How this situation could send Flynn to prison.

[brummelben]

In an explosive report by the New York Times, it was revealed that that members of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign were repeatedly in contact with Russian intelligence officials in the year preceding the election.

According to U.S. intelligence sources, communications between Trump operatives and the Russians were discovered when they looking into the hacking on the Democratic National Committee. The intelligence agencies sought to find out whether the Trump campaign working with the Russians in regard to the hacking

Intelligence officials said the intercepted communications not only included Trump campaign officials, but also other associates of the now newly-elected president. According to the the report, the Russians contacted included members of the Russian government outside of the intelligence services.

The bombshell report comes as the Trump administration is still reeling over the resignation of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn over contacts with the Russians — which he then lied about

 

[Sunni Man]

 

[bodecea]

Of course not, Comrade.

 

[brummelben]

Time to put country over party, son.

 

[rdean]

The Russians were recorded talking to Flynn. Not unusual when a hostile foreign country is talking to it's agents inside the country.

We pretty much know that Flynn told Russia that if Trump is elected, the sanctions will go away so don't take any action.

Later, Flynn was interviewed by the FBI.

If what Flynn told the FBI in that interview was very different than what he said in the transcripts, that would be lying to the FBI. That's a felony. Flynn could see jail time.

But what if it was Trump that told him to tell the Russians to keep calm? That Trump will end the sanctions after the election if he wins? Then Trump really has a problem that neither the GOP nor Russia can help him out of.

Stop with the fake news. Flynn broke no laws. The leakers did!

Lying to the FBI is a felony. He left for lying to Pence and the President. You know that, right?

 

[Oldstyle]

In an explosive report by the New York Times, it was revealed that that members of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign were repeatedly in contact with Russian intelligence officials in the year preceding the election.

According to U.S. intelligence sources, communications between Trump operatives and the Russians were discovered when they looking into the hacking on the Democratic National Committee. The intelligence agencies sought to find out whether the Trump campaign working with the Russians in regard to the hacking

Intelligence officials said the intercepted communications not only included Trump campaign officials, but also other associates of the now newly-elected president. According to the the report, the Russians contacted included members of the Russian government outside of the intelligence services.

The bombshell report comes as the Trump administration is still reeling over the resignation of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn over contacts with the Russians — which he then lied about

"American law enforcement and intelligence agencies intercepted the communications around the same time they were discovering evidence that Russia was trying to disrupt the presidential election by hacking into the Democratic National Committee, three of the officials said. The intelligence agencies then sought to learn whether the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians on the hacking or other efforts to influence the election.

The officials interviewed in recent weeks said that, so far, they had seen no evidence of such cooperation."

That is a "bombshell"? Come on Brummel...that's pathetic!

 

[brummelben]

In an explosive report by the New York Times, it was revealed that that members of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign were repeatedly in contact with Russian intelligence officials in the year preceding the election.

According to U.S. intelligence sources, communications between Trump operatives and the Russians were discovered when they looking into the hacking on the Democratic National Committee. The intelligence agencies sought to find out whether the Trump campaign working with the Russians in regard to the hacking

Intelligence officials said the intercepted communications not only included Trump campaign officials, but also other associates of the now newly-elected president. According to the the report, the Russians contacted included members of the Russian government outside of the intelligence services.

The bombshell report comes as the Trump administration is still reeling over the resignation of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn over contacts with the Russians — which he then lied about

"American law enforcement and intelligence agencies intercepted the communications around the same time they were discovering evidence that Russia was trying to disrupt the presidential election by hacking into the Democratic National Committee, three of the officials said. The intelligence agencies then sought to learn whether the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians on the hacking or other efforts to influence the election.

The officials interviewed in recent weeks said that, so far, they had seen no evidence of such cooperation."

That is a "bombshell"? Come on Brummel...that's pathetic!

You are not in the least interested in just why these conversations with the Russian government occurred? Lets for once put country over party

 

[The Original Tree]

LOL:

The only laws broken, were broken by Obama Regime Cronies in our intelligence community who leaked classified and sensitive information to the Press and who were illegally spying on our own people.

There is no evidence of any wrong doing. Only the inference that there was some directed at people who were officially on the payroll at the time.

Conversations with transition teams is a normal part of The Peaceful Transference of power.

However, it appears as though Lefty has declared war on The United States of America.

But then, you always knew they would when they agree with our enemies, and give them aide and shelter, and march down our streets linking arms with radical jihadists and communists.

 

[brummelben]

LOL:

The only laws broken, were broken by Obama Regime Cronies in our intelligence community who leaked classified and sensitive information to the Press and who were illegally spying on our own people.

There is no evidence of any wrong doing. Only the inference that there was some directed at people who were officially on the payroll at the time.

another loser, who puts party over country

 

[bodecea]

The Russians were recorded talking to Flynn. Not unusual when a hostile foreign country is talking to it's agents inside the country.

