Your argument is a violation of the 2nd Amendment.
The Second Amendment is about Well-Regulated Militias, not letting people compensate for tiny dicks with guns.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your argument is a violation of the 2nd Amendment.
Actually, Gang shootings and criminal activity accounts for a lot of the gun crimes which is supported by the link you posted.Actually, it really doesn't.
MYTH: Gangs are responsible for most U.S. homicides - GVPedia
FACT: A 2020 study by the CDC found that 9.7% of homicides in 2017 were gang-related.www.gvpedia.org
Contrary to Lott’s repeated claim that the U.S. has a relatively high homicide rate because of “drug gangs,” most gun homicides are not related to gang activity. According to the National Gang Center, the government agency responsible for cataloging gang violence, there was an average of fewer than 2,000 gang homicides annually from 2007 to 2012. During roughly the same time period (2007 to 2011), the Federal Bureau of Investigation estimated an average of more than 15,500 homicides annually across the United States, indicating that gang-related homicides were approximately 13% total homicides annually. The Bureau of Justice Statistics finds the number of gang-related homicides to be even lower. In 2008, the government agency identified 960 homicides, accounting for 6% of all homicides that year.
According to the Federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), there was a 3% increase in the number of gangs between 2010 and 2011, but gang-related homicides decreased 8% during the same period. If gang violence was truly driving the homicide rate, gang membership and gun homicide rates would move in the same direction.
A December 2020 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report of 34 states, four California counties, and Washington, D.C., found that gang-related attacks were responsible for 11.4% of male homicides and 3.6% of female homicides in 2017, for 9.7% of overall homicides. The previous year, 7.4% of all homicides were gang-related.
A 2012 CDC study examining five cities with the largest gang problems found a total of 856 gang homicides compared to 2,077 non-gang homicides from 2003–2008. Even when examining cities with the largest gang problems, gang homicides only accounted for 29% of homicides. Contrary to Lott’s claim that the illegal drug trade is fueling US gun violence, the study also says “the proportion of gang homicides resulting from drug trade/use or with other crimes in progress was consistently low in the five cities, ranging from zero to 25 percent.”
Your interpretation is wrong. Check with the courts.The Second Amendment is about Well-Regulated Militias, not letting people compensate for tiny dicks with guns.
I’m surprised, you being a noted legal scholar and all, got the above so laughably wrong.The Second Amendment is about Well-Regulated Militias, not letting people compensate for tiny dicks with guns.
So there is no way to prevent anyone, whatever their state of mind, from getting a gun UNTIL they become a felon?Enforce the laws that are already on the books forbidding felons from possessing firearms. Then jail the ones who violate those laws for long times. If they are in jail, they can't possess guns that they aren't supposed to have and can't commit any other crimes. It's a win-win.
Some people who have abused, or are likely to abuse their rights, lose those rights.Self defense is a human Right, our constitution codifies the Right to own the tools for self defense.
Your legal assessment of Constitutional law aside, I disagree that requiring guns to be registered and requiring the owners to show they know how to handle a gun is not useful. It is not a silver bullet (ha ha) but it is useful.You believe, for some reason, licensing will reduce the number of people shot each year.
This is fallacy as...
-A license does not make it less likely someone will shoot you, and will not prevent them from doing so.
-People w/o licenses will still get guns.
Never mind the fact the requirement for a person to have a license just to own a gun violates the constitution.
You can;t just ignore the constitution.Your legal assessment of Constitutional law aside,...
Useful.... for what?I disagree that requiring guns to be registered and requiring the owners to show they know how to handle a gun is not useful.
There is no way to prevent anyone, whatever, their state of mind, from committing murder -- why do you think you can prevent them from getting a gun?So there is no way to prevent anyone, whatever their state of mind, from getting a gun UNTIL they become a felon?
I can ignore your interpretation of it.You can;t just ignore the constitution.
Having fewer gun deaths, assaults, suicides, etc. Compare us to countries that have stricter gun laws.Useful.... for what?
How do you know?
I think the harder it is to commit murder the fewer murders there will be. Seems logical and fits with what I know of people.There is no way to prevent anyone, whatever, their state of mind, from committing murder -- why do you think you can prevent them from getting a gun?
Not if you want to pass your restrictions into law.I can ignore your interpretation of it.
Why do you think the registration of guns and the licensing of gun owners will bring these things?Having fewer gun deaths, assaults, suicides, etc.
You didn't answer the question.I think the harder it is to commit murder the fewer murders there will be. Seems logical and fits with what I know of people.
If you mean today, you're right. If you mean in the future, maybe.Not if you want to pass your restrictions into law.
Seems logical and fits with what I know of people.Why do you think the registration of guns and the licensing of gun owners will bring these things?
So there is no way to prevent anyone, whatever their state of mind, from getting a gun UNTIL they become a felon?
Your legal assessment of Constitutional law aside, I disagree that requiring guns to be registered and requiring the owners to show they know how to handle a gun is not useful. It is not a silver bullet (ha ha) but it is useful.
I can ignore your interpretation of it.
Having fewer gun deaths, assaults, suicides, etc. Compare us to countries that have stricter gun laws.
How are you going to enforce that on the criminals who commit the vast majority of gun violence? The courts have already ruled that you can't force a felon to register his gun since it's self-incrimination.Your legal assessment of Constitutional law aside, I disagree that requiring guns to be registered and requiring the owners to show they know how to handle a gun is not useful. It is not a silver bullet (ha ha) but it is useful.