board were arrested

Trumps…..Kill them all and let God sort them out is barbaric

Sure it is, just like it is inhumane to not allow anyone in search of a better life to just walk across our Southern border, right? At some point we have to put our foot down. At some point, lefties have to grow up and, get out of their parent's basement and face reality instead of a teenage, bleeding heart fantasy world.

 

[rightwinger]

Sure it is, just like it is inhumane to not allow anyone in search of a better life to just walk across our Southern border, right? At some point we have to put our foot down. At some point, lefties have to grow up and, get out of their parent's basement and face reality instead of a teenage, bleeding heart fantasy world.

So you want to kill people trying to sneak into the country?

You must be MAGA

 

[JoeB131]

Sure it is, just like it is inhumane to not allow anyone in search of a better life to just walk across our Southern border, right? At some point we have to put our foot down. At some point, lefties have to grow up and, get out of their parent's basement and face reality instead of a teenage, bleeding heart fantasy world.

YOu mean become like their parents and be happy to be crushed by the One Percent?

So you want to kill people trying to sneak into the country?

You must be MAGA

Hey, it's not like they're white people, amiright?

 

[jotathought]

Except they weren't really wrong.

They said it was a close race and it was.

So Trump barely managed to beat an opponent that was hobbled by being a last minute replacement.

You can’t have it both ways. In 2020, Trump outperformed expectations, and it was called a ‘significant victory’ for Democrats. In 2024, he improved on that outcome and still won — yet now it’s being spun as him ‘barely’ winning. When you consider that Democrats had the full backing of the party machinery and Harris broke spending records, only to deliver weaker results than Biden did in 2020. If anything, that shows Trump’s support held strong while the Democrats underperformed, despite every advantage.

 

[22lcidw]

No proof that they are "drug dealers".

Venezuela isn't even a major source of drugs to the US. Cocaine is so 1980s, man.

But even if they were, then you seize the boats, you arrest the smugglers, and you find out who they are working for, and if they have government support, you take it up with EVIDENCE!

You promote anyone who is not a Progressive Socialist to die. Having belief in you is suicide.

 

[JoeB131]

You can’t have it both ways. In 2020, Trump outperformed expectations, and it was called a ‘significant victory’ for Democrats. In 2024, he improved on that outcome and still won — yet now it’s being spun as him ‘barely’ winning. When you consider that Democrats had the full backing of the party machinery and Harris broke spending records, only to deliver weaker results than Biden did in 2020. If anything, that shows Trump’s support held strong while the Democrats underperformed, despite every advantage.

Actually,

Trump lost the popular vote in 2016, but because we are using a system devised by Slave Rapists, he got in.

He completely ratfucked the country and was soundly defeated in 2020.

But because Biden was too old and Republicans too cowardly, we got him back.

On the OFF CHANCE we still have a country left after he's done, the Democrats will easily beat whatever poor fool he hands the nomination off to.