What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How to be a Planned Parent In the Hood

Foolardi

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Messages
1,015
Reaction score
567
Points
893
Real easy breezie.Don't.Avoid at all costs.Whether Fatherless or just clueless as to
what being a Parent encomposses.The Left and The Democrat Party have this
condition { Fatherless Parents & Homes } down pat.Meaning it's Political.
Probably because the Left and Democrat Party BENEFIT when large swaths of
the Female gender think it Groovy,Just fine,to get an Abortion.Takes no more
contemplation than getting a Tattoo.This condition { Lack of Moral contemplation
over what Abortions are }. As seen in many a Big City run Politically by Democrat Mayors
and City Council for decades.Fatherless homes are the norm.Crime is at it's Highest.
Education is at it's lowest.Meaning public education is near worthless.Now with the
outting of how Public Schools nationwide are teaching Hate.In the form of Critical Race
Theory and obsessions of skin color.
All Because it pays for The Left and Democrat Party to gain as much popularity
as possible.Make Abortions fashionable.Not merely acceptable but near necessary.
The polar opposite attitude and thinking of Parenthood and what it encompassed in
the 40's and 50's and yes,the radical 60's.
My Proof ... the Movie :
- Love With the Proper Stranger - { 1963 } starring Steve McQueen and Natalie Wood.
It deals with the then real spooky way an Abortion is obtained.It was Back alley,
unclean and feeling Very dirty.Plus it Cost moola.Paid to shady characters and of course
the Abortionist { in this case an elderly woman who probably had the temperment of a
Ma Barber }.Meaning Nasty.
 
Last edited:

Clyde 154

Gold Member
Joined
May 30, 2021
Messages
684
Reaction score
225
Points
158
Real easy breezie.Don't.Avoid at all costs.Whether Fatherless or just clueless as to
what being a Parent encomposses.The Left and The Democrat Party have this
condition { Fatherless Parents & Homes } down pat.Meaning it's Political.
Probably because the Left and Democrat Party BENEFIT when large swaths of
the Female gender think it Groovy,Just fine,to get an Abortion.Takes no more
contemplation than getting a Tattoo.This condition { Lack of Moral contemplation
over what Abortions are }. As seen in many a Big City run Politically by Democrat Mayors
and City Council for decades.Fatherless homes are the norm.Crime is at it's Highest.
Education is at it's lowest.Meaning public education is near worthless.Now with the
outting of how Public Schools nationwide are teaching Hate.In the form of Critical Race
Theory and obsessions of skin color.
All Because it pays for The Left and Democrat Party to gain as much popularity
as possible.Make Abortions fashionable.Not merely acceptable but near necessary.
The polar opposite attitude and thinking of Parenthood and what it encompassed in
the 40's and 50's and yes,the radical 60's.
My Proof ... the Movie :
- Love With the Proper Stranger - { 1963 } starring Steve McQueen and Natalie Wood.
It deals with the then real spooky way an Abortion is obtained.It was Back alley,
unclean and feeling Very dirty.Plus it Cost moola.Paid to shady characters and of course
the Abortionist { in this case an elderly woman who probably had the temperment of a
Ma Barber }.Meaning Nasty.
One name. "Margaret Sangar". A few facts about Black Abortion. Each and every week 5700 black children/babies are aborted in the United States. Since abortion became legal in 1973.... 18 million plus black children have been aborted out of a total of 62 million plus abortions since 1973.

30% of all abortions in the United States are performed on black citizens who represent less than 15% of the total population. The math is easy............black children are being aborted at twice the rate of other races. Simply take a look at where most Planned Parenthood clinics are located.

Again.....one name stands out, "Margaret Sangar" who stated publicly that the black population required control before it got out of hand. Just like Saul Alinsky................Margaret Sangar is one the heroes of the progressive movement.
 
Last edited:
OP
F

Foolardi

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Messages
1,015
Reaction score
567
Points
893
One name. "Margaret Sangar". A few facts about Black Abortion. Each and every week 5700 black children/babies are aborted in the United States. Since abortion became legal in 1973.... 18 million plus black children have been aborted out of a total of 62 million plus abortions since 1973.