We pretty much know that Flynn told Russia that if Trump is elected, the sanctions will go away so don't take any action.

Later, Flynn was interviewed by the FBI.

If what Flynn told the FBI in that interview was very different than what he said in the transcripts, that would be lying to the FBI. That's a felony. Flynn could see jail time.

But what if it was Trump that told him to tell the Russians to keep calm? That Trump will end the sanctions after the election if he wins? Then Trump really has a problem that neither the GOP nor Russia can help him out of.

Stop with the fake news. Flynn broke no laws. The leakers did!

Give the democrats enough rope they will hang themselves

That what the Russians said about the U.S. and it's extreme capitalism, decades ago.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Russians were recorded talking to Flynn. Not unusual when a hostile foreign country is talking to it's agents inside the country.

We pretty much know that Flynn told Russia that if Trump is elected, the sanctions will go away so don't take any action.

Later, Flynn was interviewed by the FBI.

If what Flynn told the FBI in that interview was very different than what he said in the transcripts, that would be lying to the FBI. That's a felony. Flynn could see jail time.

But what if it was Trump that told him to tell the Russians to keep calm? That Trump will end the sanctions after the election if he wins? Then Trump really has a problem that neither the GOP nor Russia can help him out of.

It's clear you aren't much for rational thought or logic.
You base all of your beliefs off of pure conjecture from media reports.
If transcripts of the conversation surface then we might have something. But basically the media is telling us something was discussed without providing any context, and this is on purpose....because the context could be exculpatory in nature. i.e. Flynn wasn’t the one that mentioned sanctions. The Russian ambassador did.
The more that's known about classified conversations the weaker your case becomes.

 

[Tom Horn]

Of course none of these pinheads can tell you what Flynn might be charged with.

 

[Oldstyle]

In an explosive report by the New York Times, it was revealed that that members of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign were repeatedly in contact with Russian intelligence officials in the year preceding the election.

According to U.S. intelligence sources, communications between Trump operatives and the Russians were discovered when they looking into the hacking on the Democratic National Committee. The intelligence agencies sought to find out whether the Trump campaign working with the Russians in regard to the hacking

Intelligence officials said the intercepted communications not only included Trump campaign officials, but also other associates of the now newly-elected president. According to the the report, the Russians contacted included members of the Russian government outside of the intelligence services.

The bombshell report comes as the Trump administration is still reeling over the resignation of National Security Adviser Michael Flynn over contacts with the Russians — which he then lied about

"American law enforcement and intelligence agencies intercepted the communications around the same time they were discovering evidence that Russia was trying to disrupt the presidential election by hacking into the Democratic National Committee, three of the officials said. The intelligence agencies then sought to learn whether the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians on the hacking or other efforts to influence the election.

The officials interviewed in recent weeks said that, so far, they had seen no evidence of such cooperation."

That is a "bombshell"? Come on Brummel...that's pathetic!

You are not in the least interested in just why these conversations with the Russian government occurred? Lets for once put country over party

What's bullshit about that NY Times report is that it uses the term "Trump operatives" and "associates" of Trump were in communication with some Russians? Well yeah, Trump and his "associates" do business in Russia...A LOT OF BUSINESS! To think that there wouldn't be communications between Trump "associates" and Russians is preposterous!

Bottom line on all of this remains the same...if the very same NY Times had done it's JOB of reporting on Hillary Clinton instead of covering up her criminal acts then there wouldn't have been anything for the Russians to give the Trump campaign. The Times wants to make it appear that the election was "influenced" because someone gave the American people the truth about Clinton rather than the lies that the main stream media had been putting out.

 

[Tom Horn]

That what the Russians said about the U.S. and it's extreme capitalism, decades ago.

"extreme capitalism"?

 

[mudwhistle]

The Russians were recorded talking to Flynn. Not unusual when a hostile foreign country is talking to it's agents inside the country.

We pretty much know that Flynn told Russia that if Trump is elected, the sanctions will go away so don't take any action.

Later, Flynn was interviewed by the FBI.

If what Flynn told the FBI in that interview was very different than what he said in the transcripts, that would be lying to the FBI. That's a felony. Flynn could see jail time.

But what if it was Trump that told him to tell the Russians to keep calm? That Trump will end the sanctions after the election if he wins? Then Trump really has a problem that neither the GOP nor Russia can help him out of.

It's clear you aren't much for rational thought or logic.
You base all of your beliefs off of pure conjecture from media reports.
If transcripts of the conversation surface then we might have something. But basically the media is telling us something was discussed without providing any context, and this is on purpose....because the context could be exculpatory in nature. i.e. Flynn wasn’t the one that mentioned sanctions. The Russian ambassador did.
The more that's known about classified conversations the weaker your case becomes.

BTW, what would be the crime Flynn would be imprisoned under, talking to foreigners on the telephone? Guess we'd have lock half of the California for that one....

