How Many People Would Still Believe the 9/11 Official Story if They Knew Jet Fuel Was Only Kerosene? Because That's What It Is

munkle

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
6,100
Reaction score
10,712
Points
2,130


Why do people believe that for the first time in the history of high-rise fires, three towers fell flat in seconds, including one (WTC7) not even hit by a plane? Because JET FUEL! THIS WAS DIFFERENT! This stuff pushes hundred ton monster jetliners across oceans at 500 MPH! That must be some hot stuff!

But guess what? It's only kerosene, a little higher grade with some anti-freeze and other minor additives. Burns at roughly the same temperature when spilled into open air. Which is what the 9/11 fires were.

Remember how the shills who control you yelled "But that was JET FUEL you idiot!" Saying "That was kerosene!" just doesn't have the same ring. But yep that's what jet fuel is. For all you have heard. Nothing to make two skyscrapers fall flat (and WTC7? A whole other question.)

Spill (open air) burning temperature:

kerosene: 2,010F

How Hot Does Kerosene Burn? Its Ignition and Flame Temperature

jet-A (commercial airline jet fuel): 1,890F

Jet fuel - Wikipedia

Man plays with jet fuel, does not explode:



Major Firefighters’ Professional Journal Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?

"“Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition.” -- Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas


NY Fire Commissioner Chris Gioia: On Controlled demolition



Firefighters documentary on 9/11 Truth Calling Out Bravo 7



Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

9/11 Research:

9-11 Research: An Independent Investigation of the 9-11-2001 Attack
 
Spill (open air) burning temperature:

kerosene: 2,010F

How Hot Does Kerosene Burn? Its Ignition and Flame Temperature

jet-A (commercial airline jet fuel): 1,890F

One more time: the way the WTC was designed, when these jets exploded, they blew off the insulation designed to protect the floor spans, and the resulting jet fire was more than hot enough (1500°F) in order to weaken and soften said spans enough that they sagged under their own weight, pulled free of their supports, and collapsed.

Once the floors began collapsing, it quickly became a runaway condition leading to total structural failure.
 
Feel free to point out (in your own words) where the 9/11 Commission report got it wrong.
Boy, by you defending it I do have to question it. Afterall, democrats are cracked and usually represent opposites. In that regard your kind are informative.
 
Stand behind a jet engine while running and tell us it’s exhaust is not that hot. You failed to consider the physics of a vaporized fuel.

OMG. Vaporized fuel burns or evaporates instantly. I didn't see any jet engines blasting exhaust at the towers.
 
Last edited:


Why do people believe that for the first time in the history of high-rise fires, three towers fell flat in seconds, including one (WTC7) not even hit by a plane? Because JET FUEL! THIS WAS DIFFERENT! This stuff pushes hundred ton monster jetliners across oceans at 500 MPH! That must be some hot stuff!

But guess what? It's only kerosene, a little higher grade with some anti-freeze and other minor additives. Burns at roughly the same temperature when spilled into open air. Which is what the 9/11 fires were.

Remember how the shills who control you yelled "But that was JET FUEL you idiot!" Saying "That was kerosene!" just doesn't have the same ring. But yep that's what jet fuel is. For all you have heard. Nothing to make two skyscrapers fall flat (and WTC7? A whole other question.)

Spill (open air) burning temperature:

kerosene: 2,010F

How Hot Does Kerosene Burn? Its Ignition and Flame Temperature

jet-A (commercial airline jet fuel): 1,890F

Jet fuel - Wikipedia

Man plays with jet fuel, does not explode:



Major Firefighters’ Professional Journal Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?




NY Fire Commissioner Chris Gioia: On Controlled demolition



Firefighters documentary on 9/11 Truth Calling Out Bravo 7



Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

9/11 Research:

9-11 Research: An Independent Investigation of the 9-11-2001 Attack

If additives are added to Kerosene converting it to jet fuel then it's no longer Kerosene, Cletus.

Sign yourself in before it's too late.
 
OMG. Vaporized fuel burns or evaporates instantly. I didn't see any jet engines blasting exhaust at the towers.
Get real. Atomized kerosene explodes. That is what happened inside the tower. The jet engine blast and all that atomized fuel INSIDE the building created a blast furnace.
 
One more time: the way the WTC was designed, when these jets exploded, they blew off the insulation designed to protect the floor spans, and the resulting jet fire was more than hot enough (1500°F) in order to weaken and soften said spans enough that they sagged under their own weight, pulled free of their supports, and collapsed.

Once the floors began collapsing, it quickly became a runaway condition leading to total structural failure.

Why are you repeating the cartoon for kids? There is no such thing as a "runaway condition." The lower 80 floors were solid as rocks. This is why steel high-rises never collapse even after burning in raging infernos for 20 hours.

Watch this and get back to me. These firefighters know more than you about skyscraper fires.

 
Boy, by you defending it I do have to question it. Afterall, democrats are cracked and usually represent opposites. In that regard your kind are informative.
You "did your own research" on why the towers came down, right?
 
If additives are added to Kerosene converting it to jet fuel then it's no longer Kerosene, Cletus.