30% of all abortions in the United States are performed on black citizens who represent less than 15% of the total population. The math is easy............black children are being aborted at twice the rate of other races. Simply take a look at where most Planned Parenthood clinics are located.

Again.....one name stands out, "Margaret Sangar" who stated publicly that the black population required control before it got out of hand. Just like Saul Alinsky................Margaret Sangar is one the heroes of the progressive movement.
Black Females have 5 times the abortions than White Females.
Quite famaliar with Margaret Sanger { the Champion of Planned Parenthood }
Don't let her Emily Dickinson innocent homely looks fool you.She was an obnoxious
Uppity control freak who colloborated with Hitler's regime.Was close friends and
took advise from Ernst Rudin who was Hitler's Director of Genetic Sterilization and who
was active in the Nazi Society of Racial Hygiene.Sanger helped push in April of 1933
an article in one of her magazines. The article ... - Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need -.
 

Colin norris

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
7,552
Reaction score
2,969
Points
908
Real easy breezie.Don't.Avoid at all costs.Whether Fatherless or just clueless as to
what being a Parent encomposses.The Left and The Democrat Party have this
condition { Fatherless Parents & Homes } down pat.Meaning it's Political.
Probably because the Left and Democrat Party BENEFIT when large swaths of
the Female gender think it Groovy,Just fine,to get an Abortion.Takes no more
contemplation than getting a Tattoo.This condition { Lack of Moral contemplation
over what Abortions are }. As seen in many a Big City run Politically by Democrat Mayors
and City Council for decades.Fatherless homes are the norm.Crime is at it's Highest.
Education is at it's lowest.Meaning public education is near worthless.Now with the
outting of how Public Schools nationwide are teaching Hate.In the form of Critical Race
Theory and obsessions of skin color.
All Because it pays for The Left and Democrat Party to gain as much popularity
as possible.Make Abortions fashionable.Not merely acceptable but near necessary.
The polar opposite attitude and thinking of Parenthood and what it encompassed in
the 40's and 50's and yes,the radical 60's.
My Proof ... the Movie :
- Love With the Proper Stranger - { 1963 } starring Steve McQueen and Natalie Wood.
It deals with the then real spooky way an Abortion is obtained.It was Back alley,
unclean and feeling Very dirty.Plus it Cost moola.Paid to shady characters and of course
the Abortionist { in this case an elderly woman who probably had the temperment of a
Ma Barber }.Meaning Nasty.
What difference does it make to you if any one gets an abortion?
Is it itching you religious beliefs?
You're assumption it is the left's fault is ridiculous. Republican women have them at the same rate. How about contraception? That's against gods law but you all over look that one for the sake of a but not slap and tickle.
Then you all toddle off to church with mum rattling with contraception pills as if everything is cool. You hypocrites.
 

Clyde 154

Gold Member
Joined
May 30, 2021
Messages
684
Reaction score
225
Points
158
What difference does it make to you if any one gets an abortion?
Is it itching you religious beliefs?
You're assumption it is the left's fault is ridiculous. Republican women have them at the same rate. How about contraception? That's against gods law but you all over look that one for the sake of a but not slap and tickle.
Then you all toddle off to church with mum rattling with contraception pills as if everything is cool. You hypocrites.
What difference? There is a human life being murdered with its own unique DNA signature proving that it is a human life, simply gestating/growing. Simply because that life is dependent upon its parent does not justify the taking of that innocent dependent human life. Human DNA shows up as early as 4 weeks after conception.

Question? Even after this human life breaches the magical female vagina ........that life is dependent upon its parent for at least 18 years until its gestation/growth is finished and it is deemed an adult by LAW. What would happen if a mother decided.......due to a presupposed personal right.......to simply take a set of forceps and begin tearing into that child because society might look poorly upon her because she was the victim of rape or an out of marriage birth, or she simply was not ready for a child at this stage of her life? After all that child is not human because its not fully developed for almost 2 decades......no? If you can kill a child in the womb because its dependent upon the mother and not fully developed why not kill that child for the same reasons until its fully developed/stopped gestating, growing?

Strange is the fact that Congress has passed an act that indicates that life is present within that same species during a prebirth state of gestation. The endangered species act forbids the taking of a life while in a pre-birth state with certain animals. Ignore that Law and you face a fine and or imprisonment. Take a human life in a state of prebirth.........and a radical court system protects the muderers, both the parent and the physician that provides the service as a RIGHT OF PRIVACY. That's one magical vagina.

What's the difference? There is no difference.....in each circumstance the child is dependent upon its parent to preserve its life.

In one breath our Government declares that life is exampled within species even at prebirth..........(they have it right) in the next.........human life is not exampled in the same species (Human)......it has to be hatched to be protected by law and declared ALIVE. Animals have more rights than human children.

Its about time that SCOTUS came from the dark ages and allowed the science of DNA to protect our Children before birth as well as after birth. Speaking of DNA.........attempt to deny that a child is yours to avoid Child Support, then a different tune is played by the liberals.......out come the DNA tests.

Strange is it not that the male parent has no rights whatsoever to protect his child before birth..........its a FEMALE right alone. But as soon as the magical vagina is breached......its suddenly a Mother and Fathers right, especially if Child Support is involved.
 
Last edited:
OP
F

Foolardi

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Messages
1,015
Reaction score
567
Points
893
What difference does it make to you if any one gets an abortion?
Is it itching you religious beliefs?
You're assumption it is the left's fault is ridiculous. Republican women have them at the same rate. How about contraception? That's against gods law but you all over look that one for the sake of a but not slap and tickle.
Then you all toddle off to church with mum rattling with contraception pills as if everything is cool. You hypocrites.
No finer example of how a Society can fall.Mother Teresa never proselytized.
Or attemped to convert others to her Catholic Faith.But whenever possible the
Last Saint to be named always warned in no uncertain terms the evils of
Abortions.The taking of Innocent Unborn Life.Not many good country's allow
for Abortion On Demand.Only 6 do.That being up to the 9th month of pregnancy.
China is one country.Only 7 of 59 countries allow for elective abortions after
20 weeks.Those being China,The United States,Canada,The Netherlands,Vietnam
Singapore and North Korea.
 
OP
F

Foolardi

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Messages
1,015
Reaction score
567
Points
893
What difference? There is a human life being murdered with its own unique DNA signature proving that it is a human life, simply gestating/growing. Simply because that life is dependent upon its parent does not justify the taking of that innocent dependent human life. Human DNA shows up as early as 4 weeks after conception.

Question? Even after this human life breaches the magical female vagina ........that life is dependent upon its parent for at least 18 years until its gestation/growth is finished and it is deemed an adult by LAW. What would happen if a mother decided.......due to a presupposed personal right.......to simply take a set of forceps and begin tearing into that child because society might look poorly upon her because she was the victim of rape or an out of marriage birth, or she simply was not ready for a child at this stage of her life? After all that child is not human because its not fully developed for almost 2 decades......no? If you can kill a child in the womb because its dependent upon the mother and not fully developed why not kill that child for the same reasons until its fully developed/stopped gestating, growing?

Strange is the fact that Congress has passed an act that indicates that life is present within that same species during a prebirth state of gestation. The endangered species act forbids the taking of a life while in a pre-birth state with certain animals. Ignore that Law and you face a fine and or imprisonment. Take a human life in a state of prebirth.........and a radical court system protects the muderers, both the parent and the physician that provides the service as a RIGHT OF PRIVACY. That's one magical vagina.

What's the difference? There is no difference.....in each circumstance the child is dependent upon its parent to preserve its life.

In one breath our Government declares that life is exampled within species even at prebirth..........(they have it right) in the next.........human life is not exampled in the same species (Human)......it has to be hatched to be protected by law and declared ALIVE. Animals have more rights than human children.

Its about time that SCOTUS came from the dark ages and allowed the science of DNA to protect our Children before birth as well as after birth. Speaking of DNA.........attempt to deny that a child is yours to avoid Child Support, then a different tune is played by the liberals.......out come the DNA tests.

Strange is it not that the male parent has no rights whatsoever to protect his child before birth..........its a FEMALE right alone. But as soon as the magical vagina is breached......its suddenly a Mother and Fathers right, especially if Child Support is involved.
The Supreme Court was Not acting Constitutionally when they voted to
Pass Roe vs.Wade.It was universally agreed to be a stupid move by one Supreme
Court Jurist.The " Wade " decision was written by Supreme Court Justice Blackmun
based on " Privacy " which was " misconstrued according to Justice White and Justice
Rehnquists seperate dissents.
I've always held that it is unfair for one just one parent to control the legitimacy
of abortions.What about the Father's rights.They have a stake in the development of
a potential fetus..It's their sperm that Pro-created.
 

Colin norris

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
7,552
Reaction score
2,969
Points
908
No finer example of how a Society can fall.Mother Teresa never proselytized.
Or attemped to convert others to her Catholic Faith.But whenever possible the
Last Saint to be named always warned in no uncertain terms the evils of
Abortions.The taking of Innocent Unborn Life.Not many good country's allow
for Abortion On Demand.Only 6 do.That being up to the 9th month of pregnancy.
China is one country.Only 7 of 59 countries allow for elective abortions after
20 weeks.Those being China,The United States,Canada,The Netherlands,Vietnam
Singapore and North Korea.

I suggest you do some research about the qualities of mother Theresa.
Christopher Hitchens wo u ld be a good start.
 

Colin norris

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
7,552
Reaction score
2,969
Points
908
What difference? There is a human life being murdered with its own unique DNA signature proving that it is a human life, simply gestating/growing. Simply because that life is dependent upon its parent does not justify the taking of that innocent dependent human life. Human DNA shows up as early as 4 weeks after conception.

Question? Even after this human life breaches the magical female vagina ........that life is dependent upon its parent for at least 18 years until its gestation/growth is finished and it is deemed an adult by LAW. What would happen if a mother decided.......due to a presupposed personal right.......to simply take a set of forceps and begin tearing into that child because society might look poorly upon her because she was the victim of rape or an out of marriage birth, or she simply was not ready for a child at this stage of her life? After all that child is not human because its not fully developed for almost 2 decades......no? If you can kill a child in the womb because its dependent upon the mother and not fully developed why not kill that child for the same reasons until its fully developed/stopped gestating, growing?

Strange is the fact that Congress has passed an act that indicates that life is present within that same species during a prebirth state of gestation. The endangered species act forbids the taking of a life while in a pre-birth state with certain animals. Ignore that Law and you face a fine and or imprisonment. Take a human life in a state of prebirth.........and a radical court system protects the muderers, both the parent and the physician that provides the service as a RIGHT OF PRIVACY. That's one magical vagina.

What's the difference? There is no difference.....in each circumstance the child is dependent upon its parent to preserve its life.

In one breath our Government declares that life is exampled within species even at prebirth..........(they have it right) in the next.........human life is not exampled in the same species (Human)......it has to be hatched to be protected by law and declared ALIVE. Animals have more rights than human children.

Its about time that SCOTUS came from the dark ages and allowed the science of DNA to protect our Children before birth as well as after birth. Speaking of DNA.........attempt to deny that a child is yours to avoid Child Support, then a different tune is played by the liberals.......out come the DNA tests.

Strange is it not that the male parent has no rights whatsoever to protect his child before birth..........its a FEMALE right alone. But as soon as the magical vagina is breached......its suddenly a Mother and Fathers right, especially if Child Support is involved.

You hypocrite.
You all wave your bibles while railing against a person's rights and simultaneously forget about the sins you have committed.
You're not pro life, You're pro birth. After the child is born into poverty you then embark on a crusade of hate because it has to have SS to survive.
You give then other a hard time because she's not married. You all do it and I've seen it on here.
But it all could gave been avoided if you take your keep you religious crap to yourselves.

But here's the irony. Bill gates has been spending millions in vacinnes etc to save lives in Africa etc and all you do is suggest he is spiking the vacinnes with something to destroy the world.
You don't care about those unwanted children. You wouldnt spend a dollar to save a life there but want to punish every scared teenager in America who made a mistake. It's that filthy religion which is the why problem. You lot think you rule the world and can impose anything if it is supposed to link to God.

But the point is, it's all about religion and you know it. Nothing else. The arrogance and sanctimony surrounding you godbotherers is breathtaking yet not one of you have one word of evidence that you worship a God. Absolutely nothing.
 
OP
F

Foolardi

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Messages
1,015
Reaction score
567
Points
893
I suggest you do some research about the qualities of mother Theresa.
Christopher Hitchens wo u ld be a good start.
I happen to ,own and have read-thru - Arguably Essays - { 2011 } which is
lenghty and involved at 753 pages + Index.
I am fully aware of Hitchens devotion of Hating on Mother Teresa.
Here is one example ... Oh No ... stop the presses.
In 35 pages of Index starting with the name :
Aaronovich,David {404 } and ending with the name
Zumwalt,Elmo,Jr. {542,546 }
one will not see the name Mother Teresa nor her Missionaries of Charity.
Now why do think that be.The Little Denier of all things God-like has { had }
a purpose on Earth.To spew and vent every degree of energy he possessed to
criticize Religion as if some Voodoo.Mere black magic.Not even Magic.Just
bunk.As he drinks worse than any Mad Hatter and sweats like a farm animal about
to give birth.Because it's all about him.Like many an historic Big Mouth out
to Impress via any means afforded them.He may be {have been } well-read and
Intellectualized but he forgot one little area.He's not some demi-god like in ancient
Greece.Will never be.His name is already mostly forgotten.But then Arguably
so is the name Mother Teresa { Now } Saint Teresa of Calcutta.
Because Christopher Hitchens was Barbaric in his understandings of the
place Humanity places on Godly Devotion.
So forget what another Barbaric newspeak outlet has to say ...
" One of the 10 best Books of the year "
- New York Times Book Review -
Listen instead to what Alain Finkielkraut wrote not long ago about ' Barbarism "
" is not the inheritance of our prehistory.It is the companion that dogs our every step."
In this vein Christopher Hitchens will be caste as little more than an eternally
ticked-off,spoiled Chihuahua in constant need of snapping at fellow Humans.
As if a human,likewise.
 

surada

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
27,675
Reaction score
13,096
Points
1,288
Black Females have 5 times the abortions than White Females.
Quite famaliar with Margaret Sanger { the Champion of Planned Parenthood }
Don't let her Emily Dickinson innocent homely looks fool you.She was an obnoxious
Uppity control freak who colloborated with Hitler's regime.Was close friends and
took advise from Ernst Rudin who was Hitler's Director of Genetic Sterilization and who
was active in the Nazi Society of Racial Hygiene.Sanger helped push in April of 1933
an article in one of her magazines. The article ... - Eugenic Sterilization: An Urgent Need -.

Rudin wasn't around in 1907.

Unwanted Sterilization and Eugenics Programs in the United ...
Jan 29, 2016 · While California’s eugenics programs were driven in part by anti-Asian and anti-Mexican prejudice, Southern states also employed sterilization as a …
 

surada

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
27,675
Reaction score
13,096
Points
1,288

American eugenics refers inter alia to compulsory sterilization laws adopted by over 30 states that led to more than 60,000 sterilizations of disabled individuals. Many of these individuals were sterilized because of a disability: they were mentally disabled or ill , or belonged to socially disadvantaged groups living on the margins of society.
 

Wuwei

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2015
Messages
5,206
Reaction score
1,065
Points
255
Right-to-life people should be careful what they wish for. You will fill urban areas with mothers who are pissed and stir-crazy kids that can't get jobs. They might get wise and vote all the right-to-life politicians out of office.

Right-to-life is a misnomer. The cause is really right-to-birth. After birth they will be forgotten - mismanaged by over-worked mothers and politicians who don't care and will just complain about urban blight.

.
 

surada

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
27,675
Reaction score
13,096
Points
1,288
Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia
Margaret Higgins Sanger (born Margaret Louise Higgins; September 14, 1879 – September 6, 1966), also known as Margaret Sanger Slee, was an American birth control activist, sex educator, writer, and nurse.Sanger popularized the term "birth control", opened the first birth control clinic in the United States, and established organizations that evolved into the Planned Parenthood Federation of ...
 

surada

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
27,675
Reaction score
13,096
Points
1,288
Eugenics laws by state.


Segregation

Texas’s eugenic practice thus emphasized segregation, in insane asylums. In the early 1900s, the number of asylums in Texas grew rapidly. The asylums were meant to permanently remove the unfit from society, and within them, the unfit were not allowed to see members of the opposite sex. While there were no laws legalizing sterilization of the unfit, there was not a large chance of reproduction once one was deemed mentally ill (Hopkins, p. 27).
 
OP
F

Foolardi

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Messages
1,015
Reaction score
567
Points
893
Margaret Sanger - Wikipedia
Margaret Higgins Sanger (born Margaret Louise Higgins; September 14, 1879 – September 6, 1966), also known as Margaret Sanger Slee, was an American birth control activist, sex educator, writer, and nurse.Sanger popularized the term "birth control", opened the first birth control clinic in the United States, and established organizations that evolved into the Planned Parenthood Federation of ...
Pathetic Bunk.I was born in the 50's.Where there was No Birth Control.
How many Great Men { Statesman,Poets,Writers and Musicians } grew-up
where Society didn't even know what Birth Control was.
 

surada

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
27,675
Reaction score
13,096
Points
1,288
Pathetic Bunk.I was born in the 50's.Where there was No Birth Control.
How many Great Men { Statesman,Poets,Writers and Musicians } grew-up
where Society didn't even know what Birth Control was.

Well, every small town had an abortionist.
 

Colin norris

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
7,552
Reaction score
2,969
Points
908
I happen to ,own and have read-thru - Arguably Essays - { 2011 } which is
lenghty and involved at 753 pages + Index.
I am fully aware of Hitchens devotion of Hating on Mother Teresa.
Here is one example ... Oh No ... stop the presses.
In 35 pages of Index starting with the name :
Aaronovich,David {404 } and ending with the name
Zumwalt,Elmo,Jr. {542,546 }
one will not see the name Mother Teresa nor her Missionaries of Charity.
Now why do think that be.The Little Denier of all things God-like has { had }
a purpose on Earth.To spew and vent every degree of energy he possessed to
criticize Religion as if some Voodoo.Mere black magic.Not even Magic.Just
bunk.As he drinks worse than any Mad Hatter and sweats like a farm animal about
to give birth.Because it's all about him.Like many an historic Big Mouth out
to Impress via any means afforded them.He may be {have been } well-read and
Intellectualized but he forgot one little area.He's not some demi-god like in ancient
Greece.Will never be.His name is already mostly forgotten.But then Arguably
so is the name Mother Teresa { Now } Saint Teresa of Calcutta.
Because Christopher Hitchens was Barbaric in his understandings of the
place Humanity places on Godly Devotion.
So forget what another Barbaric newspeak outlet has to say ...
" One of the 10 best Books of the year "
- New York Times Book Review -
Listen instead to what Alain Finkielkraut wrote not long ago about ' Barbarism "
" is not the inheritance of our prehistory.It is the companion that dogs our every step."
In this vein Christopher Hitchens will be caste as little more than an eternally
ticked-off,spoiled Chihuahua in constant need of snapping at fellow Humans.
As if a human,likewise.
The fact remains she was a complete fraud. She sucked off all the wealthy.
She refused to stop the over population by allowing contraception because gods silly laws forbid it but modern western society women take it always. How's that hypocrisy.

You've been conned to think she is worthy of a saint.
 
OP
F

Foolardi

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2021
Messages
1,015
Reaction score
567
Points
893
The fact remains she was a complete fraud. She sucked off all the wealthy.
She refused to stop the over population by allowing contraception because gods silly laws forbid it but modern western society women take it always. How's that hypocrisy.

You've been conned to think she is worthy of a saint.
You are not even remotely acting like a jackass.Like was Hitchens speciality.
Mother Teresa Literally held and cared for the Worst of the worst in Calcutta.
A Calcutta so debased, poor and diseased that Airline pilots would not
leave their cockpits when stopping in for a Flight.
Mother Teresa held and tended to the Lepers of Calcutta.Who very few
would even look their way.Let alone act in any Good Samaritan way.
Actress Mia Farrow was so touched by the Miraculous Humanitarian
efforts of Mother Teresa and her Little Sisters of the Poor Efforts she
gave up acting to do her Part.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$120.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top