 

[brummelben]

The Russians were recorded talking to Flynn. Not unusual when a hostile foreign country is talking to it's agents inside the country.

We pretty much know that Flynn told Russia that if Trump is elected, the sanctions will go away so don't take any action.

Later, Flynn was interviewed by the FBI.

If what Flynn told the FBI in that interview was very different than what he said in the transcripts, that would be lying to the FBI. That's a felony. Flynn could see jail time.

But what if it was Trump that told him to tell the Russians to keep calm? That Trump will end the sanctions after the election if he wins? Then Trump really has a problem that neither the GOP nor Russia can help him out of.

It's clear you aren't much for rational thought or logic.
You base all of your beliefs off of pure conjecture from media reports.
If transcripts of the conversation surface then we might have something. But basically the media is telling us something was discussed without providing any context, and this is on purpose....because the context could be exculpatory in nature. i.e. Flynn wasn’t the one that mentioned sanctions. The Russian ambassador did.
The more that's known about classified conversations the weaker your case becomes.

Where there is smoke, there is fire. Something crappy is going on, and you are defending them. You never saw this in 8 years of the obama administration

 

[Tom Horn]

It's clear you aren't much for rational thought or logic.
You base all of your beliefs off of pure conjecture from media reports.
If transcripts of the conversation surface then we might have something. But basically the media is telling us something was discussed without providing any context, and this is on purpose....because the context could be exculpatory in nature. i.e. Flynn wasn’t the one that mentioned sanctions. The Russian ambassador did.
The more that's known about classified conversations the weaker your case becomes.

Whoever leaked the transcripts is shitting bricks about now....they have every agency at Trump's disposal after them and the knock on the door is approaching fast.

 

[brummelben]

The Russians were recorded talking to Flynn. Not unusual when a hostile foreign country is talking to it's agents inside the country.

We pretty much know that Flynn told Russia that if Trump is elected, the sanctions will go away so don't take any action.

Later, Flynn was interviewed by the FBI.

If what Flynn told the FBI in that interview was very different than what he said in the transcripts, that would be lying to the FBI. That's a felony. Flynn could see jail time.

But what if it was Trump that told him to tell the Russians to keep calm? That Trump will end the sanctions after the election if he wins? Then Trump really has a problem that neither the GOP nor Russia can help him out of.

It's clear you aren't much for rational thought or logic.
You base all of your beliefs off of pure conjecture from media reports.
If transcripts of the conversation surface then we might have something. But basically the media is telling us something was discussed without providing any context, and this is on purpose....because the context could be exculpatory in nature. i.e. Flynn wasn’t the one that mentioned sanctions. The Russian ambassador did.
The more that's known about classified conversations the weaker your case becomes.

BTW, what would be the crime Flynn would be imprisoned under, talking to foreigners on the telephone? Guess we'd have lock half of the California for that one....

Treason, depending on just what was discussed. When congress gets some balls, we will begin to get answers

 

[brummelben]

It's clear you aren't much for rational thought or logic.
You base all of your beliefs off of pure conjecture from media reports.
If transcripts of the conversation surface then we might have something. But basically the media is telling us something was discussed without providing any context, and this is on purpose....because the context could be exculpatory in nature. i.e. Flynn wasn’t the one that mentioned sanctions. The Russian ambassador did.
The more that's known about classified conversations the weaker your case becomes.

Whoever leaked the transcripts is shitting bricks about now....they have every agency at Trump's disposal after them and the knock on the door is approaching fast.

Its doesn't matter who did it, the cat is out of the bag, and it can't be covered up any more. Now its time for answers

 

[mudwhistle]

The Russians were recorded talking to Flynn. Not unusual when a hostile foreign country is talking to it's agents inside the country.

We pretty much know that Flynn told Russia that if Trump is elected, the sanctions will go away so don't take any action.

Later, Flynn was interviewed by the FBI.

If what Flynn told the FBI in that interview was very different than what he said in the transcripts, that would be lying to the FBI. That's a felony. Flynn could see jail time.

But what if it was Trump that told him to tell the Russians to keep calm? That Trump will end the sanctions after the election if he wins? Then Trump really has a problem that neither the GOP nor Russia can help him out of.

It's clear you aren't much for rational thought or logic.
You base all of your beliefs off of pure conjecture from media reports.
If transcripts of the conversation surface then we might have something. But basically the media is telling us something was discussed without providing any context, and this is on purpose....because the context could be exculpatory in nature. i.e. Flynn wasn’t the one that mentioned sanctions. The Russian ambassador did.
The more that's known about classified conversations the weaker your case becomes.

Where there is smoke, there is fire. Something crappy is going on, and you are defending them. You never saw this in 8 years of the obama administration

Yes we did, because the same people responsible for this are still in Washington. The only difference is the media never covered it in the same manner while their boy was in the Oval Office.
I think the crappy part is holdovers from the previous administration are working with media spies to undermine the government. Heads will roll....