Sign yourself in before it's too late.

So you think you know more than firefighters who do this job every day? Or engineers like the University of Alaska Engineering Department who say the official story is a lie?


Major Firefighters’ Professional Journal Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"


"“Sudden transition to freefall rules out a progressive collapse by fire or any other known natural mechanism other than explosive demolition.” -- Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas
 


Why do people believe that for the first time in the history of high-rise fires, three towers fell flat in seconds, including one (WTC7) not even hit by a plane? Because JET FUEL! THIS WAS DIFFERENT! This stuff pushes hundred ton monster jetliners across oceans at 500 MPH! That must be some hot stuff!

But guess what? It's only kerosene, a little higher grade with some anti-freeze and other minor additives. Burns at roughly the same temperature when spilled into open air. Which is what the 9/11 fires were.

Remember how the shills who control you yelled "But that was JET FUEL you idiot!" Saying "That was kerosene!" just doesn't have the same ring. But yep that's what jet fuel is. For all you have heard. Nothing to make two skyscrapers fall flat (and WTC7? A whole other question.)

Spill (open air) burning temperature:

kerosene: 2,010F

How Hot Does Kerosene Burn? Its Ignition and Flame Temperature

jet-A (commercial airline jet fuel): 1,890F

Jet fuel - Wikipedia

Man plays with jet fuel, does not explode:



Major Firefighters’ Professional Journal Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?




NY Fire Commissioner Chris Gioia: On Controlled demolition



Firefighters documentary on 9/11 Truth Calling Out Bravo 7



Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

9/11 Research:

9-11 Research: An Independent Investigation of the 9-11-2001 Attack

If someone says “jet fuel is basically a type of kerosene” — that is broadly correct.

If they mean “it’s identical to ordinary kerosene” — that is false.
 
We used to have fire training at work. What did we light for the fire? Kerosene. It got extremely hot.
 
Why are you repeating the cartoon for kids? There is no such thing as a "runaway condition." The lower 80 floors were solid as rocks. This is why steel high-rises never collapse even after burning in raging infernos for 20 hours.

Watch this and get back to me. These firefighters know more than you about skyscraper fires.



The lower 80 floors were solid as rocks.

Not after the top 20 floors fell on them.
 
15th post
Why are you repeating the cartoon for kids? There is no such thing as a "runaway condition." The lower 80 floors were solid as rocks.

Look, stupid, you are just being silly or deliberately obtuse--- floors are designed to support the load of their own weight plus the weight of office furniture and people, etc. When the two floors above suddenly drop on top of you and you are already weakened, you only add to the collapse, and every subsequent floor after that is only overburdened more and more.

That is a basic runaway condition in mechanical engineering every student learns on their first day, and the WTC design was particularly prone to it since the floor spans themselves added essentially nothing to the overall strength of the building as all of the actual strength was in the central core and the outer skin was basically just held in place by the interlinking floor spans which only served to stabilize the outer skin.

Soon as a few floor spans let go, the entire integrity of the building designed in the 1960s was gone. It was a cost-saving design.

All because the original designers never considered the possibility of someone deliberately flying a jumbo jet into them, so never intended the thermal insulation of the spans to withstand such a serious airblast.
 


Why do people believe that for the first time in the history of high-rise fires, three towers fell flat in seconds, including one (WTC7) not even hit by a plane? Because JET FUEL! THIS WAS DIFFERENT! This stuff pushes hundred ton monster jetliners across oceans at 500 MPH! That must be some hot stuff!

But guess what? It's only kerosene, a little higher grade with some anti-freeze and other minor additives. Burns at roughly the same temperature when spilled into open air. Which is what the 9/11 fires were.

Remember how the shills who control you yelled "But that was JET FUEL you idiot!" Saying "That was kerosene!" just doesn't have the same ring. But yep that's what jet fuel is. For all you have heard. Nothing to make two skyscrapers fall flat (and WTC7? A whole other question.)

Spill (open air) burning temperature:

kerosene: 2,010F

How Hot Does Kerosene Burn? Its Ignition and Flame Temperature

jet-A (commercial airline jet fuel): 1,890F

Jet fuel - Wikipedia

Man plays with jet fuel, does not explode:



Major Firefighters’ Professional Journal Fire and Safety Journal of the Americas Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

Built to last or built to fail: Could office fuel loads cause the complete collapse of WTC 7?




NY Fire Commissioner Chris Gioia: On Controlled demolition



Firefighters documentary on 9/11 Truth Calling Out Bravo 7



Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

9/11 Research:

9-11 Research: An Independent Investigation of the 9-11-2001 Attack

It wasn't a controlled demolition, dumbass.

A ******* plane hit the ************, moron.
 
I'm still waiting for someone to tell me what caused WTC7 to collapse. And then there is the velocity that all three towers fell, which was close to freefall. As an engineer, that speed of collapse defies natural physics. I really don't care what or who brought the towers down, I just need to understand the true science without the political spin.
 
Feel free to point out (in your own words) where the 9/11 Commission report got it wrong.



Mossad job #1, always troll 911 truth....


When will you fly a 757 at 530 mph with nose 8 feet above ground?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom