literally everything you've tried to forward as "argument" has been either a strawman intended to mischaracterize or an ad hominem attack.
Well thats an embarrassing lie. I have posted more than one column by former prosexutors laying out their arguments (also check the otherthread you are throwing a grade a hissy fit in).
Not to me you haven't. If you think I read everything you post you are giving yourself way too much credit.
We had a discussion where you used strawman tactics and ad hominems and I mocked you for it, as you deserved, as that's bush league crap.
I rightfully have pointed out in the other threads a couple of things.
1. The group seeming to forward this is an Anti-Trump Group.
2. There do not seem to be limits or safeguards on who can add their names to this list or any vetting of those names.
The rest of my 'hissy fit' are quotes and links to support those assertions. You know, offering facts, with actual evidence to support an argument rather than attempting to just swear at or insult people and throw baseless unsupported statements, which you seem to think is 'argument', but is not.
You are cordially invited to respond to those posts, disprove them if you can (I wish you luck on that) and I will be happy to respond to those if they are actually based in some kind of logic and not just another stream of logical fallacies laced with grade school insults.
Your primary tactic is to attempt to insult people in an attempt to enrage them, so you can hop up and down in glee and mock them for that, which is your version of 'winning' an argument. I've seen it enough times to know it for what it is and expect it from you. It didn't work the other day and it won't work now.